|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:46 pm Post subject: Insurers Stop Selling Cancer Policies |
|
|
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/08/123_50730.html
this is relevant to the hysteria in the US today over Obama's health care overhaul proposals.
I'm no liberal, but I can't think of a finer example than THIS ONE of why a private profit incentive in health care is basically INCOMPATIBALE with the "public good".
By Yoon Ja-young
Staff Reporter
The number of cancer patients has been increasing steeply, with one in four Koreans suffering from the disease during their lifetime. On top of physical and mental shock, cancer places a huge financial burden on patients and families, at a time when insurance is most needed.
However, cancer insurance ― which could relieve them of their huge financial burden ― is disappearing from the market.
AIA Life, for example, will stop selling ``Onestop Cancer Insurance" and ``Lifetime Cancer Insurance" from Friday, while Tong Yang Insurance will withdraw ``Guardian Angel Homecare Cancer Insurance" from next month.
Large players such as Samsung, Korea Life, Kyobo, and ING Life stopped selling cancer policies a few years ago. Only six mid-tier life insurers ― Mirae Asset, Shinhan, Kumho, Hana HSBC, Woori Aviva and Lina ― now sell the specialized coverage.
The demise of the policies contrasts with the early 2000s, when they were the best-selling items among life insurers. In December 2003, for example, 16 life insurance companies were selling cancer insurance.
``In the past, it was hard to detect cancer at early stages since medical devices were not so good. Now, many people detect cancer at an earlier stage,'' said a spokesperson at Korea Insurance Consumer Federation.
The development of cancer treatment has also helped cancer patients, with sufferers now more likely to survive.
But it also means that it would take more money for cancer patients to get treatment. Consequently, they are requesting more money from insurance companies, pushing up loss ratios.
Hence, insurance companies have stopped selling cancer insurance. Instead, subscribers can add cancer coverage to other insurance policies.
However, these products are not offering as much protection as cancer insurance.
``Cancer-specialized insurance is better for consumers than other products that include cancer coverage, of course,'' said the spokesperson at the Korea Insurance Consumer Federation.
He said that insurance companies in other countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, are continuing to sell cancer insurance, despite an increasing number of cancer patients.
``Insurance companies, of course, should seek profit as a business, but they should not forget that they exist for public benefit as well,'' the spokesperson said.
He suggested that insurance companies should raise premiums to make up for the rising loss ratio instead of scrapping the product completely from the market.
``Even those who have been cured of cancer can subscribe to insurance in other countries after a certain period of time. Life insurers here, however, are completely rejecting such people," the spokesperson said. ``They seem to be neglecting those who really need insurance, overlooking the other insurance function: for public good." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Forward Observer

Joined: 13 Jan 2009 Location: FOB Gloria
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just got a supplemental health insurance policy that covers cancer from AIG.
On a side note, I recently heard that (LIFE INSURANCE) Korean companies have a lot of "conditions" that they try to find loopholes not to pay out life policies.
Does anyone here have any experience with researching Korean companies vs. international companies for life insurance? What do you recommend?
I have an F5 permanent resident visa, and my wife is Korean. That's the only reason I've considered Kumho and Samsung for life insurance.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got a policy from Samsung. It's about 120,000 per month. There is cancer coverage as a part of it.
The problem with these coverages is that once they reach a certain level of pay-out, you are dropped from the entire policy, and no Korean company will pick you up again. That's my mother-in-law's problem. She beat breast cancer, got a pay-out to cover most of the bills, and is unable to ever get insurance again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xingyiman
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: Insurers Stop Selling Cancer Policies |
|
|
Epicurus wrote: |
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/08/123_50730.html
this is relevant to the hysteria in the US today over Obama's health care overhaul proposals.
I'm no liberal, but I can't think of a finer example than THIS ONE of why a private profit incentive in health care is basically INCOMPATIBALE with the "public good".
By Yoon Ja-young
Staff Reporter
The number of cancer patients has been increasing steeply, with one in four Koreans suffering from the disease during their lifetime. On top of physical and mental shock, cancer places a huge financial burden on patients and families, at a time when insurance is most needed.
However, cancer insurance ― which could relieve them of their huge financial burden ― is disappearing from the market.
AIA Life, for example, will stop selling ``Onestop Cancer Insurance" and ``Lifetime Cancer Insurance" from Friday, while Tong Yang Insurance will withdraw ``Guardian Angel Homecare Cancer Insurance" from next month.
Large players such as Samsung, Korea Life, Kyobo, and ING Life stopped selling cancer policies a few years ago. Only six mid-tier life insurers ― Mirae Asset, Shinhan, Kumho, Hana HSBC, Woori Aviva and Lina ― now sell the specialized coverage.
The demise of the policies contrasts with the early 2000s, when they were the best-selling items among life insurers. In December 2003, for example, 16 life insurance companies were selling cancer insurance.
``In the past, it was hard to detect cancer at early stages since medical devices were not so good. Now, many people detect cancer at an earlier stage,'' said a spokesperson at Korea Insurance Consumer Federation.
The development of cancer treatment has also helped cancer patients, with sufferers now more likely to survive.
But it also means that it would take more money for cancer patients to get treatment. Consequently, they are requesting more money from insurance companies, pushing up loss ratios.
Hence, insurance companies have stopped selling cancer insurance. Instead, subscribers can add cancer coverage to other insurance policies.
However, these products are not offering as much protection as cancer insurance.
``Cancer-specialized insurance is better for consumers than other products that include cancer coverage, of course,'' said the spokesperson at the Korea Insurance Consumer Federation.
He said that insurance companies in other countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, are continuing to sell cancer insurance, despite an increasing number of cancer patients.
``Insurance companies, of course, should seek profit as a business, but they should not forget that they exist for public benefit as well,'' the spokesperson said.
He suggested that insurance companies should raise premiums to make up for the rising loss ratio instead of scrapping the product completely from the market.
``Even those who have been cured of cancer can subscribe to insurance in other countries after a certain period of time. Life insurers here, however, are completely rejecting such people," the spokesperson said. ``They seem to be neglecting those who really need insurance, overlooking the other insurance function: for public good." |
So under Obamacare/Kennedycare? the government can squash your cancer insurance coverage. Meet the new boss - same as the old boss. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Spongebob Squarepants

Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Location: You wanna see my caring face?, ROK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
While we're on the topic of insurance could you other F visa people run your life insurance experiences by me.
I have a policy with Lina and my wife has one with AIG, our monthly premiums are 35,000ish and here's what I don't get, we are insured for a measly 100,000,000 won ($90,000).
When we signed up I was shocked at how low the payout would be if either of us were to die, but I was told by the company, and later my wife confirmed this by looking at other companies, that 100,000,000 is the normal maximum coverage (unless you're a CEO or something). We've seen ads on the home shopping channels for other companies that do 2 - 300,000,000 won but even that leaves me feeling that it's not enough.
Obviously back home you can insure yourself for millions of dollars (friends I have pay monthly premiums of $45 for coverage of $1,000,000), why the heck isn't it possible here?
I want to ensure that I have provided for my dependent (s) in this country if I were to die, but 90,000 is barely a couple years of my base salary here, and is a total joke.
Have any of you gotten coverage of say 3 - 500,000,000 won here, and if so with which company, and how much are your premiums (obviously they will differ with age, past history of health problems, etc but just as a guide)? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
benji
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spongebob Squarepants wrote: |
While we're on the topic of insurance could you other F visa people run your life insurance experiences by me.
I have a policy with Lina and my wife has one with AIG, our monthly premiums are 35,000ish and here's what I don't get, we are insured for a measly 100,000,000 won ($90,000).
When we signed up I was shocked at how low the payout would be if either of us were to die, but I was told by the company, and later my wife confirmed this by looking at other companies, that 100,000,000 is the normal maximum coverage (unless you're a CEO or something). We've seen ads on the home shopping channels for other companies that do 2 - 300,000,000 won but even that leaves me feeling that it's not enough.
Obviously back home you can insure yourself for millions of dollars (friends I have pay monthly premiums of $45 for coverage of $1,000,000), why the heck isn't it possible here?
I want to ensure that I have provided for my dependent (s) in this country if I were to die, but 90,000 is barely a couple years of my base salary here, and is a total joke.
Have any of you gotten coverage of say 3 - 500,000,000 won here, and if so with which company, and how much are your premiums (obviously they will differ with age, past history of health problems, etc but just as a guide)? |
If those numbers are correct, thats ridiculous. I pay 12 bucks a month in the US for 250,000 in coverage. I dont see why it should be any different here. Life expectancy is about the same, of course the US doesnt have the magical healing powers of kimchee. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a couple of policies with Friends Provident that I have a broken arranged for me.
The thing I dislike the most about Korean insurance is that it is not transferrable. I looked into it and they said if I moved, my policy wouldn't move with me. So it's pointless - like throwing money away, really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Skippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Daejeon
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
What aspect of insurance do you not understand. Thing of it this way. Insurance is gambling - you are just making a bet that if you get cancer you win. The insurance company is the house - why would the house continue to pay out when the odds are against them. I totally understand many companies deciding to get out of the cancer insurance game.
Also, If the profit is so low or you are paying out so much why not stop! As to insurance with conditions once again like the casino. Why pay if the players hand is close to a straight but is not - because its the rules, you smoke you loose - you drink you loss.. Also those things in contracts that will disqualify you that you do not like - they are contracts - so negotiate with what you want. If they do not provide or negotiate for what you want , do not buy.
As to the companies should maybe continue and just raise the premium. Supply and demand. The more you raise the premium the less people who sign up. The less people who save up the more the other have to pay to cover.
People should start saving money into a medical fund.
But thats my opinion! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:51 am Post subject: Re: Insurers Stop Selling Cancer Policies |
|
|
Quote: |
So under Obamacare/Kennedycare? the government can squash your cancer insurance coverage. Meet the new boss - same as the old boss. |
difficult decisions will have to be made, no matter what, no matter who the boss is.
such as experimental therapies that have no track record of success, or very limited success, while being super expensive.
along with therapies that merely delay the inevitable death by several months.
I'd rather throw in the money for the general good then pay to fatten up the wallets of insurance company executives.
how is it that a health insurance company helps improve your health care again?
it's merely another layer of bureaucracy. And one that is fairly immune to so called "free market" forces.
they've been running the American equivalent of cheobols on the American consumer for decades. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Skippy wrote: |
What aspect of insurance do you not understand. Thing of it this way. Insurance is gambling - you are just making a bet that if you get cancer you win. The insurance company is the house - why would the house continue to pay out when the odds are against them. I totally understand many companies deciding to get out of the cancer insurance game.
Also, If the profit is so low or you are paying out so much why not stop! As to insurance with conditions once again like the casino. Why pay if the players hand is close to a straight but is not - because its the rules, you smoke you loose - you drink you loss.. Also those things in contracts that will disqualify you that you do not like - they are contracts - so negotiate with what you want. If they do not provide or negotiate for what you want , do not buy.
As to the companies should maybe continue and just raise the premium. Supply and demand. The more you raise the premium the less people who sign up. The less people who save up the more the other have to pay to cover.
People should start saving money into a medical fund.
But thats my opinion! |
the health of the public and the general good should not be subject to a private profit motive. And most certainly NOT when there are no 'free market' forces at play, instead we get Korean styles choebols and price collusion.
caveat emptor and snake oil salesmanship shouldn't apply to the field of societal health care. It already applies to everything else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|