| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hanguker
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Demonoid is back! Good prices even in Korea.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hanguker wrote: |
Demonoid is back! Good prices even in Korea.  |
haha, you dork. Good prices in Korea, sure, but NOT for some types of tech. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whome?
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've done a bit of research on to Korean pricing during the 2000s.
What I found was that nationalism is an active part to pricing here. The product that might be made in Korea is priced identically, though most of the time higher, than it's US or Canadian counterpart. This is particularly true of electronics.
What I was told was that in the earlier part of this decade Korean products were generally seen and considered to be of lesser quality than their Japanese competition. The Japanese products being of a better quality had a higher price. Relying on nationalism and anti-japanese sentiment, the Korean products were priced at roughly the same as the Japanese products; the idea that the Korean consumer will choose to purchase the Korean product.
Another element of the pricing was to act as a subsidy. Korea was/is considered a guaranteed market; so market share will always be high. The higher prices and profits generated there from in the domestic market acted as a subsidy for allowing Korean products in foreign markets to sell at lower prices, undercutting the prices of their competitors in those markets. This was done to boost sales but also to try to gain a foothold and product share within the foreign markets.
Korean products are still sold at exorbitant markups in Korea, whether because of some of the things discussed in this thread already, or possibly as a carry-over from the early part of this decade.
In either case, the Korean consumer is voluntarily being screwed by it's own people and own corporations.
I would be outraged, but I guess nationalism trumps reason here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slaps
Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Location: Sitting on top of the world
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Another element of the pricing was to act as a subsidy. Korea was/is considered a guaranteed market; so market share will always be high. The higher prices and profits generated there from in the domestic market acted as a subsidy for allowing Korean products in foreign markets to sell at lower prices, undercutting the prices of their competitors in those markets. |
This is the reason my FIL gave me when I asked him about this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cubanlord wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
"To no extent" means "in no way," "not at all."
Sorry to intrude. Just saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| schwa wrote: |
| cubanlord wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
"To no extent" means "in no way," "not at all."
Sorry to intrude. Just saying. |
You Nazi. Don't you have anything else better to do than to keep with the jabs and quote a terrible news agency? Keep it up; you fail to remember that we know each other. Just saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whome?
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| schwa wrote: |
| cubanlord wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
"To no extent" means "in no way," "not at all."
Sorry to intrude. Just saying. |
actually, there are two interpretations of "to no extent"
I can be defined as you say, but it can also mean "to no bounds", meaning limitless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| whome? wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| cubanlord wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
"To no extent" means "in no way," "not at all."
Sorry to intrude. Just saying. |
actually, there are two interpretations of "to no extent"
I can be defined as you say, but it can also mean "to no bounds", meaning limitless. |
that's what I thought, but, I don't feel like arguing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nobbyken

Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Location: Yongin ^^
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think people feel proud of paying lots of money for things,
as it implies that a quality product has been purchased.
Also, people also like to get a bargain and pay as little as possible.
It's the middle ground which leads to confusion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cubanlord wrote: |
| whome? wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| cubanlord wrote: |
| schwa wrote: |
| "Korean pricing sickens me to no extent" = happy customer! |
? |
"To no extent" means "in no way," "not at all."
Sorry to intrude. Just saying. |
actually, there are two interpretations of "to no extent"
I can be defined as you say, but it can also mean "to no bounds", meaning limitless. |
that's what I thought, but, I don't feel like arguing. |
I think schwa was right and that the confusion lies somewhere between "to no end" and "to no matter what extent". Unless "to no extent" is one of those things that doesn't literally make sense but has been used enough that someone decided it was OK. (Like "could care less" when referring to something someone cares nothing for.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|