Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Paul Krugman wins Nobel Prize

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:16 am    Post subject: Paul Krugman wins Nobel Prize Reply with quote

http://tinyurl.com/3n76ty

Interesting, because if I understood him correctly, the recent drop in oil prices should not have happened, or at least should not have been as steep as it was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gatsby



Joined: 09 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
October 13, 2008, 7:50 am

Paul Krugman Wins Economics Nobel

By Catherine Rampell

Paul Krugman, a professor at Princeton University and an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times, was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences on Monday.

�It�s been an extremely weird day, but weird in a positive way,� Mr. Krugman said in an interview on his way to a Washington meeting for the Group of Thirty, an international body from the public and private sectors that discusses international economics. He said he was mostly �preoccupied with the hassles� of trying to make all his scheduled meetings today and answer a constantly-ringing cell phone.

Mr. Krugman received the award for his work on international trade and economic geography. In particular, the prize committee lauded his work for �having shown the effects of economies of scale on trade patterns and on the location of economic activity.� He has developed models that explain observed patterns of trade between countries, as well as what goods are produced where and why. Traditional trade theory assumes that countries are different and will exchange different kinds of goods with each other; Mr. Krugman�s theories have explained why worldwide trade is dominated by a few countries that are similar to each other, and why some countries might import the same kinds of goods that it exports.

Paul Krugman

�There was something very beautiful about the old existing trade theory, and its ability to capture the world in a surprisingly simple conceptual framework,� Mr. Krugman said. �And then I realized that some of the new insights coming through in industrial organization could be applied to international trade.�...


http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-economics-nobel/?em

Too bad the brains in Washington didn't listen to his warnings about the economy over the past two or three years. It might have saved the U.S. and Europe several trillion dollars for this bailout.

But they are listening now to people like Krugman, and using some of their ideas. Those ideas may save us yet.

This Nobel prize, combined with other news, is helping to restore my confidence, both in the economy and the human race.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like Krugman, but I feel like there is some politics in this pick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krugman has been an expected winner of the prize for at least a decade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stacyrb



Joined: 10 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And he won the prize for work he did 20 years ago to explain why countries with economies of scale that can produce their own items still buy similar items from other countries.

Basically the reason why americans buy Jag's and BMWs for higher prices instead of just buying a Contour or Caravan. Most people understand this now, but 20 years ago this was ground breaking research... WAY before he became a political pundit.

Stacy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stacyrb wrote:
And he won the prize for work he did 20 years ago to explain why countries with economies of scale that can produce their own items still buy similar items from other countries.

Basically the reason why americans buy Jag's and BMWs for higher prices instead of just buying a Contour or Caravan. Most people understand this now, but 20 years ago this was ground breaking research... WAY before he became a political pundit.

Stacy


Paul, has been on the radar largely due to his politics, and there is nothing wrong with that. He writes for the New York Times. He also worked with the Clinton Administration. He has had brilliant work, so he is qualified for the prize and he's been on the radar, so to speak, partially because of his political exposure, and there is nothing wrong with that, and his views have largely been correct. He was given a prize based on his political views, however.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
stacyrb wrote:
And he won the prize for work he did 20 years ago to explain why countries with economies of scale that can produce their own items still buy similar items from other countries.

Basically the reason why americans buy Jag's and BMWs for higher prices instead of just buying a Contour or Caravan. Most people understand this now, but 20 years ago this was ground breaking research... WAY before he became a political pundit.

Stacy


Paul, has been on the radar largely due to his politics, and there is nothing wrong with that. He writes for the New York Times. He also worked with the Clinton Administration. He has had brilliant work, so he is qualified for the prize and he's been on the radar, so to speak, partially because of his political exposure, and there is nothing wrong with that, and his views have largely been correct. He was given a prize based on his political views, however.


I agree. As was Al Gore (Peace Prize, wtf?).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International