View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Happened just after 10:30 this morning.
Quote: |
By Bomi Lim
Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) -- South Korea�s navy opened fire on a North Korean warship that crossed its western sea border, triggering an exchange of shots, the Joint Chiefs of Staff said in Seoul.
The North Korean vessel ventured 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) into South Korean waters at about 10:33 a.m. local time, ignoring several warnings from the South Korean navy, according to an e-mailed statement. The North Korean ship was badly damaged in the exchange, Yonhap News reported, citing a government official in Seoul it didn�t identify.
South Korea suffered no casualties from the exchange and the North�s ship has since returned across the border, the Joint Chiefs statement said.
North Korea doesn�t recognize the maritime boundary off the Korean peninsula�s west coast, the scene of naval skirmishes in 1999 and 2002. The two nations remain divided after the 1950-53 Korean War ended in a cease fire, and have never signed a peace treaty.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bomi Lim in Seoul at [email protected]
Last Updated: November 9, 2009 23:49 EST |
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aGZWU7SW1Qso&pos=8 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthews_world
Joined: 15 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've saw on an Arirang documentary somewhere that the western waters near the coast are quite shallow and any Korean could cross with ease. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Go Navy! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dragon777
Joined: 06 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
That is the first for a while. When was the last? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
When was the last? |
Unless I'm forgetting something, the last one was in 2002, in which a couple of South Korean sailors were killed. That's the incident that led to some controversy later on when Kim Dae-Jung refrained from attending the annual memorials, out of deference to the Sunshine Policy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
childish idiots! this could have been avoided!
the south should not have provoked an attack...
so what North Korea is across the line! the south should of been more mature about it, and waited and watched them from a distant..
NOT go full balls ahead and start shouting and screaming on the loud speaker and then firing off.. Don't believe the south Media they are not that innocent im sure..
do the south Really think that the north was trying to get onto South korean soil??? hahahahaaaha, they already have tunnels , mountain routes and a million other ways to get into the south.. they are not that stupid to try and sail a navel frigget onto shore in broad daylight..
funny how the north ship was in flames but the south was not even touched! come on now.. the north really that bad of a shot? or maybe they were taken off guard!? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
childish idiots! this could have been avoided!
the south should not have provoked an attack...
so what North Korea is across the line! the south should of been more mature about it, and waited and watched them from a distant..
NOT go full balls ahead and start shouting and screaming on the loud speaker and then firing off.. Don't believe the south Media they are not that innocent im sure..
do the south Really think that the north was trying to get onto South korean soil??? hahahahaaaha, they already have tunnels , mountain routes and a million other ways to get into the south.. they are not that stupid to try and sail a navel frigget onto shore in broad daylight..
funny how the north ship was in flames but the south was not even touched! come on now.. the north really that bad of a shot? or maybe they were taken off guard!? |
Nah, both sides knew what they were doing. NK has a boundary line entirely different from the UN recognized SK line. NK was crossing the UN/SK line to show SK their line was the real one and SK wasn't having it. To SK's credit, a policy of appeasement towards a bunch of seemingly minor infractions is what let Hitler take Germany from a neutered joke to a fully functional imperialist war machine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
catman

Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
When was the last? |
Unless I'm forgetting something, the last one was in 2002, in which a couple of South Korean sailors were killed. That's the incident that led to some controversy later on when Kim Dae-Jung refrained from attending the annual memorials, out of deference to the Sunshine Policy. |
KDJ really did that?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
"The South Korean forces will be forced to pay dearly for the grave armed provocation perpetrated by them," the North's official news agency KCNA quoted newspapers as saying.
South Korea used 100 times more firepower than the North during the skirmish, riddling the North Korean boat with about 5,000 rounds, a defence official was quoted as saying by Yonhap news agency.
http://www.france24.com/en/node/4923296 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
davesucksnfl
Joined: 11 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
These type pf skirmishes aren't that uncommon around the world, just most of the time we don't hear about them. Ships are fired on fairly frequently, be it a nice little warning shot across the bow, or an actual attempt.
street magic almost certainly has it right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
childish idiots! this could have been avoided! |
Yes, it could have been, if the North hadn't deliberately sent it's ship into the territory of another nation it's technically at war with.
itaewonguy wrote: |
so what North Korea is across the line! the south should of been more mature about it, and waited and watched them from a distant.. |
No, they shouldn't have. When you're at war with another nation, you don't simply allow them to waltz into your territory while waiting and watching. If you want to criticize someone here, criticize North Korea for pushing into enemy territory in an act of clear provocation without having any legitimate reason.
This incident is a shame, but it occured because of North Korea's actions, not South Korea's. You do not let an enemy violate your territory, and expecting them to do so is unreasonable. Direct your blame to it's proper target. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think people are missing the point here; the skirmish was not about the NLL. It was not about the South having ships and armaments decades newer than what the North has.
It was about getting NK foremost in the minds of the SK government when Obama comes to town next week. This was an entirely predictable incident given the Nork's recent behavior.
There is a very good analysis of the current situation by Lankov. Here is a bit of it:
"However, observers also agreed that while the Obama administration clearly favored negotiations and compromise in dealing with Pyongyang, North Korea would not be too high on its foreign policy agenda. The new administration had other, more pressing challenges, and one could expect that North Korea would be treated with a measure of neglect.
This might be the reason why Pyongyang strategists, usually quite good in reading (and using) the mood in Washington, decided to be proactive to make sure that North Korea would get enough attention from the White House. To achieve this, they decided to apply a well-tested strategy they had used a number of times, invariably with success.
This essentially consists of three stages. In the first stage, the North Koreans raise tensions, creating the impression they were going to do something really dangerous. They launch missiles, test nuclear devices and engage in ultra-bellicose rhetoric. Once tensions are sufficiently high, and neighboring countries feel uneasy enough, leaders in Pyongyang move to the next stage: they make a few goodwill gestures and hint at the possibility of a negotiated settlement. The world signs with relief and agrees to negotiations."
The rest of it is here and well worth your time:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/KK12Dg01.html
From a different article:
"Analysts say a provocation would make sense in the current political climate, where North Korea may see profit in escalating tension. With direct nuclear talks with the U.S. in the offing, heightened tensions on the Korean Peninsula would only help the North get what it wants. Experts say North Korea may be sending Washington a message ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama's visit to South Korea on Nov. 18-19 that military tensions continue on the peninsula.
North Korea wants to hold talks with South Korea as well while warning that it is still a force to reckon with. "Through various channels, North Korea has recently been demanding humanitarian assistance and expanded economic exchanges," a government official said. "The latest provocation can be viewed as an expression of North Korea's dissatisfaction with the South and also a message that it should not be treated lightly despite its needy situation."
Grand National Party lawmaker Jin Young of the parliamentary Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee, agreed. "North Korea trespassed the Northern Limit Line 24 times last year and already 40 times this year," he said. "The latest provocation appears designed to gain the upper hand in negotiations with the U.S. and South Korea."
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/11/11/2009111100705.html
And then there is this:
"The cannon mounted on the Chamsuri are computer-controlled and capable of delivering accurate fire even when the boats are bobbing on choppy waters. The 40 mm cannon were made by Italian arms manufacturer Breda. The 20 mm Sea Vulcan gun is capable of firing between 2,700 and 3,300 rounds per minute on its targets. In contrast, North Korea's Shanghai class patrol boats were manufactured in the 1960s and their guns must be fired manually. That makes it difficult to focus fire on a single target while the vessels are bobbing up and down. The naval clash on Tuesday occurred amid 2 m waves and at a distance of 3.2 km. Experts say the computer-controlled armaments of the South Korean boat was probably able to sustain concentrated fire more accurately than the North Korean boat."
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/11/12/2009111200586.html
It looks like the 'no drama Obama' style is paying off since it is linked to a SK administration that is not bending over backwards to appease the Norks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
This essentially consists of three stages. In the first stage, the North Koreans raise tensions, creating the impression they were going to do something really dangerous. They launch missiles, test nuclear devices and engage in ultra-bellicose rhetoric. Once tensions are sufficiently high, and neighboring countries feel uneasy enough, leaders in Pyongyang move to the next stage: they make a few goodwill gestures and hint at the possibility of a negotiated settlement. The world signs with relief and agrees to negotiations." |
I would have to say he hit that nail quite sqarely on its head.
You have to give it to NK, they are masters at marketing. Its easy to tweak the tigers tail, when you know the elephants got your back.
Especially when the tiger seems a little long in the tooth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|