|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BaldTeacher
Joined: 02 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: The Afterlife |
|
|
Do you think that something about us continues after death? It's been on my mind a lot lately. Not all of us will live until old age. I've had a close call or two and I know people who have died. In the end we all die. We'll be remembered directly by our family and friends until they all die. The details and fragments known about our lives decrease with each generation until they completely fade except for maybe a name on a family tree if we're lucky. Then inevitably, civilization collapses. It's entropy and it can't be avoided, only postponed. Even if we go down in the history books or produce great works that will be remembered by a future civilization, like Julius Ceasar or Plato did, eventually humans will go extinct too. And it's like we've never even been here.
If this Earthly realm is all that there is for us, it really doesn't matter how much fulfillment or enjoyment you get out of life, or what impact you have. You could be Hugh Hefner, George Patton, or an overweight Warcraft nerd and in the end, you all reach the same finish line and get the same prize. Of course if you pass on your DNA, a part of you does live in the physical sense. If you think about it, who we are as individuals, is a culmination of all the people in our family who came before us.
How much of your being do you think survives death? Maybe consciousness is universal and never dies. Maybe all of our egos come from the same consciousness. Who the hell really knows. I've read some interesting circumstantial evidence about the afterlife in different forms.
If there is one, that's fantastic. If there isn't, we won't be around to be disappointed. I guess that's a plus.
Anyway, what do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:14 pm Post subject: Re: The Afterlife |
|
|
| BaldTeacher wrote: |
Do you think that something about us continues after death? It's been on my mind a lot lately. Not all of us will live until old age. I've had a close call or two and I know people who have died. In the end we all die. We'll be remembered directly by our family and friends until they all die. The details and fragments known about our lives decrease with each generation until they completely fade except for maybe a name on a family tree if we're lucky. Then inevitably, civilization collapses. It's entropy and it can't be avoided, only postponed. Even if we go down in the history books or produce great works that will be remembered by a future civilization, like Julius Ceasar or Plato did, eventually humans will go extinct too. And it's like we've never even been here.
If this Earthly realm is all that there is for us, it really doesn't matter how much fulfillment or enjoyment you get out of life, or what impact you have. You could be Hugh Hefner, George Patton, or an overweight Warcraft nerd and in the end, you all reach the same finish line and get the same prize. Of course if you pass on your DNA, a part of you does live in the physical sense. If you think about it, who we are as individuals, is a culmination of all the people in our family who came before us.
How much of your being do you think survives death? Maybe consciousness is universal and never dies. Maybe all of our egos come from the same consciousness. Who the hell really knows. I've read some interesting circumstantial evidence about the afterlife in different forms.
If there is one, that's fantastic. If there isn't, we won't be around to be disappointed. I guess that's a plus.
Anyway, what do you think? |
I might add some more later, but I just wanted to point out that unlike most people I've talked to about this topic, you haven't made any of the common mistakes in hypothetically assuming death as the total cessation of consciousness (i.e. accepting that death is the end yet not accepting that this makes whatever happens before then literally inconsequential or suggesting that our lives matter because others live on to remember us when they and every other observer will eventually die too).
The worst was this one time I spent way too long unsuccessfully explaining to an ex-girlfriend why she couldn't simultaneously believe both that death was the end of consciousness and that she had consciously experienced death (she actually believed she had experienced dying on one occasion yet additionally insisted that this experience was the experience of her consciousness having ended with no afterlife following), not to mention that the loss of consciousness she apparently didn't even lose wouldn't really be death given that she regained consciousness shortly thereafter (she refused to call it a "near death" experience). For some reason, a lot of people seem convinced that they can observe what happens after they're no longer able to observe. If you believe in an afterlife, that's one thing, but these people seem to believe they can "experience" death despite the lack of experiencer that an acceptance of the straightforward consciousness cessation variety of death is defined by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Greeks had a fine way of looking at life: Beauty is proportional to mortality; with brevity and scarceness comes preciousness.
There exists beauty because a thing is remarkable in someway. We are amazed by the feats of great people because they were born and died as our peers despite their astonishing accomplishments.
And then there is love -- the eternal bond of temporary creatures.
An interpretation of a line I found in the Good Book once: You will in death be appraised for your life. What I mean is that the quality of life that you create for yourself and others is the value of you and the life you lived.
I try not to worry about death. Every once in a great while I stumble into a dark depression contemplating the briefness and futility of life and living. These episodes are pretty short, and I come out of them with one of two minds: A person should either endeavor for greatness or goodness. By greatness I mean to toil toward an end that will make you a legend or hero in posterity. By goodness I mean to dedicate your time and efforts to your family, friends, and community. Whether a legend of your time or beloved of your people, in the end each would be a fitting life.
Don't waste your life. I've wasted a lot of mine working long hours in factories, drinking habitually, and untold hours by myself on the internet. The difference between knowledge and wisdom is knowing how and actually doing...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blackjack

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: anyang
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we are born
we live
we die
we rot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kinerry
Joined: 01 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no, and there's no reason to believe so other than our own thoughts of grandeur |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
machinoman
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: The Afterlife |
|
|
| BaldTeacher wrote: |
| How much of your being do you think survives death? Maybe consciousness is universal and never dies. Maybe all of our egos come from the same consciousness. Who the hell really knows. I've read some interesting circumstantial evidence about the afterlife in different forms. |
I often get stuck thinking about this too. To me, what makes a person is the difference between the person and the perfect person. For example, when you think of a friend, you typically think of differences or flaws, "He's really tall, with really green eyes, and he snorts when he laughs." I don't believe that type of an identity survives death. I do believe that everything you like about the person, the good qualities that are uncommon in most, sort-of live on in the other people they met.
Also, I disagree with your implication that entropy will lead society to crumble; We don't know what state the universe was in when it started, and entropy could just as likely be leading us all to a utopia. The trend of technology, and even government, seems to be leading us in a better direction (would you rather live now, or five hundred years ago?) and I am sure in the future we will have a much better idea of what this life is all about. I suspect in the next few hundred years technology will even overcome natural death, rendering an afterlife obsolete. Too bad we won't likely be around to see it...
As for our actual consciousness, I don't believe that we are all part of the same whole. If we were we would be able to communicate telepathically.
Then again I have no idea. Just something I get stuck thinking about sometimes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sergio Stefanuto
Joined: 14 May 2009 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus:
| Quote: |
| This assumption [afterlife, immortality and the like - SS] completely fails to accomplish the purpose for which it has always been intended. Or is some riddle solved by my surviving for ever? Is not this eternal life itself as much of a riddle as our present life? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
To live is to die for we are just an empty bubble floating on a sea of nothingness.
Glad I don't believe it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| Regardless of your methodology, though -- and regardless of whether or not an afterlife exists -- you're left with the same proposition: you have an indeterminate amount of space-time to shape as you wish. What are you going to do with it and why? |
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that has been given to you"
Gandalf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Some really good stuff by several people on this thread and I do not want to diminish it or be crass by bringing up a tv show, but the HBO series Six Feet Under really dealt with the topic of death in a way that made me contemplate my mortality and existence in some of the very ways articulated here. If you have not seen it I highly recommend it. More recently, for some reason,the movie The Road had the same affect on me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Otus
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the answer really lies in how far you want to 'push' the question. It seems that we didn't have a choice about a 'physical' birth so don't really have a choice about a 'physical' death. Look around and you can see a lot of both happening.
Personally, I do not doubt the possibility of a higher 'consciousness. Within the so called living body, we experience states of deep sleep or unconsciousness. The difference being that we regain consciousness, whereas in the condition of death, the effects seem more permanent to the point where the heart stops beating, the brain stops functioning, etc. Even the body itself may disappear from its previously recognized form, unless somehow preserved.
However, even in physical science it is claimed that nothing remains completely inactive. Although, without consciousness and intellect, we cannot think of it as being any kind of 'moral' agent. The point here being that we cannot claim a state of complete motionlessness or inactivity and call this death; just a radical change in the physical condition of something to the point where we no longer recognize it in the condition it was before.
Is it possible to have or awaken to a different kind of experience or reality than what we previously felt or knew? Perhaps kind of like falling into a deep sleep and then being transported somewhere, and then waking up in a completely different place? I can't really say for sure. Some people just believe in a final physical death of body and consciousness and for all I know, they may stay dead. Others seem to have claimed awareness of an ongoing life, but that would have to be realized (and experienced) within themselves. I don't believe that this is involuntarily thrust upon a person on a 'deathbed' or when facing the so-called 'final curtain'. It would need to be realized in the 'here and now'.
Coming back to the key point - it may depend on how far you want to push the question (with an honest and open mind).
Emerson made some interesting remarks on this in his essay "Nominalist and Realist":
| Quote: |
| Nothing is dead: men feign themselves dead, and endure mock funerals and mournful obituaries, and there they stand looking out of the window, sound and well, in some new and strange disguise. Jesus is not dead: he is very well alive: nor John, nor Paul, nor Mahomet, nor Aristotle; at times we believe we have seen them all, and could easily tell the names under which they go. |
I just wonder if that was also his conscious experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I cant imagine utter nothingness as the payoff -- our stroll through life is far too elaborate.
I'm genuinely curious about what's next, to the extent I have no qualms about dying whenever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Before Death ... is what concerns me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
machinoman
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djsmnc wrote: |
| This involves me eating flesh directly off of a live person who is unwilling to have such done to him or herself, then going down in as much carnage as I can cause before and/or during the time that the authorities catch up to me, maximizing death and casualties ... Anyone else trying to be true to themselves will have to choose whether that involves hiding under a lead barrier or trying to lasso me in, because I'm gonna do some serious shite given the opportunity if I come to the conclusion that there is no spiritual or moral reason for not doing so. |
Only a very confused person would want to do what you described, so your actions would not be "true to yourself" but rather quite bizarre and irrational, no doubt causing even more guilt and anger in yourself for your last few moments of life. The reason you shouldn't want to hurt others should not be because you are afraid of the consequences in the afterlife; you should genuinely not want to hurt others.
| djsmnc wrote: |
| Given that there is no spiritual consequence for this, people really shouldn't be perturbed or depressed by the outcome. If they are, they should suppress this sorrow with very strong treatments as any type of pain is a weakness and leads to a lack of any practicality or productivity. |
Grieving death is important as is all physical pain; if we didn't feel it, we might allow the same thing to happen again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| machinoman wrote: |
| The reason you shouldn't want to hurt others should not be because you are afraid of the consequences in the afterlife; you should genuinely not want to hurt others. |
Given that you believe the presence or absence of an afterlife shouldn't impact whether you genuinely don't want to hurt others, what do you think of violence or murder in dreams? While it's true that humans in dreams have much shorter life expectancies than the average waking life humans do and it's also true that humans in dreams can do all sorts of apparently waking life reality defying stunts like coming back from the dead, none of this should matter to someone who discounts the importance of a finite life vs. infinite life when it comes to morality. You could argue that dream people aren't "real" people because they're products of one "real" person's mind, but as has already been mentioned in this thread, we're all just products of our ancestral lineage, the cultures and experiences we're born into, and the rules that appear to govern what is or isn't possible in our reality. The only difference between the lives of those in dreams and the lives of those in the waking is persistence-- persistence of the world, persistence of the beings inhabiting it, and persistence of the rules that govern what the beings in question can or can't do. If one has certain moral standards that one is comfortable neglecting while consciously dreaming, then this implies that persistence has a significant impact on one's sense of morality. A consequence of this impact is that the existence or nonexistence of an afterlife should, by extension, have a significant impact on one's sense of morality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|