|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Motorcycles on sidewalks: Good or Bad? |
| Good |
|
24% |
[ 9 ] |
| Bad |
|
75% |
[ 28 ] |
| WTF do I care? |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 37 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: Motorcycles on sidewalks: Good or Bad? |
|
|
I can't belive I even have to ask this question, but it appears that some people actually think it is a good idea to let motorcycles operate on city sidewalks.
What do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I mentioned in the other thread, moving a motorbike slowly and safely on a sidewalk is not dangerous. Neither are cart pushers, but if they ran with the cart they would be dangerous.
I'm am in no way okay with motorbikes moving quickly or dangerously on a sidewalk. Those people should be regulated and ticketed.
There are no designated motorbike parking areas, parking lot attendants will not let you park in car parking, there are too few car spots already, road parking is dangerous and the only option is moving a bike slowly onto a sidewalk in order to park it out of the way, usually between stalls, trees, electric boxes or hydrants.
Of course motorbikes on sidewalks is bad. Most people here are pedestrians and most only think about the dangerous bikes on the sidewalks, the delivery guys who move quickly. There should be at least one more option on this poll: No if they are being "walked" slowly and pose no threat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To paraphrase another poster, they're not providing a solution to the problem, just changing the laws.
The results will be exactly what everyone expects. A few tickets here, a few tickets there, but pretty much the same as it is now.
I ride every day, and there are virtually no places to park. I have even offered cash to park in a pay lot, and the attendents will simply wave you off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, so when you say 'move a bike slowly', are you talking about 'walking a bike' to its parking spot?
Remember, your definition of 'moving quickly' might not be the same as another person's. I've seen many motorcycles on the sidewalk that the rider thought was 'moving slow', but to me seemed far too dangerous to be around pedestrians.
Are you honestly saying that if you pay money for a parking stall, you are refused service? You've said before that it's against the rules for a motorcycle to park in 'car parking', yet my building has both a spot specifically for 'deliveries' and numerous bikes parked in 'car spots'.
That aside though, why do you think you have the right to 'special parking'? I mean, hydrants don't have parking next to them for a reason - I'm guessing you can figure out why. 'Next to trees', heaven forbid that someone wants to actually sit or stand next to that tree along the sidewalk. You've also said before that bikes should have 'an extra lane'... WTH do you think that a motorcycle is more deserving of a special lane than any other motor vehicle? If anything, I'd prefer a lane for A. Public Transit, or B. Bicycles.
Motorcycles should have the same rights and responsibilities as any other licensed motor vehicle. Nothing more, and nothing less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
earthbound14

Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't care much. I actually like it as I ride a motorcycle and sometimes find myself on the sidewalk.
I'm not against banning it though, as too many Ja-jang-myeon boys and Quick Service men see the sidewalk as an open road and not a pedestrian space somtimes.
I've never personally had a problem with bikes on the sidewalk myself, but I have seen a few drivers go too fast.
Sometimes westerners come here and freak out about it though. They see a bike on the sidewalk and get all pissy.
I like being able to park my bike on the sidewalk, I like being able to make short cuts from time to time and I like being able to get out of major congestion by taking the sidewalk out of dodge. In Korea the sidewalk is kind of a nice space to have as road space is very limited.
Back home I would never advocate for using the sidewalk as we have more than enough road space and parking space.
The only reason I would support a ban here is to stop the few reckless drivers who are dangerous. I also think banning bikes from passing buses on the right while at a bus stop would be a good idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superpan

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
Motorcycles should have the same rights and responsibilities as any other licensed motor vehicle. Nothing more, and nothing less. |
Don't you know more about this country? I mean, you are the captain. I frequently see cars, trucks, and motorcycles driving/ parking on the sidewalks, running through crosswalks and red lights, and occasionally hitting pedestrians. Everyone thinks it's their right to drive as they please. The Korean roads aren't quite a free-for-all, but they're pretty damn close. Sure, it's dangerous, but it's also quite fun.
I know of several businesses that have designated motorcycle parking areas on the sidewalk. Motorcycles are an essential part of the economy and lifestyle, and urban planning here has been merely an afterthought. Anything goes. Accept it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pedestrians shouldn't be sharing the sidewalks with motorcycles because it's an obvious hazard. It also surprises me that they permit motorcycles and cars to park on sidewalks.
This sort of nonsense makes Korea look like a Third World country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used to be very pissy about motorcycles on the sidewalks, but I've softened a bit.
Driving in Korea has a different dynamic from most western cities. The road layouts are horrible and usually very inflexible. Seoul seems to be planned on the U-turn system. As in, you usually can't turn left unless you're going in the correct direction. Having to find a U-turn spot can be tedious and time consuming.
Point is, it would defeat the point of having a scooter here in Seoul if you had to follow all the driving rules. You may as well have a car. And God forbid if there was a sharp increase of cars on Seoul's streets.
That's the hard reality. I don't like it, and it's bad for the city. Scooters buzzing around on the sidewalks make Korea look third-worldy. But that's the way it is. Unless Seoul's streets are radically re-structured, then you'll always get scooters on the sidewalks.
Then again, I've seen taek-bae guys hit the sidewalk at speed when the road was wide open!!! They are so habituated to using the sidewalk they often choose it when the street would be just as fast.
A Korean friend told me that, off the record, the police say that they can't control the dangerous driving by motorcyclists in Seoul. They simply can't catch them........I dunno.....I think they could try harder and set up traps using 2 or more checkpoints with radios who patrol busy areas looking out for the bad guys. If the 1st patrol can't make them stop, then they radio to the 2nd patrol....... I thought that was a basic police tactic?
The other main problem is that most Koreans don't blink an eye when a scooter comes speeding at them. They tolerate it. Getting your Ja-jang-myun in less than 20 minutes is seen as the height of civilisation in Korea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Motorcycles shouldn't be permitted to ignore red lights either.
Every day I see elderly Korean pedestrians running across crosswalks in fear they'll get run over. When is Korea going to take steps to protect vulnerable pedestrians? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| eamo wrote: |
Point is, it would defeat the point of having a scooter here in Seoul if you had to follow all the driving rules. You may as well have a car. And God forbid if there was a sharp increase of cars on Seoul's streets. |
Another solution would be... public transit.
So yes, motorcycles could and should follow 'the rules'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| eamo wrote: |
...Point is, it would defeat the point of having a scooter here in Seoul if you had to follow all the driving rules. You may as well have a car. And God forbid if there was a sharp increase of cars on Seoul's streets.
|
Nonsense. The primary motive for riding a motor scooter is economic. They're cheaper to own and operate.
Delivery drivers aren't going to switch to cars when they're banned from driving on sidewalks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| So yes, motorcycles could and should follow 'the rules'. |
Agreed; however, the written rules and the functional rules are quite different. Most car parks won't let motorcyclists in because they know they can easily get away with parking on the sidewalk. Who's at fault, motorcyclists for parking on the sidewalk or car park owners who leave them little choice?
I live in a small city and it's a minor problem here. The only time I can't avoid parking on the sidewalk is coming up the one-way drive to our one and only Emart and they wave me onto the sidewalk rather than let me into the parking garage. I imagine this type of situation is much more common in Seoul.
Oddly enough, our one and only Lottemart lets me in the parking garage no problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| if it's ok to 'ride a motorbike slowly' on the sidewalk, then it follows that it should be ok to 'walk quickly' on roads. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IlIlNine
Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Location: Gunpo, Gyonggi, SoKo
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: Motorcycles on sidewalks: Good or Bad? |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| IlIlNine wrote: |
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| IlIlNine wrote: |
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| Bibbitybop wrote: |
| The car parking areas are regulated by parking ajossis, either at a gate or watching over. They will not let you park in car parking. And why should I? There are too few car parking spots already. |
And here in lies your arrogance. 'Why should I?' Why should I have to park in assigned parking for motor vehicles? WTF is that about man? Seriously, why do you think that you are so special? Yes, there are too few parking spaces, welcome to Seoul. If you're unable to find a parking space for your motor vehicle, take public transit! I do it all the time. I have a car, yet I know that some areas have very restricted parking. Get off your high horse and realize that the world does not revolve around your ability to ride and park wherever you please.
|
Or, I would suggest that you get off your high horse as a pedestrian and be a little flexible and understanding of the needs of motorcyclists.
Motorcyclists are people too!
Second bold: ... or in fact, the world does not revolve around your ability to walk where you please.
This is fast becoming a circular argument.
How about we all agree to try to understand each other and give each other a little leeway, huh? |
Wrong man, pedestrians and automobiles do not compromise... they collide! |
Yeah? Ignoring the fact that you've changed motorcycles into automobiles all of a sudden (aware of something called a strawman?) Statistics please. I've never seen or heard of such a thing. Not saying it doesn't happen, mind you... but I'm saying it's statistically small. |
The change was not intentional. Motorcycles are motor vehicles, and to me that qualifies them as automobiles.
|
Yes, they are motor vehicles.. but to call a motorcycle an automobile is intellectually dishonest, and I have no doubt it was intentional.
It's commonly understood that an automobile is another word for car.
Is your argument so weak that you have to use such debating tactics?
| Quote: |
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/automobile#sharethis
| Quote: |
| An automobile vehicle or mechanism; esp., a self-propelled vehicle suitable for use on a street or roadway. Automobiles are usually propelled by internal combustion engines (using volatile inflammable liquids, as gasoline or petrol, alcohol, naphtha, etc.), steam engines, or electric motors. |
But we're welcome to go back to calling them whatever you feel comfortable with.
Are you seriously asking me for statistics on motor vehicle fatalities??
|
No! I'm asking for statistics specific to motorcycles on sidewalks. Did you miss that on purpose?
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Also, keep in mind that I'm not talking about ripping about on the sidewalk. I'm talking about putting at walk-speed to a parking spot on one of those extra-wide sidewalks. |
1. Do you get off of your motorcycle and 'walk it' to a spot?
2. Those 'spots on extra wide sidewalks' are not intended for parking. They are intended for walking. If they were intended for parking, you'd see lines or regulations assigning spaces.
| Quote: |
1. No, but I can ride at walk speed, and I obviously give peds a lot of room.
2. What you're talking about here is non-existent in Korea.. If I can put my bike in a place where it's not in anyone's way, why would you have a problem with this?
| Quote: |
Do you honestly have so little understanding of the effects of motor vehicles and pedestrians moving in the same space?
|
Yes, I understand if everyone behaves in a responsible manner, nobody is put in any danger. |
Quite presumptuous here. To use your motor vehicle, did you or did you not have to pass a test?
Do pedestrians have to pass a test to walk?
Do you see the difference?
I'll make it easier for you; can a 5 year old walk down the sidewalk? Can a 5 year old ride a motorcycle?
Different ages have different capabilities. Your talk of 'responsible manner' neglects a large segment of society.
|
Of course I passed a test. This ensures that I have full control of my vehicle t all times. Walking doesn't require a test because generally people can accomplish this on their own.
I don't see how whether or not a 5 year old can ride a motorcycle is relevant. The point is that a 5 year old is usually with a parent who can guide the child safely. When they child is old enough, they're allowed to go out alone, under the assumption that they can navigate successfully on their own.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Motor vehicles do not belong on sidewalks, they belong on the road.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
Riding a motorcycle is not a right, it is a privilidge. If you don't get this, you need to go back and take your Driver's test. |
I don't understand how a so-called veteran of Korea can be so ignorant of the way things function here. |
|
Who says I'm A a veteran, and B ignorant?
Do you honestly think I don't know how things work? WHERE IN MY POST HAVE I SHOWN LARGE AMOUNTS OF IGNORANCE?? Please, take the time to quote ALL OF THE THINGS I'VE GOTTEN WRONG.
|
You are a veteran, no? You've been here long enough to understand that this is not a nation with a strong notion of the law and strict rules. That things are generally okay as long as you don't harm anyone. The consequences of your line of thinking would lead to an american-style system of overbearing police putting you in jail because you're drunk, or fining you $200 because a taillight is burnt out. Personally, I generally like the way things function here... There's a lot of importance placed here on personal responsibility. It's very libertarian in a lot of ways.
| Quote: |
Or, is it just the fact that I've disagreed with you that miffs you so?
|
I don't care if you disagree or not. You're just one more unhappy, stressed out foreigner in Korea. My life here is too good for you and your kind to bring me down.
[quote]
| Quote: |
Maybe you missed it but...
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/archives/result_contents.asp
| Quote: |
Seoul City announced that it will work with the police agency and other concerned authorities to enforce motorcycle-related regulations.
Seoul will be carrying out a crackdown on illegal practices by motorcycle riders such as driving on sidewalks and using the bus lanes starting in October.
For the crackdown, the city has selected four types of offences as their main targets. The four offences are driving on sidewalks, parking and idling in bus lanes, parking on sidewalks and irregular practices including driving in bus lanes and cutting in. |
Wow, so the shite that people are saying on this thread about 'the rights of motorcyclists', is just that, shite. It's actually ILLEGAL do to what you do.
|
Are you really going to start equating legality with morality? Besides, as was already said - there is no legal solution to this problem, so to crack down on it is a little silly. I'll bet you that no police officer will have a problem with what I do.
| Quote: |
And just an FYI, read the OP next time BEFORE you ask me to come up with statistics.
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/archives/result_contents.asp
| Quote: |
| the number of accidents involving such vehicles increased 131 percent while fatalities and injuries respectively rose by 151 percent and 143 percent between 2003 and 2007. |
|
Irrelevant. Addressed above.
I don't like the way you argue, so I'm probably not going to reply next time. I don't want to have to have an argument over the exact definitions of clearly understood terms - it's silly - so, unless you say something really provocative in your reply, I'll leave it alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh boo-hoo. You don't like the way I argue. WTF is that about? I'm asked for statistics, and I provide them.
Here are some relevant ones for ya:
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200707/200707030007.html
| Quote: |
100,000 Korean pedestrians died in traffic accidents in 2005. That's the highest figure among the 28 OECD countries.
The OECD average was 1.58 per 100,000, which is one-third the rate of fatal accidents in Korea. |
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/archives/result_contents.asp
| Quote: |
| According to a report by National Assembly member Yoon Young, the number of motorcycle accidents increased by 57 percent between 2003 and 2007 while car accidents dropped 12 percent. Over the same period, fatalities resulting from motorcycle accidents also increased 20 percent while the number of injuries rose 70 percent. |
| Quote: |
| According to Yoon`s report, the number of accidents involving such vehicles increased 131 percent while fatalities and injuries respectively rose by 151 percent and 143 percent between 2003 and 2007 |
.
If you want statistics for motorcycles on sidewalks specifically, go get 'em yourself. This is more than enough proof for me to deduce there is a problem with the current system.
For those promoting the position of riding motorcycles on sidewalks, I ask you this; are you parents?
To operate a motor vehicle you need to have some type of training and testing - and as a poster above has stated, to walk you do not. That means that those with licenses are trained and relatively familiar with the motor vehicle. They are that way because they have chosen to be so. But not everyone is willing or able to learn how to operate one. Some are too young, or too old. Some are just unable. Sidewalks, parks, and other pedestrian areas are for them.
| Quote: |
| You are a veteran, no? You've been here long enough to understand that this is not a nation with a strong notion of the law and strict rules. That things are generally okay as long as you don't harm anyone. The consequences of your line of thinking would lead to an american-style system of overbearing police putting you in jail because you're drunk, or fining you $200 because a taillight is burnt out. Personally, I generally like the way things function here... There's a lot of importance placed here on personal responsibility. It's very libertarian in a lot of ways. |
Korea is a developed nation that spends more per capita on its children than any other country. I dig laws. I especially dig them in relation to safety. Seoul is trying to support those laws, and I applaud them for it. As a parent, I understand the need for certain laws to protect those that cannot protect themselves.
If you want to break the law in this country, especially in this matter, I sincerely hope the book is thrown at you, and I will do everything I can to support and encourage the authorities in regards to it.
You put my life in danger, and the ones I love.
You get no sympathy from me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|