View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:35 pm Post subject: Ignorance about native speaker teachers from another big wig |
|
|
President of the International Graduate School of English, and Seoul National University professor for 35 years Park Nam-sheik shared his thoughts on native speaker teachers, in the Korea Times yesterday.
Quote: |
[Park] stressed that a teaching license doesn't mean competence as an English teacher. ``Schools should open their doors more to those who can speak English well. Still many teachers are opposing to give opportunities to English teachers without teaching certificates to teach students at public schools,'' Park said. At the same time, he was very pessimistic about the increasing number of foreign English teachers from the U.S., Canada and the U.K.
``Most of the native English speakers don't have much affection toward our children because they came here to earn money and they often cause problems,'' Park said. ``If we need native English speakers, it would be better inviting young ethnic Koreans who have hometowns here. Also, we have to invite qualified English teachers from India, Malaysia and the Philippines as English is not a language only for Americans and British people.''
``Above all, we should produce qualified teachers who can replace native English speakers. I can assure you our school will produce such teachers,'' he added. |
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/04/117_43673.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
President of the International Graduate School of English, |
A large hagwon? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't read the whole article but I thought it was reasonable.
1) He thought public school teachers who want native English-speaking teachers to have teaching credentials were being unreasonable.
2) He thought the English language was not the exclusive property of Americans and Brits and that access to other English speakers was reasonable.
3) Sometime native English-speakers don't care enough about Korean children to find a way to educate them properly (though I hope he believe many do)
4) In the long run, Korea should produce teachers who can speak English well enough to teach communicatively and/or in English.
I can't argue with any of those points, though I hope he does realize that there are many good NESTs in Korea and that Korea has benefited from the use of NESTs in Korea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cdninkorea

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
I can't argue with any of those points, though I hope he does realize that there are many good NESTs in Korea and that Korea has benefited from the use of NESTs in Korea. |
I hope he realizes that too, but it doesn't look that way to me.
Also, I don't see why someone doing a job for money can't also care about students- they're not mutually exclusive categories. For me, they're mutally reinforcing: the compensation makes me feel like I'm doing a good job (no one pays worthless people if they can help it, right?) so I work harder. Oppositely, I want the money so I make sure I do a good job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was reasonable too to be fair Mr. Smee, but little more than to be honest. You can see where he is coming from more than with Jessica Park and the other one (easy to lose count and forget as they are really adding up at quite some pace these days).
But once again here is an education professional who fails to address the real issues at the heart of ESL. 'Affection towards children' or - as I presume he is implying - lack there of is not unique to natives alone. Once again he demonstrates how disenfranchised some of these so called 'experts' are from the real issues at hand.
I mean would a Philipino, Malaysian or Indian really have any different motives to that of someone from the US or Canada? Migrant workers are migrant workers, doesnt matter whether they work at SNU or in a Samsung factory: their intentions and motives are the same.
He is oblivious to the day to day problems existing teachers have. For a start, the issue of respect that natives receive in the classroom and from Korean peers obviously doesnt concern him a great deal: lord can only imagine what an Indian or Philipino or Malaysian (particularly of Chinese decent) would receive. Hiring teachers from other neighbouring Asian countries would bring out all the worst elements of Korean racism that we are all well aware of.
Right now there doesn't exist many reasons, other than money, for people to commit and stay in Korea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He's right. I don't give a lick about 80% of my students. Probably because they don't give a lick about my class. They think sitting quietly, speaking English only for 1 hour and doing their homework are optional.
The other 20% see a different side of me.
Korea needs to clean up its own backyard before letting another 'educated' yutz make stupid comments again. What a ricetard!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
I didn't read the whole article but I thought it was reasonable. |
You think it's reasonable to say that most of the foreign English teachers here cause problems? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bogey666

Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Location: Korea, the ass free zone
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
importing Hindi or Malay of Filipino/a teachers to teach English is like importing Koreans from China to Korea to teach Korean (actually worse)
they'd be ok for very low level students, but for any REAL levels of proficiency, you would need a highly educated English speaker from those countries, and they DO exist ,but in small numbers and are likely working in a good job back in their home countries.
They could never explain English idioms and the entire concept of "making a global individual" which the Korean govt is so in love with would fall flat on its face.
btw this clown merely sounds like a PR hack for his private institute. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
raulfd4
Joined: 04 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what is so unreasonable in that statement? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justaguy
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smee he is not a big wig. He just wants people to think he is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
raulfd4 wrote: |
what is so unreasonable in that statement? |
Besides the simple fact that it's a bigoted comment, it's not true. Most of the foreign teachers here cause no problems whatsoever. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-J

Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul EunpyungGu Yeonsinnae
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
``Most of the native English speakers don't have much affection toward our children because they came here to earn money and they often cause problems,''
|
Much less generalization than I find on Dave's. I'm more likely to believe that the KT cherry picked his quotes than I am to believe this guy hates foreigners.
Many of the things he said in the article were spot on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevieg4ever wrote: |
I mean would a Philipino, Malaysian or Indian really have any different motives to that of someone from the US or Canada? Migrant workers are migrant workers, doesnt matter whether they work at SNU or in a Samsung factory: their intentions and motives are the same. |
Great point.
If he thinks that 'westeners' are coming here for the money, what exactly will SE Asians be coming here for?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-J

Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul EunpyungGu Yeonsinnae
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Corea wrote: |
stevieg4ever wrote: |
I mean would a Philipino, Malaysian or Indian really have any different motives to that of someone from the US or Canada? Migrant workers are migrant workers, doesnt matter whether they work at SNU or in a Samsung factory: their intentions and motives are the same. |
Great point.
If he thinks that 'westeners' are coming here for the money, what exactly will SE Asians be coming here for?? |
Four seasons.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bogey666 wrote: |
btw this clown merely sounds like a PR hack for his private institute. |
He sure does. Sadly, his outfit isn't an institute. It's an actual degree awarding school. From that link:
Quote: |
The International Graduate School of English is an educational institution in Seoul, South Korea, that focuses on producing professionals in the field of English education. There are two departments: English Language Teaching and ELT Materials Development. Both offer master's degrees. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|