Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Military Dictatorship
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:32 am    Post subject: Military Dictatorship Reply with quote

Clinton: Iran is becoming a military dictatorship

Some have been saying this for months now, but it now seems to be the official US attitude. It puts the US firmly and openly on the side of the opposition Green Movement.

"Speaking to Arab students at Carnegie Mellon's Doha campus, Clinton said Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps appears to have gained so much power that it effectively is supplanting the government.

"Iran is moving toward a military dictatorship," she said. "That is our view."

Last week the U.S. Treasury Department announced that it was freezing the assets in U.S. jurisdictions of a Revolutionary Guard general and four subsidiaries of a previously penalized construction company he runs because of their alleged involvement in producing and spreading weapons of mass destruction."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100215/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_clinton_mideast

That will be good news to the opposition, which commonly chants "Down with Russia", "Down with China" because of their support for the 'elected' government.

It comes at a good time since the Greens were defeated in last week's demonstrations. They are having to reassess their approach since giving an oppressive gov't a month's notice of just where and when you are planning an anti-gov't demonstration finally met a brick wall.

A new front has opened:
"A leading conservative rival to Ahmadinejad, lawmaker Ali Mottahari, warned that Iran was not yet out of the clear.

"We cannot claim the crisis is totally over until both sides make up for their mistakes," he said in an interview with Khabaronline (in Persian), the news website affiliated with parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani. "The differences of opinion between the government and [the opposition] might have been eased to some extent, but they still exist. Our statesmen should not imagine that people's massive presence in the Thursday rally reflects the approval of their performance.... The presence of political elite in the rally does not mean there is no longer any criticism or objection towards the regime."

Mottahari recently called on opposition leaders Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi to stop calling for protests for a bit and let government insiders like him take care of Ahmadinejad and his ilk."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2010/02/iran-a-day-after-22-bahman-rally-a-conservative-ahmadinejad-rival-opens-fire.html

So while neo-cons spout off about bomb, bomb, bomb Iran (see Sarah Palin's Nashville interview), things continue to develop in Iran, the US gov't works to increase economic pressure while further delegitimizing the administration, a new front opens up in Iran.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ endless hypocrisy.

Quote:
The possibility of yet another U.S. war became more real last week, when the Obama administration sharply confronted both China and Iran. The first aggressive act was performed by Obama's Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who "warned" China that it must support serious economic sanctions against Iran (an act of war).

Clinton said: "China will be under a lot of pressure to recognize the destabilizing effect that a nuclear-armed Iran would have, from which they receive a significant percentage of their oil supply."

The implication here is that China will be cut off from a major energy source if they do not support U.S. foreign policy -- this, too, would equal an act of war.

A more direct military provocation occurred later when Obama agreed to honor a Bush-era military pact with Taiwan, a small island that lies off the mainland coast of China, and is claimed by China as its own territory. Taiwan has been a U.S. client state ever since the defeated nationalist forces fled there from China in the aftermath of the 1949 revolution. Taiwan has remained a bastion of U.S. intrigue and anti-China agitation for the past six decades. Obama has recently upped the ante by approving a $6.4 billion arms sale to Taiwan, including:

"... 60 Black Hawk helicopters, Patriot interceptor missiles, advanced Harpoon missiles that can be used against land or ship targets and two refurbished minesweepers." (The New York Times, January 30, 2010).

[...]Obama's polices against China have been far more aggressive than Bush's, making a farce out of his campaign promises of a more peaceful foreign policy. Obama's same, deceitful approach is used in South America, where he promised "non-intervention" and then proceeded to build military bases in Colombia on Venezuela's border, while giving a green light to the coup in Honduras.

[...]The attitude of the U.S. government towards China has nothing to do with the Dalai Lama, internet censorship, or human rights. These excuses are used as diplomatic jabs in the framework of a larger, geopolitical brawl. Chinese corporations are expanding rapidly in the wake of the decline of the U.S. business class, and Obama is using a variety of measures to counteract this dynamic, with all roads leading to war.

This grand chessboard of corporate and military maneuvering reached a dangerous standoff yesterday, with the U.S. military provoking Iran. The New York Times explains:

"The Obama administration is accelerating the deployment of new defenses against possible Iranian missile attacks in the Persian Gulf, placing special ships [war ships] off the Iranian coast and antimissile systems in at least four [surrounding] Arab countries, according to administration and military officials." (January 30, 2010)

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-Provokes-War-Against-by-shamus-cooke-100201-595.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reggie



Joined: 21 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolutely amazing, as the world�s number one arms dealer, the world�s leading nuclear armed super power, having more military bases in more nations than any other, militarily occupying more nations than any other, and that our military is the largest single portion of our budget by far Hillary Clinton is going to lecture foreign students on the dangers of military dictatorship in a nation that we militarily occupy its two closest neighboring countries?

We have absolutely got the best propaganda in the world and the most completely brainwashed mass of citizens that someone like Hillary could make such a statement with not only a straight face but half the brain dead, undereducated, wholly ignorant and deceived people in the nation cheering her on.

It defies all reason and boggles the imagination that Americans could be so blind as to the militant nature of our own nation and its agendas while being extolled to look for the tell tale symptoms of it in other nations at a time when our own nation is off the chart in its scope and scale of gunboat diplomacy, deadly violence as a solution, and has a perpetual culture of war and death.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ well said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man, I really hope we don't ever end up attacking Iran... Aside from all the obvious reasons that killing/maiming innocent people and destroying their country would be horrible, it's also a country I've been interested in traveling to for awhile. It just looks like such a fascinating part of the world. So much culture and history. The prospect of seeing it turned into Iraq #2 (ie. a bombed in hell-hole), does not impress me one bit.

Obviously the government's no good, but all the regular Iranians I've met (and I've met a fair number) have been really cool, friendly (as well as free-thinking) people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Summary of the responses so far: the US is hypocritical, thus Iran will not be a military dictatorship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Summary of the responses so far: the US is hypocritical, thus Iran will not be a military dictatorship.

Even if Iran does become a military dictatorship (which hasn't been established yet), so what? Are you suggesting that US military intervention is the answer?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
Are you suggesting that US military intervention is the answer?


No. Whatever put that idea into your head?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dude Ranch



Joined: 04 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is funny how hard the media is beating the drum for war with Iran. Who has an interest in that country I wonder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude Ranch wrote:
It is funny how hard the media is beating the drum for war with Iran. Who has an interest in that country I wonder.


Yes. It is gross.

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2010/02/09/ap-pulls-iran-nukes-story-after-antiwar-com-expos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
visitorq wrote:
Are you suggesting that US military intervention is the answer?


No. Whatever put that idea into your head?

I thought perhaps the point you were trying to make was that Iran is a military dictatorship (i.e. a threat) and therefore deserves to be bombed regardless of how hypocritical the US might be. No doubt there are plenty of people who hold this view.

Anyway, no worries, I was just asking.


Last edited by visitorq on Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:22 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:22 am    Post subject: Re: Military Dictatorship Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:


"Iran is moving toward a military dictatorship," she said.


Stay out of it (besides expressing sympathy and support for the Iranian people while wishing them luck in getting through their plight).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
mithridates wrote:
visitorq wrote:
Are you suggesting that US military intervention is the answer?


No. Whatever put that idea into your head?

I thought perhaps the point you were trying to make was that that Iran is a military dictatorship (i.e. a threat) and therefore deserves to be bombed regardless of how hypocritical the US might be. No doubt there are plenty of people who hold this view.

Anyway, no worries, I was just asking.


Okay. I agree most of the time with NIAC:

http://www.niacouncil.org/

For example:

Clinton's statement may be correct:
http://niacblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/clinton-irans-shift-towards-military-dictatorship/

But military action is definitely not the answer:
http://niacblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/deja-vu-all-over-again/

They also said that they agreed with sanctions targeted at the Revolutionary Guards and the companies they own, but not broad sanctions on the overall economy:
http://www.niacouncil.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1643&Itemid=2

I hope to live in Iran for at least a few months and maybe longer eventually, so no I definitely don't want to see anything destabilizing happening to it. I also don't like how the whole world hyperventilates every time Ahmadinejad says something. He loves the attention.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
Man, I really hope we don't ever end up attacking Iran... Aside from all the obvious reasons that killing/maiming innocent people and destroying their country would be horrible, it's also a country I've been interested in traveling to for awhile. It just looks like such a fascinating part of the world. So much culture and history. The prospect of seeing it turned into Iraq #2 (ie. a bombed in hell-hole), does not impress me one bit.

Come on, we've bombed the cradle of civilization, the Tigris-Euphrates valley in Iraq. How can we ever outdo that?

And Iran has some awesome skiing! Exclamation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
beck's



Joined: 02 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

America has to stop these continuous, long-term foreign military adventures and idealistic notions of "nation building" in parts of the world that are only just emerging from savagery. Americans are destroying their economy by following these paths which make necessary the out-of-control printing of money.

What we need to do is encourage democracy in Iran through the funding of democratic rebel groups in Iran and coming out strongly in favour of the benefits of the politics of democracy and the economics of captialism. This can be done through media blitzes and careful use of the CIA to fund and encourage the Iranian rebels. We do not need to send troops into Iran. We put the Shah (a great leader compared to the nut-job in power now) on the throne without any military involvement. We can do this again.

If military force is needed to prevent Iran from attacking Israel or any of its neighbours with nuclear weapons it should be done with the airforce. Simply bomb the sh-t out of the nuclear facilities and the launch pads. Using our airforce completely destroy Iran's will to make war a la Dresden and the other German cities circa 1944.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International