View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:31 am Post subject: S. Carolina's Common Sense Solution to the Budget Deficit |
|
|
Lt. Gov and candidate for the top spot, Andre Bauer, has an innovative solution to a big share of the budget problem:
"My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed! You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply, they will reproduce."
To be fair, he said it was a poor metaphor, but I have trouble seeing the metaphor there.
But he does have a point. Maybe we should turn the federal government over to people who think like him.
It did remind me of this: "Get my dinner from a garbage can"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoG62Wi8twU |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are people on this very forum who pretty much have said the same thing (excepting the specific use of the term animal). On the one hand, they seem able to admit that the reason many poor people are poor is because they use bad judgment. On the other hand, they seem to think that if only social program incentives were removed, the poor would suddenly exercise much better judgment with regards to how many children they could reasonably support.
I think there's enough real world data to show that the poor are going to breed no matter what. It's just a matter of whether we let the children involved suffer because of their parent's poverty or use some of our tax dollars to help them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
why does it so often seem like there's an inverse relationship between wealth and intelligence when it comes to discussions of social policy? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy, you did not properly explain the context. This is the Lt. Governor of South Carolina, you know, the state with the governor who said he was hiking the Appalachian Trail (on Hike Nude Day) when he was actually in Argentina with his mistress and who is under threat of impeachment, and has been charged by the state with 37 ethics violations.
It sounds like Andre Bauer is his insurance policy. Bauer was criticizing the free or reduced price school lunch program, and said any parent with a child on this program should be required to undergo drug testing.
(South Carolina is the state with the 40th lowest per capita income in the U.S., so I hardly think he should be blaming parents, especially during the worst Recession in decades. But that involves applying rational thought, which is so old fashioned.)
Here's the audio:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#35069406
Who elected these nut jobs? Is Bauer a member of The Fellowship, too?
Anyone here from the Palmetto State? You got some 'splainin to do.
You also have my condolences.
Last edited by Gatsby on Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
That guy's being too soft. A simple IQ test before sterilization would be far more efficient! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hope you are joking, djsmnc.
Unfortunately, one can't assume that you are. Many states had laws allowing forced sterilization to promote eugenics and even racial purity. The most infamous was Virginia's. The U.S. Supreme Court even upheld this law in 1927.
Quote: |
The ruling was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.. In support of his argument that the interest of the states in a "pure" gene pool outweighed the interest of individuals in their bodily integrity, he wrote:
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.
Holmes concluded his argument with the infamous phrase: Three generations of imbeciles are enough. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_Integrity_Act_of_1924
IQ tests of the time were a bad joke, for example asking questions that required knowledge of national advertising campaigns. IQ and personality traits were deduced by professionals by measuring the size and shape of the head, including the length and angle of the brow.
Low IQ was probably less to genetics and more to things like fetal alcohol syndrome, poor prenatal nutrition, problems during delivery of the baby, including the improper use of forceps to grab the head and speed delivery, etc.
The governor of Virginia issued an apology, but most states didn't.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/05/02/virginia-eugenics.htm
While most Americans would oppose any such laws today, it is safe to say, based on comments like Bauer's and other conservatives, that there would also be surprisingly strong support for forced sterilization based IQ, income, race or some combination of factors. And given how stupid some of these comments have been, the support would probably come from some of the same people who would qualify for sterilization, including some governors, former governors and members of Congress. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gatsby wrote: |
(South Carolina is the state with the 40th lowest per capita income in the U.S., ) |
So South Carolina is the state with the 10th highest per capita income in the U.S.?
Who'da thunk it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jon Stewart (god love him) puts this in context:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/jon-stewart-blasts-gop-ca_n_436674.html
"Making the case that the solution to poverty is starving the poor so they don't reproduce, Bauer was not helping change South Carolina's image. Said Stewart: "You keep giving them a chance, and they keep f****** that same horse."
The starving poor didn't reproduce in India much, did they? The gov't also experimented with sterilization. Perhaps Bauer could adopt this as his campaign slogan: 1970's India--South Carolina's Future!
PS: A little historical context. Bauer is not breaking new ground here. Back in the 80's the Reagan administration declared ketchup a vegetable so that kids who got french fries with ketchup for lunch didn't need to bother with another vegetable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
young_clinton
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djsmnc wrote: |
That guy's being too soft. A simple IQ test before sterilization would be far more efficient! |
If society decides who can breed and who cannot breed, especially by using IQ tests, you are going to have a population of mediocre people. You'll remove much of the individual differences that produces greatness in people.
This is something that I believe Nietsche actually mentioned in "Beyond Good and Evil". And I agree with him too.
Anyhow Beethoven's family was seriously botched, Mother syphallitic, Father an alcoholic, one sybilling retarded, the other blind or deaf. Beethoven himself was a failure at everything except composing, and his composing talents came relatively late, considering the other Major composers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, but didn't young Bill Clinton receive free school lunches?
The goal is not to stop talented geniuses from breeding, it is to stop Democrats from breeding.
It's not about race, it is a race. That's why conservatives are so strongly opposed to good Christians using birth control. If Republicans stopped breeding like rabbits, it might give the edge to the Democrats.
Just think, if young Bill Clinton had starved to death, George Bush senior would have been elected to a second term. It's just plain common sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would actually be for the government paying for voluntary vasectomies, tube ties, and contraceptives.
When I was shopping for a vasectomy a few years ago, the cheapest I could find was over $800, with some hospitals charging into the thousands. That would be a very steep price for someone living in poverty. It would be a lot more affordable for taxpayers to pony up the $800 if a poor man wants a vasectomy than to pay for all of the babies he would go out and make. If some ladies want their tubes tied or Norplant or whatever else, that would be one of the few government spending initiatives I would not complain about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be happy to scrub the rust spots off an old pair of scissors I have if you are still in the market for a vasectomy. 10% discount, too!
Social Darwinism worked out so well the first time around, it seems only fair to bring it back. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the offer, but I don't need one now and only go to female doctors anyway. It was something I had to do, though, since I'm not on welfare.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|