Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

90% want criminal investigation of Bush
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NAVFC



Joined: 10 May 2006

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I myself do also favor launching a criminal investigation and prosecuting ex-president Bush this poll is rather deceptive because it only focuses on one demographic. It would be like me asking FOXnews viewers their opinion of Obama and subsequently trying to use that # for Obama's national approval rating.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forwarded:

It turns out the Bush years were far worse than we ever imagined - and we were not shy in our imaginings.

Previously classified internal legal memos released by the Obama administration earlier this week demonstrate that the Bush administration acted under the belief that it had virtually unchecked power after 9/11. The combined effect of the memos, which in theory gave the president the power to deploy the military on our soil, ignore Fourth Amendment protections of our privacy, and even proscribe First Amendment freedom of speech protections, led writer Scott Horton to declare that in the post-9/11 era "this country was a dictatorship."

American Freedom Campaign co-founder Naomi Wolf wrote a powerful piece for Huffington Post conveying her initial reaction to the contents of the memos. She concluded, "We need to stare [the memos] in the face and understand them: they are evidence that the groundwork was laid out that gave the president the legal power to effectively subvert the Republic." Check it out:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/john-yoos-legal-groundwor_b_171552.html

While we are outraged by these memos, we do want to highlight one positive note. The American Freedom Campaign, led by members like you, helped to reverse one of the most objectionable policies - a memo declaring that the president had the power to deploy the military on our soil, a practice long prohibited under federal law. At the end of September 2008, a couple of small media outlets reported that President Bush had assigned the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team to be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army component of Northern Command (NorthCom). In response, AFC helped raise awareness about the potential dangers involved and encouraged members to take action. Just days later, the administration drafted a memo repudiating the earlier memo's authorization of far-reaching domestic military operations.

But certainly the news is not all positive. If you continue to be outraged and disgusted by the actions of Bush administration officials, including John Yoo, who wrote a number of the administration's most notorious memos, such as those authorizing torture, you can take action through existing actions on the AFC Web site. Here are two options:

Send an E-mail to Attorney General Eric Holder, urging him to launch a full criminal investigation of Bush administration activities -- from torture to warrantless wiretapping and beyond -- with prosecutions where it is found that the laws of the United States have been violated. Click here to take action:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26685

Send a strongly worded E-mail to Christopher Edley, Jr, Dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, urging the dismissal of John Yoo. While the pre-written E-mail on the site is torture-specific, the sentiment remains the same. Here is the link to that action:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=24188

We do not intend to let Bush administration officials ride off into the sunset after their widespread assault on our laws and our Constitution. We hope that you will join us as we continue to push for serious accountability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jeff's Cigarettes



Joined: 27 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this supposed to distract us from Obambi flushing the economy down the crapper. Teh Magic One has been in office all of one month and it's been nothing but a complete disaster.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff, No OT posts, please.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My concern is upholding the law, particularly on torture. I want to be able to say, "My country does not torture. If it does happen, then the perpetrators are punished." It's looking more and more like there is going to be some kind of truth commission investigation. That may be the way to handle it, it may not.

I'm not a fan of the view that simply being voted out of office is punishment enough for government officials guilty of a crime any more than I am of a bank robber saying, "Let's not obsess with the past. It's time to move on and look to the future."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
OT


Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OT = off topic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kcs0001



Joined: 24 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are the bloodthirsty leftists going to demand transparency from VP Biden

In case you didn't know, his address to the AFL-CIO was closed to media.

Nice. What will you people do when the tax base is oopso? Try asking the

"diverse" population to pay the bills. Ever read the Golden Goose

metaphor?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/05/cameras-barred-bidens-speech-afl-cio/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bush will never face charges. He did nothing wrong (unless protecting your sorry a$$ counts, assuming you're an American).

And yes, Jeff, any further hubbub about things past is definitely leftist smoke to cover the truth that their annointed one has forked us worse than any other leader in our short history. Good call.

@#%&*@# lemmings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ReeseDog wrote:
And yes, Jeff, any further hubbub about things past is definitely leftist smoke to cover the truth that their annointed one has forked us worse than any other leader in our short history. Good call.


Yeah, that massive debt plus TARP. How could Obama have done it? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still wanting to blame W. Bush for all of this, I see. We do not have the proper perspective to grasp and evaluate all that has happened since 9/11. I think of Tacitus's observations re: "still raging animosities..."

Tacitus wrote:
Famous writers have recorded Rome's early glories and disasters. The Augustan Age, too, had its distinguished historians. But then the rising tide of flattery exercised a deterrent effect. The reigns of Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius, and Nero were described during their lifetimes in fictitious terms, for fear of the consequences; whereas the accounts written after their deaths were influenced by still raging animosities...


I almost refused to engage any history after the pre-Hispanic Latin American past because of this. The Annales historian Marc Bloch said much the same thing...

Marc Bloch wrote:
Robespierrists! Anti-Robespierrists! For pity's sake, simply tell us what Robespierre was.


I would not trust anything that anyone had to tell me about the Clinton or W. Bush administrations, and especially not re: the W. Bush administration's Middle Eastern wars or today's economic crises' causes and origins. I am especially not interested in enabling and then sitting back and watching one group of hysterical partisans, who have carefully cultivated their outrage for eight years and still going, via such conduits as K. Olbermann and M. Moore, viciously attack an outgoing administration like a pack of rabid dogs under cover of "legal investigations," etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff's Cigarettes wrote:
Is this supposed to distract us from Obambi flushing the economy down the crapper. Teh Magic One has been in office all of one month and it's been nothing but a complete disaster.


I keep seeing the phrase "The Obama Recession".. Quite silly.

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/its-the-economy-stupid-thats-tanking-the-market/
Quote:

One of the more ridiculous statements going around over the last few weeks is �this is an Obama bear market.� This statement is, well, ill-informed at best and fraudulent at worst. Let�s look at why.

First � who is saying this? Such economic luminaries as John Hawkins at Right Wing News (who actually asked Is Obama Deliberately Tanking the Stock Market?), Powerline, Brit Hume along with a host of other right wing bloggers. What all of these people have in common is their incessant chearleading during the Bush years despite mounting evidence of an upcoming recession. There are the same people who argued that � housing is a small part of the economy � most people are paying their mortgages � the US economy will decouple from the rest of the world �. it�s the greatest story never told �.. you get the idea. Simply put, these are people who have distinguished themselves by being some of the best contrary indicators around.

Secondly, the SPYs � the tracking ETF for the S&P 500 � dropped from (roughly) 155 in the summer of 2007 to (roughly) 85 at the end of last year. Yet I don�t remember any of them saying that was the Bush bear market � even though that�s a drop of roughly 43%. No � it�s the new President that�s causing the problems. In addition, when Bush took office the SPYs dropped from roughly 130 at the begging of 2001 to 85 in the fourth quarter of 2002. Yet somehow I don�t think any of them blamed Bush�s policies for the drop. Then it was the �lasting effects of the Clinton recession� or something similar.

What all of these idiots are forgetting is the simple fact that the economy is the backdrop of the stock market. When the economy does well the stock market does well. When the economy doesn�t do well, the stock market doesn�t do well. And to that end, the economy isn�t doing well right now. Let�s look at some recent news events.

From the BEA:

Real gross domestic product � the output of goods and services produced by labor and propertylocated in the United States � decreased at an annual rate of 6.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008,(that is, from the third quarter to the fourth quarter), according to preliminary estimates released by theBureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP decreased 0.5 percent.

From the BLS:

Nonfarm payroll employment continued to fall sharply in February (-651,000), and the unemployment rate rose from 7.6 to 8.1 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment has declined by 2.6 million in the past 4 months. In February, job losses were large and widespread across nearly all major industry sectors.

From the Federal Reserve:

Reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts suggest that national economic conditions deteriorated further during the reporting period of January through late February. Ten of the twelve reports indicated weaker conditions or declines in economic activity; the exceptions were Philadelphia and Chicago, which reported that their regional economies �remained weak.� The deterioration was broad based, with only a few sectors such as basic food production and pharmaceuticals appearing to be exceptions. Looking ahead, contacts from various Districts rate the prospects for near-term improvement in economic conditions as poor, with a significant pickup not expected before late 2009 or early 2010.Consumer spending remained sluggish on net, although many Districts noted some improvement in January and February compared with a dismal holiday spending season. Travel and tourist activity fell noticeably in key destinations, as did activity for a wide range of nonfinancial services, with substantial job cuts noted in many instances. Reports on manufacturing activity suggested steep declines in activity in some sectors and pronounced declines overall. Conditions weakened somewhat for agricultural producers and substantially for extractors of natural resources, with reduced global demand cited as an underlying determinant in both cases. Markets for residential real estate remained largely stagnant, with only minimal and scattered signs of stabilization emerging in some areas, while demand for commercial real estate weakened significantly. Reports from banks and other financial institutions indicated further drops in business loan demand, a slight deterioration in credit quality for businesses and households, and continued tight credit availability.

From the FDIC:

Expenses associated with rising loan losses and declining asset values overwhelmed revenues in the fourth quarter of 2008, producing a net loss of $26.2 billion at insured commercial banks and savings institutions. This is the first time since the fourth quarter of 1990 that the industry has posted an aggregate net loss for a quarter. The ?0.77 percent quarterly return on assets (ROA) is the worst since the ?1.10 percent in the second quarter of 1987. A year ago, the industry reported $575 million in profits and an ROA of 0.02 percent. High expenses for loan-loss provisions, sizable losses in trading accounts, and large writedowns of goodwill and other assets all contributed to the industry�s net loss. A few very large losses were reported during the quarter-four institutions accounted for half of the total industry loss-but earnings problems were widespread. Almost one out of every three institutions (32 percent) reported a net loss in the fourth quarter. Only 36 percent of institutions reported year-over-year increases in quarterly earnings, and only 34 percent reported higher quarterly ROAs.

I could go on, but you you get the idea. The news of the underlying economy has been terrible (at best). And that�s what�s causing the problems.


We can argue about who is to blame. The roots of this go back a very long ways. But we can't yet discuss Obama being at fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, we can. Blaming B. Obama for the crisis is asinine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TexasPete



Joined: 24 May 2006
Location: Koreatown

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:05 pm    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
Nowhere Man wrote:
Issues of executive power here are fairly significant for posterity.

"The United States does not torture" is a qualified comment, but you are speaking for the United States if you're the chief executive. We still don't have proof of torture, but it's coming.

As such, a precedent should be set for future presidents. If he lied, he should be post-hoc impeached. This doesn't need to be an Obama priority. I'd be content if it happens even after a couple presidents from now.

Not so sure about a criminal prosecution. I think it will soon show that he lied.

Criminally speaking, I think that goes to the war crimes tribunal, so it's not really a US issue per se. It would be fun if he can never set foot in Europe again without facing charges.



Blah blah blah. We've been hearing this same old tune for years about Bush lying, about investigations and being never to go to Europe again...and it has all come to naught. Nothing will happen which will drive the Bush-haters mad as they just can't get over it. Kind of sad really, to spend so much time and energy now and in the future years to come, on a non-issue.


Isn't it more than just a little irritating that someone can get 25 to life in prison under a Three Strikes policy for some pretty trivial things, but by all accounts, it looks like the pack of rats who made up the last administration will get off scot-free?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:18 pm    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

TexasPete wrote:
TheUrbanMyth wrote:
Nowhere Man wrote:
Issues of executive power here are fairly significant for posterity.

"The United States does not torture" is a qualified comment, but you are speaking for the United States if you're the chief executive. We still don't have proof of torture, but it's coming.

As such, a precedent should be set for future presidents. If he lied, he should be post-hoc impeached. This doesn't need to be an Obama priority. I'd be content if it happens even after a couple presidents from now.

Not so sure about a criminal prosecution. I think it will soon show that he lied.

Criminally speaking, I think that goes to the war crimes tribunal, so it's not really a US issue per se. It would be fun if he can never set foot in Europe again without facing charges.



Blah blah blah. We've been hearing this same old tune for years about Bush lying, about investigations and being never to go to Europe again...and it has all come to naught. Nothing will happen which will drive the Bush-haters mad as they just can't get over it. Kind of sad really, to spend so much time and energy now and in the future years to come, on a non-issue.


Isn't it more than just a little irritating that someone can get 25 to life in prison under a Three Strikes policy for some pretty trivial things, but by all accounts, it looks like the pack of rats who made up the last administration will get off scot-free?


No. If I believed that Bush was a criminal then yes. But I don't. IF people had proof, real solid proof that Bush was a criminal, they'd take it to the courts. But it's been YEARS and nothing viable has even shown its head. Therefore it's a non-issue. Bush is gone, and his detractors will have to be content with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International