Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Deficit forces California to issue IOUs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cordova



Joined: 14 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:33 pm    Post subject: Deficit forces California to issue IOUs Reply with quote

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5601F220090701?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true

California government declares fiscal emergency over budget
Wed Jul 1, 2009 5:01pm EDT
By Jim Christie

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday declared a fiscal emergency to force lawmakers into a special session to tackle a state budget gap that has widened to $26.3 billion from $24.3 billion after they failed to close it on Tuesday.

Lawmakers debated late into the night Tuesday but could not agree on a plan to balance California's budget for its new fiscal year, which began early Wednesday morning.

That cleared the way for state officials to suspend payments owed to vendors and local agencies, who instead will get "IOU" notes promising payment.

The notes would mark the first time in 17 years the most populous U.S. state's government would have to resort to the unusual and dramatic measure -- and would follow warnings by Wall Street that the state's credit ratings may be lowered, which would increase its borrowing costs.

"Though the legislature failed to solve our budget problem yesterday, rest assured that solving the entire deficit remains my first and only priority, and I will not rest until we get it done. I will not be a part of pushing this crisis down the road -- the road stops here," Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

While California lawmakers struggle with budget deadlines nearly every year, this budget fight is taking place amid the state's worst drop in revenues from personal income taxes since the Great Depression as recession and rising joblessness worsen damage done to the state economy from the housing slump.

Democrats, who control the legislature, could not convince Republicans to either back their plans to tackle the shortfall or make a stopgap effort to ward off the IOUs. The two sides agree on the need for spending cuts, but are split over whether to raise taxes to help fill the gap.

Democrats have pushed for new revenues while Republican lawmakers and Schwarzenegger, also a Republican, have ruled out tax increases. They want deep spending cuts to balance the budget. Democrats say that would slash the state's safety net for the needy to the bone.

California bonds due in 10 to 30 years traded stronger in the secondary municipal market as it priced in a missed budget deadline, said Municipal Market Data analyst Domenic Vonella.

"We've seen Cal GO paper widen for the last three weeks or so ... Today things are a few basis points better," added Parker Colvin, head of municipal securities trading at Stone & Youngberg in San Francisco.

CASH CRISIS LOOMS

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the Obama administration is keeping a close eye on California's woes. State officials have proposed the U.S. government help with financial aid or by vouching for state debt. "We continue to watch the situation and we'll see as it develops," Gibbs said.

In Sacramento, California's capital, State Treasurer Bill Lockyer's office is preparing plans to issue short-term debt assuming Washington will not guarantee it.

"We've been operating since May under the assumption that there will be no help forthcoming," said Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar. "We did not ask for a bailout, repeat, we did not ask for a bailout. We wanted the federal government to step in and provide a backstop for our cash-flow borrowing."

Meanwhile, the lack of a budget may trigger action by Wall Street credit ratings agencies.

Fitch last week downgraded its rating on California's general obligation debt by one notch to A-minus, placing it four notches above speculative, or "junk" status, and making it the lowest rating of any U.S. state.

Fitch also warned of further downgrades, just as Standard & Poor's has warned of possible downgrades to California's general obligation debt. Moody's has said the state could see a multinotch downgrade of its A2 rating.

Moody's had no immediate comment on California's IOU plan or its failure to pass a budget. Fitch and S&P analysts were not immediately available to comment.

In Sacramento, tempers flared in the state Senate as the midnight start of the new fiscal year and IOUs neared.

"There is no excuse to hold this whole state hostage," state Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg told Republicans during a floor debate.

Senate Republican Leader Dennis Hollingsworth countered that major cuts are urgently needed. Otherwise, "there will be entire programs that will have to be lopped off," he said.

Due to its steep decline in revenue, California risks running out of cash later this month to pay all of its bills unless its books are balanced quickly. To conserve cash, State Controller John Chiang plans to issue IOUs by Thursday to state vendors, some local agencies and various recipients of state aid, including the elderly, disabled and college students.

Chiang plans to send $3.36 billion in IOUs this month to help make $10.9 billion in other payments, including money owed to investors holding California's debt. "The general obligation bonds will be paid," he told Reuters. "California has never defaulted on its debt obligation and we don't plan to do so."

California, which had the eighth largest economy in the world in 2006, according it its Legislative Analysts' Office, now needs to reassure Wall Street because state officials see the need to sell $7 billion to $9 billion of short-term debt once there is a budget agreement.

(Additional reporting by Marianne Russ in Sacramento, Lisa Lambert and Doug Palmer in Washington))
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saw6436



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Daejeon, ROK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We really need to start taxing religious groups. Nothing onerous, just 1 or 2%. No reason not too really.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The solution will obviously have to include lots of both cuts and taxes increases, but it is time for is rethinking the criminal justice policies of three-strikes-you're-out, the death penalty, and civil commitment, all of which are enormously expensive to implement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enormously expensive. Rolling Eyes http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/voter-info/overview-state-budget.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ That link does not refute "enormously expensive," but it does indicate that spending on prisons is about $15 billion, so I could figure they could save a billion or two right there.

Thanks.
Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

14, 15 % of the budget is not enormous when you consider a state's primary function: to protect its citizens.

But, hey, that's just me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

14, 15% of a lot is a lot. Just about all budget sectors will have to be cut, so I have indicated where cuts ought to be made in criminal justice.

If you can explain how bankrupting a state protects its citizens, I'm all ears.

But I am glad to see that you presumably agree with abolition of the death penalty, since murder rates are higher instates that have it. Wanna be better protected? Abolish it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
14, 15% of a lot is a lot. Just about all budget sectors will have to be cut, so I have indicated where cuts ought to be made in criminal justice.

If you can explain how bankrupting a state protects its citizens, I'm all ears.


Cut the other stuff first, like the governor's limo, any other pet projects. Just not the basics. I don't think funding the prisons and law enforcement is going to break the state. This is a no-brainer.

bacasper wrote:
But I am glad to see that you presumably agree with abolition of the death penalty, since murder rates are higher instates that have it. Wanna be better protected? Abolish it.


I knew a guy who had a vasectomy. Had eleven kids. Want more kids? Get a vasectomy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leslie Cheswyck wrote:
bacasper wrote:
14, 15% of a lot is a lot. Just about all budget sectors will have to be cut, so I have indicated where cuts ought to be made in criminal justice.

If you can explain how bankrupting a state protects its citizens, I'm all ears.


Cut the other stuff first, like the governor's limo, any other pet projects. Just not the basics. I don't think funding the prisons and law enforcement is going to break the state. This is a no-brainer.

What you have written is non-responsive to the request to explain, so I take it you cannot.

Sure, what are a few more hungry and homeless citizens? Just don't stop ramping up that police state.

Quote:
bacasper wrote:
But I am glad to see that you presumably agree with abolition of the death penalty, since murder rates are higher instates that have it. Wanna be better protected? Abolish it.


I knew a guy who had a vasectomy. Had eleven kids. Want more kids? Get a vasectomy.

If I had eleven kids, I'd probably get a vasectomy, too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
Leslie Cheswyck wrote:
bacasper wrote:
14, 15% of a lot is a lot. Just about all budget sectors will have to be cut, so I have indicated where cuts ought to be made in criminal justice.

If you can explain how bankrupting a state protects its citizens, I'm all ears.


Cut the other stuff first, like the governor's limo, any other pet projects. Just not the basics. I don't think funding the prisons and law enforcement is going to break the state. This is a no-brainer.

What you have written is non-responsive to the request to explain, so I take it you cannot.

Sure, what are a few more hungry and homeless citizens? Just don't stop ramping up that police state.


Police state? Are you one of those guys who fights his parking tickets "all the way to the Supreme Court"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leslie Cheswyck wrote:

Police state? Are you one of those guys who fights his parking tickets "all the way to the Supreme Court"?

Yes, Police state. The USA holds the distinction of incarcerating its citizens at the highest rate on the planet, and its blacks at a rate higher than that of apartheid South Africa. It is also the only, or one of the very few, which has the death penalty (which they get wrong quite often, too).

And you are a lucky guesser or have a really good memory. I have mentioned before that I used to fight parking tickets professionally in New York City. One of the best jobs I ever had. Yes, I became good at it from fighting my own tickets. My personal best streak was 13 consecutive tickets for which I did not have to pay a dime!

On the job, I fought about 30,000 tickets. We had a record of winning reductions or dismissals in 2/3 of our tickets. Win-win situation: if I didn't reduce or dismiss your ticket, you did not pay me.

Why do you ask?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International