| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| And the core of the issue is that news isn't (and shouldn't be) entertainment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow Foxy they should give you an award for the amount of assumptions you make. I don't listen to any of the people you wrote that I listen to so it is all a strawman. I listen to Michael Savage fro my news analaysis. Him and only him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Olivencia wrote: |
| Wow Foxy they should give you an award for the amount of assumptions you make. I don't listen to any of the people you wrote that I listen to so it is all a strawman. I listen to Michael Savage fro my news analaysis. Him and only him. |
Do Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have in-depth analysis and critical thinking on their shows? If not, then lacking it is nothing unique to liberal entertainment and your point was entirely deceptive. If so, then why don't you watch them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deceptive? Well you wrote things about me in terms of who I watch and never retracted.
I don't watch or listen to them because Savage is so much better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Olivencia wrote: |
Deceptive? Well you wrote things about me in terms of who I watch and never retracted.
I don't watch or listen to them because Savage is so much better. |
So you do think they have in-depth analysis and critical thinking on their programs? Then my original characterization of you as an individual who thinks just that stands, and your complaint about said characterization is invalidated. I'm not retracting because said characterization is true: you think these men engage in in-depth analysis and critical thinking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When Glenn Beck talks about how he's worried Scott Brown might kill an intern, Olive thinks it's good in depth analysis.
That is what you wrote so I'd like to know where I ever asserted that I believed that it is good in depth analysis? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Olivencia wrote: |
When Glenn Beck talks about how he's worried Scott Brown might kill an intern, Olive thinks it's good in depth analysis.
That is what you wrote so I'd like to know where I ever asserted that I believed that it is good in depth analysis? |
Much like certain other conservatives on the forum, you need to learn the difference between literal statements and rhetorical devices. If you can't differentiate these two things, you're not intelligent enough to bother with. If you can differentiate these two things, you have no basis for complaint. Which is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wish I could remember the statistic, but a couple of months ago someone reported that a remarkable number of conservatives didn't realize Stephen Colbert was doing satire. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| I wish I could remember the statistic, but a couple of months ago someone reported that a remarkable number of conservatives didn't realize Stephen Colbert was doing satire. |
I remember that article. Something along the lines of a poll asking if Stephen Colbert was engaging in satire. Liberals said yes, conservatives said no. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kimbop

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice dodge Foxy. You can now explain to us how it is that you were engaging in a rhetorical device by your incorrect statement. You were caught with your pants down and now back peddle inissting that .....well I really didn't mean that. Typical jerk-off liberal.
Last edited by Olivencia on Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:13 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Olivencia wrote: |
| Nice dodge Foxy. You can now explain to us how it is that you were engaging in a rhetorical device by your incorrect statement. |
So you're saying you don't understand the rhetorical device in question? Is that what you're saying? Because if you say you don't understand it, I'll believe you. I'll even apologize for speaking over your head. To be clear, the only response I'm remotely interested in from you is, "Yes I understood it," or, "No I didn't understand it." No bullshit, no whining, nothing but a simple answer to a simple question.
The edit you added in after I had all ready responded to your post makes it sound like the answer is that you didn't understand it, but for clarity, why not answer properly?
Last edited by Fox on Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's another one:
I'll never understand what you see in angry ranting from Mr. Limbaugh, and you'll always furrow your brow in a vain attempt to understand what's so funny and salient about Mr. Colberts representation of our politics.
--> Don't listen to him either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you understand the rhetorical device being used or not, Olive? Yes or no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Still another:
Look at Olive's post; he complained about a lack of in-depth analysis and critical thinking in shows like the Colbert Report and Daily Show, which implies there is real in-depth analysis and critical thinking on Limbaugh and Beck.
--> It doesn't imply that....only to your confused mind it does. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|