Korean Job Discussion Forums

[arjuna]

Zionism: A Key Factor in the New World Order Elite Power Network
by Adrian Salbuchi

Zionism is a tricky subject. It is a Key Factor in the New World Order Elite Power Network, and yet its key premises and actions cannot be openly debated. So powerful are they, that key words have been misappropriated and misused. All genuine criticism of Zionism is automatically branded and disqualified as "Anti-Semitism", "Discrimination". All public debate on the political abuse and misuse of "The Holocaust" is branded as "Revisionist Denial", "Antisemitism", "Hate Mongering", etc... This is all tantamount to Intellectual Terrorism. It needs to be stopped, otherwise the New World Order cannot be properly understood, assessed and its destructive force mitigated.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy43zYo33Dg
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY6mq8rAqAQ
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppQNpl68RiM

[Manner of Speaking]

In the 1960s, the John Birch Society (JBS) and other Patriot Movement groups peddled the anti-Freemason ideology from the 1790s, using it to explain the communist threat. Communists allegedly were just one guise of the Mason's Illuminati leadership. Later the Illuminati were variously said to control Wall Street, Hillary Clinton, and Dick Cheney. In terms of public discourse, when the JBS blamed the secret elites and plutocrats for the vast conspiracy, the organization was not covertly blaming the Jews.

Instead a favorite theme of the JBS continues to be that the liberal globalists are planning a New World Order run by a totalitarian One World Government through the United Nations. Nonetheless, the JBS cites books and other works that perpetuate stereotypes about Jews, banking, and global power.

The right-wing group Populists American takes a step further toward antisemitism. For this group, the problem is not all Jews. Rather, its website explains that the real �enemy of all mankind� is the �Zionist Jews� who are �not to be confused with other Jews.� The website then posts the text of the Protocols with the usual disclaimer.

[Manner of Speaking]

The paranoid style is not confined to our own country and time; it is an international phenomenon. When he was studying the millennial sects of Europe from the eleventh to the sixteenth century, historian Norman Cohn believed he found a persistent psychic complex made up of certain preoccupations and fantasies:

[Sergio Stefanuto]

[Manner of Speaking]

A mentality disposed to see the world in this way may be a persistent psychic phenomenon, more or less constantly affecting a modest minority of the population. A distinguished historian has said that one of the most valuable things about history is that it teaches us how things do not happen. It is precisely this kind of awareness that the paranoid fails to develop. He has a special resistance of his own, of course, to developing such awareness, but circumstances often deprive him of exposure to events that might enlighten him�and in any case he resists enlightenment.

We are all sufferers from history, but the paranoid is a double sufferer, since he is afflicted not only by the real world, with the rest of us, but by his fantasies as well.

[bacasper]

Halfway through Part One, the video promises to keep my interest.

Other resources for the interested:

The Hidden History of Zionism by Ralph Schoenman documents Zionist collaboration with the Nazi holocaust.

Missing Links goes beyond mere Zionism. It begins with the terrible and horribly traitorous Israeli attack upon the USS Liberty, a story long suppressed. A must watch.

[arjuna]

Repost:

World Government: Accept or Resist?

World Government is coming.... and it's coming fast!!! Whether it succeeds or not, depends on us... And not on a MAJORITY of us (at least not at first), but rather, it depends on whether a much smaller group of FREEDOM FIGHTERS will rally the Peoples of the world against the New World Order Masters... So, what will it be with you? Do you accept or resist the coming World Government?

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8046ffXok
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvR8GNAYpNs

[djsmnc]

On my reggae CDs they always talk about Zion! They even chant it sometimes. Is that some kind of code for the Pentagon to use?

[Manner of Speaking]

[Manner of Speaking]

When you hear someone claim that a handful of secret elites manipulate politics and the economy, who do you think they mean? The Trilateral Commission? Dick Cheney and his pals at Halliburton? Jewish Bankers? With a clever use of rhetoric, a speaker can mean all three, yet never mention the �Jewish Bankers.�

Using coded language to avoid an obvious appearance of bigotry has a long tradition.

When politicians talk about �Welfare Queens� many White Americans first envision a Black mother with ten children, even though most welfare recipients are White. This is a tradition that dates back to segregationist George Wallace.

Wallace railed against federal, state and local officials for their timid response to Molotov-throwing urban rioters, but he never referred to them explicitly in racial terms. He talked about "brutal and marauding criminals who transformed America's urban streets into war zones". But he did not directly mention race.

He constantly complained of shiftless free-loaders, collecting their welfare checks�paid for by the hard-working American. But he scrupulously avoided using racial language to describe this new parasitic welfare class.

The phrase �international bankers� is another example of a coded phrase that has long been used to suggest Jewish bankers, as has the phrase �money manipulators.� This is complicated by the fact that for some conspiracists, the target is not Jews, but another group or family. For example, in the 1960s, the term �internationalists� can refer to Jews or the Rockefeller family, depending upon the author and context. In the early 1960s Phyllis Schlafly wrote about the �Secret Kingmakers� who controlled the Republican Party. She is referring to the Rockefeller wing of the Party, yet some readers who were antisemitic would assume she really meant the global Jewish elites.

[bacasper]

Caution: this is somewhat off-topic but necessary.

There is a reason that insane people were once called "mad." There is a lot of anger inside insanity.

Often when confronted with uncomfortable facts, or even mere assertions with which they disagree, they resort to hurling epithets such as "conspiracy theorist" in order to shut down debate and/or attack the messenger instead of calmly refuting the assertions, or merely for the need to build up their low self-esteem.

They are unable to scroll past threads in which they have no interest or find irritating.

They are often so mad as to be unable to follow simple terms of service on an internet message board. This can lead to their accounts being closed, and thus hurling themselves into further and even more unproductive isolation, possibly culminating in a psychotic break with tragic consequences.

Let's hope that does not happen to anyone here.

[Manner of Speaking]

** glances around **

Anybody see any debates being "shut down"? Anybody see openly questioning their facts as well as their possible subconscious motives, amounts to closing down debate? *I* don't control what gets posted here, and I certainly don't control what gets deleted.

Where have we've heard this one before, I think...somehow its ok to discuss the conspiracy theories but not the conspiracy theorists.

We are all free to discuss the policies advocated by mainstrea- no, all - political parties, and we are all equally free to discuss the politicians themselves, including their personalities and the psychology behind their actions. Why shouldn't we all be free to discuss and evaluate the mindset of someone who comes on this forum and claims something like the entire world economy is about to be overtaken by some cabal hidden somewhere in a room?


The people who make these claims want attention. Just not too much.


The posts I've made above demonstrate that there has been an ongoing trend going back decades, if not centuries, to take a paranoid viewpoint of world events. It's not a thesis I came up with on my own, and lots of much more qualified, eminent, and talented historians and writers have explored and developed this idea. And we are all eminently entitled to discuss this mindset, since it was this mindset that lead to the murder of a security guard at a public museum just days ago.



Like most conspiracy theorists, James von Brunn drank milk as a child.


But drinking milk doesn't motivate you to go out and murder someone.


911 conspiracy theories and their like clearly do.

[Manner of Speaking]

I don't control a damn thing on this forum. I could get on this forum and say, "Look, everyone....I have 19 toes on my left foot and when I fart, sweet basil comes out of my hiney." And everybody on this forum could sit up and say, "No, that's nonsense." and there wouldn't be a damn thing I could do about it. And I'm ok with that. Why wouldn't I be?

Everybody is free to read, look at, think about, and comment on anything that gets discussed here. That's why it's called a public discussion forum. Every person on this forum is entitled to comment on and disagree with **anything ** I post or any thread I start. That is their right, and even if I disagree with their opinion I'm certainly not going to deny them their right to disagree. Maybe so few people do disagree with the threads that I start because (sometimes) they agree with my opinons - or in many cases aren't even interested in the subject.

There are lots of threads that the average forum member doesn't read, simply because they are not interested in the topic, and I am no exception. I look at the conspiracy theory threads and comment on them because I find the nonsense so interesting and entertaining.

You seem to think, however, that somehow people owe it to you to scroll past these threads and ignore them, as though somehow I or the rest of the members of this forum have some obligation to you to not engage you in the ideas you present. Nobody on this forum owes you any such thing.

[bacasper]