| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: Armed Insurrection? |
|
|
"The militia movement is a relatively new right-wing extremist movement consisting of armed paramilitary groups, both formal and informal, with an anti-government, conspiracy-oriented ideology. Militia groups began to form not long after the deadly standoff at Waco, Texas, in 1993; by the spring of 1995, they had spread to almost every state. Many members of militia groups have been arrested since then, usually on weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges. Although the militia movement has declined in strength from its peak in early 1996, it remains an active movement, especially in the Midwest, and continues to cause a number of problems for law enforcement and the communities in which militia groups are active...
The Kentucky State Militia has also held trainings out of state in an effort to help rejuvenate the movement. In states like Pennsylvania and Texas, militia leaders have held gatherings designed to reorganize and re-energize the movement in those regions as well. Whether or not such efforts will be successful is uncertain -- it is possible that only another high-profile incident like Ruby Ridge or Waco could raise the militia movement to its earlier height--but it appears to be in no danger of disappearing. New militia groups continue to form, and in some states, like Georgia and West Virginia, where groups virtually disappeared following the major arrests in 1996, the movement has become active again. As long as it is active in any substantial way, criminal activity seems likely to continue."
http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Militia_M.asp?LEARN_Cat=Extremism&LEARN_SubCat=Extremism_in_America&xpicked=4&item=mm
I watched that speech by Adam Koresh that arjuna posted and it got me thinking about what it would take for the extemists to step over the line. It seems within the realm of chance that this bailout situation and all the passion it has caused might be the right kind of thing to do it.
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=135278&sid=a8382ad84a27ab0c4f39b1272511d245
Given the close historical link between taxes and rebellions, it might be something the FBI should (and no doubt is) keeping an eye on these days. Especially around Election Day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, they are around. Groups such as this one...
Michigan Militia
And I expect that the FBI thoroughly penetrated them long ago. I believe the Kennedys used to joke about there being more FBI agents in the American Communist Party than bona fide Communists, for example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are many good FBI agents serving by which I mean they are absolutely appalled at the current state of our country and who also see the need for radical change.
They are not a monolithic block by any means. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So, ba, are you saying we should not trust the FBI to protect us from the radicals--that some of them could be in on it themselves? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sorry, I find what you propose -- that rather than the FBI's infiltrating them, they have infiltrated the FBI -- utterly lacking in plausibility. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a paragraph from the article I linked above. It lists some of the legal action taken against these groups 10 years ago.
"By early 1996, virtually every state had at least one group, and most states had several. The movement had attracted the attention not only of the media but also of law enforcement, however, which had begun to discover signs of significant criminal activity. As early as 1994, members of the Blue Ridge Hunt Club, a nascent Virginia militia group, had been arrested on a variety of weapons charges. The following year an Oklahoma Christian Identity minister and militia leader, Ray Lampley, was arrested along with several followers for conspiring to blow up targets ranging from government buildings to the offices of civil rights organizations. But in 1996, a series of investigations resulted in a number of major militia-related arrests, generally on illegal weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges. In April 1996, several members of the Georgia Republic Militia were arrested, followed in July by a dozen members of the Arizona Viper Militia. Later that same month, members of the Washington State Militia found themselves in custody, while in October members of the West Virginia Mountaineer Militia were arres-ted on weapons charges and in connection with plans to blow up an F.B.I. fingerprinting facility. These arrests, not surprisingly, had a depressing effect on the movement."
Had the feds not been on the case, it's clear we would have read more horrifying headlines like Oklahoma City. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
But in 1996, a series of investigations resulted in a number of major militia-related arrests, generally on illegal weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges.
Had the feds not been on the case, it's clear we would have read more horrifying headlines like Oklahoma City. |
Conspiracy charges?
Oh, man. I distrust 'conspiracy' as a theory of criminal liability. A crime that is not a crime. They don't have it in Europe, and its not a part of international law. But its a great way to bring down drug importers.
Illegal weapons and explosives charges are fair game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These "Militias" have been around for a long time.
Whether it was the Cole Porter Gang or the KKK the Black Panthers or the Weather Underground they all emanate from fanatic mind bent sociopathic (somebody finish this sentence for me). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cornfed
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| So, ba, are you saying we should not trust the FBI to protect us from the radicals--that some of them could be in on it themselves? |
Most of the "radicals" just support traditional Western values, as opposed to the politically correct psychopatic values that are destroying the West. It's the people currently calling the shots and their sleezebag supporters that are the lunatic fringe.
Last edited by Cornfed on Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| ...a great way to bring down drug importers. |
And other organized crime.
I understand that "conspiracy" has identifiable, testable elements, Kuros. It seems difficult to prove at times. But when linked with other charges, as "burglary" often is, it helps add weight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cornfed
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
Conspiracy charges?
Oh, man. I distrust 'conspiracy' as a theory of criminal liability. A crime that is not a crime. |
The line in these kinds of trumped-up conspiracy charges seems to follow a fairly standard pattern. First the feds will infiltrate the group with some dirtbag being blackmailed into being an informer. He'll then attach himself to a member who's not too bright and inclined to run his mouth off. The informer will tape-record they guy raving on about this or that hypothetical crime. These ravings will be prompted by leading suggestions from the informer, which won't be taped. Having established the target is Jack the Ripper, the informer will then proceed to link him with as many other members as possible. Finally the feds will raid their houses and will confiscate perfectly commonplace items (guns, fertilizer, electric circuitry etc.) which they will offer as evidence of some far-fetched conspiracy. Generally these alleged conspiracies would not pass the laugh test, but it's not difficult to con people too stupid to get out of jury duty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Cole PORTER Gang? This Cole Porter?
Times have changed
And we've often rewound the clock
Since the Puritans got a shock
When they landed on Plymouth Rock
If today, any shock they should try to stand
Steada' landing on Plymouth Rock
Plymouth Rock would land on them
In olden days a glimpse of stockings
Was looked on as something shocking
Now heaven knows
Anything goes
Good authors too who once knew better words
Now only use four-letter words
Writing prose
Anything goes
The world has gone mad today
And good's bad today
And black's white today
And day's night today
When most guys today
That women prize today
Are just silly gigolos
So though I'm not a great romance
I know that I'm bound to answer
When you propose
Anything goes
That Cole Porter? I not a fan of his, but I wouldn't consider his writing to be urban terrorism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
| ...a great way to bring down drug importers. |
And other organized crime.
I understand that "conspiracy" has identifiable, testable elements, Kuros. It seems difficult to prove at times. But when linked with other charges, as "burglary" often is, it helps add weight. |
Straight from my notes:
Pinkerton (Case Law standard)
1) Acts done in furtherance of the conspiracy is involvement and falls within scope of conspiracy, even if conspirator A was not directly involved in the acts - even if he was in jail at the time
○ See Lauria for inferrence of intent
2) OR acts were foreseeable as natural and necessary consequence the conspiracy
Only intent needed is that to establish the conspiracy
BUT, limiting principles:
(1) If the act was not in furtherance of the conspiracy
(2) Falls outside the scope of the conspiracy
MPC and KRS 506.040
Focuses culpability
Individual is guilty of conspiracy (with purpose of promoting/facilitating its commission):
(1) If you agree with one or more others to engage in conduct constituting the crime
(2) OR If you agree to aid others in the commission of the crime
○ Conspiracy liability even if you do not know the identity of some of your co-conspirators, BUT you do know that there's another conspiring with co-conspirators
○ If object of multiple crimes are part of the same agreement, only one conspiracy will be charged |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. Your notes show the only intent that matters is the intent to establish the conspiracy. I thought that one had to prove that not only did the conspirators establish a conspiracy, but that they also took "steps" to make it real and perpetrate it.
Conspirators must do a little more than talk about and agree on it, no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
The Cole PORTER Gang? This Cole Porter?
Times have changed
And we've often rewound the clock
Since the Puritans got a shock
When they landed on Plymouth Rock
If today, any shock they should try to stand
Steada' landing on Plymouth Rock
Plymouth Rock would land on them
In olden days a glimpse of stockings
Was looked on as something shocking
Now heaven knows
Anything goes
Good authors too who once knew better words
Now only use four-letter words
Writing prose
Anything goes
The world has gone mad today
And good's bad today
And black's white today
And day's night today
When most guys today
That women prize today
Are just silly gigolos
So though I'm not a great romance
I know that I'm bound to answer
When you propose
Anything goes
That Cole Porter? I not a fan of his, but I wouldn't consider his writing to be urban terrorism. |
Ooops! Cole Younger Gang. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|