|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your comments are interesting.
I have simply responded to postings made on daves. You have responded to such postings by implying that my responses are determined by certain religious feelings.
I have responded by stating that those postings were not determined by religious issues or feelings but by political feelings.
You have stated that you do not understand my postings and that I am seeking your postings to respond to them.
I would like to say that it isn't the case and while I support the idea of a jewish state (within parameters) it is not a religious issue to my mind. The reason that I mention religion is because of certain responses that you have made that imply that I am a religious person. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
After re-reading our postings, I guess that BB and I can say that
"we agree to disagree" on certain issues.
Its probably the best as if the whole world agreed on everything, it would be pretty boring.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Summer Wine,
this is what really gets on my nerves.
People who want to talk about the I/P conflict always come after me. Even when I am somewhere else.
I could be discussing abortion/North Korea/Animal rights/the NHS/the second world war but some people will ignore the topic of the thread and start gabbling on "Big Bird, blah blah....Hamas....blah blah.........Israel.....blah blah" and I think What the Fork?
Am I the ON DUTY ISRAEL/PALESTINE DEBATER? Some people, like ManintheMiddle and Postfundie just can't stop thinking about debates long past from the 2006 war on Lebanon. Jesus, guys. It's not my JOB to talk to you about Israel/Gaza/Hamas or what have you.
If you love the topic so much, post on the appropriate threads. Or start your own threads. And don't start threads demanding I come and talk to you. That's sheer bollocks.
Talk about Israel. Talk about Hamas. Talk about Lebanon. Do it to your heart's content. But don't constantly involve me. I'll get involved if I'm in the mood and I feel I've got something to say. If not, I'm perfectly within my rights not to bother.
Got that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess people involve you in these discussions because you involve yourself in them.
Maybe its not intentional, but you do sometimes come across as a palestinian/ muslim/ anything goes supporter.
If that isn't your desire then I am sorry to involve you in the debates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Summer Wine wrote: |
I guess people involve you in these discussions because you involve yourself in them. |
I involve myself in them when they are topical. When bombs are raining down on civilians, for example. Or when there is some major discussion of it in the news. I don't talk about it every day. The homosexual thread was created because I was sick to the back teeth of a certain poster dragging up Muslims with me every time he comes here. He wanted to talk about muslims and gays. I wanted to talk about fundamentalist atheists.
Quote: |
Maybe its not intentional, but you do sometimes come across as a palestinian/ muslim/ anything goes supporter. |
This is tripe. Meaningless tripe. "a palestinian/ muslim/ anything goes supporter?" What does that mean exactly? Some more woolly-headed nonsense from you.
An anything goes supporter? A muslim supporter? Or a muslim anything goes supporter? What are you trying to articulate. Because it's gone right over my head.
Quote: |
If that isn't your desire then I am sorry to involve you in the debates. |
When I'm discussing it on a thread that's fine - join in. But play the ball not the player. Respond to what i've actually said. Don't go on about what you think I think I think. If you want to reply to something I've said, that's fair enough. But don't create threads demanding I respond to you. That's pathetic.
Why not chat with Trevor. He's totally up for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Galloway leading largest US convoy ever to Palestine
We were all moved to tears of grief and anger when Israel launched its murderous bombardment against the people of Gaza in December and January. Millions of us took to the streets in unprecedented protests around the globe. Each and every one of us has asked ourselves what more we can do to help stop the suffering.
The inspirational anti-war and pro-Palestinian British MP, George Galloway, decided that while it is necessary to speak out � in his case with great force and eloquence � it is actions that speak louder than words.
While the bombs were still showering down on what has been called the largest open-air prison in history, Galloway decided to organize a humanitarian convoy that would start in Britain, drive through France and Spain, and across North Africa to arrive in Gaza with aid, even as all borders to the devastated region were under complete blockade. In just five short weeks, he pulled together 107 vehicles � including ambulances and a fire engine � 255 people and $2 million of aid, which set off from London on February 14. Some 23 days and 5,500 miles later it arrived in Gaza to tumultuous acclaim.
The fact that so many people come from Britain whose government had, along with George W Bush, backed the Israeli aggression had an enormous impact on the besieged people of Gaza.
Now, Galloway is heading a second convoy � this time from the USA. The Vietnam War veteran, Ron Kovic, whose experiences in the war led him to become a life-long advocate of a more just US foreign policy, has readily agreed to be co-leader of the convoy.
The convoy�s aim is to take hundreds of US citizens in 500 vehicles, bearing $10 million in medical aid from Cairo to Gaza. Convoy participants will leave from JFK airport on July 4, bearing the simple yet powerful message that Palestinian independence is as precious as US independence. The group will organize the convoy in Cairo and proceed to Gaza the following weekend, proudly waving US and Palestinian flags, as well as banners declaring thousands of supporting organizations and institutions.
This is set to be the biggest single aid effort for Palestine ever to leave US shores. It will be a source of great strength and hope for the Palestinian people. It will also have a major impact here in the United States, helping to stir US public opinion about the conflict in the Middle East and to bring about a permanent shift in government policy.
The US has a chance right now to step into a more progressive role in the world. But Viva Palestina USA needs your help to make this venture successful and to get this aid through the siege that has been strangling the people of Gaza for three years.
What you can do at link |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BB wrote:
Quote: |
When I'm discussing it on a thread that's fine - join in. But play the ball not the player. Respond to what i've actually said. Don't go on about what you think I think I think. If you want to reply to something I've said, |
I would like to respond to these points.
I have at times in the past made certain arguments and at certain times recieved certain postings by yourself.
In a number of those postings, it appears that you have not responded to what I have said but rather responded to "what you think, I think". If you re-read all your postings in regards to my postings I am sure that you could find them. (This is not an attack, simply a rebuttal to your statement).
(post editted) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting UN articles never replied by Israel....
Quote: |
Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission
Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes "increasing violence and disorder in Palestine" and requests that representatives of "the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee" arrange, with the Security Council, "a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine...Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately."
Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly
Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, "it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine." The Resolutions also "Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine" to stop importing "armed bands and fighting personnel...whatever their origin;...weapons and war materials;...Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine...from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;...refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine."
Resolution 48: The Palestine Question (23 Apr 1948)
Resolution 49: The Palestine Question (22 May 1948)
Resolution 50: The Palestine Question (29 May 1948)
Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)
Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)
Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)
Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)
Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)
Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)
Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)
Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)
Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)
Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and "transfer of persons".
Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)
Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)
Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)
Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)
Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)
Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid.
Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 Mar)
Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 Sep)
Resolution 111: " ... 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".
Resolution 113: The Palestine Question (4 Apr)
Resolution 114: The Palestine Question (4 Jun)
Resolution 127: " ... 'recommends' Israel suspends its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".
Resolution 138: Question relating to the case of Adolf Eichmann, concerning Argentine complaint that Israel breached its sovereignty.
Resolution 162: " ... 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".
Resolution 171: " ... determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".
Resolution 228: " ... 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".
Resolution 233 (June 6, 1967
Resolution 234 (June 7, 1967
Resolution 235 (June 9, 1967
Resolution 236 (June 11, 1967
Resolution 237: " ... 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees".
Resolution 240 (October 25, 1967: concerning violations of the cease-fire
Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967): Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area. Calls on Israel's neighbors to end the state of belligerency and calls upon Israel to reciprocate by withdraw its forces from land claimed by other parties in 1967 war. Interpreted commonly today as calling for the Land for peace principle as a way to resolve Arab-Israeli conflict
Resolution 248: " ... 'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".
Resolution 250: " ... 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
Resolution 251: " ... 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
Resolution 252: " ... 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
Resolution 256: " ... 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".
Resolution 258
Resolution 259: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".
Resolution 262: " ... 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport".
Resolution 265: " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on Salt, Jordan".
Resolution 267: " ... 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
Resolution 270: " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".
Resolution 271: " ... 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
Resolution 279: " ... 'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon".
Resolution 280: " ... 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 285: " ... 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon".
Resolution 298: " ... 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
Resolution 313: " ... 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 316: " ... 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".
Resolution 317: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".
Resolution 331
Resolution 332: " ... 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 337: " ... 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty".
Resolution 338 (22 October 1973): cease fire in Yom Kippur War
Resolution 339 (23 October 1973): Confirms Res. 338, dispatch UN observers.
Resolution 340
Resolution 341
Resolution 344
Resolution 346
Resolution 347: " ... 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon".
Resolution 350 (31 May 1974) established the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, to monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Syria in the wake of the Yom Kippur War.
Resolution 362
Resolution 363
Resolution 368
Resolution 369
Resolution 371
Resolution 378
Resolution 381
Resolution 390
Resolution 396
Resolution 398
Resolution 408
Resolution 416
Resolution 420
Resolution 425 (1978): " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon". Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon was completed as of 16 June 2000.
Resolution 426
Resolution 427: " ... 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon".
Resolution 429
Resolution 434
Resolution 438
Resolution 441
Resolution 444: " ... 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".
Resolution 446 (1979): 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
Resolution 449
Resolution 450: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".
Resolution 452: " ... 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".
Resolution 456
Resolution 459
Resolution 465: " ... 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program".
Resolution 467: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon".
Resolution 468: " ... 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".
Resolution 469: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians".
Resolution 470
Resolution 471: " ... 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
Resolution 474
Resolution 476: " ... 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
Resolution 478 (20 August 1980): 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'.
Resolution 481
Resolution 483
Resolution 484: " ... 'declares it imperative' that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors".
Resolution 485
Resolution 487: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility".
Resolution 488
Resolution 493
Resolution 497 (17 December 1981) decides that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.
Resolution 498: " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".
Resolution 501: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".
Resolution 506
Resolution 508:
Resolution 509: " ... 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".
Resolution 511
Resolution 515: " ... 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in".
Resolution 516
Resolution 517: " ... 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
Resolution 518: " ... 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".
Resolution 519
Resolution 520: " ... 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".
Resolution 523
Resolution 524
Resolution 529
Resolution 531
Resolution 536
Resolution 538
Resolution 543
Resolution 549
Resolution 551
Resolution 555
Resolution 557
Resolution 561
Resolution 563
Resolution 573: " ... 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.
Resolution 575
Resolution 576
Resolution 583
Resolution 584
Resolution 586
Resolution 587 " ... 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".
Resolution 590
Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".
Resolution 594
Resolution 596
Resolution 599
Resolution 603
Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
Resolution 609
Resolution 611
Resolution 613
Resolution 617
Resolution 624
Resolution 630
Resolution 633
Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
Resolution 639
Resolution 641: " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 645
Resolution 648
Resolution 655
Resolution 659
Resolution 672: " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
Resolution 673: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
Resolution 679
Resolution 681: " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 684
Resolution 694: " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
Resolution 695
Resolution 701
Resolution 722
Resolution 726: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 734
Resolution 756
Resolution 768
Resolution 790
Resolution 799: ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
Resolution 803
Resolution 830
Resolution 852
Resolution 887
Resolution 904
Resolution 1039
Resolution 1052
Resolution 1057
Resolution 1068
Resolution 1073
Resolution 1081
Resolution 1095
Resolution 1109
Resolution 1122
Resolution 1139
Resolution 1151
Resolution 1169
Resolution 1188
Resolution 1211
Resolution 1223
Resolution 1243
Resolution 1254
Resolution 1276
Resolution 1288
Resolution 1300
Resolution 1310
Resolution 1322 (7, October 2000)
Resolution 1328
Resolution 1337
Resolution 1351
Resolution 1559 (2 September 2004) called upon Lebanon to establish its sovereignty over all of its land and called upon Syria to end their military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and to cease intervening in internal Lebanese politics. The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias to disband.
Resolution 1583 (28 January 2005) calls on Lebanon to assert full control over its border with Israel. It also states that "the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel's withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425.
Resolution 1648 (21 December 2005) renewed the mandate of United Nations Disengagement Observer Force until 30 June 2006.
Resolution 1701 (11 August 2006) called for the full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.
Resolution 1860 (9 January 2009) called for the full cessation of war between Israel and Hamas. |
Shalom , Inshallah,
DD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
From the New York Times:
Quote: |
Children of school age, on the other hand, have a much broader repertory of responses. Some children at this age will spend an inordinate time retelling the traumatic incident in detail, but with a lack of emotion. Others will become fixated in a state of constant guardedness, as though braced for danger at any moment. |
Quote: |
Similar symptoms are commonly observed among the ''shell shock'' victims of the wars. The pattern, now called the ''post-traumatic stress syndrome,'' includes recurrent dreams of the traumatic event, the numbing of emotions, and guilt about having survived when others have not. |
EMOTIONAL IMPACT OF DISASTER: SENSE OF BENIGN WORLD IS LOST |
Israeli War Crimes Against Children during Operation Cast Lead
Posted: 2009/06/12
From: Mathaba
by Stephen Lendman
Following Israel's Operation Cast Lead, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) documented the toll on Gaza's children and published it in May. It did so "in response to the unprecedented number of children who were killed (and injured) by (the Israeli Defense Forces) during the offensive on Gaza." According to international standards, the Convention on the Rights of the Child's (CRC) definition was used to apply to anyone under age 18.
PCHR reviewed IDF killing of Gaza's children since the beginning of the Second Intifada in September 2000, then focused on the 313 youth deaths during the recent conflict. Its evidence comes from eye-witness accounts of the willful targeting of civilians, including women and children. Also covered are the psychological scars and "alarming scale of physical injuries" leaving some children blind and many others (as well as adults) permanently disabled by the loss of limbs and psychological trauma.
PCHR's report bears testimony to Israel's contempt for international laws, its imperial agenda, culture of violence, disdain for peace, genocidal intentions, disparagement of Arabs and Islam, and its scorn for Palestinian lives and welfare.
PCHR presented 13 case studies in its report. Briefly discussed below, they represent a small fraction of the many hundreds killed and thousands more grievously harmed.
Introduction
Since the September 2000 Second Intifada, Israeli forces killed 1179 children, including 865 in Gaza as part of a decades-long policy of collectively punishing millions of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, mostly civilian men, women, and children.
Israel calls self-defense "terrorism" and justifies its actions as responses to militant missile or other attacks. PCHR's investigations "have consistently undermined these claims," and condemns all killing, especially of children.
In September 2006, the London Independent's Donald Macintyre headlined his story: "Gaza: The children killed in a war the world doesn't want to know about." He wrote about more than 37 children under 18 killed since June 25 during Israel's Operation Summer Rain, according to PCHR figures, out of an overall 228 total, mostly civilians.
He highlighted a "forgotten war in the Middle East" with young boys, girls and adults blown apart by Israeli shells and missiles, but who notices. He said the IDF attacks heavily populated areas indiscriminately on the pretext of fighting a "terrorist infrastructure." He stressed that "attention (was) diverted from Gaza as Israel launch(ed) a full military invasion of southern Lebanon" yet civilian deaths mounted in both areas. He listed by name Gazan children under 18 killed and by what means - from airstrikes, while playing football, missiles, shrapnel, tank or artillery shells, and shot in the head or chest at close range. Khitam Mohammed Rebhi Tayey was one - age 11. Aya Salmeya another - age 9.
Israel rarely responds to public outrage or investigates its crimes, including against children. The few times it does turn into whitewashes. After 11 days on March 30, 2009, military advocate general Avichai Mandelblit closed the IDF's inquiry into Israeli soldiers' accounts of Operation Cast Lead crimes and dismissed them as unfounded.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Protection for Children
Various laws apply, including the Fourth Geneva Convention and UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). As protected persons, they're to be safeguarded against willful killing, coercion, corporal punishments, torture, collective penalties and reprisals.
CRC was the first legally binding international instrument incorporating all human rights for children, including civil, cultural, economic, political and social. They're now universally agreed on non-negotiable standards and obligations supporting their rights.
CRC's Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict took effect on February 12, 2002. Israel ratified it on July 18, 2005 and CRC in 1991. The Optional Protocol strengthens children's rights, recognizes that they require special protection, and condemns their being targeted in armed conflicts, especially in schools, hospitals or at home. Israel is legally bound under both laws and Geneva, yet disdains them repeatedly, especially by "willful killing" through indiscriminate attacks or deliberately targeting civilian areas or structures.
Truth and Lies: Operation Cast Lead and Civilian Deaths
Besides vast destruction and mass population displacement, 313 children were killed among the 1414 who died over a 23-day period. Of the 5300 injured (many seriously), 1606 were children. In all cases, the vast majority were noncombatants.
Of the children killed:
-- most were at home or nearby;
-- around one-third were girls and the rest boys;
-- almost 15% were under age 5 and another one-fourth between 5 and 10;
-- the remainder were between 11 and 17;
-- the "overwhelming majority" were killed in densely populated residential areas;
-- 46% were killed in northern Gaza;
-- 38% in Gaza City;
-- 9% in Khan Yunis and Rafah and 7% in less densely populated areas.
Israel used conventional and illegal weapons. The former included missiles, artillery and tank shells, mortars, and automatic weapons.
Others included:
-- white phosphorous that burns flesh to the bone and can be fatal; it's use is prohibited in civilian areas;
-- flechettes that are 4cm long darts used as anti-personnel weapons; they penetrate to the bone and can cause multiple horrific injuries; up to 8000 of them can be packed into one artillery shell; on explosion, they travel at high speed in multiple directions up to around 300 meters; and
-- various other internationally prohibited weapons that PCHR investigations uncovered and condemned.
Its case studies show a consistent failure of Israeli forces to protect civilian lives, especially those of children. They document indiscriminate attacks against densely populated neighborhoods in grave violation of international laws.
To safeguard civilians and non-military areas and structures, IHL requires that precautions be taken in any attack, and civilian protection is paramount. Israel pays no heed and attacks indiscriminately in grave violation of the law.
Case Study One - The Olaiwa Family
Gaza City's Isma'il (age 7), Mo'men (age 13), Mo'tassem (age 14) and Lana Olaiwa, (age 9) and their mother Amal were killed when an artillery shell struck their home on January 5, 2009. Three other family members were injured, including Amal's husband, Haider, and her eldest son, Muntasser.
Two survivors were too badly injured to be interviewed. PCHR spoke to Fadwa Olaiwa, Haider's sister, who lived two floors below. She said that 42 extended family members lived in the four-story house. The shell killed five of them in their kitchen where Amal was cooking.
When Fadwa heard the explosion, she ran upstairs and saw what happened. She found Amal decapitated by the refrigerator and the other bodies close by. Haider, Muntasser and Ghadir were taken to Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital. Haider sustained permanent facial and jaw injuries. Ghadir's right arm was seriously injured. She and her father's hearing were badly damaged. Muntasser had serious liver and stomach shrapnel wounds requiring two operations. Metal is still embedded in his right leg, and he continues to undergo treatment.
PCHR investigations confirm that no combatants or military targets were close by at the time of the attack. Artillery shells were fired indiscriminately, have a range of up to 60 km, and were used against entire areas, including civilian ones. This attack and many others like it constitute war crimes on two counts under Articles 8(2)(b)(ii) and (iv) of the International Criminal Court Statute.
Case Study Two - the al-Dayah Family
In the Zaytoun district of eastern Gaza, 22 family members were killed when a bomb struck their home - including 12 children and a pregnant woman. The explosion destroyed the house and buried many of the family inside. Only two family members survived, 28-year old Aamer and his brother Rida. Those killed included:
-- Fayez Musbah Hasham, age 60
-- Kawkab Sa'id Hussein, age 57
-- Radwan Fayez Musbah, age 22
-- Sabrin Fayez Musbah, age 24
-- Raghda Fayez Musbah, age 34
-- Eyad Fayez Musbah, age 36
-- Rawda Hilal Hussein, age 32
-- Ali Eyad Fayez Musbah, age 10
-- Khitam Eyad Fayez Musbah, age 9
-- Alaa' Eyad Fayez Musbah, age 7
-- Raba'a Eyad Fayez, age 6
-- Sharaf Al-Din Eyad Fayez, age 5
-- Mohammed Eyad Fayez, age 7 months
-- Ramez Fayez Musbah, age 27
-- Safaa' Saleh Mohammed, age 20
-- Baraa' Ramez Fayez, age 1.5
-- Salsabil Ramez Fayez, age 5 months
-- Tazal Isma'il Isma'il Mohammed, age 28 and 8 months pregnant
-- Amani Mohammed Fayez, age 6
-- Qamar Mohammed Fayez, age 5
-- Arij Mohammed Fayez, age 3, and
-- Yousef Mohammed Fayez, age two
On February 3, 2009, PCHR interviewed Aamer al-Dayah (who was home) and his brother, Rida who was outside the house when attacked. Aamer said 24 family members shared seven apartments in the building. When it was struck, the force knocked Aamer unconscious, and he awakened under rubble. Rida was at a nearby mosque at the time. He rushed home, freed Aamer and his twin brother Radwan inside, still alive but only barely until he died on January 9.
Both survivors told PCHR that the explosion flung some family members meters outside their home while others inside were burned beyond recognition. They had no advance warning of an immanent attack, but PCHR fieldworkers learned there was military activity nearby. However, all al-Dayah family members were civilians. The IDF attack gravely breached international law and constitutes two war crime counts under Articles 8(2)(b)(ii) and (iv) of the International Criminal Court Statute.
According to IHL principles, Israeli forces used excessive and disproportionate force against a known civilian target resulting in the death of 22 al-Dayah family members - a crime Palestinians will long remember.
Case Study Three - the al-Battran family
On January 16, six al-Battran family members were slaughtered in their al-Bureji refugee camp home by an Israeli aircraft fired missile. Killed were Manal and five of her children:
-- Manal, age 32
-- Islam, age 15
-- Eman, age 9
-- twin sister Ehsan, age 9
-- Bilal, age 6 and
-- Izziddin, age 3
Full article at link |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let�s Talk About Terrorism � From Warsaw to Jenin
April 19, 2002 � 11:47 am
Today, 19 April 2002, is the 59th anniversary of the outbreak of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising by the Jews in Nazi occupied Poland. If I were to be a Jew today, I would be deeply ashamed of how history has repeated itself on the eve of this anniversary.
The irony is simply too incredible to ignore: A totally isolated and starving civilian population confined in a dreadful ghetto with endless curfews. An oppressed and wronged people with little hope of salvation. An expansionist enemy with an elected sadist at its helm who blames the subjugated victims for their miserable predicament. A desperate uprising that knows it has no chances of military victory, but a resistance movement that is nevertheless determined to die fighting. A long and suffocating military siege, followed by a relentless and indiscriminate onslaught. A bloodbath, heroic martyrdom, a crushed uprising, but the inevitable and unstoppable rebirth of a people.
The shame that decent Jews must feel today is compounded by the fact that the Israeli generals who are bent on crushing the will of the Palestinians today have themselves unremorsefully declared recently that they must learn from the German tactics of suppressing the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in their current war against the surrounded Palestinian ghettos (see report by Amir Oren in Haaretz, 25 January 2002). The Jews who perished at the hands of the Nazis must be turning in their graves at such repulsive news these days.
...
Of course, you will hear and read none of this in the mainstream Western news organisations. They will not tell you that, for example, like their Palestinian counterparts, the Jewish resistance in the Warsaw ghetto used to execute Jewish collaborators with the Nazis (contemptuously called Kapos) without trial. Far from it, the obedient Zionist media troops are too busy waging an incessant propaganda war against all manifestations of Palestinian aspirations for freedom.
Recently, after the carnage in the West Bank could not be blacked-out any longer, the only remaining effective weapon of this actively combatant media machine in the West has been to continuously point out the criminality and immorality of intentionally targeting and murdering innocent Israeli civilians by Palestinian suicide bombers � and you can be sure to hear or read little else from them about the origins and sources of the fear and loathing in the hearts of Palestinians.
This manipulative tool of persuasion has been effective because, unfortunately, there has been no focused counter response from the Palestinian side that earnestly and boldly confronts the issue of the suicide bombers outside the popular discourse of glorification or the traditional indulgence in metaphysical certainties.
So, while Israeli tanks and planes have been wreaking destruction and death on the already besieged ghettos of Palestine, and while Israeli soldiers have been destroying ambulances and preventing them from attending to � or even burying � the Palestinians who have been left to bleed to death on the sides of the roads or under the rubble of their destroyed shacks in the refugee camps, the �usual suspects� of pro-Israeli commentators have been coming out yet again in blind defence of Israel, nauseatingly screaming �suicide bombers� and �terrorism� over and over again.
It has all been about stopping the suicide bombings, they remind us, while wickedly drawing outrageous parallels to the September 11 massacres. The random killings of Israeli civilians by Palestinian men and women wrapped with explosives, they tell the world, are simply intolerable and need to be eliminated. So the actions of the Israeli army, according to the Israeli apologists, somehow become a justifiable means of self-defence against the indefensible acts of intentional murder of civilians by the Palestinian Kamikaze men and women.
With this simplistic approach, the shameless warlords disguised as journalists in this crucial media war didn�t have to do much to deceive their audience and readers; on its face value, any position stating that the intentional murder of innocent civilians is wrong � and ending the argument there � does not need much arguing to sound convincing.
The latent, yet immense, evil, however, of this seemingly ethical stand against murder lies not in its rightful condemnation of the act itself but in its deliberate omitting of the full picture. The grave act of deception and dishonesty of the media is manifested in the disgraceful failure to point out not only that the premeditated intentional killing of civilians is an atrocity perpetrated by both sides in the conflict today, but that the leading precedents in this criminal form of warfare have been set by the Israelis and not by the Palestinians.
To unveil this deeply suppressed reality, it is incumbent upon us, Arabs and Palestinians, to remember our history and keep reminding the world of the truth. We cannot tire of reiterating the fact that the deplorable acts of intentional and targeted murder of civilians of which we now stand accused were the novelty not of the Palestinians, but indeed the patented invention of the Israeli colonizers of our land from the very start of this conflict until the present moment
It is always refreshing, therefore, in such clouded times to recount some of the glaring chapters in the biography of Israeli terrorism. Here are but a few.
article continues at link |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|