View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sigmund

Joined: 11 May 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:37 pm Post subject: Grammar question. Past simple passive with "let" |
|
|
I am having a hard time with this sentence, I am wondering if anyone more knowledgeable than myself could answer it.
It is using "let" with the past simple in the passive voice.
For example.
Dad would not let me buy a phone. Active
I was not let to buy a phone by my dad. Passive.
The passive just sound awkward and wrong. But if you replace "let" with "allow" it seems fine. Is that passive form of "let" correct? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Snowkr
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, it is not okay.
Niether is using "allowed" in that sentence unless you re-arrange the structure... "by my dad" is a dangling modifier in the position you've written it. It's misplaced.
You can use:
I was not allowed by my dad + to (infinitive)
"Let" should be used in an active sentence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Easter Clark

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
^
Yeah, "let" is followed by an object and the base form of the verb (which pretty much demands it be used in the active voice).
For the passive, I'd use "permit" + infinitive--I wasn't permitted to buy a phone. But "allowed" works fine as well.
I would think that using "Let" in the passive voice would only be used as an imperative--"Let it be done" = "Do it." But that's a stretch, I think.
sigmund--where did you find this sentence? In a Korean English textbook? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sigmund

Joined: 11 May 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It actually came from a Korean teacher during a class. She pulled me aside, during the class, and was insistent that she had heard that in a grammar book and it was correct form. I honestly couldn't understand/follow what she was talking about, both in comprehension, mine of her English, and grammar point. She was incredibly insistent and maybe upset that I wouldn't agree with her. Like I said, there is definitely a language barrier, and honestly I am not that great at grammar, but her point seemed to maybe be that you use "let to" in the passive voice? It was in reference to another sentence that I used in class
They didn't let him go.
He was not let go by them.
Incorrect?
Thanks for the responses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: hmm |
|
|
He was not let go by them...is correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Easter Clark

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: Re: hmm |
|
|
The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
He was not let go by them...is correct. |
I agree, if the meaning of "let go" is similar to "fired" or "laid off." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sigmund

Joined: 11 May 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the help guys. I guess I could ask her to clarify what she was talking about, but it is more effort than I have the patience for right now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|