| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tnwls206
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:46 pm Post subject: Pay for after-school classes : GEPIK |
|
|
I'm currently teaching at a public middle school in Gyeonggido, and I've been informed by the vice principal that the education board is REQUIRING me to teach AT LEAST 20 hours. From what I understand, the GEPIK contract doesn't say anything about "minimum" hours..it just says that my teaching hours SHOULD NOT EXCEED 22 hours.
But okay, whatever. I'll teach 22 hours if they want me to. The problem is, my school is so small that we can only make 16 teaching hours within my teaching hours (8:30~4:30) and so to meet that 20-hour mark, we need to add the rest by making after-school classes. Which, I don't mind teaching either as long as I'm getting paid for those. I approached my vice principal about this issue and she said that I was absolutely correct and that I should be paid extra. But my co-teacher came to me today and said that I would be paid 7,000 Won for each hour because that's what the education board told her. Here's what I'm confused about: the GEPIK contract says that FTs will be paid 7,000 Won for OT and 20,000 Won for teaching more than 22 hours. But I remember seeing on this forum that after-school classes and overtime hours are completely different from each other, and that even though I'm not technically teaching more than 22, I should be paid 20,000 Won for those after-school classes. I have a friend who's teaching at a GEPIK school and she's getting paid 20,000 Won for teaching after-school classes even though her hours don't meet the 22-hour mark. My co-teacher called the education board and they said that I should be just paid 7,000 Won. To be honest, I don't think it's fair. It's not my fault that the school can't make enough teaching hours for me.
If any of you have experienced this issue, correct me if I'm wrong about this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
creeper1
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: Very light work load |
|
|
This is where the confusion is arising. Some people are getting paid extra for after school classes and some are not. To be honest in your case your work load is so light with just 16 classes I think you have a cheek to ask for extra money . You are lucky to get the 7000 won.
Seriously are you for real? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugarloaf82
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am a GEPIK teacher at a small rural high school. I as well do not teach the full 22 hours and they asked me to teach one after-school class as part of my hours. When they initially asked me if I would be alright teaching that class after-school I told them it wasn't my fault that they couldn't provide me 22 hours between 8:30 and 4:30 and that I felt I should get paid extra for that class. They called the GEPIK office and were told that I would be paid 7,000 an hour since I was under 22 hours.... There isn't anything else to do in my village so I didn't really complain about it. The wording in the contract is kind of confusing when it comes to that "overtime" issue. Extra money is extra money though.
I do have another after-school class though that I am getting paid 30,000 won an hour since that goes above my 22 hours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tnwls206
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: Very light work load |
|
|
| creeper1 wrote: |
This is where the confusion is arising. Some people are getting paid extra for after school classes and some are not. To be honest in your case your work load is so light with just 16 classes I think you have a cheek to ask for extra money . You are lucky to get the 7000 won.
Seriously are you for real? |
You're right. My work load IS light and I would be the first to admit to that. That's why I told my school that I would be more than happy to teach or help out 4~6 extra classes during my regular working hours to meet the mark. But the school is saying that it won't be necessary since I'll be teaching 22 hours by teaching those after-school classes.
If I was at a bigger school, then this wouldn't be an issue since I'll have enough hours to teach during my regular working hours. And from what I'm aware of, after-school classes are completely optional and so if I wanted to, I could just flat out refuse to teach these classes and go on with teaching just 16 hours/week since my contract doesn't say anything about minimum hours. I know I sound like a brat, but a contract is a contract and that's what I signed. I just don't think it's fair that there are other FTs out there who are getting paid 20,000~30,000 Won for those after-school classes even though they're teaching less than 22 hours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OT hours and after school TEACHING hours are different.
OT hours would apply to non-teaching hours that you are doing work (lesson prep for example) and you would get 6-7000 won per hour for that.
But any classes over 22 per week and you should get around 20,000 won per class.
Some schools you get lucky and get the OT rate for classes after school regardless of the number of classes you teach, and some you don't.
They've only had FTS in public school nation-wide for a few years...they are still working the kinks out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Murakano
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sugarloaf82 wrote: |
| When they initially asked me if I would be alright teaching that class after-school I told them it wasn't my fault that they couldn't provide me 22 hours between 8:30 and 4:30 and that I felt I should get paid extra for that class. . |
My school just made up some extra pointless classes with no curriculum or book to teach from, just so they can get the max 22 out of me  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrewchon

Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We're all being asked to teach full load of 22 hours (if you aren't already) because those who aren't will be first to be dropped from GEPIK program next year when the budget cut comes through. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad-ish

Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Location: On the bottom of the food chain
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the way i read this was: you are teaching under 22 hours/week during the workday (8:30-4:30). however, the school board wants you teaching near your max, however your school can only schedule those classes after 4:30 and will only pay 7,000 W an hour.
first, if they can't schedule 22 hours a week within your 40 hours a week, then too bad. if you TEACH beyond your 8 hour work day, then the rate of pay is 20,000 W an hour.
you could be teaching 10 hours a week, but if they want you to stay late and teach more, they'd have to pay the 20,000 W teaching OT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After-school classes are not only after 4:30. You could have a first grade class between 1-3pm, and that would be an after-school class. Older kids come later. So long as they schedule those classes BEFORE 4:30, I'll repeat BEFORE 4:30, you have to teach them. I don't see how they would be paying 7,000 won in that case.
Personally, if they asked me to teach after 4:30pm, they would have to pay me that day. Since they wouldn't do that, I wouldn't do any overtime classes after 4:30. They have to fill up that 8 hour block, 5 times, to get the 22 they desire. It's up to them. That's 18 hours you could be teaching that you aren't getting paid for (and for the honor of being chained to one school). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Countrygirl
Joined: 19 Nov 2007 Location: in the classroom
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As nomad-ish said, if you are teaching afterschool classes after 4:30 then you will get paid 20,000 won per hour irregardless of total teaching hours. If it is before 4:30 you don't get paid anything because it's seen as the regular 22 hours. Also, you can refuse to teach after 4:30.
It might seem unfair that other schools are paying their teachers even though they haven't made the 22 hour teaching mark, but that's life. Some schools treat their teachers better while some schools don't understand the GEPIK contract (ie your school with the 7,000 won overtime). Basically, your friends got lucky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Burndog

Joined: 17 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Are you teaching these classes AFTER 4:40p.m?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tnwls206
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Burndog wrote: |
| Are you teaching these classes AFTER 4:40p.m?? |
Yes, these classes are from 4:30~5:30 and my regular working hours are from 8:30 to 4:30. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cruisemonkey

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I first started at my middle school, I was in a similar situation - scheduled to teach only twenty classes/week between 8:30 - 4:30. The school district then scheduled two, advanced 'after school' classes (with students from different schools coming to my school one afternoon/week, 4:30-6:00) to bring me up to my contractual, 22 classes/week. I said "Fine... but you must pay me at least 'time-and-a-half' as per the Labor Standards Act for 'extended works'." - i.e. overtime. They said there was no money in the budget for this... to which I replied "No... forget it!"
In the end, my principal proposed a solution to which I agreed - for every four, overtime classes (three hours actual time), I got an extra day of holidays. In the end, everyone (all three parties) were happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man, English teachers can be such pansies.
"Ow no, I have to work!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Juregen wrote: |
Man, English teachers can be such pansies.
"Ow no, I have to work!" |
If you'd actually read the thread, instead of being in a rush to pass judgment, you'd see that people are not complaining about working, but complaining about NOT BEING PAID for work.
But then again most hakwon directors seem to find this distinction baffling too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|