|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Or they know about the self-interest and are having an entirely understandable emotional reaction. |
Kuros:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that the people who make gleeful predictions of, or angry calls for, a US troop withdrawal do in fact recognize that the US has an interest in the troops being here? Because that's usually not apparent to me from what they write.
Quote: |
Equating the few people fuming on this message board to the Korean Left burning effigies over the 'danger' of mad cow is not warranted. |
I don't think I made a comparison, precisely, between the anti-beef protestors and the Bring 'Em Home crowd on Dave's. If you mean a comparison between the Bring 'Em Homers and the anti-USFK protestors, yeah, I basically stand by what I wrote earlier. Both groups are similar in that they are expressing feelings of grassroots resentment, but these feelings form no part of the decision-making process of either the American or Korean elites.
Granted, the anti-US protestors are closer to fitting the traditional idea of commited political activists, since they actually go to the trouble of drawing up signs and marching around on the streets. But even that difference only goes so far. A lot of the kids who show up for these rallies probably don't give much more thought to their politics than does anyone posting on Dave's. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Rather than go in circles on this, however, I will bow out -- but only after pointing out that your analogy, above, the one where you are the one paying the security guard to guard your house, seems to have the pay arrangements wrong, not to mention the reasons for "entering the contract..." |
True, the analogy is not exact. The point was that both parties in the arrangment are in it for self-gain and nothing else, and nobody really owes anyone any gratitude.
Quote: |
We disagree on everything here, especially the way you talk about the military like a muckraker.
|
I didn't intend this an anti-military thing. My original point was that if the USFK's presence were serving no American interest in East Asia, the troops would have been pulled out of here a few years back, given how desperate the US army was for more troops at that time. The bit about lowering the recruitment standards was meant simply to illustrate how desperate they were. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sojusucks

Joined: 31 May 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can name one favor.
Bush signed an agreement to bail out Korea's economy which ignited consumer confidence a while back.
I guess the person that wrote this article wasn't aware of that.
Besides, without out Bush, we wouldn't have Bushisms. I used a few once in a class to demonstrate how NOT to speak English. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
Or they know about the self-interest and are having an entirely understandable emotional reaction. |
Kuros:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that the people who make gleeful predictions of, or angry calls for, a US troop withdrawal do in fact recognize that the US has an interest in the troops being here? Because that's usually not apparent to me from what they write. |
Yes, I'm saying that they're minorities in a country blowing off steam about what they see and hear in Korea. I'm certain that if put in a position of actual power, many of these same people would suddenly recognize the realities that keep USFK forces here. I suppose a few wouldn't, but . . .
Quote: |
Quote: |
Equating the few people fuming on this message board to the Korean Left burning effigies over the 'danger' of mad cow is not warranted. |
I don't think I made a comparison, precisely, between the anti-beef protestors and the Bring 'Em Home crowd on Dave's. If you mean a comparison between the Bring 'Em Homers and the anti-USFK protestors, yeah, I basically stand by what I wrote earlier. Both groups are similar in that they are expressing feelings of grassroots resentment, but these feelings form no part of the decision-making process of either the American or Korean elites. |
I was putting words in your mouth a little bit there. But as you recognize only a little bit.
As an American, I can tell you I was unamused by the beef protests, and I used to revenge myself on Koreans (I was in China at the time), by making sour jokes about it in Korean. Of course, what really bothered me was that I understood that despite having invested greatly in Korea, there's very little place for me there besides being an English teacher. There are only a handful of foreigners who are lawyers there, and I'm quite bitter about the lack of opportunity in Korea. IOW, the beef protests are symbolic. And in this way I understand that the beef protests themselves are not really about beef to Koreans, although the fact that it was actually about beef demonstrates to me how hypocritical and chimeric their concerns are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
NoExplode wrote: |
Ingrates. |
Sums it up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
ㅁ When one entity performs actions of benefit to itself that also benefit another entity, it is highly incorrect to call this " a favor," because it's a word that implies actions and sacrifices made that have no advantage to the one performing the action. There's no way at all that this applies to the US and it's support, militarily or otherwise, to the ROK.
To assert that actions that benefit one side more than another constitute "a favor" is also problematical - for one thing, it assumes something not in evidence regarding comparable amounts of benefit, and for another it begs the question of why such actions have continued over such a long period if the imbalance is so great as is often described.
ㅁ The attitude frequently expressed that gratitude is appropriate in one direction only with regards to a situation of mutual benefit - this is something I find laughable.
ㅁ To say that the existence of the S Korean nation as a viable entity is due entirely to the US is not true for a number of reasons, chief among them that the military efforts of the Police Action were done under UN auspices with contribution from a number of nations according to their ability to do so at the time and the amount of importance they felt about the endeavor.
To say that Koreans ought to feel gratitude for it ignores the facts that the energies expended were done voluntarily and with full knowledge of all parties that opposing communism was seen as beneficial to those involved. It was not done out of great love for the Korean people, and if those involved had not felt it was worth the trouble, it would not have ever happened.
ㅁ Finally, to say that S Koreans need to feel gratitude for the existence of S Korea itself ignores the fact that unless that their home was employed as a proxy battlefield between Great Powers there would would never have been any need for their country to be divided into 2 halves at all.
ㅁ Those who ascribe altruism to US policy toward S Korea do so without evidence and one suspects they might harbor similar nonevidentiary notions regarding The Tooth Fairy, The Easter Bunny, and the ability of free markets to solve every human problem.
And it's fine if you want to believe in things that have no evidence and seem logically absurd. Just don't ask me to do so also. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ManintheMiddle
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Peaceman: Kindly refrain from gobbledygook and STFU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guri Guy

Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Location: Bamboo Island
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amen ManintheMiddle. South Korea has been sucking at America's teat for too long. It's time they were weaned. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Evidently, they want MORE-
01-08-2009 21:28
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/01/123_37566.html
Korea Pushes for Unlimited Currency Swap Deal With US
By Lee Hyo-sik
Staff Reporter
The Korean government is looking to expand its $30 billion currency swap arrangement with the United States to further ease a dollar shortage here and stabilize the domestic foreign exchange market and borrow dollars freely from the U.S. to immunize itself from a possible future currency crisis similar to the 1997-98 Asian financial market debacle.
However, it will be difficult for the government to achieve the goal with the U.S. maintaining an unbounded swap pact with just the European Central Bank, Britain, Japan and Switzerland, which use other key international currencies ― the euro, pound and yen.
Deputy Strategy and Finance Minister Shin Je-yoon told The Korea Times Thursday that the government is examining ways of persuading the U.S. administration to scrap a ceiling on the bilateral currency swap agreement.
``The U.S. already did us a big favor by signing the unprecedented $30 billion swap deal with Korea in October. But we would like to expand the arrangement to help the nation better deal with the ongoing global credit crunch. It will also further boost economic ties between the two countries,'' Shin said.
But he admitted that it will be difficult to ask the U.S. to accept the proposition, citing the country deals with other nations and the ongoing transition of the U.S. administration adding that the unbounded swap pact with the U.S. is a long-term goal, not something that Korea can achieve in the near future.
Currently, the U.S. has signed currency swap arrangements with Korea, Australia, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico and Singapore worth $30 billion each. It also has $15 billion swap agreements with Denmark, Norway and New Zealand.
Many anticipate that if Korea signs an unbounded swap deal with the U.S., the nation would never again face a currency crisis. It will also make it easier for local banks and businesses to raise funds overseas at cheaper costs and help improve Korea's international credibility.
In October last year, the $30 billion swap deal with the U.S. greatly aided Korea, which had been grappling with a dollar shortage since the summer as foreign investors dumped local stocks and bonds and took dollars out of the country in the wake of the global credit squeeze.
It became more difficult for domestic lenders and companies to borrow dollars from abroad as financial firms around the world rushed to secure cash rather than extend credit, drying up the nation's dollar supply and sending the won-dollar rate to its highest level since the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.
Additionally, Korea's current account balance has worsened on surging prices of oil and other imported commodities, while its outbound shipments have declined sharply as a result of falling overseas demand for Korean-made goods.
The expansion of the nation's currency swap arrangements with Japan and China worth $30 billion each in early December significantly boosted investor confidence in the local currency and financial market.
[email protected] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why didn't Korea want a "currency swap" when the Won was at 900? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sojusucks

Joined: 31 May 2008
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have learned a valuable lesson about Korea.
Koreans listen to people who have the power to punish them in life. Look at the classroom if you don't believe me. The teachers that have the power to discipline the students have the most fear/respect.
Same with governments. China will come down on SK so China was respected (China cutting off Korean car imports caused a backlash here). Same with North Korea. NK will come down on SK if they don't do what Kim Jong-il wants so if an old woman is shot it isn't dwelled upon. The US won't punish SK so it's alright to burn their flag, discriminate agains them and other Westerners (because all whites must be Americans right) and so on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gollywog wrote: |
Now I've seen everything. I am speechless.
What I'd like to know is what did Oh Young-jin, assistant managing editor, and the Korea Times do to get the truth to the Korean people about the falsehoods being spread in Korea about American beef?
Or, more to the point, that there is, was, and never has been an outbreak of mad cow disease in the United States?
? |
And what I would like to know is where you are getting this info from.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11809760/
According to this article there have been at least three since 2006.
Looks like the KH is nearer the mark than you.
In future please FACT CHECK your statements. This serves a valuable purpose as it makes you look informed plus it leads others to give your statements credibility.
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can anyone find me an American politician who has ever, ever said to the American people our foreign policy is conducted out of altruism?
They'd be voted out of office if they did! American foreign policy is always predicated on national security (first and foremost) and what's in the nation's best interest. American politicians gengerally don't view economic trade as zero sum game (some in Michigan, say, do, but compared to other countries Americans tend to be free traders), so they generally believe what's in America's interest roughly coincides with global interests. This has been borne out in the current economic crisis.
The tone of the article struck me as provincial and petty. I agree that an ambassador should at least feign a love for the country he works in, but complaining about his drumming? Geez.
If I recall correctly, the American ambassador's comments during the beef scare was that it's safe. And it is (I've eaten quite a bit of it since home plus started selling it). Really, if there were any justice to that incident, the Korean ambassador would be apologizing to Americans.
Oh, but wait. In America no one gives a crap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-J

Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul EunpyungGu Yeonsinnae
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Gollywog wrote: |
Now I've seen everything. I am speechless.
What I'd like to know is what did Oh Young-jin, assistant managing editor, and the Korea Times do to get the truth to the Korean people about the falsehoods being spread in Korea about American beef?
Or, more to the point, that there is, was, and never has been an outbreak of mad cow disease in the United States?
? |
And what I would like to know is where you are getting this info from.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11809760/
According to this article there have been at least three since 2006.
Looks like the KH is nearer the mark than you.
In future please FACT CHECK your statements. This serves a valuable purpose as it makes you look informed plus it leads others to give your statements credibility.
Thank you. |
I think you are confusing the terms "case" and "outbreak"
Might not seem like a big deal, but it is.
Maybe you should understand the terms you are using before being so critical of others.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|