|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| especially "early Zionists", ie referring to those who pushed for an Israeli state before there was one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| ManintheMiddle wrote: |
Big Bird:
Let's stop referring to Israelis as "Zionists." That makes you sound like spokesperson for Ahmadine-jihad. |
I think she used it to refer to actual Zionists, not Israelis broadly. Seemed appropriate to me. |
Thanks mises and BB. I sometimes think that guy is not too bright. Or perhaps he lets his 'feelings' get in the way of his thinking.
I might also point out that I very rarely even use the term "Zionist" so his little reprimand comes out of the blue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just out of interest, I did a search on Big_Bird posts (not the default topics) containing the word "zionist". There were only 36 of them spanning several years. This is post number 37.
I clicked on a few and the word "zionist" mostly appeared in other poster's text that I was quoting, or text I'd cut and pasted, or once when I was typing a translation of what your favourite Iranian was saying. So it is a word I've rarely used myself on this forum, and the evidence is there at the touch of a few keystrokes. Very amused I was.
In other words Steve, you've been fantasising about me way too much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| mises wrote: |
| ManintheMiddle wrote: |
Big Bird:
Let's stop referring to Israelis as "Zionists." That makes you sound like spokesperson for Ahmadine-jihad. |
I think she used it to refer to actual Zionists, not Israelis broadly. Seemed appropriate to me. |
Thanks mises and BB. I sometimes think that guy is not too bright. Or perhaps he lets his 'feelings' get in the way of his thinking.
I might also point out that I very rarely even use the term "Zionist" so his little reprimand comes out of the blue. |
I concur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
1.
| Quote: |
Hypocrisy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Hypocrite)
Hypocrisy (or the state of being a hypocrite) is the act of preaching a certain belief, religion or way of life, but not, in fact, holding these same virtues oneself. For example, if a person were to tell one to stop eating a kind of fruit yet he never stops himself, this is hypocrisy.
In other languages, including French, a hypocrite is one who hides his intentions and true personality. This definition is different from that of the English language. |
Israel's enemies ought to be held accountable for all their crimes against Israel , and arab jews, minority groups and terror attacks as part of the solution. |
Should Zionist groups and the IDF not also be held responsible for their terror attacks and war crimes?
| Quote: |
The King David Hotel bombing was an attack by the right-wing Zionist underground movement, the Irgun, on the central offices of the British Mandatory authorities of Palestine, which were located at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. It was carried out on 22 July 1946 and was the deadliest directed against the British during the Mandate era (1920-1948).
Operating in disguise, Irgunists planted a bomb in the basement of the main building of the hotel, under areas which housed the Mandate Secretariat and part of the British military headquarters. Telephoned warnings were sent to the main switchboard of the hotel (but not directly to the British administration or military, who had their own), the Palestine Post newspaper and the French consulate[1][2], but no evacuation was carried out, giving rise to much controversy. The ensuing explosion caused the collapse of the southwestern corner of the southern wing of the hotel. 91 people were killed and 46 were injured, with some of the deaths and injuries occurring in the road outside the hotel and in adjacent buildings.[1] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing
| Quote: |
Sabra and Shatila massacre
Main article: Sabra and Shatila massacre
During the 1982 Lebanon War, while Sharon was Defence Minister, the Sabra and Shatila massacre took place, in which between 800 and 3,500 Palestinian civilians in the refugee camps were killed by the Phalanges�Lebanese Maronite Christian militias. The Security Chief of the Phalange militia, a Lebanese himself, Elie Hobeika, was the ground commander of the militiamen who entered the Palestinian camps and killed the Palestinians. The Phalange had been sent into the camps to clear out PLO fighters while Israeli forces surrounded the camps and provided them with some logistical support and guarded camp exits. The incident led some of Sharon's critics to refer to him as "the Butcher of Beirut".[9]
An Associated Press report on 15 September 1982 stated:
Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, in a statement, tied the killing [of the Phalangist leader Gemayel] to the PLO, saying: "It symbolises the terrorist murderousness of the PLO terrorist organisations and their supporters." Habib Chartouni, a Lebanese Christian from the Syrian Socialist National Party confessed to the murder of Gemayel, and no Palestinians were involved. Sharon had used this to instigate the entrance of the Lebanese militias into the camps.
The Kahan Commission found the Israeli Defence Forces indirectly responsible for the massacre and charged Sharon with "personal responsibility." It recommended in early 1983 the removal of Sharon from his post as Defense minister. In their recommendations and closing remarks, the commission stated:
We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."[10]
Sharon initially refused to resign as Defense Minister, and Prime Minister Menachem Begin initially refused to fire him. After a grenade was tossed into a dispersing crowd of an Israeli Peace Now march, killing Emil Grunzweig and injuring 10 others, a compromise was reached: Sharon agreed to forfeit the post of Defense Minister but stayed in the cabinet as a Minister without Portfolio.[11] Ariel Sharon's removal as Defense Minister is listed as one of the important events of the Tenth Knesset.
In its 21 February 1983 issue, Time published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with "actual malice" and did not award any damages.[12]
On 18 June 2001 relatives of the victims of the Sabra massacre began proceedings in Belgium to have Sharon indicted on war crimes charges.[13] In June 2002, a Brussels Appeals Court rejected the lawsuit because the law was subsequently changed to disallow such lawsuits unless a Belgian citizen is involved.[14] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon#Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
| Quote: |
U.N. investigator: Evidence of Israeli war crimes
January 22, 2009
JERUSALEM (JTA) -- There is evidence that Israel committed war crimes during its operation in the Gaza Strip, a United Nations official said.
U.N. investigator Richard Falk, whose official title is U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, called for an independent inquiry into the issue on Thursday, Reuters reported.
Falk, who is Jewish, compared Israel's operation in civilian areas and its sealing of Gaza's borders to the Warsaw Ghetto.
"To lock people into a war zone is something that evokes the worst kind of international memories of the Warsaw Ghetto and sieges that occur unintentionally during a period of wartime," he said.
Falk added that the entire civilian population has likely been scarred for life by the operation and that all the residents of Gaza can be considered casualties of the Israeli assault.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert appointed Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann to look into issues relating to potential legal suits against Israel or Israeli officials over strikes against civilians in Gaza.
|
http://jta.org/news/article/2009/01/22/1002449/falk-evidence-of-israeli-war-crimes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blade
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ManintheMiddle wrote: |
Big Bird:
Let's stop referring to Israelis as "Zionists." That makes you sound like spokesperson for Ahmadine-jihad. |
I see nothing wrong with the term Zionist and in fact considering that many people of the Jewish faith do not support what the Israeli government is doing I think it's only fair that we try and make a distinction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="asylum seeker"
| Quote: |
| Should Zionist groups and the IDF not also be held responsible for their terror attacks and war crimes? |
Sure just as long as their enemies are made to pay. If israel is to accept right of return then its enemies have to accept true liberal democracy.
| Quote: |
Sabra and Shatila massacre
Main article: Sabra and Shatila massacre
During the 1982 Lebanon War, while Sharon was Defence Minister, the Sabra and Shatila massacre took place, in which between 800 and 3,500 Palestinian civilians in the refugee camps were killed by the Phalanges�Lebanese Maronite Christian militias. The Security Chief of the Phalange militia, a Lebanese himself, Elie Hobeika, was the ground commander of the militiamen who entered the Palestinian camps and killed the Palestinians. The Phalange had been sent into the camps to clear out PLO fighters while Israeli forces surrounded the camps and provided them with some logistical support and guarded camp exits. The incident led some of Sharon's critics to refer to him as "the Butcher of Beirut".[9]
An Associated Press report on 15 September 1982 stated:
Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, in a statement, tied the killing [of the Phalangist leader Gemayel] to the PLO, saying: "It symbolises the terrorist murderousness of the PLO terrorist organisations and their supporters." Habib Chartouni, a Lebanese Christian from the Syrian Socialist National Party confessed to the murder of Gemayel, and no Palestinians were involved. Sharon had used this to instigate the entrance of the Lebanese militias into the camps.
The Kahan Commission found the Israeli Defence Forces indirectly responsible for the massacre and charged Sharon with "personal responsibility." It recommended in early 1983 the removal of Sharon from his post as Defense minister. In their recommendations and closing remarks, the commission stated:
We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."[10]
Sharon initially refused to resign as Defense Minister, and Prime Minister Menachem Begin initially refused to fire him. After a grenade was tossed into a dispersing crowd of an Israeli Peace Now march, killing Emil Grunzweig and injuring 10 others, a compromise was reached: Sharon agreed to forfeit the post of Defense Minister but stayed in the cabinet as a Minister without Portfolio.[11] Ariel Sharon's removal as Defense Minister is listed as one of the important events of the Tenth Knesset.
In its 21 February 1983 issue, Time published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with "actual malice" and did not award any damages.[12]
On 18 June 2001 relatives of the victims of the Sabra massacre began proceedings in Belgium to have Sharon indicted on war crimes charges.[13] In June 2002, a Brussels Appeals Court rejected the lawsuit because the law was subsequently changed to disallow such lawsuits unless a Belgian citizen is involved.[14] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon#Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
[quote]U.N. investigator: Evidence of Israeli war crimes
[quote]January 22, 2009
| Quote: |
JERUSALEM (JTA) -- There is evidence that Israel committed war crimes during its operation in the Gaza Strip, a United Nations official said.
U.N. investigator Richard Falk, whose official title is U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, called for an independent inquiry into the issue on Thursday, Reuters reported Falk, who is Jewish, compared Israel's operation in civilian areas and its sealing of Gaza's borders to the Warsaw Ghetto. |
Falk is a 9-11 conspiracy theorist. He was selected for his job because of his whacko views. The UN human rights commitee has Libya and Zimbabwae on it and they don't get investigated. You do know that the UN human rights commissison is very selective about who it compains about.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2672029.stm
| Quote: |
Libya has been elected chairman of the United Nations Human Rights Commission, despite opposition from the United States.
In a secret ballot, Libyan Ambassador Najat Al-Hajjaji was backed by 33 members, with three countries voting against and 17 members abstaining.
Human rights groups have been protesting at Libya assuming the chairmanship. |
| Quote: |
Media Release
FA53 - 28 April 2005
Zimbabwe's Election to UN Human Rights Commission
Australia is disappointed that Zimbabwe has been re-elected to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights for a further three-year term after it was nominated unopposed by the African group.
Given Zimbabwe's consistent efforts to block resolutions critical of egregious human rights during its current term on the Commission, including resolutions critical of its own record, Zimbabwe's re-election is particularly unacceptable. |
http://www.foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2005/fa053_05.htm
But I don't know what your point is here.My point is that Khadday himself persecuted Libyan jews therefore he has no standing on the issue.
If Israel's enemies demand right of return then they ought to accept liberal democracy in the region as the price. That is my point. If they can't handle that then they have no standing to be against a two state solution. With things they way they are a very good reason for Israel is that Bathists. Nasser followers , Khomeni followers and Al Qaedists and all of the similar ideological types can't be trusted to govern or protect their minorites . If and when liberal democracy becomes they way things work in the middle east everything can be talked about but until then Israel has a right to two state solution where its security is protected. By the way do you need to be shown what Israel's enemies have done. If you are trying to show that Israel behaves worse during war or is morally worse than its enemies you are not going to be able to show it . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mnhnhyouh

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: The Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Israel would not go for any state where the current Israelies didnt have a majority.
This is why the West Bank, Golan Heights and Gaza have not been made part of Israel proper. If they were, then all those who live there would be able to vote in the Israeli elections, and more of them would be muslims than jews.
h |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mnhnhyouh wrote: |
Israel would not go for any state where the current Israelies didnt have a majority.
This is why the West Bank, Golan Heights and Gaza have not been made part of Israel proper. If they were, then all those who live there would be able to vote in the Israeli elections, and more of them would be muslims than jews.
h |
Yes, this is true. And this is why Sharon reluctantly gave Gaza back. And this is why they hope to give the Palestinians a state in the West Bank that is comprised of little bantusan islands - the Arabs penned inside their little territiories as the Israelis annex the surrounding parts of the West Bank for themselves.. The so called 'security wall' carves out more nice bits of the West Bank, seperating those bits from the Palestinians that lived on/farmed that land and bringing these juicy bits of real estate inside a new Israeli 'border' - I write border in that way, because in fact Israel has never declared her borders, as she has always held out in the hope of a better (extended) one.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| mnhnhyouh wrote: |
Israel would not go for any state where the current Israelies didnt have a majority.
This is why the West Bank, Golan Heights and Gaza have not been made part of Israel proper. If they were, then all those who live there would be able to vote in the Israeli elections, and more of them would be muslims than jews.
h |
Yes, this is true. And this is why Sharon reluctantly gave Gaza back. And this is why they hope to give the Palestinians a state in the West Bank that is comprised of little bantusan islands - the Arabs penned inside their little territiories as the Israelis annex the surrounding parts of the West Bank for themselves.. The so called 'security wall' carves out more nice bits of the West Bank, seperating those bits from the Palestinians that lived on/farmed that land and bringing these juicy bits of real estate inside a new Israeli 'border' - I write border in that way, because in fact Israel has never declared her borders, as she has always held out in the hope of a better (extended) one.. |
If Israel were not under attack there would have been no security wall.
As for the rest one ought to see Taba and Bill Clinton's peace plan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
[quote="asylum seeker"
| Quote: |
| Should Zionist groups and the IDF not also be held responsible for their terror attacks and war crimes? |
Sure just as long as their enemies are made to pay. If israel is to accept right of return then its enemies have to accept true liberal democracy.
| Quote: |
Sabra and Shatila massacre
Main article: Sabra and Shatila massacre
During the 1982 Lebanon War, while Sharon was Defence Minister, the Sabra and Shatila massacre took place, in which between 800 and 3,500 Palestinian civilians in the refugee camps were killed by the Phalanges�Lebanese Maronite Christian militias. The Security Chief of the Phalange militia, a Lebanese himself, Elie Hobeika, was the ground commander of the militiamen who entered the Palestinian camps and killed the Palestinians. The Phalange had been sent into the camps to clear out PLO fighters while Israeli forces surrounded the camps and provided them with some logistical support and guarded camp exits. The incident led some of Sharon's critics to refer to him as "the Butcher of Beirut".[9]
An Associated Press report on 15 September 1982 stated:
Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, in a statement, tied the killing [of the Phalangist leader Gemayel] to the PLO, saying: "It symbolises the terrorist murderousness of the PLO terrorist organisations and their supporters." Habib Chartouni, a Lebanese Christian from the Syrian Socialist National Party confessed to the murder of Gemayel, and no Palestinians were involved. Sharon had used this to instigate the entrance of the Lebanese militias into the camps.
The Kahan Commission found the Israeli Defence Forces indirectly responsible for the massacre and charged Sharon with "personal responsibility." It recommended in early 1983 the removal of Sharon from his post as Defense minister. In their recommendations and closing remarks, the commission stated:
We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."[10]
Sharon initially refused to resign as Defense Minister, and Prime Minister Menachem Begin initially refused to fire him. After a grenade was tossed into a dispersing crowd of an Israeli Peace Now march, killing Emil Grunzweig and injuring 10 others, a compromise was reached: Sharon agreed to forfeit the post of Defense Minister but stayed in the cabinet as a Minister without Portfolio.[11] Ariel Sharon's removal as Defense Minister is listed as one of the important events of the Tenth Knesset.
In its 21 February 1983 issue, Time published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with "actual malice" and did not award any damages.[12]
On 18 June 2001 relatives of the victims of the Sabra massacre began proceedings in Belgium to have Sharon indicted on war crimes charges.[13] In June 2002, a Brussels Appeals Court rejected the lawsuit because the law was subsequently changed to disallow such lawsuits unless a Belgian citizen is involved.[14] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon#Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
. By the way do you need to be shown what Israel's enemies have done. If you are trying to show that Israel behaves worse during war or is morally worse than its enemies you are not going to be able to show it . |
Nice selective highlighting buddy. The IDF did not carry out the massacre but they did orchestrate it under Sharon. (Pretty disgusting that someone with that track record was prime minister.)
I never said that the Israelis have done worse. Your quote was this:
| Quote: |
| Israel's enemies ought to be held accountable for all their crimes against Israel , and arab jews, minority groups and terror attacks as part of the solution. |
If the 'enemies' are all to be held accountable for their crimes before any solution can happen, then it's only fair that Israel itself should be too. What is so hard to understand about that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"asylum seeker"][q
| Quote: |
Nice selective highlighting buddy. The IDF did not carry out the massacre but they did orchestrate it under Sharon. (Pretty disgusting that someone with that track record was prime minister.) |
what do you mean orchestrated it? Sharon sued Time Magazine for saying that he ordered it or was behind it and Time Magazine lost on that count.
| Quote: |
In its 21 February 1983 issue, Time published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with "actual malice" and did not award any damages.[12] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon
| Quote: |
If the 'enemies' are all to be held accountable for their crimes before any solution can happen, then it's only fair that Israel itself should be too. What is so hard to understand about that? |
Nothing but if Israel enemies demand right of return which means that Israel "dies" then every thing ought to be accounted for. That is my point.
Right of return implies Israel was created in sin and that Israel must pay. If such is the case then Israel's enemies must pay as well.
If Israel has to accept " Right of Return" then liberal democracy must be the way things are done in the mideast for an extended period of time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo, do you understand the concept of a proxy militia?
Let me detail a hypothetical scenario, and see how we can apply the logic from it to the Sabra and Chatilla masacre.
Imagine Mr Smith gets on his mobile phone, and invites Mr Jones (a known killer and rapist and all round psychopath) to meet him. Smith seals off the house of a small family, and waits for Jones. Meanwhile, he prevents the family from leaving the house. When his friend Jones arrives, he opens the door and lets him inside. Jones proceeds to terrorise the family for 2 days. All the time, Mr Smith is looking through the window, and when the terrified family members try to flee, Smith forces them at gunpoint to return to the house. At night, it is a little difficult for Jones to see, so Smith shines a torch through the window so that Mr Jones can continue to rape and terrorise and kill the family. Finally, after a certain amount of peer pressure (his friends are voicing their disapproval - the screams of dying children too much for neighbours to bear) Mr Smith tells his friend Jones to stop the raping killing and torture, and to vacate the premises.
Now, can I ask you, is Mr Smith innocent? Sure, Mr Jones did all the killing and raping, and Mr Smith did not partipate other than to seal the house off, invite his friend, and shine a torch at night to help his friend continue his barbarity. If you can show me Mr Smith is in no way responsible, then perhaps you can persuade me that Sharon and IDF were not responsible for what happened at Sabra and Chatilla.
Lets see. America brokered a deal that had the PLO agreeing to leave Beirut. In return, the PLO had been assured that the Palestinian civillians in the refugee camp would not be harmed. The IDF rocked in, and broke their agreement. They circled the camps and sealed them off. Then they called the Phalangists, and waited for the Christian militias (who had a horrible and well known reputation for barbarism) to arrive. When they came, the IDF opened up he camps and let them in, without allowing civillians out. The IDF looked down and watched women children and the elderly being raped and mutilated and killed. It was a horrific scene. I've seen photos of the carnage. Fucking horrible. Murdered civillians, including little bloodied babies strewn all over the floor like garbage. Not killed by bombs, but killed up close. Really fucking horrible. It went on for 2 days. Civillians continually begged the IDF to let them out. The IDF refused them exit (whole families, begging for their lives) forcing them to remain in their cage to be raped, mutilated, massacred and the most horrific fashion. At night, the IDF lit the camps up with flares, to enable the militia to continue with its grisly work. Time was of the essense, I suppose. The IDF famously supplied the Christian militia with bulldozers to help them dispose of bodies. In the end, after the media started making a big fuss, Reagan had to get on the phone and call Sharon and ask him to end it - he was embarrassing America. Sharon gave the militias a few more hours to continue with the job. Israel's Cheif of staff even infamously congratulated the Phalangists on a job well done.
Even Israel's own investigation (whitewash that it was) found Ariel Sharon responsible for the masacres.
So my question to you Joo is: If I arrange and pay for a KNOWN psychopath WITH A HIDEOUS TRACK RECORD to enter into your family home, and merely prevent them leaving (while not participating directly in the violence) while I watch the horror show through the window, occasionally passing him tools to assist his work, or shining a light to help him see at night, am I somehow then innocent of the crime?
{to those who also read that other site - yes, I cut and paste one of my earlier posts - why bother to write it again from scratch?} |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a poet's account of Sabra and Chatillia:
�By flares bright lights at Sabra and Shatilla�
John Ishmael
For the heavens above and the hell below
Flares bright lights shot by the moral IDF,
Glowing on eviscerations, castrations, rapes
By our allies the Arab Phalange,
Goyim chosen for genocides
Washing massacred, unarmed Arabs blood off our hands.
Christian Phalange trained and paid by the IDF,
Just Arabs killing Arabs as you would expect
From the children of Ishmael
Who stole our Divine inheritance including our lands
Filled with oil, water and fruit
That is rightfully ours, Eretz Yisrael.
By our flares bright lights.
Camps sealed by the wall of moral IDF tanks
Forcing fleeing naked women, and screaming children,
Back to the hell of the camps,
�You shall not pass!�
Our moral IDF tanks, are sealing your camps.
Lit by flares bright lights of moral IDF,
Go back to hell, make peace with our allies Phalange.
Take your time, we have all the time,
Waiting in our moral IDF tanks
Sealing your camps for our allies Phalange,
Just goyim like you,
Not Chosen and moral as we set off our flares,
For the heavens above, mind you,
Not for the slaughterhouse hell of our allies Phalange.
Sharon and Eitan knew not of Arab Phalange,
our allies Phalange, Christian Phalange,
working their genocide in the Palestinian camps of Beirut,
ringed by the steel wall of our IDF tanks,
Keeping the Arabs like drugged cockroaches in a bottle;
We are tidy as Heaven - if we believed in Heaven�s mirage -
our Christian Phalange our allies Phalange
are untidy and dirty as you-know-who are
so we gave them body bags by the thousands
for the good work they will do on the cockroaches in their lairs
locked up within the steel wall of our IDF tanks.
We loaned IDF bulldozers for our allies Phalange
to erase the evidence their cockroach removal will create;
Ariel �Bulldozer� Sharon well earned his name
from other moral removal of cockroach women, children and men.
As he waged war for eretz Yisrael
Wresting it from the cockroaches and snakes
Who wave their anti-semitic house keys and dirty land deeds
for our houses they claim as they scurry around their dirty camps
Sabra and Shatilla in Lebanon truly a part of Eretz Yisrael.
We in our moral IDF tanks, a wall of steel
ringing the nests of the cockroach Palestinians below,
Waiting two days for the end when the goyim Phalange
Will report to Arik Bulldozer Sharon who says to Amos Oz:
�The dirty work of Zionism is not yet done, far from it,�
and to our Israeli hero Rafael Eitan who smiling, sneers
�Arabs will scurry around,
Like drugged cock roaches in a bottle.�
So if eviscerations and rapes visited Sabra and Shatilla,
Under flares bright lights shot upward to heaven by moral IDF
Then blame goyim Phalange, Arab Phalange;
We sent in our allies the Christian Phalange, the Arab Phalange
Armed with their weapons and our moral admonitions,
To remember the standards of our moral invasion,
To use the body bags we supplied for cleaning the garbage
Not for bodies of Palestinian refugees who abandoned their homes,
who fled from their lands to make way for the Rightful Owners of yore.
We lit the heaven not your goyim hell, with flares bright lights
Sent upward by the moral IDF and their chosen crews.
What could we the IDF know?
The women�s� cries could well have been,
Arabs ululating in their primitive joy.
How would we know of eviscerations or rapes?
The cries of the boys could have been,
From some hellish Arab ritual,
How could we know of castrations and rapes
As we lit the camps for two nights, ringed by the wall of IDF tanks?
We have read the reports, the anti-semitic reports,
Of flares from the moral IDF painting the the sight
Of little Arab girls being fucked by our Allies Phalange,
Before the eyes of their moms and grans were gouged
Sparing the sight of the eviscerations and sodomies
Of little boys penises sliced off and stuffed.
But Judge Kahan has said, it was the Christian Phalange,
Though Ariel Sharon bore personal responsibility
our beloved Arik Sharon is free from Appendix �B�
To live and to bulldoze more death to cockroaches and snakes
who would stay and infest the land of Ertez Yisrael,
The goyim Phalange, for two days and nights,
By our flares bright lights, within the ring of moral IDF tanks,
Could merely have been cleansing
some of Israel's most wanted
Of the 9 million Palestinians wanted worldwide
For crimes against Zion,
For daring to recall names of their villages
Now back in our hands as God long wanted,
For showing keys to locks long changed
Keys that mean anti-Semitic hate
Of a people who want to return to these �homes�
Now occupied by their rightful owners of 2,500 years past.
These anti-Semitic memories of homes long lost,
As our God says take their land, take their homes,
Grow fat on their property,
�We shall live by the sweat of nations�
as our rabbis teach us to take Palestinian harvests, our Right;
And soon we will go for the oil of the Ismaelites
Isaacs� rightful inheritance.
The Jewish state has no blood on its hands.
Its morality is known to the Heavens
And to the Hell of the Camps
At Sabra and Shatilla,
Where our allies the Phalange
Acted like goyim to goyim
So what do you expect
And blame us not.
Our IDF flares lit up the camps, our IDF tanks ringed the camps,
A wall of steel, manned by moral IDF tank crews
Fleeing naked women and screaming children,
Begging moral IDF lads for Arab life,
�You shall not pass!�
Our orders are that you scuttle back to your lairs and nests
Under the light of our IDF flares
And make your peace with our allies Phalange;
As Katsav has said on Canada�s soil
� �Each Palestinian baby when he is born
suckles hate from his mother�s milk�.
We were raised on this cultural taxonomy
And will do what it takes, not from a culture of hate,
To prevent cockroaches and snakes from wanting to Return
To olive groves their say their forefathers planted
a thousand years before,
for every Israeli child knows even before he suckles his milk
that this was a �Land without People for a People without land�,
And Arik Sharon and Rafael Eitan, and Amir Drori and Menachem Navot
know how to cleanse our land of cockroaches and snakes.
We hired the Phalange, our allies Phalange,
Goyim on goyim at Sabra and Shatilla,
We gave them body bags and IDF bulldozers;
We trained our allies the Christian Phalange,
To be moral and tidy but what do you expect,
From goyim on goyim;
But there is no blood on IDF hands
For Sabra and Shatilla for Sabra and Chatilla,
nor for all our many massacres
for we investigate ourselves and duly find us moral and right
and no goy has the right to judge a Jew or the Jewish state.
The moral IDF has no Muslim blood on its hands
except those that we have rightfully killed
infant or not.
If the time does come for our Bulldozer Arik to be King of Israel
He knows what he wants and is experienced as hell
In cleansing cockroaches and vermin from our rightful Land
As Chief Rabbi, Mordehai Eliahu has taught from our holy texts
�We shall inherit the labour of nations�
And we were chosen to be a Light unto those benighted nations.
end
http://www.ishmael.ca/POETRY-JOHN-ISHMAEL.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
Joo, do you understand the concept of a proxy militia?
Let me detail a hypothetical scenario, and see how we can apply the logic from it to the Sabra and Chatilla masacre.
Imagine Mr Smith gets on his mobile phone, and invites Mr Jones (a known killer and rapist and all round psychopath) to meet him. Smith seals off the house of a small family, and waits for Jones. Meanwhile, he prevents the family from leaving the house. When his friend Jones arrives, he opens the door and lets him inside. Jones proceeds to terrorise the family for 2 days. All the time, Mr Smith is looking through the window, and when the terrified family members try to flee, Smith forces them at gunpoint to return to the house. At night, it is a little difficult for Jones to see, so Smith shines a torch through the window so that Mr Jones can continue to rape and terrorise and kill the family. Finally, after a certain amount of peer pressure (his friends are voicing their disapproval - the screams of dying children too much for neighbours to bear) Mr Smith tells his friend Jones to stop the raping killing and torture, and to vacate the premises.
Now, can I ask you, is Mr Smith innocent? Sure, Mr Jones did all the killing and raping, and Mr Smith did not partipate other than to seal the house off, invite his friend, and shine a torch at night to help his friend continue his barbarity. If you can show me Mr Smith is in no way responsible, then perhaps you can persuade me that Sharon and IDF were not responsible for what happened at Sabra and Chatilla.
Lets see. America brokered a deal that had the PLO agreeing to leave Beirut. In return, the PLO had been assured that the Palestinian civillians in the refugee camp would not be harmed. The IDF rocked in, and broke their agreement. They circled the camps and sealed them off. Then they called the Phalangists, and waited for the Christian militias (who had a horrible and well known reputation for barbarism) to arrive. When they came, the IDF opened up he camps and let them in, without allowing civillians out. The IDF looked down and watched women children and the elderly being raped and mutilated and killed. It was a horrific scene. I've seen photos of the carnage. Fucking horrible. Murdered civillians, including little bloodied babies strewn all over the floor like garbage. Not killed by bombs, but killed up close. Really fucking horrible. It went on for 2 days. Civillians continually begged the IDF to let them out. The IDF refused them exit (whole families, begging for their lives) forcing them to remain in their cage to be raped, mutilated, massacred and the most horrific fashion. At night, the IDF lit the camps up with flares, to enable the militia to continue with its grisly work. Time was of the essense, I suppose. The IDF famously supplied the Christian militia with bulldozers to help them dispose of bodies. In the end, after the media started making a big fuss, Reagan had to get on the phone and call Sharon and ask him to end it - he was embarrassing America. Sharon gave the militias a few more hours to continue with the job. Israel's Cheif of staff even infamously congratulated the Phalangists on a job well done.
Even Israel's own investigation (whitewash that it was) found Ariel Sharon responsible for the masacres.
So my question to you Joo is: If I arrange and pay for a KNOWN psychopath WITH A HIDEOUS TRACK RECORD to enter into your family home, and merely prevent them leaving (while not participating directly in the violence) while I watch the horror show through the window, occasionally passing him tools to assist his work, or shining a light to help him see at night, am I somehow then innocent of the crime?
{to those who also read that other site - yes, I cut and paste one of my earlier posts - why bother to write it again from scratch?} |
| Quote: |
he Sabra and Shatila massacre (or Sabra and Chatila massacre; Arabic: مذبحة صبرا وشاتيلا Maḏbaḥat Ṣabrā wa Shātīlā) ( [show location on an interactive map] 33�51′40.47″N 35�30′01.50″E / 33.8612417�N 35.500417�E / 33.8612417; 35.500417) was carried out between September 16 and 18, 1982 by the Lebanese Forces militia group after the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) allowed Lebanese Phalangist militiamen to enter two Palestinian refugee camps, and the militia massacred civilians inside. It was argued that the Israelis should have known that a massacre could occur, considering the assassination of Phalangist leader and prospective president Bachir Gemayel two days before, and given the long history of animosity between the Palestinians and the Phalangists.
The exact number killed is disputed, with estimates ranging from 328 to 3,500 (see below).
The Phalangists stood under the direct command of Elie Hobeika, who later became a long-serving Lebanese Member of Parliament and, in the 1990s, a cabinet minister. Hobeika was eventually assassinated in 2002. He was said to have been deeply influenced by the massacre of much of his family and of his fianc�e by Palestinian militiamen at Damour in 1976. [2] The Israeli military's Chief of Staff was Lt. General Rafael Eitan, and Israel's Defence Minister was Ariel Sharon.
A major outcry erupted both in Israel and internationally, because the Sabra and Shatila camps had been under the control of Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). Yet the Phalangists, who committed the killings, were spared the brunt of the condemnations. Some commentators have suggested that the Israeli military may have been involved in the incident to some extent (see below).
The Israeli government established the Kahan Commission to investigate, and it subsequently found Israel indirectly responsible for the event. The report said that Israeli commanders should have recognized the possibility of a revenge attempt, and not permitted Phalangists into the camps. Ariel Sharon was found to bear personal responsibility[3] for "ignoring the danger of bloodshed and revenge" and for "not taking appropriate measures to prevent bloodshed." The commission recommended that Sharon be removed as head of the Defence Ministry, and Sharon, after initial resistance, resigned. |
Israel is probably this much responsible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|