|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:49 am Post subject: One party States in the US ... |
|
|
Elections in the US are not free despite the commonly held idea of America as a democracy. Every year thousands of candidates for offices at all levels are kept off the ballot by the Democrat and Republican parties who then run unopposed.
The Constitution Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party and independent Ralph Nader are all important enough for nationwide political ballot access, yet they are on the ballot only in 37, 32, 45, and 46 states respectively. They have been kept off by bad laws and corrupt judges including one US Supreme Court judge selected specifically by Bill Clinton after promising to ALWAYS vote AGAINST free elections.
This is worse in the many one party states in the US, where the majority of offices are contested by only one candidate. This is due to bad laws that keep others off the ballot:
Massachusetts: 130 out of 160 State Rep candidates are unopposed
Illinois: 20 out of 39 State Senate candidates are unopposed
and ........... 61 out of 118 State Rep candidates are unopposed
Georgia: 141 out of 180 State Rep candidates are unopposed
Arkansas: 17 out of 18 State Senate candidates are unopposed
Washington State: has a new law that has banned all parties, for offices other than President and VP, except the Ds and Rs, not by name, they call it "top two."
There are more examples. In most of these cases, write in votes are also banned, so there are no alternatives. But, thousands of would-be candidates were not allowed to run due to bad ballot access laws.
At the same time that the Ds and Rs openly conspire to keep opponents off the ballot, when they fail to get their own candidates on the ballot, as they did this year in California, Texas, and Kansas, they just break the law that they enforce against others and put themselves on the ballot.
America needs to wake up to the fact that we do not have free elections. We have fewer candidates per office than they did in the old Soviet Union.
In politics, Dorothy, we're not in Kansas anymore ... nor Iowa either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
To be fair, the American public seem quite content to keep them so far outside of the political discourse as to label them useless. Political parties have come and gone in the US; there must be a reason for that.
And then remember what the incumenbency rates are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Out of 5,773 state legislative races in the US, more than 2,200 are running unopposed! But the Democrats and Republicans conspire to make it hard for people to run for office, and especially for independents and third parties.
Quote: |
Ballot Access News
Republicans, Democrats Fail to Run Against Each Other in 39.5% of State Legislative Elections This November
October 24th, 2008
One of the scandals of elections in the United States is that the Democratic and Republican Parties field so few nominees for state legislative posts. This year, there are 5,773 regularly-scheduled state partisan legislative elections. In 2,281 of those elections, either the Democratic Party, or the Republican Party, has no nominee. That means that 39.5% of the legislative races have no Democratic-Republican contest.
This is the worst competitive posture since 2000. The percentage in previous even-numbered years has been: 2006 37.6%; 2004 38.7%; 2002 36.9%; 2000 40.6%; 1998 41.1%; 1996 32.7%; 1994 35.8%; 1992 32.8%; 1990 35.9%; 1988 36.6%.
Of course the major parties ought to be free to decide to skip running candidates in districts in which they feel they can�t win. But, given the large number of districts with no contest between the two major parties, it is infuriating that ballot access laws in many states keep minor parties and independent candidates from contesting legislative seats and giving the voters a choice. |
http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/republicans-democrats-fail-to-run-against-each-other-in-395-of-state-legislative-elections-this-november/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of the major problems is that the Democrat already represent the LEFT and the Republicans already represent the RIGHT.
SO any third party inherently either takes votes directly away from either the left or the right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiger Beer wrote: |
One of the major problems is that the Democrat already represent the LEFT and the Republicans already represent the RIGHT.
SO any third party inherently either takes votes directly away from either the left or the right. |
How can a third party take away votes from a non-existant candidate?
If 40% of the seats are going with only one candidate, we have a real problem.
There are thousands of individuals who want to run for office in America who are kept off the ballot every year. That is why there are so many seats going unopposed in every general election. And it is one of the reasons people don't vote. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|