| 
			
				|     | Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 |  
 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic |  
		| Author | Message |  
		| NoExplode 
 
  
 Joined: 15 Oct 2008
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:50 am    Post subject: Re: Email applications for Unis--read the ad |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | Rumple wrote: |  
	  | 
 
	  | NoExplode wrote: |  
	  | 
 
	  | Scott in Incheon wrote: |  
	  | This is just a heads up for people who are applying for jobs.  I sit in the same office as one of the guys who wades through job applications.  The ad for our school clearly states that people should not email applications. 
 Yet the moment after the ad comes out, the first emailed applications start to arrive.  They are not being looked at.  The policy of the school is to only accept applications by mail or in person.  Those that ignore this are destroying their chance of getting a job.
 
 Just a reminder.  Follow the instructions in the ad.
 |  
 Who in their right mind would want a job where the employer is so backwards that they cannot figure out how email works?
 
 To me this signals that there probably isn't a copier or printer around the office, communication between Department heads/teachers is likely nonexistent, and the program is generally underfunded.
 
 What kind of moron, presumably with a PhD., can't open an attachment?
 |  
 I like your logic. Let me apply it to you: Who in their right mind would want to hire someone who either is too stupid to understand simple instructions, or too obstinate to follow instructions that they don't agree with?
 |  
 By your logic, typewritten CV's wouldn't be allowed 20 years after the invention of the typewriter, or faxed in applications wouldn't be allowed 20 years after the invention of the fax machine.
 
 It's laziness on the part of the employer if they simply want to narrow their potential pool of talent over points that have nothing to do with the applicant's quality.
 
 Microsoft, Google, and NASA all accept emailed applications.  A good employer wants the most applicants humanly possible.  They WILL decide whom they like in the end, but they are not throwing top intellects' CV's in the trash because two references were submitted instead of three.
 It is true, as late as 1999 (but not any more), if you were applying for a tenure-track full Professorship at a US University, it often had to be via snail mail.
 
 However, there are relatively few foreign PhD's in Korea, and you certainly were not talking about tenure track positions.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| wanderingsalsero 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Dec 2006
 Location: Houston, TX.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:42 am    Post subject: Well said, Dave! |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I know what Dave is talking about.  He's exactly right. 
 Art
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Scott in Incheon 
 
 
 Joined: 30 Aug 2004
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:48 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I don't think it really matters whether you agree with the policy or not...it doesn't matter what other schools do...if you want a job at a particular school it is just a good idea to follow their rules. 
 My school is one of the good ones and it would be a shame if someone missed out the chance just because they didn't read the ad.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| PRagic 
 
  
 Joined: 24 Feb 2006
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:12 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I really like your posts and you are spot on with this one, too.   But I've always said that university jobs have gone to hell in a hand bad so I don't know how I'm out of touch. 
 Anyway, yes, for some the public school system is fine.   Particularly for those with degrees in education.   Teaching younger kids isn't for me.  My point has been that for the highly qualified and experienced, there are a few competitive university positions that pay quite well.  These pay more than public schools and afford much more vacation and earning potential on-site. Don't forget that the places without the term limits provide annual salary increases, too, so the people who have been there a while are making fantastic coin.
 
 To be sure, though, the cush jobs for those 'breaking into' university teaching are all but gone, and the majority of the slots out there are glorified hakwon jobs.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| bassexpander 
 
 
 Joined: 13 Sep 2007
 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:51 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| PR's avatar is one of my favorite on this board, btw. |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Easter Clark 
 
  
 Joined: 18 Nov 2007
 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | ddeubel wrote: |  
	  | I have to agree with the general comment that Uni. jobs  in terms of both pay and vacation are substandard and going down hill.
 
 In many ways, the univ. system and teaching here is back in the stone ages. Not a lot of good stuff happening and the students suffer. Lots of people just taking their time, pretending and not really adding to the ability of Korean's to speak English. I really find it abysmal , the level of the average uni. lecturer/teacher. Atrocious.
 DD
 http://eflclassroom.ning.com
 |  
 This has been my conclusion as well. Hey~ we finally agree on something, dd!
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| branchsnapper 
 
 
 Joined: 21 Feb 2008
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| How high on the hill were these uni jobs in the first place? By what criteria are the lecturers at universities so bad? If they apply standard western teaching theory to big Korean university classes that might be pretty bad. People who make really harsh judgements about other teachers qualities are just on an ego trip for the most part. The situation is complex, and research doesn't bear out big differences between results of different teachers or techniques. It's the students that count. 
 Also, surely qualifications are better than before due to increased competition and more people with long years behind them.
 
 Anyway, of course Scott in Incheon is right and you've got to jump the hurdles they set, in general, and post your stuff if they say so. However, his post rather suggests that these systems work well, and people always hire on the basis of what they claim to hire people on, and at that time, and with those conditions. That isn't necessarily the case.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| DrunkenMaster 
 
  
 Joined: 04 Feb 2008
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| At the end of the day, most of these resume packages are being processed by people who don't speak or read English very well, and even if they are proficient, they have other tasks that these applications are keeping them from. Like Go-Stop and solitaire. 
 They are usually unmarried 24-30 year old female office workers who are sick of having to deal with foreigners every day. They couldn't be arsed to really care who makes it through the initial screening, so they do it like this: was the process followed and is everything here on-time? Proceed. Otherwise, disqualified.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Rumple 
 
  
 Joined: 19 Sep 2007
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:04 am    Post subject: Re: Email applications for Unis--read the ad |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | NoExplode wrote: |  
	  | 
 
	  | Rumple wrote: |  
	  | 
 I like your logic. Let me apply it to you: Who in their right mind would want to hire someone who either is too stupid to understand simple instructions, or too obstinate to follow instructions that they don't agree with?
 |  
 It's laziness on the part of the employer if they simply want to narrow their potential pool of talent over points that have nothing to do with the applicant's quality.
 |  
 I think ability to understand and follow instructions is one major indicator of an applicant's quality.
 
 
 
 
	  | NoExplode wrote: |  
	  | Microsoft, Google, and NASA all accept emailed applications.  A good employer wants the most applicants humanly possible.  They WILL decide whom they like in the end, but they are not throwing top intellects' CV's in the trash because two references were submitted instead of three. |  
 1) A good employer wants the BEST applicants possible, and an applicant that doesn't follow instructions isn't the BEST if lots of others do.
 2) We aren't hiring theoretical physicists. "Top intellect" is just one of many important attributes, like ability to follow instructions (as I've already said).
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| NoExplode 
 
  
 Joined: 15 Oct 2008
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:46 am    Post subject: Re: Email applications for Unis--read the ad |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | Rumple wrote: |  
	  | 
 
	  | NoExplode wrote: |  
	  | 
 
	  | Rumple wrote: |  
	  | 
 I like your logic. Let me apply it to you: Who in their right mind would want to hire someone who either is too stupid to understand simple instructions, or too obstinate to follow instructions that they don't agree with?
 |  
 It's laziness on the part of the employer if they simply want to narrow their potential pool of talent over points that have nothing to do with the applicant's quality.
 |  
 I think ability to  understand and follow instructions is one major indicator of an applicant's quality.
 
 
 
 
	  | NoExplode wrote: |  
	  | Microsoft, Google, and NASA all accept emailed applications.  A good employer wants the most applicants humanly possible.  They WILL decide whom they like in the end, but they are not throwing top intellects' CV's in the trash because two references were submitted instead of three. |  
 1) A good employer wants the BEST applicants possible, and an applicant that doesn't follow instructions isn't the BEST if lots of others do.
 2) We aren't hiring theoretical physicists. "Top intellect" is just one of many important attributes, like ability to follow instructions (as I've already said).
 |  
 YOu should make it a requirement to have the documents sealed with wax, ribboned in a roll, and delivered only by horse courier.  You will have an even better
  pool of applicants that can follow directions even better! 
 Why stop there?  Make them include an 8X10 glossy of their latest bowel movement.  You can get out a ruler, as I'm sure some idiot will take a polaroid instead, or try to be sneaky and submit a 5X7.
 
 I would personally require them to submit a videotape of them doing 20 push-ups, 3 sets of sqats, and a set of his max. bench press.  I think the ability to  do physically challenging tasks is important,  as that makes your mind sharper.  If his form sucks, disqualified.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| McGenghis 
 
 
 Joined: 14 Oct 2008
 Location: Gangneung
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:54 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I got my university job via email. I had to make a few calls and rub some balls on the way, but that was my first step. 
 My second step was taking my incredibly few hours and my admirable pay.
 
 My third step was using my second step to debauch myself properly. Plus, saying you've a uni job means more hits with the chicks. Actually, these are lies. I speak a modicum of the Korean. People told me that it wouldn't help, but gosh, it warmed up the president's balls right nice. So a great big pooh to those who say that remaining provincial in Korea is a benefit.
 
 Gosh. Jee whiz. 아이고. And other things one says when one scratches his head.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| TECO 
 
  
 Joined: 20 Jan 2003
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:36 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | branchsnapper wrote: |  
	  | What's higher than the SKY then, in your book? |  
 funny
  |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| TECO 
 
  
 Joined: 20 Jan 2003
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 11:15 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | PRagic wrote: |  
	  | ...the majority of the slots out there are glorified hakwon jobs. |  
 I agree with you - the above comment particularly.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Unposter 
 
 
 Joined: 04 Jun 2006
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| From what I have come to understand, it is a common procedure in Human Resources to have some minimal instructions when advertising for positions for the specific reason to see if people are following them.  You do not have to believe me but I am still offering this advice for free. 
 My experience in Korea with university applications is that it is a lot like playing slots and other games of chance.  I think questions about who actually reads the applications, the criteria they use and even if their criteria is explicit or not, and even their willingness to be flexible on interview times are all valid.  From what I have seen, application procedures can be quite shady.
 
 Korea is still a place where who you know may be more important than what you know and what you can do.
 
 And, the "timing" of your application may be your only distinguishing feature.
 
 But, there is no question in my mind, if a job offer has instructions, you are playing with fire if you do not follow them!
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| justaguy 
 
 
 Joined: 01 Jan 2008
 Location: seoul
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:10 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Korean University has an all foreigner interview for job applicants.  My friend just applied there and I was shocked when I heard that.  IMO If the school is a Korean school, I think that Koreans should be conducting the interviews. 
 I have another friend at Ewha, and they also use foreigners in the hiring process.  The foreigners there weed out the bad resumes first and then participate with Koreans in the interview process.
 
 Both schools have cliques of foreign teachers who are looking for new people who will "fit in."  I find it hard to believe that the Koreans are unable to screen and interview new applicants.  It seems like they just can't be bothered, and the foreigners volunteered to do it.
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 |  |