| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
slee0316
Joined: 04 May 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: Nikon d90 vs Nikon d200 |
|
|
Thoughts?????
Preferences???? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swigs

Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would personally get the D90 if I had to choose between only those two options.
With the D90 being able to capture HD makes it a pretty sweet deal.
But it really comes down to what features appeal to you most. Both have a few features that the other doesn't. I think the D200 might be built tougher and be weather resistant, while the D90 has some other practical consumer features that you might find interesting.
You can't really make a bad choice either way. Both are cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superdave

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: over there ----->
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D200 is a superior camera, but older technology ... so things like battery life and noise handling won't be as good as in newer cameras.
regarding specs, D200 is better. 5fps, magnesium alloy body (fully sealed). yadda yadda.
for most hobbyist shooters i'd recommend the D90 though. it's easier to wield and people have been getting a hard on for this whole 'movie' rubbish ... and you probably won't miss the refinements that the D200 offers anyway.
so, that's your simple answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slee0316
Joined: 04 May 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thats what i was looking for, an easy answer; thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|