|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bacasper
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:21 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| pkang0202 wrote: |
The court struck down SCOTUS in the current form.
You liberals talk like its the end of the world. Why not push through a different version of SCOTUS? Change the wording a little bit as to not get struck down by the Supreme Court. |
The Court struck itself down? 
Are people supposed to know what they are talking about to post here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pkang0202 wrote: |
The court struck down SCOTUS in the current form.
You liberals talk like its the end of the world. |
I do not personally consider myself a liberal. Granted, I probably am liberal on certain issues, but I am also conservative on other issues. All in all, I would call myself a centrist. And yes, I also consider the Supreme Court ruling to be very disturbing.
| pkang0202 wrote: |
| Why not push through a different version of SCOTUS? Change the wording a little bit as to not get struck down by the Supreme Court. |
| State of the Union Address wrote: |
| Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests � including foreign corporations � to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don�t think American elections should be bankrolled by America�s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that�s why I�m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong. |
Evidently, that is also exactly what Barack Obama wants Congress to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| pkang0202 wrote: |
The court struck down SCOTUS in the current form.
You liberals talk like its the end of the world. |
I do not personally consider myself a liberal. Granted, I probably am liberal on certain issues, but I am also conservative on other issues. All in all, I would call myself a centrist. And yes, I also consider the Supreme Court ruling to be very disturbing.
| pkang0202 wrote: |
| Why not push through a different version of SCOTUS? Change the wording a little bit as to not get struck down by the Supreme Court. |
| State of the Union Address wrote: |
| Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests � including foreign corporations � to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don�t think American elections should be bankrolled by America�s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that�s why I�m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong. |
Evidently, that is also exactly what Barack Obama wants Congress to do. |
| bacasper wrote: |
The Court struck itself down?
Are people supposed to know what they are talking about to post here? |
SCOTUS = Supreme Court of the United States |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontheway wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| pkang0202 wrote: |
The court struck down SCOTUS in the current form.
You liberals talk like its the end of the world. |
I do not personally consider myself a liberal. Granted, I probably am liberal on certain issues, but I am also conservative on other issues. All in all, I would call myself a centrist. And yes, I also consider the Supreme Court ruling to be very disturbing.
| pkang0202 wrote: |
| Why not push through a different version of SCOTUS? Change the wording a little bit as to not get struck down by the Supreme Court. |
| State of the Union Address wrote: |
| Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests � including foreign corporations � to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don�t think American elections should be bankrolled by America�s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that�s why I�m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong. |
Evidently, that is also exactly what Barack Obama wants Congress to do. |
| bacasper wrote: |
The Court struck itself down?
Are people supposed to know what they are talking about to post here? |
SCOTUS = Supreme Court of the United States |
Yes, I knew that, but it was clear to me what Pkang was trying to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pkang0202
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| ontheway wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| pkang0202 wrote: |
The court struck down SCOTUS in the current form.
You liberals talk like its the end of the world. |
I do not personally consider myself a liberal. Granted, I probably am liberal on certain issues, but I am also conservative on other issues. All in all, I would call myself a centrist. And yes, I also consider the Supreme Court ruling to be very disturbing.
| pkang0202 wrote: |
| Why not push through a different version of SCOTUS? Change the wording a little bit as to not get struck down by the Supreme Court. |
| State of the Union Address wrote: |
| Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests � including foreign corporations � to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don�t think American elections should be bankrolled by America�s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that�s why I�m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong. |
Evidently, that is also exactly what Barack Obama wants Congress to do. |
| bacasper wrote: |
The Court struck itself down?
Are people supposed to know what they are talking about to post here? |
SCOTUS = Supreme Court of the United States |
Yes, I knew that, but it was clear to me what Pkang was trying to say. |
You know when you type fast and you try to put down your thoughts as fast as you can and the words get jumbled up?
Maybe if I had mad mistake-free texting skills, I wouldn't have done that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
