| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hang10

Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Location: Asia, Twice the sex half the foreplay
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:38 pm Post subject: STRIKE !!!!! |
|
|
Nothing is stronger than the union. Wheres our union?
GEPIK? -CRAP.
lets all organise a strike action
Its time for the Revolution! Viva la Rev!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Call that lady in the pic, maybe she can be our leader. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is only one thing that will help to change the situation for English teachers in Korea, and that is if people just stop coming here. Then maybe Koreans will realize they have to improve things if they want people to come.
Looking at the forum, it seems that's not going to happend any time soon.
Looks like hoards of newbies eager to get here and as long as that continues, nothing will change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tobias

Joined: 02 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A union? What a laughable notion. You ARE talking about a high-turnover industry, an industry in which the 'me-me-me, *beep*-everybody-else' mentality reigns.
If a union were to be established it look like this:
A few people would be doing all the busywork making the union happen, while the far majority would be mooching off the hard work and not contributing. If they were expected to pay union dues, they'd be bitching about it and refusing to pay. Such a regime does not a good union make, at least not a union that will endure. It'd actually be a nightmare for those trying hard to make it work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soviet_man

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as strikes go, here is what I think:
- Start by talking to other teachers one-on-one about the issue.
- Then if the issue is still not resolved, call a meeting of all teachers at your school, excluding the manager/s, preferably off-site.
- Then you can collectively appoint someone to go to speak to management.
- I mean you don't just go from zero to strike. You have to try to resolve issues in an organized way step by step before escalating problems to a strike. You won't get support for a strike unless other options have been exhausted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| You have to try to resolve issues in an organized way step by step before escalating problems to a strike. |
That's where the problem lies. Who determines how many steps must be taken? I am not necessarily in favor of a union, but the idea is that a union can walk softly and carry a big stick.
As teachers, we don't have much time to wait things out step by step. In many cases, you would be better off counting your losses and move on than fighting something alone which will eat up your resources (giving you less to eat with).
I think one thing is certain, and that is it is completely moronic for 100's of teachers to fight the same battle alone. That's partly why we are here, to give and get advice.
If the answer is not a union, then what group will help sway the Korean government to change some of its policies towards foreigners working in Korea to make it fairer?
You might be worried about one group forming and calling itself "the union", but maybe what we need are several of "these unions".
Dave's ESL cafe is like the CNN of ESL teaching. It's a media/medium for us to get some message across. Maybe having groups formed through this site, and in conjunction with other sites, we can bring one group to the top which will have that power.
However, as the little guy, without grass to do anything at the grassroots level, nothing can be done. Get your paycheck when you can, save up, and leave a bad situation when it arises. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tobias

Joined: 02 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:00 pm Post subject: Some points |
|
|
Some points to ponder:
1. Very few people care about TESOL enough to exert the effort required to make a union work. People who plan on doing this long-term can be relied on, but what of those who are in it for only a year or two?
2. Different bosses have different styles and knowledge levels here. Some will be good to work for and will obey the law. Others....well, they look at the law as something to be broken and the white face as someone to be abused. Going on strike en-masse to send a message to the thugs will harm the good bosses.
3. If you're humming along just fine at your job, not causing problems nor experiencing problems, and you are instructed by the union to go on strike, what would you do?
4. Would the union ensure every teacher meets some sort of minimum teaching ability? If so, who decides what the minimum is? Some teachers cause problems because of inadequate teaching ability, inadequate hygiene, et al. Would the union serve as a 'gatekeeper' to weed out these people? If a teacher causes problems for a school, the school will probably cause problems for him. I'm not going on strike over somebody's getting bad treatment because he lays out drunk or doesn't bathe properly. Would you? Clearly some kind of gatekeeping role would have to be played.
5. What if I, a member of the union, work at a school with three other white teachers, teachers who aren't union members, and I'm instructed to go on strike? Do I walk and leave my teaching duties to my colleagues? Why should they pick up my slack? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
red_devil

Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: STRIKE !!!!! |
|
|
| hang10 wrote: |
Nothing is stronger than the union. Wheres our union?
GEPIK? -CRAP.
lets all organise a strike action
Its time for the Revolution! Viva la Rev!!!!! |
Good. More jobs for me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hang10

Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Location: Asia, Twice the sex half the foreplay
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tobias wrote: |
A union? What a laughable notion. You ARE talking about a high-turnover industry, an industry in which the 'me-me-me, *beep*-everybody-else' mentality reigns.
If a union were to be established it look like this:
A few people would be doing all the busywork making the union happen, while the far majority would be mooching off the hard work and not contributing. If they were expected to pay union dues, they'd be bitching about it and refusing to pay. Such a regime does not a good union make, at least not a union that will endure. It'd actually be a nightmare for those trying hard to make it work. |
Having a union is not a Laugh. Its what protects you and me from the buggers that be. Also its a community where we share responsibility for each other. One for all and all for one. There is nothing wrong with helping each other out. Yea sure if your having a great time getting paid 7 mill a month and taken out wined and dined then great.
But i would guess that the large majority of people who are here have had some kind of problem, and felt fairly lonely.
As for the new recruits then they need a back up too. Its just that, the hogwans and doggy PS need to put in check. They know very well if they are dealing with a new fresh uni student then they can get away with so much more. The union is a very valuble tool for experienced and inexperienced alike.
Most if not all industries in the western world have unions. They work hard to protect their members. When the shit hits the fan(and it often does here) then you need all the friends you can get.
In addition, employers would be better off. They would know where the lines are drawn, and also each others rights on the issue. There are far to many abmbigous regulations that neither the employee or employers fully understand. A union would cover all these aspects and deliver clear information.
Now tell me Im wrong about that, SLAG  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DC in Suwon
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| can you honestly blame anyone who has the "me-me-me" attitude? The last feeling you get when you come to this message board is that of unity. What a crock. I think most people are going to Korea to get away from their present environment. Why start a union/strike and get in more drama? I want to be unknown in Korea, except for those I work with and those I like to be around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rusty Shackleford
Joined: 08 May 2008
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Communism never helped anybody. Except for the guys at the top (the union leaders). Take responsibility for your own outcomes in life rather than leaving it up to someone else.
All a union would get us would be less total jobs for less pay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lebowski
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:12 am Post subject: Re: STRIKE !!!!! |
|
|
| hang10 wrote: |
Nothing is stronger than the union. Wheres our union?
GEPIK? -CRAP.
lets all organise a strike action
Its time for the Revolution! Viva la Rev!!!!! |
Be Careful what you say. Chicken Lover might file a report against you for breaking the laws according to your rights given to you with your E2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tobias

Joined: 02 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:42 am Post subject: Let's work on this first |
|
|
Let's work on this first:
Compile a complete, up-to-date guidebook that provides answers to (*choke*) all our questions about working here. It could also list important tips and maybe could even include a blacklist of the bad apples and even a 'whitelist' of good employers.
Get that together first, and then start the union. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheBulimicFatGuy
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never had any interest in starting a union and still don't. Here's a good example of why. Some years ago I was working at a hogwon with 2 other foreigner teachers. The hogwon had the habit of coercing us into working overtime hours for which we were paid at a rate significantly less than our normal hourly wage. I know what you're thinking; you've never heard of that kind of thing happening before. Anyway, we had had enough and decided as a group to present a united front to the hogwon and ask for overtime pay that at least matched our average normal hourly wage or none of us would work the overtime hours. When it came time to give out the overtime hours the boss called us to have a meeting as usual (one of my co-workers wasn't even invited to the meeting). I stuck to my guns but my co-worker folded almost immediately. He told them he'd prefer to make the higher salary but that it depended on the hogwon. Of course they jumped on that and just said it wasn't their policy to pay more and without further discourse my "stalwart" co-worker accepted the overtime hours. I left in disgust and have never even been tempted to try to collaborate with co-workers on bettering my workplace since then. I confronted the guy about it later and called him a scab. I found it so utterly laughable when he got quite angry about that and told me his family had a long tradition of being loyal union workers back in the states. Man, if that's the kind of loyalty people think of that come here, there's just no hope of a successful union movement.
An alternate idea that might have some chance of success is to create a co-op recruitment agency. The agency could approach hogwons with the idea of offering teachers at a discounted recruitment fee if the hogwon accepted a more reasonable contract. Since it would be a co-op, it might be possible to afford it. Plus, membership fees would be nil or quite low compared to the formation of a union. Of course, the majority of teachers in Korea - those on their first (and typically only) year of work - would likely not even have the chance to find out that they could even join such a co-op so it probably would never be very big. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's look at "a" and "the".
When we use "a", then we are talking about one of many.
"There is always a bad apple in the bunch."
When we use "the", then we are calling out a specific item.
"Did you pick the bad apple?"
Now, is "a" union the same as "the" bunch?
| Quote: |
| Anyway, we had had enough and decided as a group to present a united front |
This is not really the same as a union, nor does it live and breathe like a union. A union is supposed to connect people from different walks of life. In your case, you had a more concentrated group of people who were only at one school. If the system as a whole were better (the bunch), and only your school was bad (the bad apple), then you would have been better off ditching the school (which is a no win situation for both parties). In a union, the idea is to get an overall representation of a large enough body of people to move employers in a different direction. So, in your case it wouldn't have mattered if your co-worker worshipped your hagwon owner. Through the efforts of other people in your shoes coming together, changes still could have been made.
| Quote: |
| Chicken Lover might file a report against you for breaking the laws according to your rights given to you with your E2. |
From what I have read, he is complaining about the very thing people fear about a union. That is that it will become THE UNION. I am definitely not in favor of "the union", but I do not see any problem with people forming unions to fight for better working conditions. In fact, this would give the Korean government a stronger message if they saw different entities run by different kinds of people come to the same conclusions and request similar treatment by their employer.
If you were making the decisions, would you want to listen to thousands of teachers individually or a group of representatives, one of them representing what you want?
Right now, the Korean government is the only entity representing you in these cases, and are you getting what you want? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|