|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
As regards immediate withdrawal, that seems taken out of context. I was under the impression that he said 16 months during the campaign. This article states so too.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2009/03/03/obama_iraq_withdrawal/
Seriously no one with half a brain expected Obama the moment he took office to pull tens of thousands of troops and equipment out of Iraq. The logistics of such a move take time. And not just a few days or weeks but months if not years.
And don't bother with any more of your mistaken impressions, such as calling me an Obama supporter...I wanted McCain to win. |
The point is his story is constantly changing. If you actually watch the film, you'll see the clip of him from the campaign trail in which he say, "If I am elected, I'll begin to withdraw troops from Iraq immediately." Then it went to 16 months. Then 23 months.
And don't bother with any more of your false accusations. I never called you an Obama supporter. |
I never said you did. I said don't call me one. Do you understand the difference between an accusation and a request?
And FTR you have however called me a Bush supporter. And you have said that there is very little difference betwen Bush and Obama.
But that aside I was only making a pre-emptive comment to prevent you from making an error like on the other thread where you called me an American.
I'm just nice like that.
Last edited by TheUrbanMyth on Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
Informative?
Really just opinionated. Not that much data to be had, really.
The film admits that all of history is about Marx's materialist dialectic, and that the rich have always been in power; and thus the movie is all too conclusory. |
OK, it is not really rocket science that people with money and power use them to influence events to their benefit. So why all the skeptics?
Exactly because of that, we little guys need to constantly oppose them from taking everything we have. In the film, Jones gives information and some tactics to use in doing this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
he and webster tarpley talked about how "this guy" governor general of canada michelle jean (actually a women) had more power than the canadian prime minister and parliament.
to prove that the queen really runs the show in canada, they pointed to the example of the canadian nafta debate. apparently the usually elected senators (correct me if i'm wrong but they aren't elected nor have they ever been), were "packed" or "stacked" in order to pass it (canadian senators do not usually vote down something once it has been sent their way by the "lower chamber").
the governor general of canada controls canadian commerce, according to alex jones. hilarious nonsense!
and this is all from just one 10 minute segment of his show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wa0cH9UH_M
shall i continue?
i think this is very telling because he probably doesn't really know much about canada (why would he) so he seems to be content just making it up, or going along with what his "historian" tells him. he also doesn't know much about what goes on in those "secret meetings" (how could he), so isn't it perhaps wise to suspect a little of the same from him in this case? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rory_Calhoun27
Joined: 14 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:03 am Post subject: Re: The Obama Deception |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
The Obama Deception
The full-length version of Alex Jones' documentary, The Obama Deception, is now available on youtube in High Quality.
This extraordinary film explains how this relative unknown went from State Senator to US President in six years, and goes into depth about the power base behind his meteoric rise.
It goes into detail about how he is leading the bankers' efforts to bankrupt the country, but also gives hope and concrete measures on what to do to resist.
Very informative and highly recommended. |
It takes a lot of guts to badmouth the guy who clean pubies' clock in the election, and is left with the unenviable task of cleaning up the mess left to him by that nitwit gwb, who starts a war with the Arab world to finish the job he thinks deep down his old man should have done in the early 90s....
I'm sure that movie will the talk of tinseltown in the near future.... as soon as youtube vids get their own Oscar. so it's not good enough for real theaters, is it?
So I think someone is in the running to be Ann Coulter's lapdog! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
space
Last edited by scott on Mon May 14, 2012 6:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ubermenzch wrote: |
he and webster tarpley talked about how "this guy" governor general of canada michelle jean (actually a women) had more power than the canadian prime minister and parliament.
to prove that the queen really runs the show in canada, they pointed to the example of the canadian nafta debate. apparently the usually elected senators (correct me if i'm wrong but they aren't elected nor have they ever been), were "packed" or "stacked" in order to pass it (canadian senators do not usually vote down something once it has been sent their way by the "lower chamber").
the governor general of canada controls canadian commerce, according to alex jones. hilarious nonsense!
and this is all from just one 10 minute segment of his show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wa0cH9UH_M
shall i continue?
i think this is very telling because he probably doesn't really know much about canada (why would he) so he seems to be content just making it up, or going along with what his "historian" tells him. he also doesn't know much about what goes on in those "secret meetings" (how could he), so isn't it perhaps wise to suspect a little of the same from him in this case? |
If you had to stretch all that far to find something wrong with what Jones said, and it is about Canada no less, I guess the most of his other info is pretty solid then.
Continue, if you will, with something American. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
apparently the usually elected senators (correct me if i'm wrong but they aren't elected nor have they ever been), were "packed" or "stacked" in order to pass it (canadian senators do not usually vote down something once it has been sent their way by the "lower chamber").
|
That wasn't NAFTA, it was the Goods And Services Tax debate. And yes, the Senate was stacked, but the stacking was actually on the side of democracy.
What happened was this:
The tax legislation had been passed by the elected House Of Commons, but was being debated to death(basically fillibustered) by the unelected senate. The Liberal senators shrewdly bet that, since the tax was very unpopular with the public, nobody would really complain about the bill being killed by an unelected body.
So, the Conservative government, who controlled the Commons, sent an envoy to London to ask the Queen to add a few more seats to the senate. The Queen agreed to do so, the Tories appointed the extra senators to give themselves a majority, and the bill was passed.
So yes. The Senate was stacked, but that was only so as to give the democratically-elected government the ability to pass legislation it had actually campaigned on in the previous election.
And if Alex Jones is claiming that Canadian senators are normally elected, he doesn't know the first thing about Canadian politics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| On the other hand wrote: |
| Quote: |
apparently the usually elected senators (correct me if i'm wrong but they aren't elected nor have they ever been), were "packed" or "stacked" in order to pass it (canadian senators do not usually vote down something once it has been sent their way by the "lower chamber").
|
That wasn't NAFTA, it was the Goods And Services Tax debate. And yes, the Senate was stacked, but the stacking was actually on the side of democracy.
What happened was this:
The tax legislation had been passed by the elected House Of Commons, but was being debated to death(basically fillibustered) by the unelected senate. The Liberal senators shrewdly bet that, since the tax was very unpopular with the public, nobody would really complain about the bill being killed by an unelected body.
So, the Conservative government, who controlled the Commons, sent an envoy to London to ask the Queen to add a few more seats to the senate. The Queen agreed to do so, the Tories appointed the extra senators to give themselves a majority, and the bill was passed.
So yes. The Senate was stacked, but that was only so as to give the democratically-elected government the ability to pass legislation it had actually campaigned on in the previous election.
And if Alex Jones is claiming that Canadian senators are normally elected, he doesn't know the first thing about Canadian politics. |
thanks for this info. this only further shows how confused alex jones and his historian are, as they didn't even get the debate right.
and bacasper, this is not a case of my scouring the internet and finally... finally finding him saying something suspect. i remembered that he had said crazy stuff about the queen so i entered "alex jones queen" in youtube and it was the first video that came up. but give me a bit, i'll provide some more evidence as to his general inaccuracy and paranoia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
in the 'endgame' documentary, alex jones claims "armaments companies financed from rothschild-controlled banks in germany, france, england and austria bankrolled all the factions" in the first world war because "they wanted to create the league of nations. they had this in their plans all along", and intented the league to serve as a framework for world government. however, many countries viewed the league as a threat to their sovereignty, and along with the united states senate, refused to join.
so "british intelligence with the help of the rockefeller family set up the council on foreign relations in new york city in 1921." we are then told "the cfr's stated mission is to abolish all nation states in favour of an all powerful world government administered by a tiny elite."
he then goes on to tell us that by 1930 the world government crowd had split into two conveniently labeled factions, the communists (centered in london) and the fascists (in italy and germany). we are all expected to gasp in horror as hitlers words come up on the screen, 'national socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order'. OH NO! the new world order! you mean george h.w. bush wasn't the originator of all that n.w.o. stuff? tell me more mr. jones.
he proceeds to very kindly simplify the fascist and communist movements for us. you see both were globalists, but the fascists wanted to use the military to quickly transform the world into a new world order, while the socialists wanted to take a steady incremental path. as evidence that the american bankers and robber barons were partial to the national socialist way to globalization, he points to a major general smedley butler who "went public in 1934 exposing an attempt by the robber barons to launch a military overthrow of the united states. the war hero testified to the mccormick-dickstein commitee in congress that some of the most powerful men in america had tried to recruit him to lead a military coup so they could set up national socialism in the united states." (reading the history of this episode is quite interesting, but what is known is not conclusive enough for jones to use it to make such sweeping assumptions) he also claims that fascism had made deep inroads in england, pointing to the abdication of edward the 8th because of his support for hitler as evidence of this (in reality he adbicated so he could marry some woman, a marriage that for reasons i won't go into here would have been morally unacceptable for a king).
well, the german-lead fascists put up a good fight , but the socialists slow-but-steady approach proved the winner, says jones, and they maintained control of the u.s., russia and england. and of course the bankers came out on top, having once again financed all sides to the global war, but this time, their victory was complete as they set up that most evil of world bodies, the united nations. "the united nations complex was then built in new york city, on land donated by john d. rockefeller." the global elite used this complex as their base within the united states. they quickly set to work. the first step was to form the european union.
we are then introduced to the bilderberg group, and their apparent stated mission is the formation of a european superstate. once this was accomplished, they set to work on the formation of a north american union, and an asian union, and voila "the three interlocking superstates form(ing) the core of the global government." the united nations' job would be to regulate and enforce its dictates over the third world. who are these bilderberg group people, you might ask? we are told that they are no less than "heads of all of the managing round-table groups that steer individual countries." well isn't that a satisfying answer.
some typical alex jones hijinks ensues as he tries to get into canada to cover a bilderberg group meeting in ottawa, but of course their dark malevolence conspires to attempt to detain him at the airport, but our hero is not to be stopped so easily. what are they talking about in the meeting? here, alex jones is quick to fill in the blanks. they're talking about "the death of canada, is what's going on in there right now, the death of your sovereignity is happening in there right now." the very end of canada, the united states and mexico.
finally, we are introduced to an investigative journalist who jones claims physically attended 20 of these meetings. at last someone who was actually there... he tells us all kinds of scary things about their plans. but we don't hear any more about how he got into these meetings, and are left to guess he was never actually in there at all and is just telling us his opinion.
blah blah blah .. all set to dark threatening music and i didnt even mention the opening 5 minute warning about our planned future at the hands of the global elite.
Last edited by ubermenzch on Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this has something to do with the direction the current administration is taking.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090421235207681
Tuesday, April 21 2009 - Other Important News
Are Members of Congress (and Maybe Even the President) Being Blackmailed?
Two articles with more details on the Harmon wiretap follow Lindorff's piece.
� Ed.
April 21, 2009
by Dave Lindorff
thiscantbehappening.net
For some time now, many Americans have wondered how Congress, the elected body that the nation�s Founding Fathers saw as the bulwark of liberty, could have been so thoroughly unwilling to, or incapable of challenging the dictatorial power-grabs and the eight-year Constitution wrecking campaign of the Bush/Cheney administration.
There has been speculation on both the far left and the far right, and even among some in the apolitical, cynical middle of the political spectrum, that somehow the Bush/Cheney administration must have been blackmailing at least the key members of the Congressional leadership, most likely through the use of electronic monitoring by the National Security Agency (NSA). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:06 am Post subject: Re: The Obama Deception |
|
|
| Rory_Calhoun27 wrote: |
| bacasper wrote: |
The Obama Deception
The full-length version of Alex Jones' documentary, The Obama Deception, is now available on youtube in High Quality.
This extraordinary film explains how this relative unknown went from State Senator to US President in six years, and goes into depth about the power base behind his meteoric rise.
It goes into detail about how he is leading the bankers' efforts to bankrupt the country, but also gives hope and concrete measures on what to do to resist.
Very informative and highly recommended. |
It takes a lot of guts to badmouth the guy who clean pubies' clock in the election, and is left with the unenviable task of cleaning up the mess left to him by that nitwit gwb, who starts a war with the Arab world to finish the job he thinks deep down his old man should have done in the early 90s....
I'm sure that movie will the talk of tinseltown in the near future.... as soon as youtube vids get their own Oscar. so it's not good enough for real theaters, is it?
So I think someone is in the running to be Ann Coulter's lapdog! |
So I'm a Republican partisan
Everyone who knows me here knows what an absurd accusation that is.
Search my posts for Bush and see how many anti-Bush threads I have started. It is certainly more than my anti-Obama threads, but it looks like BO will be catching up pretty quick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
Maybe this has something to do with the direction the current administration is taking.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090421235207681
Tuesday, April 21 2009 - Other Important News
Are Members of Congress (and Maybe Even the President) Being Blackmailed?
Two articles with more details on the Harmon wiretap follow Lindorff's piece.
� Ed.
April 21, 2009
by Dave Lindorff
thiscantbehappening.net
For some time now, many Americans have wondered how Congress, the elected body that the nation�s Founding Fathers saw as the bulwark of liberty, could have been so thoroughly unwilling to, or incapable of challenging the dictatorial power-grabs and the eight-year Constitution wrecking campaign of the Bush/Cheney administration.
There has been speculation on both the far left and the far right, and even among some in the apolitical, cynical middle of the political spectrum, that somehow the Bush/Cheney administration must have been blackmailing at least the key members of the Congressional leadership, most likely through the use of electronic monitoring by the National Security Agency (NSA). |
Also from that article:
| Quote: |
| I�ll admit that I considered the idea of blackmail a bit far out. But now suddenly there is at least some evidence that such seemingly wild speculation may not have been off the mark, with reports that the NSA was indeed monitoring Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), and that the Bush Administration used the evidence it had obtained of her improper conversations with and promises to assist agents of the Israeli government and its lobby here in the US, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), to blackmail her into supporting the NSA�s warrantless spying program�the very kind of spying that led to her being caught on tape plotting with an agent of a foreign power. |
So this Harman was herself caught by exactly the type of wiretapping she was blackmailed into supporting? But if she played along and supported the program, how did the story get out anyway?
(Hmm.. I wonder if Mark Foley was similarly blackmailed in to sponsoring the Adam Walsh Act, provisions of which he was accused of violating and he was thus forced to resign. )
| Quote: |
The only possible position for the public to adopt as of today is to be suspicious of any politician who opposes a full and public investigation into the NSA�s seven-year-long campaign of sweeping, warrantless electronic eavesdropping, since opposition to such an investigation, in the wake of the Harman episode, could well be an indication that the political figure in question is afraid she or he has been monitored, or worse, that she or he has been threatened by those who have the records. Every citizen concerned about the fate of American democracy should demand that his or her senators and representative promptly call for such a public probe.
It is no longer a wild idea at all to imagine that our Congress has been reduced to the status of a Potemkin legislature because of real or imagined spying by the NSA. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ubermenzch wrote: |
| in the 'endgame' documentary, alex jones claims "armaments companies financed from rothschild-controlled banks in germany, france, england and austria bankrolled all the factions" in the first world war because "they wanted to create the league of nations. they had this in their plans all along", and intented the league to serve as a framework for world government. however, many countries viewed the league as a threat to their sovereignty, and along with the united states senate, refused to join. so "british intelligence with the help of the rockefeller family set up the council on foreign relations in new york city in 1921." we are then told "the cfr's stated mission is to abolish all nation states in favour of an all powerful world government administered by a tiny elite." he then goes on to tell us that by 1930 the world government crowd had split into two conveniently labeled factions, the communists (centered in london) and the fascists (in italy and germany). we are all expected to gasp in horror as hitlers words come up on the screen, 'national socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order'. OH NO! the new world order! you mean george h.w. bush wasn't the originator of all that n.w.o. stuff? tell me more mr. jones. he proceeds to very kindly simplify the fascist and communist movements for us. you see both were globalists, but the fascists wanted to use the military to quickly transform the world into a new world order, while the socialists wanted to take a steady incremental path. as evidence that the american bankers and robber barons were partial to the national socialist way to globalization, he points to a major general smedley butler who "went public in 1934 exposing an attempt by the robber barons to launch a military overthrow of the united states. the war hero testified to the mccormick-dickstein commitee in congress that some of the most powerful men in america had tried to recruit him to lead a military coup so they could set up national socialism in the united states." (reading the history of this episode is quite interesting, but what is known is not conclusive enough for jones to use it to make such sweeping assumptions) he also claims that fascism had made deep inroads in england, pointing to the abdication of edward the 8th because of his support for hitler as evidence of this (in reality he adbicated so he could marry some woman, a marriage that for reasons i won't go into here would have been morally unacceptable for a king). well, the german-lead fascists put up a good fight , but the socialists slow-but-steady approach proved the winner, says jones, and they maintained control of the u.s., russia and england. and of course the bankers came out on top, having once again financed all sides to the global war, but this time, their victory was complete as they set up that most evil of world bodies, the united nations. "the united nations complex was then built in new york city, on land donated by john d. rockefeller." the global elite used this complex as their base within the united states. they quickly set to work. the first step was to form the european union. we are then introduced to the bilderberg group, and their apparent stated mission is the formation of a european superstate. once this was accomplished, they set to work on the formation of a north american union, and an asian union, and voila "the three interlocking superstates form(ing) the core of the global government." the united nations' job would be to regulate and enforce its dictates over the third world. who are these bilderberg group people, you might ask? we are told that they are no less than "heads of all of the managing round-table groups that steer individual countries." well isn't that a satisfying answer. some typical alex jones hijinks ensues as he tries to get into canada to cover a bilderberg group meeting in ottawa, but of course their dark malevolence conspires to attempt to detain him at the airport, but our hero is not to be stopped so easily. what are they talking about in the meeting? here, alex jones is quick to fill in the blanks. they're talking about "the death of canada, is what's going on in there right now, the death of your sovereignity is happening in there right now." the very end of canada, the united states and mexico. we are introduced to an investigative journalist who jones claims physically attended 20 of these meetings. finally someone who was actually there... he tells us all kinds of scary things about their plans. but we don't hear any more about how he got into these meetings, and are left to guess he was never actually in there at all and is just telling us his opinion. blah blah blah .. all set to dark threatening music and i didnt even mention the opening 5 minute warning about our planned future at the hands of the global elite. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| ubermenzch wrote: |
| in the 'endgame' documentary, alex jones claims "armaments companies financed from rothschild-controlled banks in germany, france, england and austria bankrolled all the factions" in the first world war because "they wanted to create the league of nations. they had this in their plans all along", and intented the league to serve as a framework for world government. however, many countries viewed the league as a threat to their sovereignty, and along with the united states senate, refused to join. so "british intelligence with the help of the rockefeller family set up the council on foreign relations in new york city in 1921." we are then told "the cfr's stated mission is to abolish all nation states in favour of an all powerful world government administered by a tiny elite." he then goes on to tell us that by 1930 the world government crowd had split into two conveniently labeled factions, the communists (centered in london) and the fascists (in italy and germany). we are all expected to gasp in horror as hitlers words come up on the screen, 'national socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order'. OH NO! the new world order! you mean george h.w. bush wasn't the originator of all that n.w.o. stuff? tell me more mr. jones. he proceeds to very kindly simplify the fascist and communist movements for us. you see both were globalists, but the fascists wanted to use the military to quickly transform the world into a new world order, while the socialists wanted to take a steady incremental path. as evidence that the american bankers and robber barons were partial to the national socialist way to globalization, he points to a major general smedley butler who "went public in 1934 exposing an attempt by the robber barons to launch a military overthrow of the united states. the war hero testified to the mccormick-dickstein commitee in congress that some of the most powerful men in america had tried to recruit him to lead a military coup so they could set up national socialism in the united states." (reading the history of this episode is quite interesting, but what is known is not conclusive enough for jones to use it to make such sweeping assumptions) he also claims that fascism had made deep inroads in england, pointing to the abdication of edward the 8th because of his support for hitler as evidence of this (in reality he adbicated so he could marry some woman, a marriage that for reasons i won't go into here would have been morally unacceptable for a king). well, the german-lead fascists put up a good fight , but the socialists slow-but-steady approach proved the winner, says jones, and they maintained control of the u.s., russia and england. and of course the bankers came out on top, having once again financed all sides to the global war, but this time, their victory was complete as they set up that most evil of world bodies, the united nations. "the united nations complex was then built in new york city, on land donated by john d. rockefeller." the global elite used this complex as their base within the united states. they quickly set to work. the first step was to form the european union. we are then introduced to the bilderberg group, and their apparent stated mission is the formation of a european superstate. once this was accomplished, they set to work on the formation of a north american union, and an asian union, and voila "the three interlocking superstates form(ing) the core of the global government." the united nations' job would be to regulate and enforce its dictates over the third world. who are these bilderberg group people, you might ask? we are told that they are no less than "heads of all of the managing round-table groups that steer individual countries." well isn't that a satisfying answer. some typical alex jones hijinks ensues as he tries to get into canada to cover a bilderberg group meeting in ottawa, but of course their dark malevolence conspires to attempt to detain him at the airport, but our hero is not to be stopped so easily. what are they talking about in the meeting? here, alex jones is quick to fill in the blanks. they're talking about "the death of canada, is what's going on in there right now, the death of your sovereignity is happening in there right now." the very end of canada, the united states and mexico. we are introduced to an investigative journalist who jones claims physically attended 20 of these meetings. finally someone who was actually there... he tells us all kinds of scary things about their plans. but we don't hear any more about how he got into these meetings, and are left to guess he was never actually in there at all and is just telling us his opinion. blah blah blah .. all set to dark threatening music and i didnt even mention the opening 5 minute warning about our planned future at the hands of the global elite. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EnglishTeacher |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha sorry about the lack of organization (paragraph-wise). i've gone back and fixed it.
and bacasper, i'm both a master ironist and english teacher, and also quite humble as you can see.
based on what i've pointed to, i hope we can now agree alex jones is not to be taken seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|