| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pootle
Joined: 05 May 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:17 am Post subject: Is 1.8m too low? |
|
|
| Hakwon job, outside Seoul - should I expect to get more on my 2nd tour of duty? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Totti
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Definitely too low for a hagwon position. The minimum you should be expecting is 2.2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alphakennyone

Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Location: city heights
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Why would you even consider it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OculisOrbis

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 2.2 should be the absolute lowest you should consider,,,and even then there should be at least a couple special considerations in your contract since you have proven you can fulfill a one year obligation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pocariboy73
Joined: 23 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Is 1.8m too low? |
|
|
| pootle wrote: |
| Hakwon job, outside Seoul - should I expect to get more on my 2nd tour of duty? |
Depending on what the conditions are - hours, vacation, etc.
6 hours a week and 5 months paid vacation is not bad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karea
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I've never worked in Korea before and the lowest I am being offered is 2mil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbybigfoot
Joined: 05 May 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol
1.8 million!!!
Have you seen the exchange rate lately?
Not to mention the cost of living is probably 10% higher than it was two years ago.
This thread made me laugh out loud. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dodgy Al
Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As Pocariboy pointed out, we need more info. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not a bad salary if you are living in 1996. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It's not a bad salary if you are living in 1996. |
QFT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sakamuras
Joined: 21 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It's not a bad salary if you are living in 1996. |
I assume it's better than 0, which is what you're probably getting right now back west. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I get paid 1.8 for a very easy elementary PS job. I can save a fair amount and I'm in Busan which is a perk. But I wouldn't take the wage for a hagwon job which is going to be far more work and less holiday. And especially seeing as it's your second year here. A while back people reckoned 2.4 was a decent hagwon job, but now I think there's more agreement around 2.2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goku
Joined: 10 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
 | |