Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Obama, the African Colonial
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cordova



Joined: 14 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:09 pm    Post subject: Obama, the African Colonial Reply with quote

BTW, written by an African lest the American educated scream "raciss"

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/obama_the_african_colonial.html


Obama, the African Colonial
By L.E. Ikenga

Had Americans been able to stop obsessing over the color of Barack Obama's skin and instead paid more attention to his cultural identity, maybe he would not be in the White House today. The key to understanding him lies with his identification with his father, and his adoption of a cultural and political mindset rooted in postcolonial Africa.


Like many educated intellectuals in postcolonial Africa, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was enraged at the transformation of his native land by its colonial conqueror. But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism. I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign "isms", instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.


The tropes of America's racial history as a way of understanding all things black are useless in understanding the man who got his dreams from his father, a Kenyan exemplar of the African Colonial.


Before I continue, I need to say this: I am a first generation born West African-American woman whose parents emigrated to the U.S. in the 1970's from the country now called Nigeria. I travel to Nigeria frequently. I see myself as both a proud American and as a proud Igbo (the tribe that we come from -- also sometimes spelled Ibo). Politically, I have always been conservative (though it took this past election for me to commit to this once and for all!); my conservative values come from my Igbo heritage and my place of birth. Of course, none of this qualifies me to say what I am about to -- but at the same time it does.


My friends, despite what CNN and the rest are telling you, Barack Obama is nothing more than an old school African Colonial who is on his way to turning this country into one of the developing nations that you learn about on the National Geographic Channel. Many conservative (East, West, South, North) African-Americans like myself -- those of us who know our history -- have seen this movie before. Here are two main reasons why many Americans allowed Obama to slip through the cracks despite all of his glaring inconsistencies:


First, Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not. Barack Obama is intrinsically undemocratic and as his presidency plays out, this will become more obvious. Second, and most importantly, too many Americans know very little about Africa. The one-size-fits-all understanding that many Americans (both black and white) continue to have of Africa might end up bringing dire consequences for this country.


Contrary to the way it continues to be portrayed in mainstream Western culture, Africa is not a continent that can be solely defined by AIDS, ethnic rivalries, poverty and safaris. Africa, like any other continent, has an immense history defined by much diversity and complexity. Africa's long-standing relationship with Europe speaks especially to some of these complexities -- particularly the relationship that has existed between the two continents over the past two centuries. Europe's complete colonization of Africa during the nineteenth century, also known as the Scramble for Africa, produced many unfortunate consequences, the African colonial being one of them.


The African colonial (AC) is a person who by means of their birth or lineage has a direct connection with Africa. However, unlike Africans like me, their worldviews have been largely shaped not by the indigenous beliefs of a specific African tribe but by the ideals of the European imperialism that overwhelmed and dominated Africa during the colonial period. AC's have no real regard for their specific African traditions or histories. AC's use aspects of their African culture as one would use pieces of costume jewelry: things of little or no value that can be thoughtlessly discarded when they become a negative distraction, or used on a whim to decorate oneself in order to seem exotic. (Hint: Obama's Muslim heritage).


On the other hand, AC's strive to be the best at the culture that they inherited from Europe. Throughout the West, they are tops in their professions as lawyers, doctors, engineers, Ivy League professors and business moguls; this is all well and good. It's when they decide to engage us as politicians that things become messy and convoluted.


The African colonial politician (ACP) feigns repulsion towards the hegemonic paradigms of Western civilization. But at the same time, he is completely enamored of the trappings of its aristocracy or elite culture. The ACP blames and caricatures whitey to no end for all that has gone wrong in the world. He convinces the masses that various forms of African socialism are the best way for redressing the problems that European colonialism motivated in Africa. However, as opposed to really being a hard-core African Leftist who actually believes in something, the ACP uses socialist themes as a way to disguise his true ambitions: a complete power grab whereby the "will of the people" becomes completely irrelevant.


Barack Obama is all of the above. The only difference is that he is here playing (colonial) African politics as usual.


In his 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father -- an eloquent piece of political propaganda -- Obama styles himself as a misunderstood intellectual who is deeply affected by the sufferings of black people, especially in America and Africa. In the book, Obama clearly sees himself as an African, not as a black American. And to prove this, he goes on a quest to understand his Kenyan roots. He is extremely thoughtful of his deceased father's legacy; this provides the main clue for understanding Barack Obama.


Barack Obama Sr. was an African colonial to the core; in his case, the apple did not fall far from the tree. All of the telltale signs of Obama's African colonialist attitudes are on full display in the book -- from his feigned antipathy towards Europeans to his view of African tribal associations as distracting elements that get in the way of "progress". (On p. 308 of Dreams From My Father, Obama says that African tribes should be viewed as an "ancient loyalties".)


Like imperialists of Old World Europe, the ACP sees their constituents not as free thinking individuals who best know how to go about achieving and creating their own means for success. Instead, the ACP sees his constituents as a flock of ignorant sheep that need to be led -- oftentimes to their own slaughter.


Like the European imperialist who spawned him, the ACP is a destroyer of all forms of democracy.


Here are a few examples of what the British did in order to create (in 1914) what is now called Nigeria and what Obama is doing to you:


Convince the people that "clinging" to any aspect of their cultural (tribal) identity or history is bad and regresses the process of "unity". British Imperialists deeply feared people who were loyal to anything other than the state. "Tribalism" made the imperialists have to work harder to get people to just fall in line. Imperialists pitted tribes against each other in order to create chaos that they then blamed on ethnic rivalry. Today many "educated" Nigerians, having believed that their traditions were irrelevant, remain completely ignorant of their ancestry and the history of their own tribes.
Confiscate the wealth and resources of the area that you govern by any means necessary in order to redistribute wealth. The British used this tactic to present themselves as empathetic and benevolent leaders who wanted everyone to have a "fair shake". Imperialists are not interested in equality for all. They are interested in controlling all.
Convince the masses that your upper-crust university education naturally puts you on an intellectual plane from which to understand everything even when you understand nothing. Imperialists were able to convince the people that their elite university educations allowed them to understand what Africa needed. Many of today's Nigerians-having followed that lead-hold all sorts of degrees and certificates-but what good are they if you can't find a job?
Lie to the people and tell them that progress is being made even though things are clearly becoming worse. One thing that the British forgot to mention to their Nigerian constituents was that one day, the resources that were being used to engineer "progress" (which the British had confiscated from the Africans to begin with!) would eventually run out. After WWII, Western Europe could no longer afford to hold on to their African colonies. So all of the counterfeit countries that the Europeans created were then left high-and-dry to fend for themselves. This was the main reason behind the African independence movements of the1950 and 60's. What will a post-Obama America look like?
Use every available media outlet to perpetuate the belief that you and your followers are the enlightened ones-and that those who refuse to support you are just barbaric, uncivilized, ignorant curmudgeons. This speaks for itself.


America, don't be fooled. The Igbos were once made up of a confederacy of clans that ascribed to various forms of democratic government. They took their eyes off the ball and before they knew it, the British were upon them. Also, understand this: the African colonial who is given too much political power can only become one thing: a despot.


L.E. Ikenga can be reached at [email protected].

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/obama_the_african_colonial.html at June 29, 2009 - 06:07:59 PM EDT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although disguised in a different type of language, this is no different than what other Conservatives have been saying: Barack Obama is a Socialist that wants to grab as much power as possible and will run America into the ground. The only difference is he's chosen to couch this attack in strange racial terms instead of just outright saying it like other Conservatives have been.

If Conservatives want to attack specific policies of Obama's, that's cool; there's plenty to attack. This sort of vague fear-mongering that's oh so common from Conservative writers, however, is just pathetic. If one's case isn't strong enough to be persuasive without this sort of rubbish, one really needs to consider why that is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Although disguised in a different type of language, this is no different than what other Conservatives have been saying: Barack Obama is a Socialist that wants to grab as much power as possible and will run America into the ground.


Yeah, the writer does a good job of appropriating the lingo of the "multicultural diversity" crowd for her own ideological ends.

Quote:
First, Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not. Barack Obama is intrinsically undemocratic and as his presidency plays out, this will become more obvious. Second, and most importantly, too many Americans know very little about Africa. The one-size-fits-all understanding that many Americans (both black and white) continue to have of Africa might end up bringing dire consequences for this country.


Contrary to the way it continues to be portrayed in mainstream Western culture, Africa is not a continent that can be solely defined by AIDS, ethnic rivalries, poverty and safaris. Africa, like any other continent, has an immense history defined by much diversity and complexity. Africa's long-standing relationship with Europe speaks especially to some of these complexities -- particularly the relationship that has existed between the two continents over the past two centuries. Europe's complete colonization of Africa during the nineteenth century, also known as the Scramble for Africa, produced many unfortunate consequences, the African colonial being one of them.


The African colonial (AC) is a person who by means of their birth or lineage has a direct connection with Africa. However, unlike Africans like me, their worldviews have been largely shaped not by the indigenous beliefs of a specific African tribe but by the ideals of the European imperialism that overwhelmed and dominated Africa during the colonial period. AC's have no real regard for their specific African traditions or histories. AC's use aspects of their African culture as one would use pieces of costume jewelry: things of little or no value that can be thoughtlessly discarded when they become a negative distraction, or used on a whim to decorate oneself in order to seem exotic. (Hint: Obama's Muslim heritage).


It sounds as if bell hooks got a job writing Republican spam mail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha. Bell Hooks. I forgot about her.

^ ^ My middle finger to power
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Wall of Whiner



Joined: 24 Jan 2003
Location: Middle Land

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've seen pieces of poo that were more attractive to me than this article.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cordova



Joined: 14 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Great Wall of Whiner wrote:
I've seen pieces of poo that were more attractive to me than this article.


I guess you are Raciss since the author is African, Huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raciss? Anyway, how did Obama manage to get all of that from his father, whom he only saw once after the future president was two years old?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cordova wrote:
The Great Wall of Whiner wrote:
I've seen pieces of poo that were more attractive to me than this article.


I guess you are Raciss since the author is African, Huh?


Conversely, he may be so decidedly non-racist that he realizes just like people of European descent, people of African descent can write things that are total rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saw6436



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Daejeon, ROK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This should surprise no one who knows anythng about the Democratic Party. Democrats are by nature anti-democracy. Bigger government, more government regulations, more intrusive goverment. More government control = less freedom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saw6436 wrote:
This should surprise no one who knows anythng about the Democratic Party. Democrats are by nature anti-democracy. Bigger government, more government regulations, more intrusive goverment. More government control = less freedom.

And this differs from Republicans exactly how?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RufusW



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[Sorry, wrong thread]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

saw6436 wrote:
This should surprise no one who knows anythng about the Democratic Party. Democrats are by nature anti-democracy. Bigger government, more government regulations, more intrusive goverment. More government control = less freedom.


Nothing about bigger government, government regulation, or even government intrusion is un-democratic, so long as those policies are enacted by the people's chosen representatives.

Like many Conservatives, you seem to confuse "democracy" with "doing whatever the Hell I want."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saw6436



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Daejeon, ROK

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who said I'm conservative? I just point out that, traditionally, the Democratic Party has been opposed to Democracy (not that the US is a Democracy).

The Democratic Party's record is quite clear. More regulation. More control. More intrusion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

saw6436 wrote:
Who said I'm conservative? I just point out that, traditionally, the Democratic Party has been opposed to Democracy (not that the US is a Democracy).

The Democratic Party's record is quite clear. More regulation. More control. More intrusion.


And none of that is anti-democracy. You're misusing the word.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

saw6436 wrote:
The Democratic Party's record is quite clear. More regulation. More control. More intrusion.

Neither party has a monopoly on that.

Democrats want regulation on CORPORATIONS...and Republicans want regulation on HUMAN BEINGS.

8 years of Bush, and didn't you read or hear about the LACK of corporate regulation - i.e. WALL STREET? If you also followed the intrusion/big brother laws set in place to spy/regulate/check on people under the name of terrorism, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International