View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:53 pm Post subject: DMZ to be developed into Ecological tourist attraction |
|
|
I just saw the article in the Times.
I've heard there are lots of endagered species there and things, but is this really a good idea when :
a) the countries are technically still at war
b) the area is still mined
??????/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The DMZ couldn't be any better than it is now; totally untouched. After possible reunification, I'm encouraged to see that environmental preservation figures in their plans- but of course inevitably there will be progressively more and more disturbance.
The red _Crowned Crane is The national bird of Korea and japan, and emblem of the orient.. The DMZ is one of it's last safe haunts on earth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A splendid idea. When most of this peninsula has been essentially raped for human purposes, there remains a largely untouched strip (except for the land mines). An ecological perserve makes great sense. I'm told that there are still a few Siberian tigers roaming around in there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Took the Panmunjom tour two weeks ago. As the bus drove out of the DMZ area we saw two deer browsing in an empty rice field, not afraid of the bus at all. Just stared at us as we drove past. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course it should be treated as some sort of a nature reserve. The part I was questioning was the part where it becomes a tourist attraction.
I'm not really convinced that the North Koreans would like hordes of South Korean people that close to the border, could be good cover for an invasion after all. I think it's a case of Sunshine Policy induced naivete.
The other part of the problem is: how long will it stay pristine and "peaceful" once hordes of curious ajumas and ajosshis invade? Do you really think it's possible to have an eco friendly tourist site in this country? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
peppermint wrote: |
Of course it should be treated as some sort of a nature reserve. The part I was questioning was the part where it becomes a tourist attraction.
I'm not really convinced that the North Koreans would like hordes of South Korean people that close to the border, could be good cover for an invasion after all. I think it's a case of Sunshine Policy induced naivete.
The other part of the problem is: how long will it stay pristine and "peaceful" once hordes of curious ajumas and ajosshis invade? Do you really think it's possible to have an eco friendly tourist site in this country? |
Good questions there pepper: obviously the actaul demilitarised zone area itself cannot be developed in any way so long as the 2 states are divided. I think the article was refferring to the hypothetical day when reunification occurs.
Of course you can still observe wildlife in the zone now, through long range telescopes etc, and rural areas on the edge of the dmz are wildlife- rich. (such as around Paju and cheorwon).
Korea is totally new to the whole idea of ecotourism, valuing wildlife and the environment. There's not even a nature reserve in the country as yet: and the most valuable and environmentally sensitive areas in South Korea are all being built on and ruined as we speak.
If the DMZ becomes korea's first real experiment in ecotourism, I am encouraged that they're at least making a start, but fearful at the same time that they'll mess it up due to their almost total lack of knowledge and experience in these matters:) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good point, Rapier. From the experience that others have had with Korean 'Zoos', I seriously doubt whether this land should be entrusted to a people who treat animals so badly. Perhaps the UN should step in and create an International Wildlife Park, or whatever the current nomenclature is for a site set aside for all the inhabitants of this planet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
You only have to look at Korea's current status as an environmental pariah. Having signed up to the RAMSAR convention's protocols for preservation of threatened species and wise sustainable use of wetlands, they then totally ignored their obligations.
Korea currently has plans to reclaim every area of tidal estuary on its coast: environmental sacriledge and ruination of the highest order.
The most important issue at the moment now is the development of saemangeum, an area of international importance. It is the last remaining stopover/ feeding area for thousands upon thousands of migrating birds, an essential link in the chain sustaining the existence of several bird species. They're pushing ahead with damming it to create extra land for, nobody actually knows yet. Just to give the construction industry more jobs and money.
If you're interested, do check out this website:
http://wbkenglish.com/saemref.asp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's tempting to suggest that augmenting the water supply with some LSD might play fast and loose with some attitudes here. Oh, sorry, that was the plot of a novel written about a place very different from this one: uptight, populated with born-again racist Christians, in need of a good spiritual reaming. No, it couldn't be the Land of the Mourning Clam. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt the DMZ will be preserved. The North Koreans will be in such a hurry to get to the south that some will be trampled. Then the Southerners will have granduer reunification plans(in other words unregulated develoment) which will cement over a lot more leaving onlt basically Gangwondo left.
Sorry to sound like a cynic but good intentions are usually pushed away when it comes to an opportunity for development and money making in this country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alias

Joined: 24 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. Siberian Tigers? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
just because wrote: |
I doubt the DMZ will be preserved. The North Koreans will be in such a hurry to get to the south that some will be trampled. Then the Southerners will have granduer reunification plans(in other words unregulated develoment) which will cement over a lot more leaving onlt basically Gangwondo left.
Sorry to sound like a cynic but good intentions are usually pushed away when it comes to an opportunity for development and money making in this country. |
sadly i share these fears...which is why i hope reunification takes place in at least another 20 years- by which time Korea would hopefully have gotten used to the idea of abiding by their conservation obligations under international agreements that they've signed.
At the moment there is still virtually no environmental awareness in this country, a shocking state of affairs for a leading 1st world economy. But there are small signs that this may change, in time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|