Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

North Korea could opt for devastating land assault
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Passions wrote:
visitorq wrote:
Passions wrote:
visitorq wrote:

cangel wrote:
Why does everyone bring up Vietnam? America lost that war, yeah, yeah, yeah... That was a political war and the US military wasn't allowed to win it. The US could have turned Vietnam into a parking lot.

Exactly. We didn't "lose" the war, we just walked away from it.


58,000 deaths and 350,000 casualties. Vietnam turns Communist after US leaves. Yup, you're right, we didn't loose anything, we just walked away. Rolling Eyes You must be a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan.

The key word is "choice". I mean we could've just dropped a few dozen neutron bombs and waited for the dust to settle. We chose not to.


Like I said, you must be a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan. "Winning" wars is all about flattening and turning other countries into glass, huh. As long as we drop hundreds of nukes, we'll "win." YEEEHAW!

Huh? Well if it makes you feel better to put words into other peoples' mouths, then go ahead... Rolling Eyes No, I'm not a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan. I didn't advocate anything, simply described a fact. The US could've wiped out the entire population of Vietnam, even leaving nukes out of it, and won the war (personally I'm quite glad we didn't); just chose not to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris_J2



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: From Brisbane, Au.

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Passions: Looks like the pigs are getting ready to fly:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aT01vl_zTYJ8&refer=home
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shifter2009



Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Location: wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Passions wrote:
visitorq wrote:

cangel wrote:
Why does everyone bring up Vietnam? America lost that war, yeah, yeah, yeah... That was a political war and the US military wasn't allowed to win it. The US could have turned Vietnam into a parking lot.

Exactly. We didn't "lose" the war, we just walked away from it.


58,000 deaths and 350,000 casualties. Vietnam turns Communist after US leaves. Yup, you're right, we didn't loose anything, we just walked away. Rolling Eyes You must be a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan.


I think you should differentiate between military and political victory. We did kill 1.1 million of the enemy so they were giving well better than they were taking. US military might had very little to do with our failure to win there, it was a lack of insight into the situation. If it was just a simply matter of driving to the north and conquering all of Vietnam it would have been over in no time. Yet, as well all know that wasn't the case and we paid for it pretty good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shifter2009 wrote:
Passions wrote:
visitorq wrote:

cangel wrote:
Why does everyone bring up Vietnam? America lost that war, yeah, yeah, yeah... That was a political war and the US military wasn't allowed to win it. The US could have turned Vietnam into a parking lot.

Exactly. We didn't "lose" the war, we just walked away from it.


58,000 deaths and 350,000 casualties. Vietnam turns Communist after US leaves. Yup, you're right, we didn't loose anything, we just walked away. Rolling Eyes You must be a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan.


I think you should differentiate between military and political victory. We did kill 1.1 million of the enemy so they were giving well better than they were taking. US military might had very little to do with our failure to win there, it was a lack of insight into the situation. If it was just a simply matter of driving to the north and conquering all of Vietnam it would have been over in no time. Yet, as well all know that wasn't the case and we paid for it pretty good.


Impressive until you realize how many unarmed farmers, women, and children went into those body counts. The brass demanded body counts and the men in the field complied, never mind how. An extraordinary number of enemy combatants' weapons could not be accounted for due to being destroyed or lost in the fighting. Sometimes as high as 90% of the rifles vanished.

Anyway, North Korea's arsenal is antiquated and poorly maintained, its mass army would be decimated in a war, and it may even be faking its so-called nuclear tests, although the missiles are real enough. Probably not time to flee the country yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shifter2009



Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Location: wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Privateer wrote:
shifter2009 wrote:
Passions wrote:
visitorq wrote:

cangel wrote:
Why does everyone bring up Vietnam? America lost that war, yeah, yeah, yeah... That was a political war and the US military wasn't allowed to win it. The US could have turned Vietnam into a parking lot.

Exactly. We didn't "lose" the war, we just walked away from it.


58,000 deaths and 350,000 casualties. Vietnam turns Communist after US leaves. Yup, you're right, we didn't loose anything, we just walked away. Rolling Eyes You must be a Cheney/Rumsfeld fan.


I think you should differentiate between military and political victory. We did kill 1.1 million of the enemy so they were giving well better than they were taking. US military might had very little to do with our failure to win there, it was a lack of insight into the situation. If it was just a simply matter of driving to the north and conquering all of Vietnam it would have been over in no time. Yet, as well all know that wasn't the case and we paid for it pretty good.


Impressive until you realize how many unarmed farmers, women, and children went into those body counts. The brass demanded body counts and the men in the field complied, never mind how. An extraordinary number of enemy combatants' weapons could not be accounted for due to being destroyed or lost in the fighting. Sometimes as high as 90% of the rifles vanished.

Anyway, North Korea's arsenal is antiquated and poorly maintained, its mass army would be decimated in a war, and it may even be faking its so-called nuclear tests, although the missiles are real enough. Probably not time to flee the country yet.


Doesn't really negate the point that the failure of the war in Vietnam had very little to do with our ability to fight and kill the enemy and more to do with the politics surrounding the situation. The brass demanding body counts could be pointed to an example of politics getting in the way of tangible military success. I think we can agree the whole thing was FUBARed from top to bottom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris_J2 wrote:
Passions: Looks like the pigs are getting ready to fly:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aT01vl_zTYJ8&refer=home


I see nothing about food and monetary aid stopping. It's all for show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chris_J2



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: From Brisbane, Au.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:41 am    Post subject: Pigs Reply with quote

The UN resolution on sanctions is in a week or 2, bassexpander. But a good start by China, no?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:00 am    Post subject: Re: Pigs Reply with quote

chris_J2 wrote:
The UN resolution on sanctions is in a week or 2, bassexpander. But a good start by China, no?


Just long enough for them to allow things to cool down a bit and say that there's no need for sanctions because things are cooling down.

More of the same.

At best, they'll water-down any attempt to make sanctions tough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cangel wrote:
The area between the north and south is either devoid of vegetation (so both sides can see the other side coming), and or covered in rice fields. .


Not sure what you mean exactly here. The DMZ has been untouched for 60 years and is without doubt the most luxuriantly vegetated zone on the peninsula. There ain't no rice fields there, cos there ain't no people. But plenty of thick forest and swamp with 10 foot-high grasses. Were it not for modern infra red technology it could probably hide an army of tens of thousands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris_J2



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: From Brisbane, Au.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bassexpander wrote

Quote:
More of the same


I want the winning numbers of next weeks lottery results, in advance!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nuthatch wrote:
bassexpander wrote:
Quote:
What the US needs to do, if NK attacks, is drop a few pinpoint nukes in exact locations. The US needs to make it VERY clear that if a nation threatens it with nukes, then it nukes WILL be on the table in a battle.


hello...Korea is a small place...I don't think South Korea or Japan would appreciate that

visitorq:
military numbers chart:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8071175.stm


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8074527.stm
N Korea 'planning more missiles'



The right way to deal with North Korea.


http://orbitalvector.com/Space%20Weapons/Orbital%20Bombardment/rods%20from%20god.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
patongpanda



Joined: 06 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:


The right way to deal with North Korea.

http://orbitalvector.com/Space%20Weapons/Orbital%20Bombardment/rods%20from%20god.jpg


HURR DURR
DURR HURR
DERP DERP DERP

http://media.photobucket.com/image/HURR%20DURR/Atmosphere_03/1230837407265.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International