View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mandinga
Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
well Daniel Craig is definitely the best bond since Connery, in fact I think he IS better than Sean. Bond is supposed to be a killer so he should look like one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
meangradin

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also liked "Solace", but thought "Casino" was more entertaining. Solace felt like it was setting up a sequel. I think Craig owns this role, and has rejuvinated the franchise. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharkey

Joined: 12 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i agree about Craig, he is a money bond |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Judi Dench as "M" is something special, too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
actually bond is not suppose to be a ruthless killer..
bond is suppose to be a gentleman, suave, good looking and a ladies man!
but I guess that was pre 80's! and now 2008 we want it fast!!
next bond will be black! and play hip hop you watch.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D.D.
Joined: 29 May 2008
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
it sucked |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
actually bond is not suppose to be a ruthless killer..
bond is suppose to be a gentleman, suave, good looking and a ladies man!
but I guess that was pre 80's! and now 2008 we want it fast!!
next bond will be black! and play hip hop you watch.. |
Read the books and it might change your mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maingman
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Location: left Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:32 pm Post subject: , |
|
|
it was \not good |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maingman
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Location: left Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:32 pm Post subject: , |
|
|
it was \not good |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cangel

Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: Jeonju, S. Korea
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
The last 2 Bond movies have, in my opinion, been the worst. No matter how much action you throw into a picture, you just can't mask a pathetic story. As for Craig, he's too rough. Bond is suave, not buff. And, did anyone notice that this move didn't end with the ubiquitous roll in the hay? Oh, and yes, I am aware that in the novels Bond is rather roguish and rough but I prefer that to which I have become accustomed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maingman
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Location: left Korea
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John_ESL_White
Joined: 12 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
*Spoiler*
!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's not oil they're collecting!!!!!!!!
It's WATER!!!!!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
worse bond ever. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't seen the new one, but thee last was long. slow, and kind of knitty-gritty. I agree that Bond should be suave, but I (marginally) liked the last flick. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|