|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: The British sound from the 60's & 70's |
|
|
I'm curious, did the Americans invade England around the same time the Brits invaded America? or were the Americans already famous in England?.
The rock sound from the British was just awesome and seems like they stole the light from the Americans...
nothing against the Americans, they had some legendary bands..
but man, The british were pumping out legends like the Italians were pumping out fast cars..
to name a few...
Pink Floyd, deep purple, The Rolling Stones, The Who, The Kinks, bowie, elton john, the beatles, The Hollies, led zepplin, Van Morrison, Queen, slade, Sex pistols, Black Sabbath,The Clash, Joy Division, the ramones, Depeche Mode, clapton , ok I could keep going.. but Ill stop..
It seemed The British brought back the Blues from the Americans and then ran with it, then while The Americans had shut out the blacks from the music scene for so many decades the black sound was finally becoming popular on mainstream and everyone was trying to copy that, but the Brits were just rolling out the Alternative Rock bands and offering their own sound..
The Music that was to come from England in the 60's and 70's was just pure class...
I don't really know, but perhaps some of the music aficionados could give their thoughts on the Music scene back then....
How much was England an influence on the music era of that time?.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AgentM
Joined: 07 Jun 2009 Location: British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good question OP! I'd like to hear some thoughts on this too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The standard story goes like this.....
.......Mainstream pop was terrible in both US and UK in the late 50's. "How much is that doggie in the window?", was a huge hit at the time. Mostly just crooners.
But if you wanted to rebel, you could be a Teddy-Boy. A rock n roller. Eddie Cochrane, Buddy Holly, Elvis...... That kind of thing. The teddy boys were the first people who didn't listen to the same music their parents did.
Then Lonnie Donegan had a few big hits in England in the late 50's. Which sparked off the Skiffle craze. Every teenager in England wanted to be in a skiffle band. Guitars were flying off the shelves. They couldn't make them fast enough.
Skiffle is where The Beatles et al started. So you had a whole country of young men who could play guitar and they all wanted to be in bands.
Another factor was the generous welfare state during the 60's and 70's. Young people could live on the dole and have lots of time to practice their music. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to sing the blues and/or rock, you gotta be down and out. White Americans weren't (for the most part). You want good American music, you have to check out the black artists.
But, I totally agree, the British sound of the 60s and 70s was the best "white" music ever.
I know it sounds a little not quite right and a bit stereotypical (I guess it is) but I think that is why music is so bad now. People are just too wealthy to put their hearts and souls into music. They are too busy preparing for professional jobs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morrisonhotel
Joined: 18 Jul 2009 Location: Gyeonggi-do
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dude, The Ramones were American. In answer to your question, no, not really with a few notable exceptions (Hendrix, etc.).
Last edited by morrisonhotel on Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roadwork
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Location: Goin' up the country
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
morrisonhotel wrote: |
Dude, The Ramones were American. |
LOL  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always known it to be that in the late 50s, rock and roll was losing its edge on the charts in the US and a lot of people were turning to Doo-wop and stuff from the Everley Brothers. It was around '59 with the deaths of Buddy Holly and Ritchie Valens that rock n roll started to become a bit passe in the US. The rock records were traveling with ships over to Liverpool and making waves with the already Skiffle-influenced British youth. Some American rockers like Gene Vincent were doing their tours over in England after falling out of favor in the US. The British really worked wonders with rock and infused it with the sound of "race records" that had been shunned by the mainstream white community in the US for years. Paul McCartney mentioned before that he was often trying to emulate Little Richard in the beginning.
As it was, a lot of people in the US got into the Dylan-influenced folk thing a bit more for awhile. The Beatles were a big hit in the US, but initially attracted more of a boy band type of following. It was the Stones and the Who that really locked in the bad-boy image. Eventually the US had some artists like Jimi, the Doors, Santana, CCR, Frank Zappa, Janis Joplin, and a number of others that made some significant contributions, though the British still held the mainstream for quite some time.
The more perplexing issue for me is how 80s metal and 90s grunge led to lame, queer emo shyte to come out of both sides of the Atlantic. Like this whole trend of masculinity, armpit smell, and straight sex that went on for so long turned into scrawny boys whining about and bending over for their boyfriends. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morrisonhotel
Joined: 18 Jul 2009 Location: Gyeonggi-do
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
djsmnc wrote: |
The more perplexing issue for me is how 80s metal and 90s grunge led to lame, queer emo shyte to come out of both sides of the Atlantic. Like this whole trend of masculinity, armpit smell, and straight sex that went on for so long turned into scrawny boys whining about and bending over for their boyfriends. |
The influence of proper emotional hardcore (read: Fugazi, Embrace, etc.) on 'emo' stuff at the present owed very little to metal or grunge so it's in no way a linear progression. Besides, most 80s metal was terrible (as was most of the grunge scene (Pearl Jam anyone?)). The real great music from the 80s and 90s was the underground alt-rock scene. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
beercanman
Joined: 16 May 2009
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
roadwork wrote: |
morrisonhotel wrote: |
Dude, The Ramones were American. |
LOL  |
and Van Morrison is from Belfast. Not sure where he sits on being British or Irish. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tycho Brahe
Joined: 15 Jul 2009 Location: Suwon, SK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
If you want to sing the blues and/or rock, you gotta be down and out. White Americans weren't (for the most part). You want good American music, you have to check out the black artists.
But, I totally agree, the British sound of the 60s and 70s was the best "white" music ever.
I know it sounds a little not quite right and a bit stereotypical (I guess it is) but I think that is why music is so bad now. People are just too wealthy to put their hearts and souls into music. They are too busy preparing for professional jobs. |
The great music of the 60s and 70s wasn't exactly ''white''. All the great bands from that period were predominantly middle class kids ripping off black artists. Apart from the Byrds, Dylan and the Beatles pretty much everyone else started off in blues bands. And Dylan borrowed heavily from blues and the beatles started off playing chuck berry covers ... I am embarrassed about how little byrds I know.
You can't really say that these people were poor or down and out ... most of them had college educations or were session musicians for years before hitting it big.
My brain is just waking up and I remember that Sabbath were working class. But most of the english successes at the time weren't.
I think the only reason that we think of this as a specifically good period for british music is that the british scene in the 60s was so heavily centred around london, which had a great infrastructure for exposure.
But american cities were much more self contained, and scattered. Like you had 6/7 big centres for music depending on your genre ... and then that genre was so ingrained in a city that to move beyond it became difficult. It still happens today with New York, Seattle in the 90s, Montreal and Toronto having their own unique appeals. (I am aware of which cities aren't american, I just think it operates on the same principle)
Whereas with everyone focusing on london a much more multi-genre, mutli-appeal kind of sound came out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
morrisonhotel wrote: |
Dude, The Ramones were American. In answer to your question, no, not really with a few notable exceptions (Hendrix, etc.). |
oooppsss hahahahahahaa you are right, I must of been typing to fast and not thinking...
speaking of Hendrix didn't he have to go to England to become famous?
the americans never really took to him I heard?? this true? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgeperec
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some interesting view on this
Quote: |
Liverpool was perhaps uniquely placed within Britain to be the point of origin of a new form of music. Commentators have pointed to a combination of local solidarity, industrial decline, social deprivation, and the existence of a large population of Irish origin, the influence of which has been detected in Beat music. It was also a major port with links to America, which made for much greater access to American records and instruments like guitars, which could not easily be imported due to trade restrictions. As a result Beat bands were heavily influenced by American groups of the era, such as Buddy Holly and the Crickets (from which group The Beatles gained the model for their name, combining it with a pun on the beat in their music), and to a lesser extent by British rock and roll groups such as The Shadows. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_music
Quote: |
By the end of 1962, the British rock scene had started with beat groups like the Beatles drawing on a wide range of American influences including soul music, rhythm and blues and surf music. Initially, they reinterpreted standard American tunes, playing for dancers doing the twist, for example. These groups eventually infused their original rock compositions with increasingly complex musical ideas and a distinctive sound. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_music
itaewonguy wrote: |
The Music that was to come from England in the 60's and 70's was just pure class... |
+1
And here is my all time fav from that era. I wouldn't mind checking out others', gimme some links guys.
Procol Harum - In the Wee Small Hours Of Sixpence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHCtZDpqvVg |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roadwork
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Location: Goin' up the country
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
morrisonhotel wrote: |
Dude, The Ramones were American. In answer to your question, no, not really with a few notable exceptions (Hendrix, etc.). |
oooppsss hahahahahahaa you are right, I must of been typing to fast and not thinking...
speaking of Hendrix didn't he have to go to England to become famous?
the americans never really took to him I heard?? this true? |
Hendrix was from Seattle, WA |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morrisonhotel
Joined: 18 Jul 2009 Location: Gyeonggi-do
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
oooppsss hahahahahahaa you are right, I must of been typing to fast and not thinking...
speaking of Hendrix didn't he have to go to England to become famous?
the americans never really took to him I heard?? this true? |
True to an extent. He became well known in the music scene and then became famous in the UK first. Not sure about the Americans never taking to him - he did play a rather pivotal and celebrated role at Woodstock. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
highdials5
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you haven't already, check out an album called "Forever Changes" by a band called "Love" - it's often voted the best album of all time, and it's certainly one of them.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|