Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Enemy Belligerent Act: US on Path to Military Dictatorship
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:44 am    Post subject: Enemy Belligerent Act: US on Path to Military Dictatorship Reply with quote

McCain and Lieberman's "Enemy Belligerent" Act Could Set U.S. on Path to Military Dictatorship

Glenn Greenwald calls the bill "probably the single most extremist, tyrannical and dangerous bill introduced in the Senate in the last several decades."

March 19, 2010 | On March 4th, Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman introduced a bill called the "Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010" that, if passed, would set this country on a course to become a military dictatorship.

The bill is only 12 pages long, but that is plenty of room to grant the president the power to order the arrest, interrogation, and imprisonment of anyone -- including a U.S. citizen -- indefinitely, on the sole suspicion that he or she is affiliated with terrorism, and on the president's sole authority as commander in chief.
...
As constitutional expert Glenn Greenwald has pointed out, "It's basically a bill designed to formally authorize what the Bush administration did to American citizen Jose Padilla -- arrest him on U.S. soil and imprison him for years in military custody with no charges." What happened to Padilla, a notorious perversion of justice in a country that claims to be a democratic standard-bearer, would thus go from being an exception to the rule itself.

As "war on terror"-era legislation goes, Greenwald calls the Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act "probably the single most extremist, tyrannical and dangerous bill introduced in the Senate in the last several decades, far beyond the horrific, habeas-abolishing Military Commissions Act." This is a sobering statement, especially given the intense controversy the MCA generated at the time of its passage, in the heady weeks preceding the 2006 midterm elections. Then-Senator Obama was one of only 34 senators who voted against it, calling it "sloppy," and expressing his wish that "cooler heads � prevail after the silly season of politics is over."

Now, however, as president, Obama has helped pave the way for such radical legislative efforts as the one introduced by McCain and Lieberman, by embracing -- and re-branding -- the military commissions he once opposed.

"Belligerents" are the new "Combatants"

Three years after Obama eloquently opposed the Military Commissions Act, the now-president signed a Military Commissions Act of his own, as part of the 2010 Defense Authorization Bill. The law, which sought to overhaul the discredited Bush-era military commissions for "alien enemy combatants," introduced what is apparently turning out to be an important new term to the counterterror lexicon: Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent, defined as "an individual who: 1) has engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or 2) has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners."

full article at link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What are your thoughts on this bill's chances getting through Congress?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't really assessed it, although nothing would surprise me. They don't usually have much trouble getting stuff through packaged and sold as "making us safer." And, something so rare these days, it has bipartisan support.

You?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right.


This doesn't work anymore. It is meaningless. Your boy is a complete disaster war monger murderer, just like the last guy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing.

Yat, I hope you are right for once.

mises wrote:
This doesn't work anymore. It is meaningless. Your boy is a complete disaster war monger murderer, just like the last guy.

Unfortunately, I think mises is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.38 Special



Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing.


This is a bill specifically created to oppress and destroy extremists of the far-right. Right-wing extremists are the ones with the desires and the means to overthrow the government. The far-left extremists are on hiatus until Obama leaves office. Not that they're capable of anything other than chucking molotovs and complaining loudly. Martial threat to the government from the Left was proven a fairy tale 40 years ago.

This is a bipartisan effort to silence aggressive criticism. This isn't about parties, directions, or even policy. This is about perpetuating an increasingly tyrannical government.

But go ahead and blame the right-wingers. I'm sure that will help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Terrorists are a minimal threat to our nation. A few thousand people out of hundreds of millions have had their lives meaningfully affected by actual terrorism in a negative way. By contrast, all of us have been negatively affected by our government's response to terrorism. The last thing we need is more "protection" from terrorism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen.

I have known some good military people who, I agree, would not want to let that happen. Let us just hope they are not outnumbered or overpowered.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.38 Special



Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen.


The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.

The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.

This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.

And the Legislative is authorizing it.

That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.

No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djsmnc



Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Location: Dave's ESL Cafe

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It'll be like the pictures I drew in 2nd grade with the USA airplanes and ships destroying Russians. Even patriotic sharks eating the survivors!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.38 Special wrote:
CentralCali wrote:
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen.


The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.

The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.

This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.

And the Legislative is authorizing it.

That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.

No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary.


Sorry, I lost my "whacked-out theories to English" dictionary. Care to try that post again, preferably with some logic applied?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.38 Special



Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
.38 Special wrote:
CentralCali wrote:
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen.


The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.

The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.

This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.

And the Legislative is authorizing it.

That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.

No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary.


Sorry, I lost my "whacked-out theories to English" dictionary. Care to try that post again, preferably with some logic applied?


Sure, I'll dumb it down for you.

If the president is the leader of the military, and the congress finances the military, and everyone who disagrees with the military is imprisoned indefinitely on unvalidated charges by the military, then who controls the country?

I'll give you a hint: It's not you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently some people think members of the military are automatons with absolutely no brains whatsoever. They're not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International