|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The length of a letter to the editor should be shorter than a guest column. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fact of the matter is that any opinion piece that reflects badly on Korea will most likely not be printed. Especially by a foreigner. And especially ones that mention people in esteemed positions specifically (bar possibly 이명박 of course).
Smee and Bum Suk
Could you not forward it to that 'Herald' poster who came on these boards and apologised, whatever his name is?
Plus it�s not in the Confucian mindset to bring one's problems out in to the open blah blah blah
Perhaps you could try removing the occasional article and preposition and change your name to Minsu and add vague and random lines about '4 seasons', 'metal chopsticks', that figure skater et all |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Smee wrote: |
This statement is ignorant and damaging to the validity of the other points Park tried to make about training Korean English teachers, or hiring certified teachers from other countries. It shows a profound ignorance about who we are and what we do, and regrettably suggests that Park is not as trustworthy an authority on English education as believed.
Unfortunately, this isn�t the only case of cranio-rectal inversion by big names in the field of English education. |
you seriously don't know why they chose not to print it?
the article in the KT was a general report on a school with some questionable quotes by Park.
a more appropriate response (and one that is more likely to be accepted and printed) would be to discuss the pros and cons of the school itself.
if one has criticism towards Park's comments, that's fine but his comments were general in terms so it's best to address them that way - and not towards him personally.
i.e., Sally Smith said "I think all Mexicans are dirty and that's why the swine flu is coming from there."
rather than attack Smith herself, it makes a lot more sense - and will reach a lot more people - to attack her comments - as in
"Those who believe swine flu originated in Mexico because Mexicans are dirty people are simply unaware of the multitude of social problems in the country, not the least with which in regards to the infrastructure itself. Making sweeping generalizations about an entire country only demonstrates a lack of understanding and intelligence and offers no real insight to the fundamental issue at stake, which is how and why the swine flu developed in Mexico."
in regards to the KT article, there are sweeping generalizations about the NET in Korea, yet interestingly, the IGSE appears to employ NETs - really - check out their little promo movie on their website at
http://english.igse.ac.kr/Student/movie.asp
The KT is a newspaper, after all, it is not an internet forum. It was reporting an article and what Smee and YoBumSuk did was to write rhetorical responses that were personal and inflammatory to the individual at the school.
While I do not agree at all with the statements made by Park - I do understand KT's position not to print the responses as written. Additionally, as others have said, the length is simply too much. No, there is no reason to make an exception especially for such an irrelevant article which is not much more than what is termed a fluff piece.
if you seriously want a response printed, edit out the personal attacks and shorten the length, and then focus on concrete points. it would help.
thanks for sharing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly. Its clearly just more double standards isn't it.
And whilst we are on the subject of English teachers what about hiring other Europeans?? My Scandinavian friends can speak three or four languages and, such is their education, all have an elementary grounding in linguistics to boot. Many Dutch and Germans, for example, I have met speak much better than a lot of the teachers I have met in Korea.
On the subject of India and Malaysia, there are people who are more than competent and qualified to teach ESL from those countries. But it depends who they are after, the qualified ones or the ones with a lower standard of education who will, invariably, cost less and demand less in terms of rights and such in the workplace. I wonder....
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
As for being demeaning, again, imagine if I said in an interview to a Canadian newspaper 'Most of the Korean teachers abuse their students and spend most of the day sleeping and Internet shopping because they often don't have to worry about job security'. How would anyone interpret that as anything but an attempt to demean? Would you like to work for, with, or teach someone who had been influenced by Mr Park's opinion?
At any rate, I'm not sure that he was really giving his honest opinion about NETs, but rather providing an excuse for hiring cheaper non-native speakers. You'll notice that he didn't mention hiring Singaporean teachers along with Malaysians, Filipinos, and Indians, despite Singapore clearly having the highest level of English amongst Asian countries. I wonder why not? Because he can't afford them - probably the same reason why he doesn't want to shell out for experienced NETs who do have a history of commitment to teaching in Korea. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buymybook
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Location: Telluride
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't like the kiss kiss at the beginning but I suppose you have to attempt to get their attention.
Perhaps it was your 2nd to last sentence...
"However, the attitude of its president leaves me feeling very sceptical."
People don't feel "sceptical," they either are "sceptical" or aren't. Oh, and it's skeptical not "sceptical." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sceptical UK English
Skeptical US English
Both are correct and neither are incorrect.
And your part about 'feeling sceptical' being inappropriate is specious at best. Ofcourse people use 'feeling sceptical' just as they use 'feeling tired' or 'feeling sleepy' or 'feeling good'. Its used all the time in Korean as well: ever heard of 느끼다 as in 피곤함을 느끼다, 좋음을 느꼈다, 졸림을 느끼다 등??
People will argue anything on these boards won't they!!!!
| buymybook wrote: |
I didn't like the kiss kiss at the beginning but I suppose you have to attempt to get their attention.
Perhaps it was your 2nd to last sentence...
"However, the attitude of its president leaves me feeling very sceptical."
People don't feel "sceptical," they either are "sceptical" or aren't. Oh, and it's skeptical not "sceptical." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stevieg4ever wrote: |
The fact of the matter is that any opinion piece that reflects badly on Korea will most likely not be printed. Especially by a foreigner. And especially ones that mention people in esteemed positions specifically (bar possibly 이명박 of course).
Smee and Bum Suk
Could you not forward it to that 'Herald' poster who came on these boards and apologised, whatever his name is?
Plus it�s not in the Confucian mindset to bring one's problems out in to the open blah blah blah
Perhaps you could try removing the occasional article and preposition and change your name to Minsu and add vague and random lines about '4 seasons', 'metal chopsticks', that figure skater et all |
Well, every country has some form of self-censorship and things they won't print. In Korea, it's just more obvious to the people whereas back home it is not so in your face. Yet, in the US the unions and people on the Left have historically had little space to speak about their views.
The gatekeepers who controlled the media were the corporate elites, and they often try to manage the news and control things. Of course, that has been to the detriment of the people at large.
In the end, in Korea, the people of Korea are not served well people by their gatekeepers who have a very right wing mentality and encourage a society that is even more subservient to business interests and gives a green light to xenophobic drivel you often see. There is a lot of emphasis on controlling others in Korea in an overt way, and one thing that's not like about us is that Westerners are not so easily controlled and subservient.
As far as that professor of that institute, he shouldn't be one talking about how foreigners came here only for money, I know I didn't come here to work for free, but foreigners are no different than other people in the sense that most of them do care about doing a good job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sinsanri
Joined: 20 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, i don't know about your arguments if theyhold up or not. Here is a letter to the editor that was not printed, even though it was submitted twice: {rough copy}
| Quote: |
Punish ATEK, Please
This is an open letter to the MOJ and the KFTA.
Dear Sirs,
Recently a group of fanatical foreigners formed a group called ATEK and have been making all sorts of false accusations against the Korean government in the name of Native English teachers. The have manipulated the CERD Convention to fit their false charges and have partnered with a law professor who confesses to be a non-expert on Korean law.
Yet that lack of qualification has not stopped them from distorting the issues nor from interfering with the Korean Governments own right to make their own laws. This action distresses many foreigners who do not have a problem with Korean rules and laws and work to meet those requirements so we can contribute constructively to this society.
We are afraid that the actions taken by these fanatics will bring severe backlash to all Nets, even though thousands do not want, do not support nor even know about ATEK�s interference in our lives and employment.
We ask that you do NOT punish the innocent Native English teacher but direct your retribution against the founding members of, past and present, of ATEK and all those who have joined with them. Punishing the innocent for things they have not done is never right and we are tired of paying for other people�s wrongful acts
ATEK is wrong and the real victims will be the Korean children (elem., middle & high school students) as they become pawns and hostages in a power struggle over an industry the ATEK members have no right to rule or interfere.
Please take the appropriate measures to disband this group and let it be severe enough that future foreigners will avoid repeating such actions. I am not the type of person who asks that they lose their jobs BUT they are interfering with my employment, my life and my students without authorization and that is very wrong. They need to be taught a lesson, which I hope will include loss of employment and living privileges in this country.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:42 pm Post subject: What the KT did print! |
|
|
Foreign Teachers Wrongly Portrayed in Korea.
| Quote: |
| There are many misconceptions about native speaker English teachers in Korea and profound ignorance about who we are and what we do. This article will look at 10 of the most common misconceptions about us. It's not compiled for the sake of complaining or for being clever but rather to look more closely at 10 misinformed assumptions that are repeated so often that they're practically taken for granted. |
The ten myths Mr. Deutsch addresses are:
- We're unqualified.
- We don't care about teaching.
- We're sexual predators.
- We just talk in class.
- We can't teach on our own.
- We can't find jobs at home.
- We're uppity.
- We're criminals.
- We're here for money.
- We're unhappy.
Mr. Deutsch: GOOD JOB! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sinsanri
Joined: 20 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since someone posted those, i will say the following:
1. Some are, some aren't. I worked with 3 people who had B.Eds Only 1 could teach and the other two should have found employment in other fields.
2. Some do and some don't. They are more interested in the night life than they are the classroom.
3. Again, some are and some aren't. Though K-bridge did post the book 'How to Pick up korean Women' on their website and supported the ideas presented in the book as did many other members.
4. Worked with a man who did that. I am sure there are others.
5. This one I would give him as we can.
6. This is a possibility as some western countries do NOT hire older workers and those who are Over-Qualified for the position.
7. Quite a few are. enough said
8. Hard to say. There are enough westerners being caught with drugs to give legitimacy to this claim. Though th eword criminal can be applied subjectively.
9. Quite a few are. This is a given as many do not care about their students or quality of their classes and look solely at their paycheck, for whatever reason.
10. Some are. There was a poster last week who stated this very thing.
The author should have done some research and realized that his sweeping generalizations are as much of a distortion as he claims the article he was answering was.
Yes there are good foreigners here but there are also many who fit into those categories and NEts should stop claiming innocence and own up to the reality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sinsanri,
You might be taken more seriously if you seem more reasonable. Attacking 10 myths abotu NESTs detracts from your criticisms of the letters as it just makes you sound prejudiced whether you are or not.
Some additional points.
1. Whether someone can teach or not has nothing to do with whether they are qualified. This is a big problem with the whole question of qualification as it is being made here in Korea.
2. Concern about nightlife and concern about the classroom are not mutually exclusive. One can be interested in more than one thing.
3. Being a sexual predator is a pretty serious and criminal designation. Desire to pick-up women does not make one a sexual predator.
4. Who cares? What is absolutely necessary in these discussions is real studies.
6. Who cares?
7. You are just continuing the stereotypes. What makes you think so? Your lack of reasoning skills is, well, worrisome.
8. What do you mean enough? There have been a few but what do you mean by "enough?"
9. Again, what do you mean by here for the money? Do you mean people come to Korea to work? I would not equate the desire to work with only here for the money? But, I would like to hear what you mean by that?
10. Again, the problem is what is meant by "we're." One person or even a handfull does not mean "we're" unhappy. And, more importantly, why are these people unhappy? If it has to do with being victimized by the illegal activities of Koreans than this is a serious complaint that needs to be addressed as any illegal activity is.
Native English-speakers come to Korea and undergo hardships to perform necessary services on behalf of the Korean people. Yes, they are compensated financially. While most may not t deserve to be "thanked" as they are compensated, they certainly don't deserve to be kicked either. I think most just want to be treated fairly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree - Deutch's article ROCKS !
thanks for posting -  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sinsanri
Joined: 20 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| You might be taken more seriously if you seem more reasonable. Attacking 10 myths abotu NESTs detracts from your criticisms of the letters as it just makes you sound prejudiced whether you are or not. |
NESTS?? I thought it was NETS. I was just pointing out that the author did exactly what he claimed the Korean author was doing and that there was no difference between the two.
Just because I point out that there are bad foreign teachers here does it mean I am prejudiced. You know as well as I, that we all pay the price for their 'errors'.
| Quote: |
| Native English-speakers come to Korea and undergo hardships to perform necessary services on behalf of the Korean people |
So? You do not have to come and you do not have to stay, the korean people owe you nothing except was is agreed to in the contracts.
Your 10 'points' are just the typical result of the 'entitled' attitude too many foriegners bring with them. You are not 'entitled' to anything and you should be grateful you have a job and a home during times like this. I wouldn't bite the hand that feeds you just yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scotticus
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sinsanri wrote: |
3. Again, some are and some aren't. Though K-bridge did post the book 'How to Pick up korean Women' on their website and supported the ideas presented in the book as did many other members.
|
Wow, the racism here is just palpable. What kind of screwed up world view does it take to equate sex between two consenting adults (who happen to be of differing races) with being a sexual predator. Just... wow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sinsanri wrote: |
Since someone posted those, i will say the following:
1. Some are, some aren't. I worked with 3 people who had B.Eds Only 1 could teach and the other two should have found employment in other fields.
2. Some do and some don't. They are more interested in the night life than they are the classroom.
3. Again, some are and some aren't. Though K-bridge did post the book 'How to Pick up korean Women' on their website and supported the ideas presented in the book as did many other members.
4. Worked with a man who did that. I am sure there are others.
5. This one I would give him as we can.
6. This is a possibility as some western countries do NOT hire older workers and those who are Over-Qualified for the position.
7. Quite a few are. enough said
8. Hard to say. There are enough westerners being caught with drugs to give legitimacy to this claim. Though th eword criminal can be applied subjectively.
9. Quite a few are. This is a given as many do not care about their students or quality of their classes and look solely at their paycheck, for whatever reason.
10. Some are. There was a poster last week who stated this very thing.
The author should have done some research and realized that his sweeping generalizations are as much of a distortion as he claims the article he was answering was.
Yes there are good foreigners here but there are also many who fit into those categories and NEts should stop claiming innocence and own up to the reality. |
Are you posting on the Korea Times comments section as archeologist17? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|