|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Captain Corea
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul
|
 Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 3:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| Fox wrote: |
| RyanInKorea wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Physically restraining someone is a degree of force. Under your system, if a person were to run out onto the field it would be functionally impossible to remove them until they harmed someone in some way, since police wouldn't even be allowed to touch him. Police would be stuck repeatedly asking him to leave, which probably wouldn't do much. |
Obviously, running out onto the field would be a enough ('fullfill the requirement', to use my previous definition) to physically restrain and even tackle an individual. Running onto the field is not enough to warrant the taser though. |
Why? I asked for statistics that showed if tasers were more likely to cause lasting harm than being tackled earlier in this thread and no one answered me. Do you have such statistics? Because if a taser hasn't been proven to be more likely to cause lasting harm than a tackle, I don't see your point. If you do have such statistics on the other hand, I'll agree with you that this situation wasn't worth the added chance of lasting injury. |
Are you seriously comparing tasering to tackling? People have died from tasers but not from tackles. |
Wrong. A doorman in my city pushed a guy down and he died. It was that easy. I expect that it wasn't the first time someting so simple has happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
