Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Coming Retirement Crisis
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, I didn't factor in the the fact that it is a perpetuity. From my attempt to put a value on your potential annuity, I calculated it to be worth about $74K in today's dollars with two assumptions:

1. 1000 won=1 dollar
2. A discount rate of 4%

So yeah, ignore my previous post Smile. Might be wise to just make the contributions. Even if you were to invest that money into something that gave you a 8% return (but 4% once you figured in the aforementioned DF), you wouldn't come close to that $74K. This is also making the assumption that you would start withdrawing 300/month no matter which route you decided to take.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jaykimf



Joined: 24 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Ok, I didn't factor in the the fact that it is a perpetuity. From my attempt to put a value on your potential annuity, I calculated it to be worth about $74K in today's dollars with two assumptions:

1. 1000 won=1 dollar
2. A discount rate of 4%

So yeah, ignore my previous post Smile. Might be wise to just make the contributions. Even if you were to invest that money into something that gave you a 8% return (but 4% once you figured in the aforementioned DF), you wouldn't come close to that $74K. This is also making the assumption that you would start withdrawing 300/month no matter which route you decided to take.


Even if the pension would be worth 74k as you assert, you have no way of knowing what the alternative would be worth without knowing how much is already invested in the plan. the pension would be based on 2 components, past contributions and future contributions. Without knowing what past contributions are, there is no way to even guess what the self invested option would be worth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jaykimf



Joined: 24 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:



2. If you take out what you've accumulated so far and invest it, be sure to DIVERSIFY. Avoid mutual funds, honestly. You can do just as well putting your money into an index fund. The S&P 500 has had a better return than virtually all funds PLUS you wouldn't have to pay the dumb ass fees that mutual funds charge.



As for avoiding mutual funds that is not necessarily good advice. Since there are index mutual funds, I assume you mean that ETF index funds are better. That is not necessarily true. Depends on the situation. ETFs may have lower expense ratios, but they also have higher trading commissions. If you were to be investing 300,000/month till 2015 and then withdrawing 300,000 a month thereafter you would most likely be better off with the mutual fund index (assuming its a no commision low fee fund such as Vanguards)

Here's what Vanguard says:

Vanguard ETFs can benefit �

* Long-term, buy-and-hold investors. Because buy-and-hold investors don't incur frequent trading costs, they can reap the benefit of the lower expense ratios characteristic of Vanguard ETFs.
* Investors with a sizable lump-sum amount to invest. A single large investment spreads the trading commissions across the entire investment, reducing the impact of the fees. In the long term, Vanguard ETFs' lower expense ratios can make up for the initial transaction cost.
* Investors looking for trading flexibility. Vanguard ETFs can be bought or sold from a broker at any time during the trading day, allowing investors to use stock trading techniques such as limit orders, buying on margin, and selling short.

Traditional index funds can be better for �

* Investors who rebalance frequently. When you rebalance, you have to go through a broker to buy or sell Vanguard ETFs holdings and incur commissions and bid-ask spreads. These fees will reduce the cost benefit of your ETF investment.
* Investors engaging in regular transactions. If you practice dollar-cost averaging,** make direct deposits or periodic withdrawals, buying and selling Vanguard ETFs will generate brokerage commissions to complete the transactions. These fees will erode the cost benefit of your investment.
* Investors with a small amount to invest. There are no trading commissions from Vanguard when you purchase our traditional index funds directly from us. Because you buy Vanguard ETFs through a broker, you will typically incur commissions and bid-ask spreads. It will be difficult for Vanguard ETFs' lower expense ratios to make up for the initial transaction costs of small investments�even in the long term.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lots of interesting and useful information, guys. Thanks. Keep it up! Very Happy

I'll try to answer some of the questions:

1. I don't know for a fact that the pension plan is adjusted for inflation. It's a gov't (Korean) run plan. All I can say is that I would expect it to be adjusted from time to time, but who knows.

2. I just checked and my mutual fund is at 29.01% right now. (In late 2007 it was at a happiness-inducing 45%.) I know that's exceptional--last winter at this time it was in negative territory, big time. I can only withdraw at the beginning of April without penalty, so there is a narrow window of opportunity each year. One reason the pension plan is attractive is its reliability--who is to say where my fund will be in 5 years? Or the currency exchange rate, for that matter.

3. I've been paying W180,000 a month (or whatever the monthly deduction has been) and my employers the other half for 5 years. Now I have to pick up the slack since the employer is no longer required to kick in if I stay in the program. I figured the 7 1/2 years by adding up monthly contributions.

Thanks again for the advice/information. It's been helpful. I've been tossing this around for a couple of weeks and it helps to hear other views.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jaykimf wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Ok, I didn't factor in the the fact that it is a perpetuity. From my attempt to put a value on your potential annuity, I calculated it to be worth about $74K in today's dollars with two assumptions:

1. 1000 won=1 dollar
2. A discount rate of 4%

So yeah, ignore my previous post Smile. Might be wise to just make the contributions. Even if you were to invest that money into something that gave you a 8% return (but 4% once you figured in the aforementioned DF), you wouldn't come close to that $74K. This is also making the assumption that you would start withdrawing 300/month no matter which route you decided to take.


Even if the pension would be worth 74k as you assert, you have no way of knowing what the alternative would be worth without knowing how much is already invested in the plan. the pension would be based on 2 components, past contributions and future contributions. Without knowing what past contributions are, there is no way to even guess what the self invested option would be worth.


Jay, what already is invested in the plan is irrelevant. At least from what ya-ta boy posted. From what it sounds like, this current option is put in 300/month for the next 5 years, then retire and get 300/month for the rest of his life. That's it. Past savings are not coming into play. Ya-ta, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Now if that 300 is going to a fund, and getting a rate of return, and consequently he'll get a higher payment down the road, then yes, you would be correct. From what Ya-ta described, however, that is not the case.

And btw, valuing a perpetuity is quite easy:

payment/discount rate.

I PV'd $3600 and divided it by 4%. If I made an error there, feel free to point it out.

In regards to the ETF vs. Mutal fund, sorry, jay, what I meant was invest in an index fund, either ETF or mutual. Just meant the typical, "specialty" funds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jaykimf



Joined: 24 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you have been paying in 180k a month and your employer the same amount for 5 years, you should have about 21600k in the plan. Assuming a 10% return and assuming you put the same 300k a month that you would have put into the pension into your mutual fund, at the end of 1 year you would have 27360k (21600 *1.1 +3600) year 2 33696k, year 3, 40665, year 4, 48332k and at the end of year 5, 56765k. (of course this is very simplified because your returns will vary from year to year and you have to take into account taxes etc.) A 10% return on the year 5 amount would be 5675k/ year or 473k per month for the rest of your life (and the principal would be left to your estate). This is very simplified, your actual returns will vary considerably from year to year and may average out to significantly more or less than the 10% that is assumed for illustration. You can vary your assumptions about your starting investment and rate of return and see where the math takes you. I think I would be inclined to take the money and invest it myself. There is the potential for a much greater return, however there is also more risk involved. People who are extremely risk adverse would undoubtedly take the risk free pension. Anyway, good luck with your choice, there really is no correct choice without taking into account your own risk tolerance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jaykimf



Joined: 24 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:

Jay, what already is invested in the plan is irrelevant. At least from what ya-ta boy posted. From what it sounds like, this current option is put in 300/month for the next 5 years, then retire and get 300/month for the rest of his life. That's it. Past savings are not coming into play. Ya-ta, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Now if that 300 is going to a fund, and getting a rate of return, and consequently he'll get a higher payment down the road, then yes, you would be correct. From what Ya-ta described, however, that is not the case.

And btw, valuing a perpetuity is quite easy:

payment/discount rate.

I PV'd $3600 and divided it by 4%. If I made an error there, feel free to point it out.

In regards to the ETF vs. Mutal fund, sorry, jay, what I meant was invest in an index fund, either ETF or mutual. Just meant the typical, "specialty" funds.


No ,I don't think past contributions are irrelevant. since he has the option of taking out the full amount that he has already contributed and investing that amount in lieu of the pension.

also, I didn't mean to suggest there was an error in your calculation, I just meant I was taking your word for it because I hadn't figured that out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jaykimf wrote:


No ,I don't think past contributions are irrelevant. since he has the option of taking out the full amount that he has already contributed and investing that amount in lieu of the pension.


Ah, ok, my mistake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Jay, what already is invested in the plan is irrelevant. At least from what ya-ta boy posted. From what it sounds like, this current option is put in 300/month for the next 5 years, then retire and get 300/month for the rest of his life. That's it. Past savings are not coming into play. Ya-ta, please correct me if I'm wrong.



If I'm following correctly, that isn't right. The W300,000 will be the result of 5 years of employer/my contributions in the past + my W300,000 contributions for the next 5 years. (total of 10 years contributions)

Given my past record of investing--I entered the Korean stock market in the spring of '97 and ended up getting wiped out at the end of the year, I'm less than confident about my ability to choose a sound stock. I'm leaning to the safe secure pension option as a way of diversifying...most of my current savings is going into the good mutual fund I have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Jay, what already is invested in the plan is irrelevant. At least from what ya-ta boy posted. From what it sounds like, this current option is put in 300/month for the next 5 years, then retire and get 300/month for the rest of his life. That's it. Past savings are not coming into play. Ya-ta, please correct me if I'm wrong.



If I'm following correctly, that isn't right. The W300,000 will be the result of 5 years of employer/my contributions in the past + my W300,000 contributions for the next 5 years. (total of 10 years contributions)


So is jay also correct? That if you were to decide to not do this for the next 5 years, you'd be able to withdraw what has been put into the plan so far?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I could withdraw the money up to this point and do whatever I want with it.

I went in last Friday afternoon and set things up for the next 5 years. I decided that the security of having W300,000 a month forever with no way to lose it was a better deal for me at this age than gambling on the stock market.

Considering the political paralysis in Washington that shows no sign of getting better, the security of having an independent income from a second country, no matter how small, just might be a good thing. I also have my fingers crossed that the Korean gov't will raise the payout at some point in the future to keep up with inflation. Who knows, it could happen.

Thanks again for the advice, guys. It was good to hear the different views.

PS: My mutual funds were doing great last week. One was at 30% and the other at 21%, the highest in over a year. Sadly, the market has been dropping Friday and today. IF the decline is just temporary and things have recovered by April, I'll be raiding the smaller fund to buy a new car. I think I deserve it. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies to the OP for totally hijacking his thread on a very important issue. In an effort to restore it to the original topic, here is something from Martin Amis:

'But none of those opponents were as tough as his new target promises to be. Now 60, Amis has picked a fight with the grey power of Britain's ageing population, calling for euthanasia "booths" on street corners where they can terminate their lives with "a martini and a medal".

The author of Time's Arrow and London Fields said in an interview at the weekend that he believes Britain faces a "civil war" between young and old, as a "silver �tsunami" of increasingly ageing people puts pressure on society.

"They'll be a population of demented very old people, like an invasion of terrible immigrants, stinking out the restaurants and cafes and shops," he said. "I can imagine a sort of civil war between the old and the young in 10 or 15 years' time.

"There should be a booth on every �corner where you could get a martini and a medal," he added.'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/jan/24/martin-amis-euthanasia-booths-alzheimers

It pushes one of my buttons because years and years ago, when I was teaching Me Generation high school students in the heart of red neck country, I told them my prediction was that they would have wheel chair races with each other, pushing their grannies into gas chambers in the name of fiscal responsibility and low taxes. I have seen nothing in the past 35 years to change my mind.

I totally believe in dying with dignity, but the way things are going, there is going to be enormous social pressure from the insurance companies to cut their losses by encouraging my generation to 'think of the next generation'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GwangjuParents



Joined: 31 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Apologies to the OP for totally hijacking his thread on a very important issue. In an effort to restore it to the original topic, here is something from Martin Amis:

'But none of those opponents were as tough as his new target promises to be. Now 60, Amis has picked a fight with the grey power of Britain's ageing population, calling for euthanasia "booths" on street corners where they can terminate their lives with "a martini and a medal".

The author of Time's Arrow and London Fields said in an interview at the weekend that he believes Britain faces a "civil war" between young and old, as a "silver �tsunami" of increasingly ageing people puts pressure on society.

"They'll be a population of demented very old people, like an invasion of terrible immigrants, stinking out the restaurants and cafes and shops," he said. "I can imagine a sort of civil war between the old and the young in 10 or 15 years' time.

"There should be a booth on every �corner where you could get a martini and a medal," he added.'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/jan/24/martin-amis-euthanasia-booths-alzheimers

It pushes one of my buttons because years and years ago, when I was teaching Me Generation high school students in the heart of red neck country, I told them my prediction was that they would have wheel chair races with each other, pushing their grannies into gas chambers in the name of fiscal responsibility and low taxes. I have seen nothing in the past 35 years to change my mind.

I totally believe in dying with dignity, but the way things are going, there is going to be enormous social pressure from the insurance companies to cut their losses by encouraging my generation to 'think of the next generation'.



A martini and a medal.... I like that!


Funny thing is my wife and I were discussing the same concept: euthanasia for senior citizens.

Far fetched idea?

Well, when you realize that HUGE numbers of boomers about to retire who have virtually no savings or any kind of real pension plan, the idea doesn't seem so far fetched.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I knew that would appeal to some. I suspect there are plenty more posters who also agree with it.

Lots complain about the Social Security system (rightly) and the need for reform. They usually refer to it as entitlement reform, possibly as a euphemism meant to undercut the idea that anyone (but them) are entitled to anything. Few are specific about the reforms they consider desirable. I'm suspicious that many are using 'reform' as a code for abolishment.

I'm curious just what reforms they have in mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International