Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Corruption in Education

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wylies99



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:29 am    Post subject: Corruption in Education Reply with quote

Corruption in Education

Is Reform Possible With Teachers Like This?
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2010/02/202_61171.html

Two high-school principals in Seoul were arrested on charges of taking bribes last week; a former headmaster also killed himself after being fired for similar reasons. These incidents are grim reminders of why some teachers are dying ― literally ― to assume top school posts and, more importantly, why the nation's public education is what it is now.

The arrested high-school principals took money from teachers aspiring to become school inspectors, an avenue regarded as a shortcut to becoming a principal. It takes at least 20 years for teachers to become deputy principals, but in the case of school inspectors, the period can be shortened to 17 years in elementary schools and 19 years in middle schools.

Out of the total 9,026 school principals in 2007, 27.3 percent were former school inspectors. Considering these so-called educational specialists account for just 1 percent of all teachers, the chances for their rising to the top posts are almost 30 times higher than the latter.

The issue is what some of these teachers do after reaching their lifelong destinations. Quite a few of them receive money from teachers for promotion or assignment, or from private contractors in relation to various construction works, after-school tutoring and school lunch programs. One of the arrested principals, who also served as a high-level school inspector at the Seoul Office of Education, was found to be keeping a secret 1.4 billion-won ($1.1-million) bankbook.

The more ambitious of these principals run for the top posts of local education offices, which require several billion won for campaigning, and ``recover their investment" after their election by exhorting money from teachers and related businesses in a vicious ― and grander ― circle of corruption in the educational community. Critics say some elected educational officials' behavior can make their political counterparts pale, saying the cases of some principals now under charges are but the tip of the iceberg.

Now, one can partly see why President Lee Myung-bak felt rather sorry to hear the praises heaped on the Korean educational system by his U.S. counterpart.

Of course, President Lee's discontent with the nation's educational situation is of a more fundamental nature, such as the poor quality of public education and soaring private tutoring costs as a consequence as well as the content of the education largely focusing on test-taking abilities rather than cultivating creativity. Considering this is an area in which the integrity of people involved is more important than others, however, it is deeply doubtful whether his much-touted education reform will go anywhere.

It is small surprise then that schoolteachers received far lower marks than their counterparts in cram institutions from students in a recent survey. The research by the Korean Educational Development Institute shows that high school students find hagwon instructors outperform public schoolteachers in most of the 14 categories, including not just raising student achievement but even genuine communication.

Public-school teachers would probably cite such disadvantages as overcrowded classes and administrative chores that keep them from focusing on teaching.

But few would deny the difference between public and private teachers lies in the presence ― and intensity ― of competition. Like in other public- sector jobs, becoming a teacher is very difficult but living as one is very easy given what they call an ``iron bowl." Hard work and fair competition are quintessential in schools, but they're the last thing that can be expected of corrupt principals and inspectors.

President Lee has rightly set education reform as his priority for 2010. Cleaning up the deep-rooted corruption among top educational officials is a good place to start.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aishiii



Joined: 24 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So a corrupt person is going to stop corruption.

Good one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Corruption in Education Reply with quote

wylies99 wrote:
Corruption in Education

Is Reform Possible With Teachers Like This?
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2010/02/202_61171.html

Two high-school principals in Seoul were arrested on charges of taking bribes last week; a former headmaster also killed himself after being fired for similar reasons. These incidents are grim reminders of why some teachers are dying ― literally ― to assume top school posts and, more importantly, why the nation's public education is what it is now.

The arrested high-school principals took money from teachers aspiring to become school inspectors, an avenue regarded as a shortcut to becoming a principal. It takes at least 20 years for teachers to become deputy principals, but in the case of school inspectors, the period can be shortened to 17 years in elementary schools and 19 years in middle schools.

Out of the total 9,026 school principals in 2007, 27.3 percent were former school inspectors. Considering these so-called educational specialists account for just 1 percent of all teachers, the chances for their rising to the top posts are almost 30 times higher than the latter.

The issue is what some of these teachers do after reaching their lifelong destinations. Quite a few of them receive money from teachers for promotion or assignment, or from private contractors in relation to various construction works, after-school tutoring and school lunch programs. One of the arrested principals, who also served as a high-level school inspector at the Seoul Office of Education, was found to be keeping a secret 1.4 billion-won ($1.1-million) bankbook.

The more ambitious of these principals run for the top posts of local education offices, which require several billion won for campaigning, and ``recover their investment" after their election by exhorting money from teachers and related businesses in a vicious ― and grander ― circle of corruption in the educational community. Critics say some elected educational officials' behavior can make their political counterparts pale, saying the cases of some principals now under charges are but the tip of the iceberg.

Now, one can partly see why President Lee Myung-bak felt rather sorry to hear the praises heaped on the Korean educational system by his U.S. counterpart.

Of course, President Lee's discontent with the nation's educational situation is of a more fundamental nature, such as the poor quality of public education and soaring private tutoring costs as a consequence as well as the content of the education largely focusing on test-taking abilities rather than cultivating creativity. Considering this is an area in which the integrity of people involved is more important than others, however, it is deeply doubtful whether his much-touted education reform will go anywhere.

It is small surprise then that schoolteachers received far lower marks than their counterparts in cram institutions from students in a recent survey. The research by the Korean Educational Development Institute shows that high school students find hagwon instructors outperform public schoolteachers in most of the 14 categories, including not just raising student achievement but even genuine communication.

Public-school teachers would probably cite such disadvantages as overcrowded classes and administrative chores that keep them from focusing on teaching.

But few would deny the difference between public and private teachers lies in the presence ― and intensity ― of competition. Like in other public- sector jobs, becoming a teacher is very difficult but living as one is very easy given what they call an ``iron bowl." Hard work and fair competition are quintessential in schools, but they're the last thing that can be expected of corrupt principals and inspectors.

President Lee has rightly set education reform as his priority for 2010. Cleaning up the deep-rooted corruption among top educational officials is a good place to start.



Korea should just close down the public schools. There are enough private insitutions of various kinds that already do nearly all the real teaching that actually takes place in this country. The private institutes could take over and teach everyone from tomorrow.

The kids would learn more and get more sleep by freeing up the hours wasted in public schools that are merely daytime detention centers.

The parents already pay for the good after school education costs, that would offer even more variety, quality, lower prices and better educations with the government schools closed. So, the parents could pay lower taxes and save two ways.

Poor kids could still be subsidized by discounted and free classes that are already available in private institutes. These would be expanded in a free educational market. Those who fear that the poor will somehow go uneducated can easily set up private foundations to fund those few who are truly too poor and unable to find private scholarships.

Existing schools could be sold or just given to the existing public school teachers. Let them try to compete for paying students by offering some real education with small class sizes. They might actually have to teach 6 or 8 hours per day and do some real class prep. This would actually be easier than things are now, since all the unneeded bureaucrats, dishonest principals and administrators could be fired - and all the useless paperwork eliminated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This has already been posted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International