|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I've always wondered, in a country with higher than desirable unemployment among young people and with public schools under decades-long criticism for doing a poor job, why there isn't a movement to expand the number of schools (or at least increase faculty) in order to reduce the number of kids in a class.
It seems to me it would kill several birds with one stone. |
That does seem like a good idea. It would of course result in the government having to make a significant outlay. Another problem are the stupid rules which govern who can become a public school teacher. The rules make absolutely no sense at all. For example, those who perform very well in the first year of their degree can gain a hakyo Myeon Ha (Public school license is the literal definition), much easier than those who didn't do well in their first year. Even if those people then do badly in their second and third years, and others do brilliantly in their later years, those who did well later will still find it much more difficult to become a public school teacher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tokki

Joined: 26 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
IF, IF, and I stress IF, the extra classes were beneficial, in the sense that the students would learn more at school than at a hagwon, then I would say its a good idea. However, Im damn sure that learning English in a class with 35 other students from a Korean who cant even have a conversation in English, will be far less beneficial than learning in a class with 10 students, from a native speaker. What exactly is the point of this anyway? Is it done just to spite the hagwons? I see no benefit, other than saving the parents some money. Its pointless and yes, I think it is a case of the government pointlessly flexing its muscle.
Anyway, I was glad to see that today alone, 5 new students signed up, and another was in the office when I was leaving work. A few signed up yesterday too, and the classes are getting bigger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gollum
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To answer Tokki and Gwangjuboy's last posts, and add a little more info....
I have a Korean female friend who teaches at an all-girls Public high school in Seoul -- not much different of a situation than mine. I've seen her school before, and it's similar, other than that mine is "privately-owned". Hers is "public." We also seem to have more resources than her, at least from the way it sounds.
She was asking me about pay and stuff. Somewhere, she heard that foreign teachers at public schools were going to be offered 3 million in pay, and wondered if that was true. I get 2 million plus housing (not sure what my housing costs here -- it's a nice, brand-new bundang offictell though), so I corrected her on that. Made me wondered if I'm supposed to be getting 3.0, but the school is skimming or something. Really curious now. I don't recall the other high school teachers I met on the visa run to Osaka saying they were getting any more than average.
Anyway, my Korean female friend asked about my school, and I told her about some of the good points, like how our class has big-screen TVs with a computer (although old) in every English room, and also a new multimedia room with brand-new computers that just arrived this week, and a movie/video projection system for presentations. She then launched into this tyrade about how my school is considered "low class" to work at, because it's privately-owned -- not an actual gov't public school.
Apparently, teachers at the public schools are pretty much "in there for life" unless they royally mess up in some way. Teachers at my school can be fired more easily, I guess. She said something about how the teachers at these schools were the ones who "weren't good enough" to get into the public schools like hers. I was just trying to give my friend some basic facts about the school and pay, etc, and she seemed to retort as if she'd been hurt. I hope I wasn't bragging too much. Must have been. Anyway, according to what she said about the teachers, Gwangjuboy is correct. I appreciate getting more information about that, Gwangju...
As for the Tokki's argument about extra classes, and classes with a native speaker being more or less "beneficial" than at a hagwon, I'd say less, if the student stops going to a hagwon.
We simply don't see the students enough at the school to offset the difference in time a student might spend in one week at a hagwon (of course, there are good and bad hagwons -- but still). I see my own classes for 2 fifty-minute sessions per week, and I co-teach with other classes just once per week. I also will start teaching a class for the teachers next week. I look forward to that one, actually (I enjoy teaching adults when they're not complaining). That class should be enjoyable, because we are told just to teach whatever we want -- not a lot of pressure. I intend to teach a lot of idioms from my favorite idioms book by Broukal.
Also, the classes I teach are painting with a broad brush, so-to-speak. The girls are grouped according to level, but obviously, there is a big difference between those in my classes who can actually speak English, and those who can read and answer test questions correctly. Due to class size (20 to 40 on average) there is simply no way I can give much individual attention in class. In such a situation, you are somewhat limited to the "say it -- everyone repeat it" type of situation. I might call out on a few random students to say it, and point out the common errors in speech, and how to correct those errors, then have everyone repeat again -- but that's really the best I can do with such a large class. That and having them do conversation in groups, then floating around the room for assistance.
On another note, I have found I can't go anywhere near Yatap or Seohyun stations in Bundang without some girl in the crowd blushing, screeching (yes, screeching -- they did that the first few days at the school too, but in groups... ugh) pointing, and whispering to her friends. I was ordering food at a McDonalds in Samsung Plaza yesterday, and one of the girls about dove under the counter when she first saw me -- totally freaking out that her English teacher might expect her to speak English when he ordered his choco-cone. Her co-workers got quite a laugh out of that one.
I ordered in my simple Korean -- saving her the big scare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Medic
Joined: 11 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The national examination to teach in the public school system at either a highschool or a middleschool is marked so that 80% of the candidates fail. I think the exam is given twice a year, and the poor candidates have to spend months in one of those hell places where they cram for exams.
Most newer teachers in the system probably tried three or four times before they were succesful. I also heard that there are upwards of 4000 people who prepare for the examination at any one time, and I'm sure that at least 60% of the candidates would pass on merit alone.
Seems as though the ministry of education could easily have more than enough staff to fill smaller sized classes in all subjects. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tokki

Joined: 26 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Medic wrote: |
The national examination to teach in the public school system at either a highschool or a middleschool is marked so that 80% of the candidates fail. I think the exam is given twice a year, and the poor candidates have to spend months in one of those hell places where they cram for exams.
Most newer teachers in the system probably tried three or four times before they were succesful. I also heard that there are upwards of 4000 people who prepare for the examination at any one time, and I'm sure that at least 60% of the candidates would pass on merit alone.
Seems as though the ministry of education could easily have more than enough staff to fill smaller sized classes in all subjects. |
Im sure they could stock the classrooms if need be.They could hire those ajummas that pick up the garbage and then they could have 2 students per class. Stocking a class isnt the issue, its what you are stocking it with. 90% of those that pass those exams probably couldnt hold a conversation in English, and what about those (the MAJORITY) that fail? I see this as an exercise with no real purpose. Its like being famous just for being famous. They are giving free classes just to give free classes, and in the long run, even the short run, this will be the OPPOSITE of beneficial for the students. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:02 pm Post subject: Re: Schools muscle in on hagwon students |
|
|
| Gwangjuboy wrote: |
Recently the government launched extra English classes in public schools.
The intention was to ensure the poorer communities weren't being disadvantaged in the hagwon rat race, while forcing change in the hagwon industry. It is also hoped that this will impact negatively on those directors who circumvent the tax regulations. At my institute this has already had a negative impact on student numbers, and this is exacerbated because the area is poor. The director has already began to think about gearing her marketing campaign to the parents of kindergarten students. Despite the common belief that a foreign teacher is a marketing coup, the neighbouring school has no foreign teacher, but is still ebbing away at the hagwon's custom. What's your postition on this? Has your hagwon felt the pinch yet? Is this going to impact negatively on the Korean economy? Is this going to create problems in the job market? Are Korean graduates going to suffer further woes? I personally think that this is a policy which will do nothing more than disadvantage decent hagwons. It's also disgusting that public school teachers will benefit from the demise of their hagwon counterparts, despite their own positions already being much easier. This is a blatant example of the misuse of state power. I think this will backfire on the government.
Firstly there could be major job losses in the industry, and this could impact on an already weak job market. Consider the amount of Korean graduates who take hagwon posts for lack of a better opportunity, and one can come to the conclusion that it is indeed disgusting. The state uses it's muscle to offer free English classes. The hagwon directors can't compete with such offers. Is it right that honest hagwon directors who worked hard, invested money, and created jobs, should be penalised? If the government was serious about tackling corruption in the industry, then it would strengthen regulation of the tax system, and make sure those abusive hagwon directors are weeded out of the system. Instead, it just offers free English classes which have a blanket effect. Such indiscrimatory policies serve no purpose at all. One could argue that it forces positive change in an industry which has a dreadful reputation. One could also argue that it will cripple the industry because even those hagwons which have operated within the boundries of the law will suffer. It has been argued that the presence of a foreign teacher will limit the effects of this policy. I would argue that it only serves to hinder the poor. Hagwons located in poor areas will suffer the most because free English classes will appeal to lower income parents. Thus, those hagwons which offered affordable fees might no longer be an option. Instead, the only option for those parents might be to place their child in an English class with 40 other students. Meanwhile, their middle class counterparts can continue to afford the hagwon fees and place their child in a class of 10 students. |
Actually, the polar opposite of what you predict will happen. You can pretty much dig up any scenario where increasing the exposure of something at the school level only increases it's spread outside the school. English, computers, science, exercise, literature, etc. The more you do in schools, the more people study it out of school.
I just quoted everything you said because I'm surprised you've written so much on something you don't really understand and driven only by your fear of job insecurity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Gord.
They are my sentiments exactly. If interest is whipped up even more at school than the parents are gong to want an even greater advantage which means more for us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tokki

Joined: 26 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Perhaps.I know that last week I saw maybe ten new students in my school. Doesnt look like attendence is dropping. Although I did lose one class, 4 students, who are going to HS and have no time to study at the hagwon. Hell, if the boss doesnt schedule something in that time slot, that gives me 3 classes I dont have to teach per week hehehe. Good deal for me. |
|
| Back to top |
| |