View previous topic :: View next topic |
Is being forced to pour drinks for a man harassment? |
yes |
|
29% |
[ 7 ] |
no |
|
70% |
[ 17 ] |
|
Total Votes : 24 |
|
Author |
Message |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: Sexual harassment? |
|
|
Saw this article today in the Joong Ang Daily this morning.
Quote: |
The Ministry of Gender Equality announced yesterday that it will appeal a Seoul administrative court ruling that said an elementary school administrator had not engaged in sexual harassment when he ordered a female teacher to pour drinks for the school's principal.
The administrator, a vice-principal identified only as Mr. Kim, had repeatedly demanded that the teacher serve the principal at a school faculty dinner.
"This happens to many women," a ministry official said. "We are appealing to establish a precedent on sexual harassment and to stop insults to women at company dinners."
The Committee on Gender Equality Promotion, a direct department under the minister, announced last April that forcing a woman to pour alcoholic drinks continuously constituted sexual harassment.
The administrative court however, did not agree. "Even if it did contain sexual connotations, a rational person would not feel sexually abused."
According to other teachers who were at the scene, in September, 2002, faculty members of a school in Andong, North Gyeongsang province, were having dinner together, during which the principal poured everyone an alcoholic drink. After a toast, the vice principal told female teachers who were not drinking to empty their glasses and to pour the principal a drink. One teacher refused the request twice but in the end, poured the principal a drink in her own cup. She then filed a complaint to the ministry, which ordered the school to discontinue the practice. |
I'm reasonably sure that there's some aspect of Korean culture that I don't understand at play here, but I'd really appreciate some enlightenment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That basically mean that all women in Korea are sexually harrased. Another law that will never be implemented but if it is, then all the men are in jail.
PARTY TIME  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maxxx_power

Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Location: BWAHAHAHAHA! I'M FREE!!!!!!!
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder what the rest of the story is. There is definately more going on, and that went on at that dinner, than is being written. Maybe she was insulting his pen is size by not complying or somehow lessening him as a man. I mean, the horror, of having a woman subordinate tell you no!
I imagine the situation was completely fucked up and turned into some male dominance/face BS that occasionally happens here. Personally I would tell most people who forced me to do something that silly just because they were older or a man, or in some supposed power position to go *beep* themselves and pour their own damn drink. But if it would cost me a decent job I guess I would just suck it up and do it. Culturally, I imagine working dinners here are unbelievably tense and hierarchical - *beep* that shit. It's nice to be American sometimes.
Good for her for filing a complaint. I can't imagine the shit she has to deal with now but it's refreshing to read about someone taking a stand against outdated cultural bull shit.
If the behavior created a hostile working environment then it would fit a legal definition (by American standards) of harassment. There may also have been a pattern of harassment against this one woman. Who knows really? I say yes, good for her.
Last edited by maxxx_power on Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure that I mentioned it here before, but my students said something along the same line- that pouring drinks was harassment. At the time I thought that the men kept pouring them drinks, and they couldn't refuse because of the culture. Men going out of their way to get a woman drunk could be viewed as harrassment, sorta.
But I thought that being forced to pour drinks for someone who's both older and a man was simply part of the culture. At home I'd just laugh and tell him to pour his own, and one for me too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Butterfly
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Kuwait
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that it is wrong to continuously expect women to pour the drinks or whatever, but I worry that too many things come under the umbrella of sexual harrassment, which still implies groping, or lewd comments of a sexual nature. I think abuse of women's status should come under a different label.
Thus I voted no. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peppermint wrote: |
I'm pretty sure that I mentioned it here before, but my students said something along the same line- that pouring drinks was harassment. At the time I thought that the men kept pouring them drinks, and they couldn't refuse because of the culture. Men going out of their way to get a woman drunk could be viewed as harrassment, sorta.
But I thought that being forced to pour drinks for someone who's both older and a man was simply part of the culture. At home I'd just laugh and tell him to pour his own, and one for me too. |
I've heard this too and think it may result from a translation problem or conflation of sexual harassment/discrimination based on gender. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yoda

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Location: Incheon, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess we don't really know the whole story, but the image of GiSaeng, Tabang girl or DallonJuJom girl comes to mind. So I would say that it probably does constitute some kind of harassment. I am by no means convinced, but I do remember the small university that I worked for in the country (KangWondDo) about 4 years ago:
There, the English Department professors kept two 20 something hot young things on staff as secretaries/personal assistants. These woman were toted around to all of their drinking parties and were often told when to drink and when to pour drinks. True, they never complained about it, but I wonder if they would have gone to all of these drinking parties if they really had the choice and their jobs didn't depend on it.
Besides the image of sex-industry women pouring drinks for men is just so prevalent that even if the principal intended no harassment, I can see why a respectable female high school teacher would want to avoid doing that. The choice should be hers if she feels uncomfortable with it.
Last edited by yoda on Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:49 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Butterfly wrote: |
I agree that it is wrong to continuously expect women to pour the drinks or whatever, but I worry that too many things come under the umbrella of sexual harrassment, which still implies groping, or lewd comments of a sexual nature. I think abuse of women's status should come under a different label.
Thus I voted no. |
Moi aussi. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
weatherman

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The whole culture says that young serve the old, and an old man getting a young woman to pour out his drink would seem very natural. The whole thing is sexist, but when a whole society is sexist, where, in this example is the harm to the woman? Maybe she doesn't know her own cultural and needs to learn to respect older men... Dae-han-min-guk!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's wrong, but I voted not sexual harassment, because sexual harassment needs to retain it's status as a very serious offense. I call that sexual discrimination. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, most people here don't consider this harassment, just discrimination at worst. What are those stats on sexual harrassment and abuse in Korea again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yoda

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Location: Incheon, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sexual Discrimination VS Sexual Harassment
Alright. Several people are arguing quite convincingly that it should be put under another label (discrimination). I'll buy that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The same behaviors are demanded of junior male staff as well, which muddies the connotation of 'sexual' harrassment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tsgarp

Joined: 01 Dec 2003
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome to the new age of Korean Femi-Nazism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what about ageist - harrasment if it is male??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|