|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kinerry
Joined: 01 Jun 2009
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:17 am Post subject: Re: Have women changed for the better? |
 |
|
| sugarkane59 wrote: |
| fromtheuk wrote: |
Some women in my view have become mean, nasty, and overly keen to get ahead, whereas men seem to be sensitive, reasonable, and aren't as over the top as some 'power crazed' women are.
It's still predominantly a man's world, and there are plenty of nasty, career-obsessed men out there too.
Yes, women still aren't treated fairly, they aren't always paid as much as men when they do the same job etc.
|
Hundreds of years of oppression, which to some extent still exists (as you mentioned above) is the reason many women have to act the way they do. Men have had and still have it easier than women (e.g. better paid for the same job role sometimes) and thus don't have to run around like blue arsed flies to get ahead...Or are you just simply feeling the competition fromtheuk?
| fromtheuk wrote: |
| I'm all for success, but when I observe power hungry women acting like men, it's a real turn-off. |
Women don't work their 'balls' off to turn you on, so you can rest easy there hon. |
yep, all that free money for college and legal protection sure sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CapnSamwise
Joined: 11 Jan 2010
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
Also, Street Magic, women watch a great deal more TV than men - a sad reflection on the female preoccupation with triviality.
|
I'll give ten dollars to the person who can tell me the classic logical fallacy made above. Twenty for the latin! |
Backstreet boys.
Sorry, WHAT IS the backstreet boys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DorkothyParker wrote: |
| BaldTeacher wrote: |
Gender is not a social construct. What, am I imagining the hole that my dick goes in? Am I imagining that I have a dick and balls instead of a vagina? Are my pecs really a pair of knockers? I must be one ugly-ass girl then.
|
You are confusing gender with sex. The former is sociology and the latter is biology. Don't worry, it happens all the time. It's all part of the greater "nature vs. nurture" debate. Whether you agree or disagree with the concept of gender as a social construct, it is important not to confuse the terms. |
Equally, ethnicity is a genetic reality but a social construct when it comes to taking censuses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| None of you are right, but I will give ten dollars to the dude who said backstreet boys because their tunes are so neat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Draz
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Location: Land of Morning Clam
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mcviking wrote: |
| Intelligence, self esteem, and ones ability to manipulate people is the real issue here, whether you have a *beep* or a vagina is irrelevant. |
Haven't you heard? Women are master manipulators. They will use their vaginas to steal all your money and you'll never even see it coming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Draz wrote: |
| mcviking wrote: |
| Intelligence, self esteem, and ones ability to manipulate people is the real issue here, whether you have a *beep* or a vagina is irrelevant. |
Haven't you heard? Women are master manipulators. They will use their vaginas to steal all your money and you'll never even see it coming. |
Which is good, because it's really gross to watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
guava
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
Also, Street Magic, women watch a great deal more TV than men - a sad reflection on the female preoccupation with triviality.
|
I'll give ten dollars to the person who can tell me the classic logical fallacy made above. Twenty for the latin! |
post hoc ergo propter hoc
cum hoc
post hoc
(one of the above) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| guava wrote: |
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
Also, Street Magic, women watch a great deal more TV than men - a sad reflection on the female preoccupation with triviality.
|
I'll give ten dollars to the person who can tell me the classic logical fallacy made above. Twenty for the latin! |
post hoc ergo propter hoc
cum hoc
post hoc
(one of the above) |
If you have this much trouble swallowing, you should just spit. No one likes a gagger.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| guava wrote: |
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
Also, Street Magic, women watch a great deal more TV than men - a sad reflection on the female preoccupation with triviality.
|
I'll give ten dollars to the person who can tell me the classic logical fallacy made above. Twenty for the latin! |
post hoc ergo propter hoc
cum hoc
post hoc
(one of the above) |
Yay, you win!! twenty dollars for you... in Canadian! Mwahahahaha, fool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
