|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Would you like to trade healthcare systems? |
| Yes, I'm not from the US, but I'll trade my country's system for that of the US. |
|
5% |
[ 2 ] |
| Yes, I'm from the US, but I'd like to trade systems with another country. |
|
47% |
[ 18 ] |
| No, I'm not from the US and I'd keep my healthcare before trading to the US one. |
|
34% |
[ 13 ] |
| No, I'm from the US, but I'd rather keep my healthcare than trade for another country's system. |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
| I like to complain about not enough poll options. Purple is a fabulous color. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 38 |
|
| Author |
Message |
youtuber
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^ Yup. There's no doubt, if I had oodles of cash, I would want to be treated for everything in America.
But since I don't, and probably never will, I will stay away. Unless Obama makes significant change, which is doubtful.
One of the nice things about Canada, is that your job is not tied to your health. We are more free to follow our dreams and do what we love.
In the US however, it is literally work or die. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| youtuber wrote: |
In the US however, it is literally work or die. |
Poor people get medical care in a program called Medicaid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
youtuber
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Although I don't know much about Medicaid, I would suspect that the care is substandard compared to what one would receive if they had a Cadillac insurance plan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| youtuber wrote: |
| Although I don't know much about Medicaid, I would suspect that the care is substandard compared to what one would receive if they had a Cadillac insurance plan. |
Wouldn't a better comparison be between the care that all Canadians (less athletes, politicians etc) receive and Medicaid? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
Anyone saying America has the best health care system in the world is, again, mistaking a health care system for health care technology. America has the best health care technology in the world. That fact makes the fact that America's health care system is so bad all the more embarassing.
Most of the people who make the above mistake also seem to mistakenly believe that changing the way we pay for health care involves giving up that technological advantage. It doesn't; we can strip away the parasitism of the insurance industry without sacrificing any medical innovation at all. The insurance industry produces nothing, all it does is leech.
Most people in America either don't benefit from America's technological advantage, or go into immense debt benefitting from it. Sure, wealthy Americans receive excellent care. Middle class and lower class people, however, don't receive noticably better care than their European counterparts do, and they pay more for it. That's an objectively worse deal for them. |
Great post.
The most brilliant individual I know is the doctor featured in this article http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/11/health/11prof.html?ex=1310270400&en=799360eaae879b1c&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss This guy is totally going to win a Nobel Prize and makes me proud to be an American and proud of our diverse population. THIS is why I like to see money kept in the hands of Americans who utilize it on productive ideas instead of in the hands of the government to waste on Afghanistan or useless BS.
But at the same time, the only people who can afford decent health care are the rich or the parasites of the middle class (government employees and welfare queens). 
Last edited by Reggie on Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mmstyle
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: wherever
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| youtuber wrote: |
In the US however, it is literally work or die. |
Poor people get medical care in a program called Medicaid. |
Youtuber, yep, you called it.
Mises, nope, wish it were that simple. More often than not, blatantly not true. Case in point: the MA healthcare plan created to help those who are not insured through work routinely (and some uphold, purposefully) denies people coverage with their first request, and often subsequently.
I know this through personal experience with my family, among others.
Right now, in that same state, which has passed a law REQUIRING that everyone PAY for healthcare coverage if they don't have it, I know someone who is a mom in a family of 3, husband has been laid off, can't get coverage through her job, but makes too much for any government plan, still well under, oh, 48K a year. Her required healthcare payment is more than her mortgage. They still have to pay high deductibles for every thing. Has yet to use it for so much as a sniffle. Tell me that isn't set up to put money in the insurance companies pockets.
If you don't believe in universal care, why are you so opposed to helping others stay healthy? You might need their help one day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smee18
Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My point, Rusty, is that the logic of free market privatization, a la the American health care system, is clearly INSANE. A fully privatized, free-market driven world would be a satanic poo-hole not worth living in, which is the world steadily being brought into being by the powers that be. What really gets me is that people can't see the evidently flawed logic behind the whole sordid affair. Privatization means bloated parasitic corporations sucking as many resources out of the system as they can, in the form of profit. Its simple maths really, the more they charge, the less efficient the system is, the more money they make.
As an Australian married to an American, I can tell you the health care system in America is one of the major factors behind our intention to live in Australia rather America when we are done here in Korea. Medication bought at full cost in Australia (without medicare ... my wife is yet to be eligible) were close to half the price of the same in America. My sister in law in America pays more for health insurance than see pays for her mortage, some $1200 a month. It amazes me that people can be so scared by the specter of socialism that they will let themselves get f'ed in the ass so bad. As per my earlier post, if you're so scared of socialism, then stop using the bloody tap water!!!
Last edited by smee18 on Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:15 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moral of the story: if you're American, you had better marry and get a green card somewhere else so you won't go broke due to our crappy health care system.
Smee, any Aussie sisters??  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| smee18 wrote: |
| My point, Rusty, is that the logic of free market privatization, a la the American health care system, is clearly INSANE. A fully privatized, free-market driven world would be a satanic poo-hole not worth living in, which is the world steadily being brought into being by the powers that be. What really gets me is that people can't see the evidently flawed logic behind the whole sordid affair. Privatization means bloated parasitic corporations sucking as many resources out of the system as they can, in the form of profit. Its simple maths really, the more they charge, the less efficient the system is, the more money they make. |
It doesn't have to be this way. In a free market system (something we haven't had the semblance of in the US for a hundred years), competition drives the prices down. The current insurance cartel you see now is a result of government intervention. The new Obama plan will force people to have insurance, which will reduce competition and increase prices. Taxes will also go up.
Blame corporatism (of which government is half the equation), not free market capitalism. Free market capitalism hasn't even been given a chance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rusty Shackleford
Joined: 08 May 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| smee18 wrote: |
| My point, Rusty, is that the logic of free market privatization, a la the American health care system, is clearly INSANE. A fully privatized, free-market driven world would be a satanic poo-hole not worth living in, which is the world steadily being brought into being by the powers that be. What really gets me is that people can't see the evidently flawed logic behind the whole sordid affair. Privatization means bloated parasitic corporations sucking as many resources out of the system as they can, in the form of profit. Its simple maths really, the more they charge, the less efficient the system is, the more money they make. |
This is an assertion.
| Quote: |
As an Australian married to an American, I can tell you the health care system in America is one of the major factors behind our intention to live in Australia rather America when we are done here in Korea. Medication bought at full cost in Australia (without medicare ... my wife is yet to be eligible) were close to half the price of the same in America. My sister in law in America pays more for health insurance than see pays for her mortage, some $1200 a month. It amazes me that people can be so scared by the specter of socialism that they will let themselves get f'ed in the ass so bad. As per my earlier post, if you're so scared of socialism, then stop using the bloody tap water!!! |
Someone somewhere is still paying for the healthcare. Aussie doesn't have some mythical beast that farts MRI machines and lipitor chained up out the back.
Insurance is expensive because of govt regulations on its provision. In fact "insurance" in the States doesn't even meet the definition of insurance! If you are already broken, why should you be entitled to insurance? You can't buy accident insurance after the car crash. In saying this, I 'm not saying that sick people with no "insurance" shouldn't be allowed care, I'm saying it doesn't make sense to allow them to buy insurance. And to mandate that the insurance companies must sell it to them. This scenario is part of the reason insurance is so expensive in the first place.
Why would I stop drinking tap water? It's free! All I'm doing is responding to incentives, as all people do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mmstyle
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: wherever
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| visitorq wrote: |
The new Obama plan will force people to have insurance, which will reduce competition and increase prices. Taxes will also go up.
Blame corporatism (of which government is half the equation), not free market capitalism. Free market capitalism hasn't even been given a chance. |
Visitorq, as per my example, many people are already forced to have insurance. As per smee18 (who IS my husband, BTW my sister already pays OVER 1200 (more like 1230 or more) for insurance that she can't afford to use because she has something like a $1000 deductible (hospital visit).
I think taxes would be cheaper for my sister.
Edited to add: I am fairly certain that if smee and I moved to Aus tomorrow, our tax contributions for health care would be far outstripped by the amount of money would would be forced to pay, by law, for insurance in the state most of my family lives in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smee18
Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rusty, yes, its an assertion ... so? Doesn't stop it from being true.
Australia (don't know this mythical land you call Aussie) doesn't need a mythical beast to fart MRIs or whatever. "Someone is paying for it" ... no sh&t Sherlock, we the people are, for the benefit of, you guessed it, we the people. And guess what, when there is no bloated, undemocratic parasite, known as a private 'corporation,' sucking all the resources (money) into the pockets of executives and shareholders its a hell of a lot cheaper. A HELL of a lot cheaper.
Visitorq, capitalism by nature of the very term suppose a society that posits as its highest good the private accumulation of wealth (capital). That's what the term in and of itself supposes. Thus, no 'capitalist' system is ever going to put a social, collective good, like public health, above profit. More competition does not drive down price. It leads to a survival of the fittest (greediest) system where larger, more powerful economic entities inevitably take over smaller ones, leading to massive oligarchies which drive the price UP, because it means more money and power for them. People like to valorise 'competition' as though it were some kinda of good, when what it usually amounts to is greedy and destructive self-interest. What about cooperation? Why don't we have a cooperative, democratic system that works to maximize benefit for all, rather than a 'competitive' system that benefits the few at the expense of the rest of us? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
For all the complaining we and I do about Korea, my health care is cheap, partly covered by my workplace, and easy to access. Drugs are preposterously cheap here, and I can go to a dentist or optometrist as easy as I can an emergency room.
I lived in the states for three years. My teeth and health deteriorated and when my wife was ill it was cheaper for her to fly home to Korea. I paid a thousand dollars a semester for mandatory foreign student health insurance that didn't cover any non-emergency health care.
When I got sick teaching in Mexico, the school had an arrangement with a local doctor. Essentially I had better access to medical care in Mexico than in America. Mexico. Saying that everyone has superior health care in the US because of their medical technology is like saying everyone has better air transportation because of their space shuttle. Not if you have no access. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mmstyle wrote: |
| visitorq wrote: |
The new Obama plan will force people to have insurance, which will reduce competition and increase prices. Taxes will also go up.
Blame corporatism (of which government is half the equation), not free market capitalism. Free market capitalism hasn't even been given a chance. |
Visitorq, as per my example, many people are already forced to have insurance. As per smee18 (who IS my husband, BTW my sister already pays OVER 1200 (more like 1230 or more) for insurance that she can't afford to use because she has something like a $1000 deductible (hospital visit).
I think taxes would be cheaper for my sister.
Edited to add: I am fairly certain that if smee and I moved to Aus tomorrow, our tax contributions for health care would be far outstripped by the amount of money would would be forced to pay, by law, for insurance in the state most of my family lives in. |
You mean cheaper than the $1000 deductible? Well, where do you suppose the $1.2 trillion required to pay for the new system is going to come from? It's a ridiculous amount of tax - and most of it will be wasted on government bureaucracy. Obama is bald-face lying when he says there will be no more tax.
And let's not forget if the gov't just runs over to the Fed to print another trillion that leads to inflation, which steals your purchasing power, and is a tax in disguise. Actually, Obama-care is so ridiculously expensive it might just destroy the dollar altogether. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| smee18 wrote: |
| Visitorq, capitalism by nature of the very term suppose a society that posits as its highest good the private accumulation of wealth (capital). That's what the term in and of itself supposes. Thus, no 'capitalist' system is ever going to put a social, collective good, like public health, above profit. |
Yes, the freedom to pursue legitimate profit is a prerequisite of liberty. It doesn't therefore follow that people are only out to cut each others' throats in a free market. This is a lie the socialists would like you to believe. People work together voluntarily to help each other and their communities out and freely trading goods and services benefits everyone. Charity is also a free market concept. You are really just confusing free market capitalism with corporatism (which requires government intervention to prop up the cartels).
Also, be careful about putting faith into the socialist ideas of "common good". The government always spouts this stuff to the people, and yet has the most miserable record imaginable of actually delivering. Words are just words- the gov't will tell you anything you want to hear. But the government does not care about you - this is very clear in nearly every action they take. Washington is now an open sewer of corruption run by the same banker criminals who are presently raping our country for all it's worth.
| Quote: |
| More competition does not drive down price. |
Yes, it does.
| Quote: |
| It leads to a survival of the fittest (greediest) system where larger, more powerful economic entities inevitably take over smaller ones, leading to massive oligarchies which drive the price UP, because it means more money and power for them. |
What you are describing is corporatism, which is a form of socialism. It positively requires government intervention to function. Just look at any cartel - esp. the Federal Reserve (private banking cartel). The food and drug cartel propped up by the FDA is another good example, as is the entire military industrial complex. Without government support, they could not exist.
| Quote: |
| People like to valorise 'competition' as though it were some kinda of good, when what it usually amounts to is greedy and destructive self-interest. What about cooperation? Why don't we have a cooperative, democratic system that works to maximize benefit for all, rather than a 'competitive' system that benefits the few at the expense of the rest of us? |
It was John D. Rockefeller, the most despicable monopolist in history (and progenitor of David Rockefeller, who is currently the most powerful man in America) who said "competition is sin". If you want to agree with Rockefeller, go ahead - but realize that without government support (ie. corruption), these monopoly men would never be able to dominate as they do. They dominate at our expense, and stifle competition to the greatest extent possible.
Competition lowers prices, keeps more people independently employed, and above all gives us all opportunity. No competition = no opportunity. Just look at the state of our country today! It's falling apart, and you have your government (whether Republican or Democrat, they're all working for the same Rockefeller controlled think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission) to thank for it.
Finally, before you go on blaming "free market capitalism" any further, just stop and realize that it hasn't existed in the US since the Fed was created in 1913. In fact it has never really been given a chance to prove itself, because the socialists do such a good job of convincing the people that that government is necessary to solve all their problems.
EDIT: I see you're not American, but all the points still stand regardless of which country we're talking about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|