View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
noobteacher
Joined: 27 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like there is new speculation that the attack was to garner support and a victory for little Kim Jong Un who will probably be taking over soon due to KJI's deteriorating health.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_skorea_ship_sinks_analysis
I still don't really believe that it was the North behind this at all and that there is some kind of cover up going on, but this article adds a bit of a new twist to the story. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b-class rambler
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: Re: No torpedo? |
|
|
TL wrote: |
Do you think this is plausible or some nut making stuff up?
Quote: |
I am S.C. Shin, a civil investigator recommended by Korean National Assembly for the sinking of Cheonan and I'm writing this letter to let you know the truth exactly here in Korea. |
Quote: |
I didn't agree with the conclusion of the Korean military administration and now sued for libel by them. |
Quote: |
The Military Administration made a conclusion that Cheonan had torn in two and sunken by the 'Explosion of Torpedo'. |
Quote: |
But my oppinion is quite different from it because I could not find even a slight sign of 'Explosion' but could find so many evidences of grounding in/out of the vessel. |
http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=154146 |
Interesting and quite thorough if not completely flawless. But I'm not sure if Hillary Clinton was the person he should have been sending it to  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Nautilus and The Lemon have got it.
Quote: |
It's not the worst by body count - they've bombed airliners - or ballsy provocation. They've run across and axed to death soldiers on the other side of the border-no need for two-month investigations to determine the culprit then!
Even in the life of this board the Norks have crossed red line after red line without much consequence. It was discovered that they had a nuclear program in defiance of their agreement in the 90s not to. Then they tested a nuke. Then they tested another.
|
For me, their gutsiest move in the last little while was when they mowed down an unarmed civilian who had crossed a vaguely marked line on the beach at one of those joint tourist places in the North. As I recall, they didn't even bother denying they had done that, they just basically said "Yeah, so what?" without providing any further explanation. |
So you guys are basically saying that since it has always been this way it will always continue to be this way. You could be right. I hope you are. Short of leaving the country there is not much I can do about it anyway. But underestimating, minimizing, and sometimes outright scoffing at the risks just because something has not happened yet can sometimes come back to haunt you.
2 examples: underestimating the housing bubble and the chances of a catastrophic oil rig explosion just because they had never happened before.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/magazine/06fob-wwln-t.html?hp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tiger fancini

Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Location: Testicles for Eyes
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
noobteacher wrote: |
I still don't really believe that it was the North behind this at all and that there is some kind of cover up going on |
So you believe North Korea over South Korea, the UK, Australia and Sweden combined? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
noobteacher wrote: |
Looks like there is new speculation that the attack was to garner support and a victory for little Kim Jong Un who will probably be taking over soon due to KJI's deteriorating health.
I still don't really believe that it was the North behind this at all and that there is some kind of cover up going on |
I have my suspicions as well. A sudden crisis that co-incides with the election campaigns of both countries?. Hmmm. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|