Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Guri Guy]

The United States of America never stated that the Liancourt Rocks were Korean territory. In fact, they did the exact opposite. This is before and after the San Francisco Peace Treaty.


Monday, August 11, 2008
1951 August; Rusk's Letter
History of San Francisico peace Treaty: Part Twelve

There is a document called as "Rusk's Documents", "Rusk note" or "Rusk's Letter". This document has been already referred to by Gerry here:

http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.com/2007/12/1953-jul-22-us-doc-reconfirms-dean-rusk.html

This document is a very important one, as USA brought this document every once in a while when they needed to persuade Korean government. So I would dare to show here the whole document. If you want to see the original document, please click the above.


His Excellency

Dr. You Chan Yang, Ambassador of Korea.

Excellency:

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of
your notes of July 19 and August 2, 1951 presenting certain requests for the
consideration of the Government of the United States with regard to the draft treaty of peace with Japan.

With respect to request of the Korean Government that Article 2(a) of the draft be revised to provide that Japan "confirms that it renounced on August 9, 1945, all right, title and claim to Korea and the islands which were part of Korea prior to its annexation
by Japan, including the islands Quelpart, Port Hamilton, Dagelet, Dokdo and
Parangdo," the United States Government regrets that it is unable to concur in
this proposed amendment. The United States Government does not feel that the
Treaty should adopt the theory that Japan's acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration on
August 9, 1945 constituted a formalor final renunciation of sovereignty by Japan over the areas dealt with in the Declaration. As regards the island of Dokdo, otherwise known as Takeshima or Liancourt Rocks, this normally uninhabited rock formation was according to our information never treated as part of Korea and, since about 1905, has been under the jurisdiction of the Oki Islands Branch Office of Shimane Prefecture of Japan. The island does not appear ever before to have been claimed by Korea. It is understood that the Korean Government's request that "Parangdo" be included among the islands named in the treaty as having been renounced by Japan has been
withdrawn.

The United States Government agrees that
the terms of paragraph (a) of Article 4 of the draft treaty are subject to
misunderstanding and accordingly proposes, in order to meet the view of the
Korean Government, to insert at the beginning of paragraph (a) the phrase,
"Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this Article", and then to add a
new paragraph (b) reading as follows:

(b) "Japan recongnizes the validity of
dispositions of property of Japan and Japanese nationals made by or pursuant to directives of United States Military Government in any ofthe areas referred to in Articles 2 and 3".

The present paragraph (b) of Article 4 becomes paragraph(c).

The Government of the United States regrets that it is unable to accept the Korean Government's amendment to Article 9 of the draft treaty. In view of the many national interests involved, any attempt to include in the treaty provisions governing fishing in high seas areas would indefinitely delay the treaty's conclusion. It is desired to point out, however, that the so-called MacArthur line will stand until the treaty comes
into force, and that Korea, which obtains the benefits of Article 9, will have
the opportunity of negotiating a fishing agreement with Japan prior to that
date.

With respect to the Korean Government's desire to obtain the benefits of Article 15(a) of the treaty, there would seem to be no necessity to oblige Japan to return the property of persons in Japan of Korean origin since such property was not sequestered or otherwise interfered with by the Japanese Government during the war. In view of the fact that such persons had the status of Japanese nationals it would not seem appropriate that they obtain compensation for damage to their property as a result of the war.

Accept, Excellency, the renewed
assurances of my highest consideration.

For the Secretary of State:

Dean Rusk

Dean Rusk (1909-1994) was an Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs in the 1950's when he wrote this document, later he became the 54th United States Secretary of State in 1961 and worked with John F. Kennedy.

http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.com/2008/08/1951-august-rusks-letter.html

[Guri Guy]

As well as that, there is this letter stating the United States' military position on the Dokdo/Takeshima issue.

[TheUrbanMyth]

In the spirit of my last post


http://video.aol.com/video-detail/the-vapors-turning-japanese/878206510