Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Obama's Budget: Irresponsible
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Obama's budget is . . .
fine
9%
 9%  [ 2 ]
bleak but necessary
23%
 23%  [ 5 ]
irresponsible and inflationary
52%
 52%  [ 11 ]
bad, but not his fault!
14%
 14%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 21

Author Message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
One place to start: The Great Corporate Tax Dodge

Which is the only one that has not set up an offshore subsidiary to avoid paying taxes?

* AIG
* American Express
* Bank of America
* Comcast
* Coca-Cola
* Dell
* Exxon-Mobil
* Home Depot
* Pepsi
* Pfizer

Of the ten companies listed above, only Home Depot has not set up an offshore subsidiary to avoid paying its taxes.

They are truly in the minority.

In all, 83 of the 100 biggest corporations in America have set up off-shore tax shelters, costing the rest of us as much as $100 billion a year!

https://www.iowapirg.org/action/tax-budget/tax-dodge


Okay, Ya-Ta, tell us how to reform the corporate tax code to collect money from these corporate entities?

My solution is to abolish corporate taxation and make dividend income ordinary in character. What's yours?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Chris2007 wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
What would you propose instead?


Uh....cut spending?


Not politically realistic. And some economists would disagree with you too.


Who, Krugman?

Economists are policy-makers as much as anyone of us else.

Yes, you cut spending and raise taxes. And don't start with me on this 'you don't raise taxes in a recession,' simply because when Hoover did it he overdid it.

Don't just raise margins on the rich, although you'll need to do that. Break dividends: they're ordinary income now, and meanwhile kill corporate taxes, which cost us almost as much in enforcement as they garner in revenue; the taxes on dividends and corporate dissolution (ordinary income now) will suffice. Kill carryovers on capital losses since adjusting the capital gains rate is pointless now. Wipe out all Federal tax deductions in real estate. Principal residence deductions? GONE. Deductions for home equity and acquisition financing? also GONE.

But the stew is already cooked. Its the stimulus that'll break us. An immense part of that bill was pork and silly tax cuts, and we haven't even gotten around yet to the pressing problems: entitlement reform, healthcare reform, and education. Its TARP I that'll break us, not entirely Obama's fault, but he should've seen that it would narrow our options.

You'll notice the small to medium sized banks are still okay. Why? They weren't leveraged to all hell b/c they still had to follow the net capital rule of 15-to-1 securities-to-assets. The big banks need to be dismantled piece by piece, and we need to price those damned toxic assets rather than stick our heads in the sand and cover them up with good money!

Face it, Bucheon Bum, Obama has exhausted his political capital, and by political capital I mean simply the money in the coffers.


Kuros, I'm presently tired and beat, and I'll try to elaborate here later.

I'll put it like this: I agree TARP sucks and is a waste. That isn't what this thread is about though, at least not your original post. The budget is a whole other beast.

And come on, raise taxes and cut spending? ha ha ha. Right. That's both economically unwise and political suicide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Kuros wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Chris2007 wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
What would you propose instead?


Uh....cut spending?


Not politically realistic. And some economists would disagree with you too.


Who, Krugman?

Economists are policy-makers as much as anyone of us else.

Yes, you cut spending and raise taxes. And don't start with me on this 'you don't raise taxes in a recession,' simply because when Hoover did it he overdid it.

Don't just raise margins on the rich, although you'll need to do that. Break dividends: they're ordinary income now, and meanwhile kill corporate taxes, which cost us almost as much in enforcement as they garner in revenue; the taxes on dividends and corporate dissolution (ordinary income now) will suffice. Kill carryovers on capital losses since adjusting the capital gains rate is pointless now. Wipe out all Federal tax deductions in real estate. Principal residence deductions? GONE. Deductions for home equity and acquisition financing? also GONE.

But the stew is already cooked. Its the stimulus that'll break us. An immense part of that bill was pork and silly tax cuts, and we haven't even gotten around yet to the pressing problems: entitlement reform, healthcare reform, and education. Its TARP I that'll break us, not entirely Obama's fault, but he should've seen that it would narrow our options.

You'll notice the small to medium sized banks are still okay. Why? They weren't leveraged to all hell b/c they still had to follow the net capital rule of 15-to-1 securities-to-assets. The big banks need to be dismantled piece by piece, and we need to price those damned toxic assets rather than stick our heads in the sand and cover them up with good money!

Face it, Bucheon Bum, Obama has exhausted his political capital, and by political capital I mean simply the money in the coffers.


Kuros, I'm presently tired and beat, and I'll try to elaborate here later.

I'll put it like this: I agree TARP sucks and is a waste. That isn't what this thread is about though, at least not your original post. The budget is a whole other beast.

And come on, raise taxes and cut spending? ha ha ha. Right. That's both economically unwise and political suicide.


You asked me how I would address the situation. The stimulus and TARP are responsible for a lot of that deficit.

Well no shit its political suicide. When has raising taxes and cutting spending ever NOT been politically dangerous?

That is the whole goddamned problem!

Anyway, give an extended reply at your leisure. I'll be here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
My solution is to abolish corporate taxation and make dividend income ordinary in character. What's yours?


Ahhhh....trickle down economics, I take it. Skew things so the richest keep theirs and the hell with the rest of us. That's been tried.

I'm an English teacher, not a tax expert. I don't pretend to know the best way to keep the fat cats from gaming the system. I'll leave that to those who've made a study of it. I wouldn't be adverse to a corpse or two dangling from a Wall Street lamp post or two, for starters.

Biden was right last fall. Paying taxes should be seen as a patriotic duty. I don't mind a tax system that allows the rich to stay rich up to a point. All societies are designed to favor someone. What I object to is the favored whining that their favored position is not favored enough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
My solution is to abolish corporate taxation and make dividend income ordinary in character. What's yours?


Ahhhh....trickle down economics, I take it. Skew things so the richest keep theirs and the hell with the rest of us. That's been tried.

I'm an English teacher, not a tax expert. I don't pretend to know the best way to keep the fat cats from gaming the system. I'll leave that to those who've made a study of it.



Funny that when the experts tell you what we need to do, those of us who actually have made a study of it, you don't actually care to listen.


Ya-ta Boy wrote:


Biden was right last fall. Paying taxes should be seen as a patriotic duty. I don't mind a tax system that allows the rich to stay rich up to a point. All societies are designed to favor someone. What I object to is the favored whining that their favored position is not favored enough.


This is quite humorous when contrasted with:

http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=146503
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canuckistan wrote:
Quote:
You'll notice the small to medium sized banks are still okay. Why? They weren't leveraged to all hell b/c they still had to follow the net capital rule of 15-to-1 securities-to-assets.


Let's not forget the beginning of the shyte circle: mortgage companies, who had very little regulation at all, and whose questionable mortgages the big banks hoovered up, re-packaged, sold & sold again into derivatives (again with little regulation) few could understand.




This is nonsense.

That argument has been totally refuted. No one educated in economics believes that anymore.


This depression is just one in a series of recessions caused by the bursting of bubbles made by monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve.

Although you still hear people talking about rescuing the failed banks, you hear little about the blame. That's because they have already been exonerated by economic analysis.

It is now widely known that not only did the government cause this depression by inflation, printing money, deficit spending, and tax policies that generate massive, wasteful overconsumption and massively diminished savings, massive shortages of investment capital and massive malinvestment, but, there was no need to rescue AIG or any of the big banks.

AIG should have been allowed to fail, and its healthy subsidiaries sold off, piece by piece, as is now happening anyway.

The big, stupid banks should have been allowed to fail. We have thousands of smaller, strong, healthy banks waiting to take over and do a better job of serving the public.


The government made the disease.

The government's attempted "cure" is worse than the disease.

The disease will be even worse following the government's "cure."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Funny that when the experts tell you what we need to do, those of us who actually have made a study of it, you don't actually care to listen.


Unlike you, the experts I listen to don't wear tin foil hats. It clashes with their socks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now the solution.

As I've posted previously, we need to repeal ALL taxes on income and property in the United States.

Income and property taxes can never be fixed, overhauled or repaired. There is no way to make them fair. There is no way to use these taxes without severely distorting the economy, imparing productivity growth, hampering economic growth and hurting the lower income and middle income groups the most.

We also get massive malinvestment and misallocation of resources that amount to tens of trillions of dollars already.

Further, income taxes (including the horrible, regressive socialist security tax) are complicated and unfair. They are most easily avoided by the politically powerful classes (politicians like the Kennedys that have hundreds of millions of dollars in assets hidden away in trusts, tax free.)


The answer is to abolish all taxes on income and property and institute a simple, across the board consumption tax.

A consumption tax would be a sales tax, VAT, or some variant. There is a big movement to make such a swap on a revenue neutral basis. This would be much too great of a burden for the economy, of course, as the total tax level is already much too high. But the switch needs to be made. We just have to drastically cut the size and scope of the government at the same time. Given the current state of the economy, the need for massive reduction in the size of government is apparent to every real expert on the economy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Funny that when the experts tell you what we need to do, those of us who actually have made a study of it, you don't actually care to listen.


Unlike you, the experts I listen to don't wear tin foil hats. It clashes with their socks.



How long have you and your friends been wearing tin foil socks?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The reason we need to make the switch to a single, consumption tax is to make the system fair, friendly and promote maximum savings, investment and economic growth.

The income tax was one of the primary goals of the socialist and communist movements. The various forms of income taxation have cost the world hundreds of trillions of dollars in lost investment or malinvestment and has cost the world at least 1 billion good jobs.

There are ways to shelter investment funds for certain groups. You can start a corporation when you are young and leave your earnings inside the business entity. You can use one of the sheltered retirement accounts for investments. The wealthy can set up very clever trust funds that let them live a good life, tax free, or nearly so.

These options are not available to most poor and middle class workers who want to climb the ladder to the American dream.


The solution is, of course, to abolish income and property taxes. Let the people who are consuming their money pay for the consumption of government. Let everyone who is investing do so tax free, without the complication of legal forms that are impossibly difficult for ordinary Americans to utilize.


Those Americans who are saving and investing will be able to do so tax free, whether they save $10 or $10 billion. These are the productive people who make the country grow.

They will be able to save for short periods or long periods. They will be able to do so without the current fear of being locked-in to some investment when they might need the money for some major life event such as a home purchase, educational expenses for a child, major health payment or whatever. This element of being a freely available option that can be chosen without any paperwork whatsoever is absolutely essential to allow the lowest income Americans the option to save, invest and build their personal and family portfolios.


Those Americans who choose to spend everything will pay the maximum consumption tax rate.

Those Americans who save, invest and build the economy will pay less according to how much they save.


Finally, eliminating the paperwork burden of the income and property taxes, will save tens of billions of dollars annually, and relieve a major contributor to personal and family stress in America.


There is, in fact, no benefit to continuing the use of income taxes or property taxes in any form.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
My solution is to abolish corporate taxation and make dividend income ordinary in character. What's yours?


Ahhhh....trickle down economics, I take it. Skew things so the richest keep theirs and the hell with the rest of us. That's been tried.

I'm an English teacher, not a tax expert. I don't pretend to know the best way to keep the fat cats from gaming the system. I'll leave that to those who've made a study of it.


Its not trickle-down economics, Ya-Ta. Its the same way we tax partnerships, except partnerships are almost always capital in character. In other words, by making it ordinary income, we assure that those in the highest tax bracket pay 39% while those in the lower tax brackets pay only insofar as their bracket. Its completely progressive as to the recipient.

And we tax corporate dividends more than partnership interests (ordinary versus capital) because the liability stays at the corporate level.

Corporate liquidation of assets would be the same as it is now: determine each asset's character depending on whether its a hot asset (accounts receivable or inventory) or capital asset.

Its a mechanical problem, not an ideological one. The corporate entities themselves are evading taxation by going to countries who will allow them to exist for nominal fees. So, reward the corporations that have stayed by releasing them all from taxation at the corporate level, and get them at the shareholder level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abolish all payroll taxes. Hello? Jobs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is very irresponsible. It is also generational theft, but the boomers have screwed the next two generations already.

There is a second stimulus in the works, apparently will be 600-700b. There is no way this kind of budget will get financed for several years.

Tough choices are just around the corner. Obama doesn't have what it takes. So we have to hope the Republicans can do better? Good grief.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hater Depot wrote:
As far as "irresponsible and inflationary" I don't see avoiding inflation as a responsible policy goal right now. We are facing serious threat of deflation.


Why is deflation a "threat"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I worry about falling into a liquidity trap and our own lost decade or worse. If that is inevitable then the budget and the stimulus and the fed's actions are indeed wasteful. But we don't know that, and it's probably worth taking the chance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International