View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rokricky
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Location: Yongsan, Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:51 am Post subject: Grammar Question |
|
|
A student asked me today to explain to him why this sentence was gramatically incorrect: I was busy to prepare the party.
Is it in fact gramatically incorrect? Or is it just awkward? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iammac2002
Joined: 12 Jun 2009 Location: 'n Beter plek.
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you ever use the word 'busy' without a verb ending with '-ing'? (Just like you have to use is/am/are/was/were/will be with -ing, you can't use 'busy' without '-ing'. Except if you say 'busy with...'.)
If you are busy doing something, it will be in the continuous tense. So unless you say 'busy trying to...', I don't think you can use the 'to'.
What was the question again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sugarkane59
Joined: 10 Jun 2009 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
In that sentence it does not sound/look right to use an infinitive (to do something) after 'busy' when it's used in this way: always use the gerund (-ing)
e.g.
He was busy feeding the cat
She is busy showing him the painting
The are busy finding the remote control
Whereas these sentences use the infinitive:
He was too busy to feed the cat
She is too busy to show him the painting
etc...
Hope this helps  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another way to look at it is to identify an interruption using past continuous. You can reject "to prepare" solely on the basis of it conflicting with "was" which puts an event in the past, but the sentence as it is doesn't seem complete.
"You called me."
"I was preparing for the party."
"I was preparing for the party when you called me."
To me, this makes the initial sentence complete. It's true, you can separate past continuous with the interruption by simply asking a question like, "What were you doing yesterday?". However, if we are talking about only the past, then I don't see much point in using present continuous unless there is an interruption. You could have used simple past. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iammac2002
Joined: 12 Jun 2009 Location: 'n Beter plek.
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sugarkane59 wrote: |
In that sentence it does not sound/look right to use an infinitive (to do something) after 'busy' when it's used in this way: always use the gerund (-ing)
e.g.
He was busy feeding the cat
She is busy showing him the painting
The are busy finding the remote control
Whereas these sentences use the infinitive:
He was too busy to feed the cat
She is too busy to show him the painting
etc...
Hope this helps  |
That said, it sounds not right to just add 'too'.
I was too busy to prepare the party.
I would also add 'for'.
I was too busy to prepare FOR the party.
Or, I would just change the word,
I was too busy to organize the party. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seonsengnimble
Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Location: taking a ride on the magic English bus
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sugarkane59 wrote: |
In that sentence it does not sound/look right to use an infinitive (to do something) after 'busy' when it's used in this way: always use the gerund (-ing)
e.g.
He was busy feeding the cat
She is busy showing him the painting
The are busy finding the remote control
|
Right, but wrong terminology. In this case the ing is used to make a participle because the verb is acting as a modifier rather than a noun.
I like fishing: gerund
I am fishing: present participle |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|