Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New Evidence of Bush Torture Crimes
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:04 am    Post subject: New Evidence of Bush Torture Crimes Reply with quote

Where is that thread on "Bush may get tried?"

New Evidence of Bush Torture Crimes

By Jason Leopold
March 17, 2009



As more pieces of a very ugly mosaic fall into place � including new details from a confidential 2007 report by the International Committee of the Red Cross about interrogations at CIA �black sites� � any remaining doubt that the Bush administration engaged in a conscious policy of torture is disappearing.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney may continue to say, as he did on Sunday, that the interrogation of �war on terror� suspects was �done legally; it was done in accordance with our constitutional practices and principles.� But those assurances ring hollow.

The true story is coming into ever-sharper focus: high-ranking U.S. officials turning to what Cheney called �the dark side� after the 9/11 attacks and ordering the CIA to create a network of secret prisons. Determined to extract information from suspected terrorists, the White House then collaborated with Justice Department lawyers to find ways around anti-torture laws and American traditions.

Though the outlines of this story have been sketched out over several years, many chilling details are now getting filled in, including an article by author Mark Danner in the New York Review of Books about an ICRC report concluding that the abuse of 14 �high-value� detainees �constituted torture.�

�In addition, many other elements of the ill treatment, either singly or in combination, constituted cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,� according to the ICRC report cited by Danner. Since the ICRC�s responsibilities involve ensuring compliance with the Geneva Conventions and supervising the treatment of prisoners of war, the organization�s findings carry legal weight.

The ICRC report also found that there was a consistency in many details from the detainees who were interviewed separately and that the first �high-value� detainee to be captured, Abu Zubaydah, appeared to have been used as something of a test case by his interrogators. According to various accounts, he was transferred to a secret prison in Thailand and possibly elsewhere to be brutally questioned.

According to Zubaydah�s account to the ICRC:

�Two black wooden boxes were brought into the room outside my cell. One was tall, slightly higher than me and narrow. Measuring perhaps in area [3 1/2 by 2 1/2 feet by 6 1/2 feet high]. The other was shorter, perhaps only [3 1/2 feet] in height. I was taken out of my cell and one of the interrogators wrapped a towel around my neck, they then used it to swing me around and smash me repeatedly against the hard walls of the room. I was also repeatedly slapped in the face....

�I was then put into the tall black box for what I think was about one and a half to two hours. The box was totally black on the inside as well as the outside.... They put a cloth or cover over the outside of the box to cut out the light and restrict my air supply. It was difficult to breathe.

�When I was let out of the box I saw that one of the walls of the room had been covered with plywood sheeting. From now on it was against this wall that I was then smashed with the towel around my neck. I think that the plywood was put there to provide some absorption of the impact of my body. The interrogators realized that smashing me against the hard wall would probably quickly result in physical injury."

Zubaydah told the ICRC that CIA interrogators told him he was the first prisoner to be tortured in this way, "so no rules applied. It felt like they were experimenting and trying out techniques to be used later on other people."

Zubaydah also told the ICRC representatives that he was subjected to the drowning sensation of waterboarding, a practice that has been considered torture since the Inquisition. Zubaydah and other detainees added that they were kept naked, placed in frigid rooms and forced to spend long hours in painful �stress� positions.

Danner said the chapter headings of the ICRC report listed some of the torture techniques reported by the detainees to ICRC personnel: �suffocation by water,� �prolonged stress standing,� �beatings by use of a collar,� �confinement in a box.�

Some of these techniques, such as the use of waterboarding on three detainees, have been acknowledged by senior Bush administration officials, including Cheney who has said he approved of specific harsh tactics applied during the interrogations.

more at link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know what's likely to come of all this?

You guessed it: not a damn thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now, if you catch him selling a little blow..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

caniff wrote:
You know what's likely to come of all this?

You guessed it: not a damn thing.

Come on, that's no attitude!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(sob, sniff, sob, sob, sniff)


Oh no a murderous terrorist got some rough treatment!
What is the world coming to, when savage thugs get a little of their own medicine?"



(runs off crying)



Is that a little better "attitude"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
catman



Joined: 18 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
(sob, sniff, sob, sob, sniff)


Oh no a murderous terrorist got some rough treatment!
What is the world coming to, when savage thugs get a little of their own medicine?"



(runs off crying)



Is that a little better "attitude"?


What about the innocent that were tortured?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kimbop



Joined: 31 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

catman wrote:


What about the innocent that were tortured?


You mean the ones who got water poured on their head and poop smeared on them? I'd much rather be a Guontanamo detainee than a Daniel Pearl. Or a Korean in Yemen.

This pepsi had better be diet! Oh yeah, and death to America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJygJQNQHkw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esmalldeadanimals%2Ecom%2Farchives%2F2009%5F03%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
catman



Joined: 18 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kimbop wrote:
catman wrote:


What about the innocent that were tortured?


You mean the ones who got water poured on their head and poop smeared on them? I'd much rather be a Guontanamo detainee than a Daniel Pearl. Or a Korean in Yemen.

This pepsi had better be diet! Oh yeah, and death to America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJygJQNQHkw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esmalldeadanimals%2Ecom%2Farchives%2F2009%5F03%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded


Yeah, at least they weren't as bad as Al-Qaeda! Nice standard. Rolling Eyes

We know for a fact that innocent people were detained at Gitmo and thye have claimed to have been tortured.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

catman wrote:
Kimbop wrote:
catman wrote:


What about the innocent that were tortured?


You mean the ones who got water poured on their head and poop smeared on them? I'd much rather be a Guontanamo detainee than a Daniel Pearl. Or a Korean in Yemen.

This pepsi had better be diet! Oh yeah, and death to America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJygJQNQHkw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esmalldeadanimals%2Ecom%2Farchives%2F2009%5F03%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded


Yeah, at least they weren't as bad as Al-Qaeda! Nice standard. Rolling Eyes

We know for a fact that innocent people were detained at Gitmo and thye have claimed to have been tortured.


I could claim that reading your posts is a form of torture as well. Doesn't make it necessarily so. They will have the chance to prove their claims in a court of law. Until then, this is so much howler monkey screaming...loud but no substance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TexasPete



Joined: 24 May 2006
Location: Koreatown

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
(sob, sniff, sob, sob, sniff)


Oh no a murderous terrorist got some rough treatment!
What is the world coming to, when savage thugs get a little of their own medicine?"



(runs off crying)



Is that a little better "attitude"?

Listen, knucklehead! What you and yours don't seem to get is that INNOCENT people were subjected to horrendous treatment in our name and supported by our tax dollars. The red cross, in a secret report recently attained, has actually concluded that the US did indeed torture its prisoners. Another recent report stated that of the 700 or so people detained in Abu Ghraib prison, only about a dozen or two were actually guilty of anything. In another interview i recently that the US poloicy in Iraq/Afghanistan regarding detainees was to scoop anybody and everybody near a battlefield regardless of guilt and imprison them. In Guantanamo bay, a 13 year old kid was held for quite a lonnnng time as was a 90+ year old. Another policy that backfired was paying for information so that you literally had people settling old grudges and feuds by finger pointing, collecting the money and the pointee would just disappear. Finally, go watch the documentary, "Taxi to the Darkside" and tell me that the victim there warranted even a fraction of a percent of the actual treatment he received which resulted in an innocent man being tortured to death.

There are real terrorists and baddies galore imprisoned by the US doubtless, but there's also an awful lot of people who've done jack sh!t and are rotting away indefinitely in secret prisons and well known ones (and it's not inconceivable to think that real, innocent men imprisoned and ill-treated for years won't exactly have a high opinion of us if they ever are released). Put another way, the use of torture or "enhanced interrogation techniques" (many of which were cited by the US gov. itself in the 50s as reasons why we were better than the Reds), once used can create people who want to do terror and once these methods are exposed (and they have been), it only adds fuel to AQ and the Talebans fire. If we sink to their methods to get results or "keep us safe", then what does that make us?

Another point on this matter is that as we are a nation of laws and justice, evidence gathered in an illegal manner by say beating the hell out of someone or water boarding is inadmissible in court. We are effectively making these people unconvictible by these methods. Finally, despite large numbers of books and expert's opinions on the matter, your side refuses to acknowledge that torture does not work and does not yield relliable results. John McCain himself stated that after being tortured in Vietnam he was willing to tell them anything regardless of its truth, meaning that information extracted by torture is not only unreliable, it often times is just plain bad information. Most interrogators in the CIA will tell you torture does not work, but Cheney and his ilk let the psychopaths run the show or downright gave the go ahead.

I in no way, shape or form support the real baddies out there, but the use of torture is morally and ethically repugnant while yielding very little if any good information. It inspires our enemies and gives them recruiting material. It makes conviction impossible. It's just plain bad policy which is counterproductive and the fact that we, as Americans, even have to have a discussion on the merits of torture is a sad, sad situation that pains me to no end.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
TexasPete



Joined: 24 May 2006
Location: Koreatown

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
catman wrote:
Kimbop wrote:
catman wrote:


What about the innocent that were tortured?


You mean the ones who got water poured on their head and poop smeared on them? I'd much rather be a Guontanamo detainee than a Daniel Pearl. Or a Korean in Yemen.

This pepsi had better be diet! Oh yeah, and death to America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJygJQNQHkw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esmalldeadanimals%2Ecom%2Farchives%2F2009%5F03%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded


Yeah, at least they weren't as bad as Al-Qaeda! Nice standard. Rolling Eyes

We know for a fact that innocent people were detained at Gitmo and thye have claimed to have been tortured.


I could claim that reading your posts is a form of torture as well. Doesn't make it necessarily so. They will have the chance to prove their claims in a court of law. Until then, this is so much howler monkey screaming...loud but no substance.

Something tells me that were claims of torture proven to be true in a court of law, you'd still find some way of justifying it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
wesharris



Joined: 10 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's horrible.
You kill others, and you don't get the Hilton treatment, oh the horror.
Next time just field execute the suckers.
Then there is no torture, only death.
_+_
Wes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HughCl



Joined: 18 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the traditional US legal system punishment comes after conviction NOT before. Majority of Gitmo never even got to a trial fair or otherwise

American Jews who have volunteered to help the Israeli Defense Force or supported other foreign governments had better hope Saudi Arabia doesnt swoop down out of the sky capture you from New York and take you to Jeddah for trial. Then they could pour water into your lungs and see if you confess.

When America reverts to an international legal standard the rest EVERYONE benefits from seeing other countries don't emulate its illegal judicial actions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TexasPete wrote:
TheUrbanMyth wrote:
(sob, sniff, sob, sob, sniff)


Oh no a murderous terrorist got some rough treatment!
What is the world coming to, when savage thugs get a little of their own medicine?"



(runs off crying)



Is that a little better "attitude"?

Listen, knucklehead! What you and yours don't seem to get is that INNOCENT people were subjected to horrendous treatment in our name and supported by our tax dollars. The red cross, in a secret report recently attained, has actually concluded that the US did indeed torture its prisoners. Another recent report stated that of the 700 or so people detained in Abu Ghraib prison, only about a dozen or two were actually guilty of anything. In another interview i recently that the US poloicy in Iraq/Afghanistan regarding detainees was to scoop anybody and everybody near a battlefield regardless of guilt and imprison them. In Guantanamo bay, a 13 year old kid was held for quite a lonnnng time as was a 90+ year old. Another policy that backfired was paying for information so that you literally had people settling old grudges and feuds by finger pointing, collecting the money and the pointee would just disappear. Finally, go watch the documentary, "Taxi to the Darkside" and tell me that the victim there warranted even a fraction of a percent of the actual treatment he received which resulted in an innocent man being tortured to death.

There are real terrorists and baddies galore imprisoned by the US doubtless, but there's also an awful lot of people who've done jack sh!t and are rotting away indefinitely in secret prisons and well known ones (and it's not inconceivable to think that real, innocent men imprisoned and ill-treated for years won't exactly have a high opinion of us if they ever are released). Put another way, the use of torture or "enhanced interrogation techniques" (many of which were cited by the US gov. itself in the 50s as reasons why we were better than the Reds), once used can create people who want to do terror and once these methods are exposed (and they have been), it only adds fuel to AQ and the Talebans fire. If we sink to their methods to get results or "keep us safe", then what does that make us?

Another point on this matter is that as we are a nation of laws and justice, evidence gathered in an illegal manner by say beating the hell out of someone or water boarding is inadmissible in court. We are effectively making these people unconvictible by these methods. Finally, despite large numbers of books and expert's opinions on the matter, your side refuses to acknowledge that torture does not work and does not yield relliable results. John McCain himself stated that after being tortured in Vietnam he was willing to tell them anything regardless of its truth, meaning that information extracted by torture is not only unreliable, it often times is just plain bad information. Most interrogators in the CIA will tell you torture does not work, but Cheney and his ilk let the psychopaths run the show or downright gave the go ahead.

I in no way, shape or form support the real baddies out there, but the use of torture is morally and ethically repugnant while yielding very little if any good information. It inspires our enemies and gives them recruiting material. It makes conviction impossible. It's just plain bad policy which is counterproductive and the fact that we, as Americans, even have to have a discussion on the merits of torture is a sad, sad situation that pains me to no end.



Listen knucklehead, I wasn't talking about some hypothetical situation or some nameless faceless people. I was talking about Zubaydah. Got it?
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TexasPete wrote:
TheUrbanMyth wrote:
catman wrote:
Kimbop wrote:
catman wrote:


What about the innocent that were tortured?


You mean the ones who got water poured on their head and poop smeared on them? I'd much rather be a Guontanamo detainee than a Daniel Pearl. Or a Korean in Yemen.

This pepsi had better be diet! Oh yeah, and death to America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJygJQNQHkw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esmalldeadanimals%2Ecom%2Farchives%2F2009%5F03%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded


Yeah, at least they weren't as bad as Al-Qaeda! Nice standard. Rolling Eyes

We know for a fact that innocent people were detained at Gitmo and thye have claimed to have been tortured.


I could claim that reading your posts is a form of torture as well. Doesn't make it necessarily so. They will have the chance to prove their claims in a court of law. Until then, this is so much howler monkey screaming...loud but no substance.

Something tells me that were claims of torture proven to be true in a court of law, you'd still find some way of justifying it.



Something tells me, that having never met me, or spoken to me off-line that you are talking out of your a$$. Trying to pigeonhole people through their Internet persona on a messageboard is a silly and futile endeavour. But good luck with that... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International