View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:44 am Post subject: Enemy Belligerent Act: US on Path to Military Dictatorship |
|
|
McCain and Lieberman's "Enemy Belligerent" Act Could Set U.S. on Path to Military Dictatorship
Glenn Greenwald calls the bill "probably the single most extremist, tyrannical and dangerous bill introduced in the Senate in the last several decades."
March 19, 2010 | On March 4th, Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman introduced a bill called the "Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010" that, if passed, would set this country on a course to become a military dictatorship.
The bill is only 12 pages long, but that is plenty of room to grant the president the power to order the arrest, interrogation, and imprisonment of anyone -- including a U.S. citizen -- indefinitely, on the sole suspicion that he or she is affiliated with terrorism, and on the president's sole authority as commander in chief.
...
As constitutional expert Glenn Greenwald has pointed out, "It's basically a bill designed to formally authorize what the Bush administration did to American citizen Jose Padilla -- arrest him on U.S. soil and imprison him for years in military custody with no charges." What happened to Padilla, a notorious perversion of justice in a country that claims to be a democratic standard-bearer, would thus go from being an exception to the rule itself.
As "war on terror"-era legislation goes, Greenwald calls the Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act "probably the single most extremist, tyrannical and dangerous bill introduced in the Senate in the last several decades, far beyond the horrific, habeas-abolishing Military Commissions Act." This is a sobering statement, especially given the intense controversy the MCA generated at the time of its passage, in the heady weeks preceding the 2006 midterm elections. Then-Senator Obama was one of only 34 senators who voted against it, calling it "sloppy," and expressing his wish that "cooler heads � prevail after the silly season of politics is over."
Now, however, as president, Obama has helped pave the way for such radical legislative efforts as the one introduced by McCain and Lieberman, by embracing -- and re-branding -- the military commissions he once opposed.
"Belligerents" are the new "Combatants"
Three years after Obama eloquently opposed the Military Commissions Act, the now-president signed a Military Commissions Act of his own, as part of the 2010 Defense Authorization Bill. The law, which sought to overhaul the discredited Bush-era military commissions for "alien enemy combatants," introduced what is apparently turning out to be an important new term to the counterterror lexicon: Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent, defined as "an individual who: 1) has engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or 2) has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners."
full article at link |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
What are your thoughts on this bill's chances getting through Congress? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't really assessed it, although nothing would surprise me. They don't usually have much trouble getting stuff through packaged and sold as "making us safer." And, something so rare these days, it has bipartisan support.
You? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. |
This doesn't work anymore. It is meaningless. Your boy is a complete disaster war monger murderer, just like the last guy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing. |
Yat, I hope you are right for once.
mises wrote: |
This doesn't work anymore. It is meaningless. Your boy is a complete disaster war monger murderer, just like the last guy. |
Unfortunately, I think mises is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
McCain's being challenged from the right. This bill looks like a sop to the extremists of the far right. As long as the Democrats hold a majority of at least one house, the bill doesn't have a chance of passing. |
This is a bill specifically created to oppress and destroy extremists of the far-right. Right-wing extremists are the ones with the desires and the means to overthrow the government. The far-left extremists are on hiatus until Obama leaves office. Not that they're capable of anything other than chucking molotovs and complaining loudly. Martial threat to the government from the Left was proven a fairy tale 40 years ago.
This is a bipartisan effort to silence aggressive criticism. This isn't about parties, directions, or even policy. This is about perpetuating an increasingly tyrannical government.
But go ahead and blame the right-wingers. I'm sure that will help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Terrorists are a minimal threat to our nation. A few thousand people out of hundreds of millions have had their lives meaningfully affected by actual terrorism in a negative way. By contrast, all of us have been negatively affected by our government's response to terrorism. The last thing we need is more "protection" from terrorism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen. |
I have known some good military people who, I agree, would not want to let that happen. Let us just hope they are not outnumbered or overpowered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen. |
The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.
The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.
This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.
And the Legislative is authorizing it.
That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.
No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It'll be like the pictures I drew in 2nd grade with the USA airplanes and ships destroying Russians. Even patriotic sharks eating the survivors! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
.38 Special wrote: |
CentralCali wrote: |
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen. |
The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.
The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.
This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.
And the Legislative is authorizing it.
That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.
No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary. |
Sorry, I lost my "whacked-out theories to English" dictionary. Care to try that post again, preferably with some logic applied? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
.38 Special wrote: |
CentralCali wrote: |
I always get a big laugh out of people saying the US government's going to turn into a military dictatorship. They forget one very important thing: for that to happen, th e military itself would need to take over the country. That's not going to happen. |
The United States government is composed of three essential components: The Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial.
The Executive is the head of the military. They are conjoined by design.
This bill would in an undefined volume or type of situations replace the Judicial with the military. The two should never meet.
And the Legislative is authorizing it.
That's two-thirds control of the government at the whim of the military and with a lot of useful idiots voting it all in.
No coup d'etat necessary. It's all voluntary. |
Sorry, I lost my "whacked-out theories to English" dictionary. Care to try that post again, preferably with some logic applied? |
Sure, I'll dumb it down for you.
If the president is the leader of the military, and the congress finances the military, and everyone who disagrees with the military is imprisoned indefinitely on unvalidated charges by the military, then who controls the country?
I'll give you a hint: It's not you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently some people think members of the military are automatons with absolutely no brains whatsoever. They're not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|