Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Could Oh Eun-Sun have saved the man?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:21 am    Post subject: Could Oh Eun-Sun have saved the man? Reply with quote

Quote:
Oh also faced criticism concerning the death of a Spanish climber, who died on Annapurna while she was still on the mountain. The Spanish team blamed Oh for not trying to save the missing crew.

Asked about the incident, Oh paused a moment, taking a sip of water.

�At first, I heard the missing man was 300 meters from our camp, but later, one of our sherpas told me it could actually take minimum of six hours to get to the point.�

�We were running out food and completely exhausted. Sherpas told me that they could not risk their lives, so I had to make a decision,� said Oh, her eyes welling up with tears.


From the Korea Herald...

Could Oh Eun-Sun have saved the man? Were the Sherpas just not interested? I find this article to be interesting. Check out what The Korea Times says about it:

Quote:
On allegations that her team "ignored" an emergency rescue call from a troubled Spanish team on her way down after reaching the top of Annapurna, she said her team members were so exhausted that they couldn't make it. A Spanish climber died in the accident.

"We tried to help them with all the resources we had, but it was useless," she said. "All of my team members including myself were exhausted at that time. The troubled climber was at a point that may have taken six or seven hours to get to. Sherpas are not iron men."


hmmmm....


Last edited by cubanlord on Wed May 12, 2010 1:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tfunk



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's too much information we don't know to be able to make an intelligent decision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oskinny1



Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Location: Right behind you!

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The KT is also a sponsor of hers, so they aren't going to give any critical information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ThingsComeAround



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Could Oh Eun-Sun have saved the man? Reply with quote

cubanlord wrote:
Quote:
Oh also faced criticism concerning the death of a Spanish climber, who died on Annapurna while she was still on the mountain. The Spanish team blamed Oh for not trying to save the missing crew.

Asked about the incident, Oh paused a moment, taking a sip of water.

�At first, I heard the missing man was 300 meters from our camp, but later, one of our sherpas told me it could actually take minimum of six hours to get to the point.�



�We were running out food and completely exhausted. Sherpas told me that they could not risk their lives, so I had to make a decision,� said Oh, her eyes welling up with tears.



When someone asks you why you didn't respond to a distress call, you don't pause and take a sip of water
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thomas pars



Joined: 29 Jan 2009

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A friend of mine has climbed just about every mountain over 20K.
K2, Aconcagua, McKinley, Kilimanjaro, and Everest.

The stories he can tell you would curl your hair.

He told me that if you have any sort of emergency/equipment failure
you are dead. And there is an unwritten rule that your primary concern
is to yourself. This rule comes from the fact that it is virtually impossible to help anyone in trouble. Over 23,000 feet most helicopters cant fly to come get you. And the trail is in some places less that 12 inches across, with a 1000 foot drop.

The sherpas own those mountains. And if they tell you something you had
better listen to them. Sorry to say it but that Spanish climber only has himself or his equipment to blame.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buildbyflying



Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: To your right. No, your other right.

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see how taking a sip of water to collect your thoughts is somehow illogical.

As for leaving a team stranded on a mountain... if you're aware of the risks, you're also aware of the limitations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
VanIslander



Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am shocked the Korean had so little consideration for the welfare of strangers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In all honestly, I would have done the same thing. Imagine how exhausted you would be? And if your Sherpa guide tells you there is no point...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kwokman



Joined: 09 Aug 2009

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VanIslander wrote:
I am shocked the Korean had so little consideration for the welfare of strangers.


Uhm...this isn't like some picnic where the Korean didn't share their kimchi. Granted it was 300 meters but imagine what could have happened to everyone else by taking that extra trip. It's always that fine moral line. Do you go and try to save the life of one person while jeopardizing the lives of your camp? Being a war veteran, I would have made the same choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couldn't she have eaten one of the sherpas for extra energy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thomas pars wrote:
A friend of mine has climbed just about every mountain over 20K.
K2, Aconcagua, McKinley, Kilimanjaro, and Everest.

The stories he can tell you would curl your hair.

He told me that if you have any sort of emergency/equipment failure
you are dead. And there is an unwritten rule that your primary concern
is to yourself. This rule comes from the fact that it is virtually impossible to help anyone in trouble. Over 23,000 feet most helicopters cant fly to come get you. And the trail is in some places less that 12 inches across, with a 1000 foot drop.

The sherpas own those mountains. And if they tell you something you had
better listen to them. Sorry to say it but that Spanish climber only has himself or his equipment to blame.



This.

If the Sherpas say it's not possible or too dangerous...then it is. You listen to the experts...particularly when your life or the life of your team is at risk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pkang0202



Joined: 09 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
thomas pars wrote:
A friend of mine has climbed just about every mountain over 20K.
K2, Aconcagua, McKinley, Kilimanjaro, and Everest.

The stories he can tell you would curl your hair.

He told me that if you have any sort of emergency/equipment failure
you are dead. And there is an unwritten rule that your primary concern
is to yourself. This rule comes from the fact that it is virtually impossible to help anyone in trouble. Over 23,000 feet most helicopters cant fly to come get you. And the trail is in some places less that 12 inches across, with a 1000 foot drop.

The sherpas own those mountains. And if they tell you something you had
better listen to them. Sorry to say it but that Spanish climber only has himself or his equipment to blame.



This.

If the Sherpas say it's not possible or too dangerous...then it is. You listen to the experts...particularly when your life or the life of your team is at risk.


Agreed. There is no civility at the top of the world's highest peaks. I've heard stories of people having their equipment stolen by other hikers. Vital equipment like oxygen, food, and water. You look out for yourself and your team.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thomas pars



Joined: 29 Jan 2009

PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had the drop wrong. On one particular ridge, the Indian side is an
8000 foot drop. On the Tibetan side the drop is 12000 foot.

He had a joke that if you are gunna fall you should do it on the
Tibetan side cause " you'll live longer." Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ruthdes



Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2010 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kwokman wrote:
VanIslander wrote:
I am shocked the Korean had so little consideration for the welfare of strangers.


Uhm...this isn't like some picnic where the Korean didn't share their kimchi. Granted it was 300 meters but imagine what could have happened to everyone else by taking that extra trip. It's always that fine moral line. Do you go and try to save the life of one person while jeopardizing the lives of your camp? Being a war veteran, I would have made the same choice.


I'm no mountain climber, so I could be wrong, but I believe that when you talk about distance in mountain climbing, it actually means a vertical distance. Three hundred meters would probably have been a long way to go back. It would've been completely irresponsible to put more lives in danger.

I also don't think that taking a sip of water is particularly telling. It seems like a pretty manipulative thing to have included in the article. Especially since it was a Korea Herald article and you'd expect them to portray her in a good light, being a Korean. However, someone above said that The Korea Times is her sponsor. If that's true, maybe they're trying to make her look bad deliberately.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International