| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rt
Joined: 27 May 2009
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:07 am Post subject: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned school? |
|
|
It is my understanding that one must be extended beyond 5 years at a privately owned school (be it a university or hagwon) before the school is required to pay any pension money (otherwise you just get your monthly contributions back). This is assuming that the school has opted out of the national pension plan (as most have)
I think this has been the case since the pension law was changed (from when all schools were required to belong to the national pension plan) several years ago.
People who were employed by privately owned schools at the time the law was changed were grandfathered in, but all teachers hired since that time must stay longer than5 years in order to get the pension contributions from the employer.
My question is: has anyone hired by a privately owned school (either hagwon or university)after the law was changed been renewed beyond 5 years, thus triggering the matching contributions from the employer? I don't know of any, and I suspect this is the reason people employed by privately owned schools aren't renewed beyond 5 years nowadays.
Your thoughts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:13 am Post subject: Re: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned sch |
|
|
| rt wrote: |
It is my understanding that one must be extended beyond 5 years at a privately owned school (be it a university or hagwon) before the school is required to pay any pension money (otherwise you just get your monthly contributions back). This is assuming that the school has opted out of the national pension plan (as most have)
I think this has been the case since the pension law was changed (from when all schools were required to belong to the national pension plan) several years ago.
People who were employed by privately owned schools at the time the law was changed were grandfathered in, but all teachers hired since that time must stay longer than5 years in order to get the pension contributions from the employer.
My question is: has anyone hired by a privately owned school (either hagwon or university)after the law was changed been renewed beyond 5 years, thus triggering the matching contributions from the employer? I don't know of any, and I suspect this is the reason people employed by privately owned schools aren't renewed beyond 5 years nowadays.
Your thoughts? |
I've never heard of such a rule for hogwans. There are some special rules and exemptions for Universities that have their own pension programs.
As far as I know, hogwan employees must be covered by national pension with the school and the teacher each paying half of a 9% total contribution based on salary.
Apparently some schools have found a legal loophole that allows them to base this 9% on only 70% of the teacher's salary instead of the whole salary, but very few schools are using this loophole. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
curiousaboutkorea

Joined: 21 Jan 2009
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:46 am Post subject: Re: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned sch |
|
|
| ontheway wrote: |
| Apparently some schools have found a legal loophole that allows them to base this 9% on only 70% of the teacher's salary instead of the whole salary, but very few schools are using this loophole. |
Mine is. The boss as not competent enough to set up my pension payment (or pretended to not be competent). So after lots of calling and pushing I got the guy at the pesnion office to talk to her. He so kindly explained to my boss the 70% thing. My boss, of course, was more than happy to arrange it based on the 70%  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: Re: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned sch |
|
|
| curiousaboutkorea wrote: |
| ontheway wrote: |
| Apparently some schools have found a legal loophole that allows them to base this 9% on only 70% of the teacher's salary instead of the whole salary, but very few schools are using this loophole. |
Mine is. The boss as not competent enough to set up my pension payment (or pretended to not be competent). So after lots of calling and pushing I got the guy at the pesnion office to talk to her. He so kindly explained to my boss the 70% thing. My boss, of course, was more than happy to arrange it based on the 70%  |
This loophole is relatively new on the scene. Public schools are picking up on this as well, according to some posts here. If the pension office is pushing this 30% discount, it will eventually spread, so that most schools will be using it withing a few years.
My wonjangnim is aware of this loophole, however, and has rejected using it because it is cheap and disrespectful of the teachers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rt
Joined: 27 May 2009
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So nobody has been allowed to stay longer than 5 years at a private university? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rt wrote: |
| So nobody has been allowed to stay longer than 5 years at a private university? |
I have been... others as well.
I think this is a fairly timely issue.
By this I mean that most universties only swithced the foreing professors over in the past 5 years to the private pension system. As such, anyone swithced over is just getting to the 5 year limit...which may account for the lack of responses here.
There was a big push about 4-5 years back for universities to include the foreing professors(teachers) into the pension plan as a way to increase the overall rating of the university, and thereby, government subsidies to the university...(this is a condensed summary of that issue)
There are pros and cons for this, but suffice to say, time will tell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned sch |
|
|
| rt wrote: |
My question is: has anyone hired by a privately owned school (either hagwon or university)after the law was changed been renewed beyond 5 years, thus triggering the matching contributions from the employer? I don't know of any, and I suspect this is the reason people employed by privately owned schools aren't renewed beyond 5 years nowadays.
Your thoughts? |
I have no choice but to pay pension for EVERY person I hire in a full time contract (arbeit does not have this requirement) from the first day they start working till the least. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rt
Joined: 27 May 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
An English speaking gentleman I spoke to recently at the Korea Private Teachers Pension Fund told me that you are entitled (under the relatively new law which most, if not all, privately owned universities have opted to use) to receive matching contributions (from the university and the government) only if you stay for longer than 5 years at that employer (not cumulative over several private universities).
So I am just curious to know how many have been allowed to stay beyond the "magic" 5 year mark. Not too many I imagine, as this would automatically and immediately cost the university 25,000,000 - 30,000,000 won (immediately upon extending you beyond five years.)
I was just thinking it would be worthy of a formal complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (or even a class action law suit) if a pattern of discrimination (after the 5 year date passes) could be shown on the part of the private university owners. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goon-Yang
Joined: 28 May 2009 Location: Duh
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I work at a private uni. PM me Dec/Jan and I'll know if I'll be here my 6th year
I've been told "no problem", but like any other foreigner I can't trust anything my boss says.
Wish me luck guys. I'm on an f visa, so I wonder if that means they have to hire me as a permanent worker (as Korean labour law states). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:37 pm Post subject: Re: been longer than 5 years at the same privately owned sch |
|
|
| rt wrote: |
It is my understanding that one must be extended beyond 5 years at a privately owned school (be it a university or hagwon) before the school is required to pay any pension money (otherwise you just get your monthly contributions back). This is assuming that the school has opted out of the national pension plan (as most have)
I think this has been the case since the pension law was changed (from when all schools were required to belong to the national pension plan) several years ago.
People who were employed by privately owned schools at the time the law was changed were grandfathered in, but all teachers hired since that time must stay longer than5 years in order to get the pension contributions from the employer.
My question is: has anyone hired by a privately owned school (either hagwon or university)after the law was changed been renewed beyond 5 years, thus triggering the matching contributions from the employer? I don't know of any, and I suspect this is the reason people employed by privately owned schools aren't renewed beyond 5 years nowadays.
Your thoughts? |
I don't know about universities...but hakwons are required to pay into pension each and every year. There is no 5 year mark when it comes to them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rt
Joined: 27 May 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, back in the 1990's and early 2000's all unis were covered by the National Pension Plan, and English teachers got matching monthly pension contributions from the uni (mostly from the uni, but part of it came from the gov't). Plus we got a one month salary bonus paycheck for each year we stayed there at the uni. This worked out to an extra $4,000 per year or so (I left after 3 years and got almost $13, 000 in pension and bonus when I left Korea)
But all that changed a few years ago when the national assembly passed what amounts to a "private university owner relief act." This newish law now allows university owners to avoid having to contribute to the pension (and from having to pay the one month salary "bonus" for each year of service). All they have to is just not renew you beyond five years. Sweet deal for the university owners, eh? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I was at one uni for 6 years....when they decided that it was MUCH cheaper for them to hire a bunch of newbies and get rid of the teachers who had been there for 6-10 years! They then put a 5 year limit on all contracts!
My current uni tells us right up front that we can work a maximum of 6 years there. Not sure why 6, but they do have 2 year contracts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|