|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:33 am Post subject: Obama's Greatest Speech So Far/GOP's Waterloo |
|
|
Do it for them. Do it for people who are really scared right now through no fault of their own, who've played by the rules, who've done all the right things, and have suddenly found out that because of an accident, because of an ailment, they're about to lose their house; or they can't provide the help to their kids that they need; or they're a small business who up until now has always taken pride in providing care for their workers and it turns out that they just can't afford to do it anymore and they've having to make a decision about do I keep providing health insurance for my workers or do I just drop their coverage or do I not hire some people because I simply can't afford it -- it's all being gobbled up by the insurance companies.
Don't do it for me. Don't do it for the Democratic Party. Do it for the American people. They're the ones who are looking for action right now...
Sometimes I think about how I got involved in politics. I didn't think of myself as a potential politician when I get out of college. I went to work in neighborhoods, working with Catholic churches in poor neighborhoods in Chicago, trying to figure out how people could get a little bit of help. And I was skeptical about politics and politicians, just like a lot of Americans are skeptical about politics and politicians are right now. Because my working assumption was when push comes to shove, all too often folks in elected office, they're looking for themselves and not looking out for the folks who put them there; that there are too many compromises; that the special interests have too much power; they just got too much clout; there's too much big money washing around.
And I decided finally to get involved because I realized if I wasn't willing to step up and be true to the things I believe in, then the system wouldn't change. Every single one of you had that same kind of moment at the beginning of your careers. Maybe it was just listening to stories in your neighborhood about what was happening to people who'd been laid off of work. Maybe it was your own family experience, somebody got sick and didn't have health care and you said something should change.
Something inspired you to get involved, and something inspired you to be a Democrat instead of running as a Republican. Because somewhere deep in your heart you said to yourself, I believe in an America in which we don't just look out for ourselves, that we don't just tell people you're on your own, that we are proud of our individualism, we are proud of our liberty, but we also have a sense of neighborliness and a sense of community -- (applause) -- and we are willing to look out for one another and help people who are vulnerable and help people who are down on their luck and give them a pathway to success and give them a ladder into the middle class. That's why you decided to run...
But you know what? Every once in a while, every once in a while a moment comes where you have a chance to vindicate all those best hopes that you had about yourself, about this country, where you have a chance to make good on those promises that you made in all those town meetings and all those constituency breakfasts and all that traveling through the district, all those people who you looked in the eye and you said, you know what, you're right, the system is not working for you and I'm going to make it a little bit better.
And this is one of those moments. This is one of those times where you can honestly say to yourself, doggone it, this is exactly why I came here. This is why I got into politics. This is why I got into public service. This is why I've made those sacrifices. Because I believe so deeply in this country and I believe so deeply in this democracy and I'm willing to stand up even when it's hard, even when it's tough.
Every single one of you have made that promise not just to your constituents but to yourself. And this is the time to make true on that promise. We are not bound to win, but we are bound to be true. We are not bound to succeed, but we are bound to let whatever light we have shine. We have been debating health care for decades. It has now been debated for a year. It is in your hands. It is time to pass health care reform for America, and I am confident that you are going to do it tomorrow.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/20/obama-quotes-lincoln-to-h_n_507124.html
Last edited by Ya-ta Boy on Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
And it was only two days ago that we finally had confirmed what (at least to me) was obvious all along: namely, the White House had agreed in secret with health care industry representatives that there would be no public option in a final bill, even as the President publicly feigned support for it and pretended to be fighting for it. |
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html
Yes. Last August he promised health firms that there would be no public option but then wandered around the counting giving Soaring Speeches and Uplifting Rhetoric pretending to support a public insurance plan when he knew otherwise.
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/12/15/health-care-on-the-road-to-neo-feudalism/
Quote: |
Health Care on the Road to Neo-Feudalism
I believe that if the Senate health care bill passes as Joe Lieberman has demanded it�with no Medicare buy-in or public option�it will be a significant step further on our road to neo-feudalism. As such, I find it far too dangerous to our democracy to pass�even if it gives millions (perhaps unaffordable) subsidies for health care.
20% of your labor belongs to Aetna
Consider, first of all, this fact. The bill, if it became law, would legally require a portion of Americans to pay more than 20% of the fruits of their labor to a private corporation in exchange for 70% of their health care costs.
|
Etc. This is a really horrible bill. And it will make things worse.
So, save your love for OMGObama's Soaring Speeches for when he actually accomplishes something good. If he ever does. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
People who listen to and actually believe these kind of rehearsed speeches and rhetoric given by politicians are morons. Obama just reads all that crap from a teleprompter and it is almost certainly not even written by him.
WORDS MEAN NOTHING, ACTIONS ARE ALL THAT COUNT. Obama has done nothing good whatsoever. All he has done is smooth talk the idiotic bleeding heart public (liberals) while selling the country out to the Wall Street elite. Anyone who believes anything he says (after he's lied about everything) is a complete and utter fool. Period. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mises wrote: |
Etc. This is a really horrible bill. And it will make things worse. |
Agreed entirely. Health care in America needs to be reformed, but no bill would have been better than this bill. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visitorq wrote: |
People who listen to and actually believe these kind of rehearsed speeches and rhetoric given by politicians are morons. Obama just reads all that crap from a teleprompter and it is almost certainly not even written by him.
WORDS MEAN NOTHING, ACTIONS ARE ALL THAT COUNT. Obama has done nothing good whatsoever. All he has done is smooth talk the idiotic bleeding heart public (liberals) while selling the country out to the Wall Street elite. Anyone who believes anything he says (after he's lied about everything) is a complete and utter fool. Period. |
I usually don't agree with you, but I do in this case. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My, my, there are a lot of skeptics in the crowd today. Oh well.
I won't argue against actions speaking louder than words, but words do matter. I just re-read David McCullough's '1776' and he of course mentioned Thomas Paine's 'Common Sense' and 'The Crisis'. Words matter a great deal.
It looks to me like Obama is just hours away from scoring a victory that no president has ever achieved--and many of them since Teddy Roosevelt a hundred years ago have tried. In that sense, Obama's actions have matched his rhetoric. David Frum agrees with me:
Waterloo
Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.
It�s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster. Conservatives may cheer themselves that they�ll compensate for today�s expected vote with a big win in the November 2010 elections. But:
(1) It�s a good bet that conservatives are over-optimistic about November � by then the economy will have improved and the immediate goodies in the healthcare bill will be reaching key voting blocs.
(2) So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now...
This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none.
Could a deal have been reached? Who knows? But we do know that the gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney�s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.
Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise � without weighing so heavily on small business � without expanding Medicaid? Too late now. They are all the law.
No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed.
http://www.frumforum.com/waterloo
The details of the bill are far less important than the fact that the direction for the future is set. And it is based on Obama's victory.
(PS: I amended the title because I wanted to.)
Last edited by Ya-ta Boy on Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
mises wrote: |
Etc. This is a really horrible bill. And it will make things worse. |
Agreed entirely. Health care in America needs to be reformed, but no bill would have been better than this bill. |
I disagree. Give people entitlements and they won't ever want to give them up (good, they deserve them!); but they'll also ask and expect more. It changes the population's whole perspective on healthcare and government services.
Creating no bill doesn't put America on the path towards single payer or anything else, this does.
visitorq wrote: |
Obama has done nothing good whatsoever. |
So what about ending recision, or stopping insurance companies denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions? Are you just going to ignore the good things in the bill? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whether his actions or intentions match his words (and I believe they do), it is in itself a beautiful speech and a soaring piece of rhetoric. We've kind of lost this in public discourse until recently. Whether you support the bill or not, surely it has the potential to move people to positive action more than "I hope he fails."
I would say getting this done is itself a giant accomplishment. And if it passes, well done USA, in finally having a form of universal health coverage. Welcome to the 20th century. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the way, Nancy Pelosi just earned her place in the history books. She was going to be there as first female speaker, but now she'll be there as one of the greatest Speakers of the House. Well done, Madame Speaker! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RufusW wrote: |
I disagree. Give people entitlements and they won't ever want to give them up (good, they deserve them!); but they'll also ask and expect more. It changes the population's whole perspective on healthcare and government services.
Creating no bill doesn't put America on the path towards single payer or anything else, this does.
|
I don't think it does put us on the path to single payer. I think it pushes us further from it by reinforcing this mentality that everything has to be done through the private sector. It also removes a key argument-point that could be used in favor of future, effective health care reform: the number of people uninsured. Arguing based on cost alone is far less effective, especially when a large portion of Americans are going to be getting help with those costs via subsidization.
But we'll see, I guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
RufusW wrote: |
I disagree. Give people entitlements and they won't ever want to give them up (good, they deserve them!); but they'll also ask and expect more. It changes the population's whole perspective on healthcare and government services.
Creating no bill doesn't put America on the path towards single payer or anything else, this does.
|
I don't think it does put us on the path to single payer. I think it pushes us further from it by reinforcing this mentality that everything has to be done through the private sector. It also removes a key argument-point that could be used in favor of future, effective health care reform: the number of people uninsured. Arguing based on cost alone is far less effective, especially when a large portion of Americans are going to be getting help with those costs via subsidization.
But we'll see, I guess. |
I think you're both potentially right. These particular speculations remind me of the two main views of the Missouri Compromise:
1) Slavery would be limited once and for all, allowing an eventual move towards total abolition.
2) Slavery would be further legitimized through the specification of acceptable regions, allowing grounds for future continuity or even expansion of the institution.
*waits for someone to misinterpret this post as equating socialized health care with slavery* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
RufusW wrote: |
I disagree. Give people entitlements and they won't ever want to give them up (good, they deserve them!); but they'll also ask and expect more. It changes the population's whole perspective on healthcare and government services.
Creating no bill doesn't put America on the path towards single payer or anything else, this does.
|
I don't think it does put us on the path to single payer. |
It puts the US farther down the path to national bankruptcy. Which has really already happened. The entitlement mentality is going to be incredibly useless following a funding crisis. It will be a national liability. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.parapundit.com/archives/007040.html
Quote: |
New Health Care Entitlement To Expand US Deficits
In a New York Times Op-Ed Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, explains the fantasy financial numbers underlying the Democrats' big health care reform bill. This bill is a fiscal disaster piled on top of the existing much larger fiscal disaster.
ON Thursday, the Congressional Budget Office reported that, if enacted, the latest health care reform legislation would, over the next 10 years, cost about $950 billion, but because it would raise some revenues and lower some costs, it would also lower federal deficits by $138 billion. In other words, a bill that would set up two new entitlement spending programs � health insurance subsidies and long-term health care benefits � would actually improve the nation�s bottom line.
Could this really be true? How can the budget office give a green light to a bill that commits the federal government to spending nearly $1 trillion more over the next 10 years?
The answer, unfortunately, is that the budget office is required to take written legislation at face value and not second-guess the plausibility of what it is handed. So fantasy in, fantasy out.
In reality, if you strip out all the gimmicks and budgetary games and rework the calculus, a wholly different picture emerges: The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion.
Please click thru and read the details of this political and financial fraud. It is amazing.
This bill, which at the time of this writing looks set to pass, will accelerate the coming US sovereign debt crisis. Much higher taxes for the middle class and severe cuts in entitlements lie in our future. This bill represents a high point in the push for ever growing entitlements. The overreach of the US government now has reached a point where a sovereign financial crisis is inevitable. That crisis will make the crisis of 2008 seem small in comparison.
Update: More on the fantasy financial numbers:
The 153-page fix-it bill assumes that future Congresses will not only be willing to cut Medicare payments to doctors and hospitals by 21 percent immediately but to cut them even more in the future. No Congress has ever demonstrated any willingness to take such actions, according to Joseph Antos of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and formerly of the CBO.
Further, in order to pay back the labor unions for their support, the bill moves the trigger date for a tax on Cadillac health-insurance policies to 2018, per an agreement hammered out with President Obama during closed midnight negotiating sessions at the White House in January. But the lost revenues are made up by indexing the tax on these high-end insurance plans at the rate of inflation (instead of inflation plus one percent), meaning the tax will affect more plans, more quickly. |
I agree with the part in bold. With the European welfare state being exposed as unsustainable and every bit as debt thirsty as the American empire I find it really astonishing that the US government would take the time to add more bills to an already broken bank. This will end. Everything ends. But the fiscal nuthouse we've been living in during the last 70 years will end. It will not end well. And soon, too. The boomers "entitlement mentality" means they didn't save for retirement. They're also fat and unhealthy. They'll completely destroy whatever cash remains. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mises wrote: |
The boomers "entitlement mentality"... |
I would think there is an entitlement mentality with any society. i don't see why benefits and social welfare are fundamentally impossible. Europe and the US may have corrupt, inefficient, bankrupt systems, but better to try and fail... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Senior
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RufusW wrote: |
mises wrote: |
The boomers "entitlement mentality"... |
I would think there is an entitlement mentality with any society. i don't see why benefits and social welfare are fundamentally impossible. Europe and the US may have corrupt, inefficient, bankrupt systems, but better to try and fail... |
Yup, because bankrupting the nation makes soooo much sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|