|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KAMAKAZI
Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Jamshil
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:36 am Post subject: HDMI cables |
|
|
Hi
Im looking to buy a "certified" HDMI 1.3 Version cable for a flat panel screen tv. There are tons on auction or gmarket, but a friend who has HDMI cables said, look carefully and buy the certified one. He bought a certified cable and compared it to the cable that came free with his satelite box, and you could tell a big difference.
Knowing that most of these cables selling here for cheap online, and many made in China, would someone have a link to an HDMI cable that they had purchased and is certified?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ukon
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just buy from a reputable store (e-mart or a major chain)...I can't see why they would have fakes... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KAMAKAZI
Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Jamshil
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ukon wrote: |
Just buy from a reputable store (e-mart or a major chain)...I can't see why they would have fakes... |
Nah, I dont wanna pay triple the price stores like that charge. Internet shopping is the cheapest way to, even on genuine items.
Its hard to go through so many links on auction looking for a CERTIFIED one |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wuzza

Joined: 02 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got one for 8500 from Homeplus. I don't think you'll get it a lot cheaper online, especially if as you say, there is a big quality difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sojukettle
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Location: Not there, HERE!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.smh.com.au/news/digital-life/home-entertainment/articles/expensive-tv-cables-are-a-ripoff-choice/2009/03/12/1236447357378.html
Asher Moses
March 12, 2009 - 10:46AM
Tests by consumer advocate Choice have proven what everyone always suspected: spending hundreds of dollars on high-end home theatre cables is a waste of money.
Panel tests by the non-profit company found that, although retailers try to push customers into buying high-margin cables for their digital TVs and DVD players costing upwards of $300, no-frills options costing $40-$60 are just as good.
It comes after this website reported that Australians were being duped into spending hundreds of dollars on so-called "high-performance" HDMI cables when buying new home entertainment equipment.
The report was backed up by Choice's tests, which found that there was no statistically significant difference in picture and sound quality between high-end HDMI cables and their much cheaper rivals.
Some stores and installers of HDMI cables only stock or recommend the much more expensive products, peddling them using now-discredited claims that they somehow perform better.
The longer the cables, the bigger the price difference between the cheaper and more expensive versions. For the segment of cables up to 10 metres, people can pay up to six times more for some brands even though there was no appreciable difference, Choice found.
"Those with vested interests have been over-hyping the benefits of shelling out top dollar for HDMI cables with nothing but bluff to back up their case," Choice spokesman Christopher Zinn said.
"Our testing shows clearly that for once you don't always get what you pay for and there are perfectly acceptable cables available at reasonable prices. The problem is that stores are not always making consumers aware of all the options."
Harvey Norman's marketing manager for electrical, Hayden Myers, refused to make a formal comment, saying he had not yet seen Choice's tests and did not know what brands it tested.
However, he said data provided to Harvey Norman showed that there were picture quality differences between the cheaper and more expensive cables.
Choice's report, available for free on its website, tested HDMI cables from Belkin, Monster, Concord, Phillips, Panasonic, Sony and Audioquest, as well as Toslink digital audio cables from Belkin, Monster, Foxtel, DSE, Audioquest and Neotech.
"Although the results were slightly in favour of the more expensive brand for longer lengths, the differences were not enough to conclude any brand delivers a significantly better result," the report said.
"Results for the digital audio cable were even more conclusive, with no advantage to be gained through the use of more expensive cables for better performance." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ukon
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as differences between cable, it depends on the brand and the quality of your set up....there is a ceiling effect that can occur however.
Blue jeans cables offers affordable higher end quality cables. Monster cables sells higher end cables with an insane markup....however don't fall into the mistake of thinking "any cable" will look the same. If your set up is decent and you know your stuff...shell out the extra 10 bucks to get a decent cable from a reputable correctly priced brand(blue jeans cable for instance). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KAMAKAZI
Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Location: Jamshil
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
sojukettle wrote: |
http://www.smh.com.au/news/digital-life/home-entertainment/articles/expensive-tv-cables-are-a-ripoff-choice/2009/03/12/1236447357378.html
Asher Moses
March 12, 2009 - 10:46AM
Tests by consumer advocate Choice have proven what everyone always suspected: spending hundreds of dollars on high-end home theatre cables is a waste of money.
Panel tests by the non-profit company found that, although retailers try to push customers into buying high-margin cables for their digital TVs and DVD players costing upwards of $300, no-frills options costing $40-$60 are just as good.
It comes after this website reported that Australians were being duped into spending hundreds of dollars on so-called "high-performance" HDMI cables when buying new home entertainment equipment.
The report was backed up by Choice's tests, which found that there was no statistically significant difference in picture and sound quality between high-end HDMI cables and their much cheaper rivals.
Some stores and installers of HDMI cables only stock or recommend the much more expensive products, peddling them using now-discredited claims that they somehow perform better.
The longer the cables, the bigger the price difference between the cheaper and more expensive versions. For the segment of cables up to 10 metres, people can pay up to six times more for some brands even though there was no appreciable difference, Choice found.
"Those with vested interests have been over-hyping the benefits of shelling out top dollar for HDMI cables with nothing but bluff to back up their case," Choice spokesman Christopher Zinn said.
"Our testing shows clearly that for once you don't always get what you pay for and there are perfectly acceptable cables available at reasonable prices. The problem is that stores are not always making consumers aware of all the options."
Harvey Norman's marketing manager for electrical, Hayden Myers, refused to make a formal comment, saying he had not yet seen Choice's tests and did not know what brands it tested.
However, he said data provided to Harvey Norman showed that there were picture quality differences between the cheaper and more expensive cables.
Choice's report, available for free on its website, tested HDMI cables from Belkin, Monster, Concord, Phillips, Panasonic, Sony and Audioquest, as well as Toslink digital audio cables from Belkin, Monster, Foxtel, DSE, Audioquest and Neotech.
"Although the results were slightly in favour of the more expensive brand for longer lengths, the differences were not enough to conclude any brand delivers a significantly better result," the report said.
"Results for the digital audio cable were even more conclusive, with no advantage to be gained through the use of more expensive cables for better performance." |
Its not the high end cables I want that cost $300, its getting the same quality of cables as the ones that sell for $40-50. There are tons on Gmarket that sell for 10,000-15,000 won, that look great, but Im worried they are missing something the $40-50 ones have
Most 10,000 are made in China and I want to make sure its "Certified" 1.3 version
I dont know the difference in HDMI 1.3 AND 1.3b though? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I call bullshit on this one.
I have owned more than 3 LCD and Plasma televisions -- all of them have done HDMI of different versions. I own 3 HDMI cables currently.
Every one of them has performed EXACTLY the same.
If you're doing a cable run over 10 meters, THEN you need to worry about quality. Shorter than that, spending a lot more on an HDMI cable makes you a sucker.
Buy the 10,000 won one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|