View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
seosan08

Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: The Trouble with North Korea |
|
|
The Trouble with North Korea
by James Na
December 9th, 2008
http://www.dprkstudies.org/
The trouble with North Korea is that nobody wants it � except the current ruling elite of North Korea itself.
In a previous post, I rather immodestly predicted that, should the Kim regime collapse in North Korea, a military junta backed by China would emerge, resulting in a Burma-ization of North Korea. I further speculated that in an increasingly Sinicized North Korea, the lot of ordinary North Koreans would be bleak.
I have given some further consideration to this topic and present additional thoughts below for a discussion.
Let�s examine the position and motivation of each external actor involved in �the North Korean problem.� First, the United States. By now, it is clear that neither the outgoing Republican administration nor the incoming Democratic one is serious about North Korea. With Iraq, Afghanistan, other aspects of the War on Terror and the latest economic malaise occupying the attention, North Korea would not even register as a serious policy issue but for its nuclear arsenal. Because of this, I suspect that Washington would not object to Chinese domination of North Korea provided the Chinese disarmed the North Korean nuclear arsenal in return.
It would not be too far-fetched to assume that many in Washington want the North Korean problem to simply go away and will make extraordinary concessions (to principle, mostly) to make this happen.
Ah, but what about the small, but vocal and occasionally effective (but generally ineffectual) human rights lobby in Washington? More on that below.......................
http://www.dprkstudies.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Washington won't lift a finger if China steps in and takes over NK. Neither would anyone else, including SK.
It will eventually happen, bank on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sk has botched the NK issue from the beginning. They deserve to lose it. The thing is, China doesn't deserve to gain it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ilsanman wrote: |
The thing is, China doesn't deserve to gain it. |
True, but realpolitik says let 'em have it. The US will maintain its containment policy by continuing to stand by SK and Taiwan.
Let China shoulder that burden. Last I heard, they've got the cash to implement quick measures should they choose to do so, and I imagine cleaning up that mess won't be cheap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't mind trading the north and the south for Taiwan and Tibet.
I'd cave on Tibet if they jail the President of Hyundai. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nobody wants it? What about the homosexual elite that rule the planet? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JMO wrote: |
Nobody wants it? What about the homosexual elite that rule the planet? |
I don't think they want it either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|